Impact of a Brief Intervention on Patient Anxiety Prior to Day Surgery

Psychometric evaluation of Urdu-translated Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale and assessment of preoperative anxiety in adult surgical patients of Karachi, Pakistan: A cross-sectional study

Objective

The primary aim of this study was to develop an Urdu-translated version of the Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale and perform a psychometric evaluation of it. A secondary aim was to estimate the prevalence of preoperative anxiety using Urdu-translated Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale in patients undergoing surgery in Karachi, Pakistan, and the factors contributing to anxiety among them.

Method

This cross-sectional survey included 267 patients enrolled for elective surgery under general anesthesia from March 5 to November 20, 2022. In psychometric analysis, face validity, criterion validity, construct validity, and reliability of Urdu-translated Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale were determined. Face validity was evaluated by performing blind-back translation and a pilot study. Criterion validity was evaluated by correlating the Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale with the visual analog scale for anxiety. Exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach's α test were used to analyze construct validity and reliability, respectively. The associate variables were identified by performing a one-sample t-test and one-way analysis of variance on SPSS 26.

Results

Cronbach's α test is 0.85 for the Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale anxiety scale and 0.70 for the need for information. 65.3% of the total variance is explained by the Urdu version of Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale items in factor analysis and the intercorrelation of all items was >0.20 (mean: 0.575). Urdu-translated Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale and visual analog scale for anxiety showed a good correlation (r = 0.664, p < 0.001). The overall prevalence of preoperative anxiety among patients is 52.4% suggested by the Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale cutoff score of more than 11. Females, students, and patients elected for major surgery shared significantly higher anxiety levels (p < 0.05). The commonest factors contributing to anxiety are postoperative pain in 140 (52.4%) patients, fear of death in 115 (43.1%), and financial loss in 91 (34.1%).

Conclusions

The Urdu-translated Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale is a reliable, valid, and acceptable screening tool for preoperative anxiety. The prevalence of preoperative anxiety was high. The preoperative anxiety level is significantly associated with gender, employment status, and type of surgery.

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease Following Hospitalization (from APPROACH-IS)

In this international study, we (1) compared patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in adults with congenital heart disease (CHD) who had versus had not been hospitalized during the previous 12 month, (2) contrasted PROs in patients who had been hospitalized for cardiac surgery versus nonsurgical reasons, (3) assessed the magnitude of differences between the groups (i.e., effect sizes), and (4) explored differential effect sizes between countries. APPROACH-IS was a cross-sectional, observational study that enrolled 4,028 patients from 15 countries (median age 32 years; 53% females). Self-report questionnaires were administered to measure PROs: health status; anxiety and depression; and quality of life. Overall, 668 patients (17%) had been hospitalized in the previous 12 months. These patients reported poorer outcomes on all PROs, with the exception of anxiety. Patients who underwent cardiac surgery demonstrated a better quality of life compared with those who were hospitalized for nonsurgical reasons. For significant differences, the effect sizes were small, whereas they were negligible in nonsignificant comparisons. Substantial intercountry differences were observed. For various PROs, moderate to large effect sizes were found comparing different countries. In conclusion, adults with CHD who had undergone hospitalization in the previous year had poorer PROs than those who were medically stable. Researchers ought to account for the timing of recruitment when conducting PRO research as hospitalization can impact results.

Effect of Spiritist "Passe" on Preoperative Anxiety of Surgical Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial, Double-Blind

The objective of this study was to evaluate the preoperative anxiety of hospitalized patients exposed to Spiritist "passe," laying on of hand with the intention of healing (Sham) and without laying on of hand. Other variables as depression, pain, physiological parameters, muscle tension, and well-being were assessed. Patients in the Spiritist "passe" intervention group showed greater reductions in anxiety (p < 0.05) and muscle tension (p < 0.01) and increases in well-being (p < 0.01). More marked reductions in preoperative anxiety and muscle tension and improvement in well-being were observed in patients exposed to Spiritist "passe" compared to Sham or standard medical care.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03356691.

A multidisciplinary approach to improve preoperative understanding and reduce anxiety: a randomised study

BACKGROUND

Emotional factors may influence reception of information provided during informed consent leading to incomplete understanding and reduced satisfaction.

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to test the hypothesis that a multidisciplinary approach could improve understanding of the information provided by the anaesthesiologist and in turn, reduce anxiety.

DESIGN

A randomised controlled clinical trial.

SETTING

Veneto Oncology Institute, Italian comprehensive cancer centre. Recruitment from December 2008 to June 2010.

PATIENTS

Two hundred and fifty-one women requiring anaesthesia for breast cancer surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Women undergoing surgery for primary breast cancer were randomly assigned to either the structured anaesthesiology interview group (SAI) or the integrated multidisciplinary psycho-oncological approach (IPA). In the IPA arm, patients underwent an interview with the psycho-oncologist. Subsequently, and prior to preoperative anaesthesia evaluation, the psycho-oncologist informed the anaesthesiologist of the type of communicative strategy to adopt for each individual. In the SAI arm, patients received only the anaesthesiology interview.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Anxiety as assessed by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) questionnaire.

