The impact of perceptions of health control and coping modes on negative affect among individuals with spinal cord injuries

Perception and predictors of health locus of control at rehabilitation discharge and 1 year after traumatic spinal cord injury

This retrospective study examined the perception and predictors of health locus of control (LOC) in 71 individuals with a spinal cord injury (SCI) at discharge from inpatient rehabilitation (average age 39 years, 77% male, 54% black, 51% cervical SCI, 51% incomplete SCI and average time post-SCI 20 days). We also determined if health LOC beliefs and predictors change over the 1st year after SCI in a representative subsample of 36 individuals. The participants completed surveys regarding the health LOC, self-esteem and depression whereas demographic and SCI information were retrieved from medical records. At inpatient discharge, 55% of SCI individuals endorsed the doctor LOC category compared to internal (14%), other people (6%), chance (3%) or multiple LOC categories (22%). A similar pattern was found at 1-year postinjury (doctor LOC 44% and non-doctor LOC combined 56%). A backward stepwise regression revealed that white race (P = 0.093), >12 years of education (P = 0.001) and cervical level