RESULTS

Two hundred and fifty-one patients were randomised and 234 analysed: 124 in the IPA arm and 110 in the SAI arm. For both groups, mean anxiety scores, according to the STAI questionnaire, were statistically lower after the anaesthesiology visit than at baseline, with a reduction of 6.5 points for the IPA arm [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.6 to 8.4, P < 0.0001] and 4.7 points for the SAI arm (95% CI 2.6 to 6.7, P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the mean anxiety score before and after the interview. For highly anxious patients, the STAI score decreased significantly more in the IPA group (10.2 points, 95% CI 7.4 to 13.0) than in the SAI group (6.8 points, 95% CI 3.8 to 9.8), P = 0.024.The information provided during the anaesthesiology visit was correctly understood by more than 80% of patients and was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

In breast cancer surgical patients with high levels of preoperative anxiety, a multidisciplinary approach with psycho-oncological intervention proved to be useful at the preoperative anaesthesiology interview.

Risk factors for moderate and severe persistent pain in patients undergoing total knee and hip arthroplasty: a prospective predictive study

Persistent post-surgical pain (PPSP) is a major clinical problem with significant individual, social and health care costs. The aim of this study was to examine the joint role of demographic, clinical and psychological risk factors in the development of moderate and severe PPSP after Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty (TKA and THA, respectively). This was a prospective study wherein a consecutive sample of 92 patients were assessed 24 hours before (T1), 48 hours after (T2) and 4–6 months (T3) after surgery. Hierarchical logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of moderate and severe levels of PPSP. Four to six months after TKA and THA, 54 patients (58.7%) reported none or mild pain (Numerical Rating Scale: NRS ≤3), whereas 38 (41.3%) reported moderate to severe pain (NRS >3). In the final multivariate hierarchical logistic regression analyses, illness representations concerning the condition leading to surgery (osteoarthritis), such as a chronic timeline perception of the disease, emerged as a significant predictor of PPSP. Additionally, post-surgical anxiety also showed a predictive role in the development of PPSP. Pre-surgical pain was the most significant clinical predictive factor and, as expected, undergoing TKA was associated with greater odds of PPSP development than THA. The findings on PPSP predictors after major joint arthroplasties can guide clinical practice in terms of considering cognitive and emotional factors, together with clinical factors, in planning acute pain management before and after surgery.

Anaesthesia type, gender and anxiety

The number of patients treated by elective day-case surgery in the UK is growing. Patient preoperative anxiety can be considerable, although the opportunity to help to reduce fears is minimal. Day surgery patients (n = 674) were surveyed and 82% were found to be anxious. General anaesthesia patients were more anxious than local anaesthesia patients and females more anxious than males. The results indicate that general anaesthesia patients may require more preoperative information, and gender differences associated with waiting may need to be given greater consideration.

Influence of gender and anaesthesia type on day surgery anxiety

AIM

  To investigate the possible influence of gender and anaesthesia type on anxiety prior to day surgery.

BACKGROUND

  Elective surgery undertaken on a day, short stay or 'day of surgery' basis is growing and much emphasis also placed on 'enhanced recovery' for in-patient surgery. During such brief episodes preoperative apprehension can be considerable but the opportunity to help reduce anxiety is minimal and formal plans uncommon.

METHOD

  As part of a larger study, a questionnaire was distributed to 1606 patients undergoing day surgery, with anaesthesia (2005-2007). Participants were requested to return the questionnaire by mail 24-48 hours following surgery, with 674 returned. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and multivariate analysis of variance.

RESULTS

  Of the total patients 82·4% experienced anxiety on the day of surgery with the wait, anaesthesia and possible pain being common anxiety-provoking aspects. The majority preferred to receive information between 1-4 weeks in advance and participants experiencing general anaesthesia required information at a statistically significantly earlier stage. General anaesthesia patients were statistically significantly more anxious than local anaesthesia patients and desired more information. Female patients were statistically significantly more anxious, anxiety commenced earlier and they preferred to wait with a relative/friend or talk with other patients.

CONCLUSIONS

  Anxiety was experienced by the majority of participants but was more prevalent amongst general anaesthesia and female patients. For general anaesthesia patients, a comprehensive level of information may be required a number of weeks prior to surgery and gender differences associated with the preoperative wait may require greater consideration.

Conscious surgery: influence of the environment on patient anxiety

AIMS

This paper is a report of a study: (i) to investigate anxiety arising from the experience of the clinical environment during surgery under local/regional anaesthesia and (ii) to uncover the specific aspects patients find anxiety provoking and possibly dissuade them from opting for such anaesthesia.

BACKGROUND

Operating theatre staff have focused historically on conducting safe, efficient surgery with unconscious patients and not primarily on the care of 'awake' patients. However, with the rise in day surgery, the volume of surgery performed under local or regional anaesthesia is increasing.

METHOD

As part of a larger study investigating anxiety in elective day surgery, a questionnaire was given to 523 patients on the day of surgery to adult patients undergoing surgery with local or regional anaesthesia between 2005 and 2007. They were asked to return this by mail 24-48 hours following surgery and 214 completed questionnaires were returned (response rate 41%).

FINDINGS

The experience of being awake, possibly feeling the surgeon's touch, seeing their body cut open or surgery being more painful than expected were anxiety-provoking aspects. Using factor analysis, 'intra-operative apprehension', 'anaesthetic information provision' and 'health control' were identified as central features. Multiple regression showed that apprehension associated with the intra-operative experience and anaesthetic information provision were statistically significantly associated with an increase in overall level of anxiety.

CONCLUSION

Focusing care on managing the intra-operative experience and providing anaesthetic information in advance might help limit anxiety and expel the apparent misapprehensions associated with conscious surgery.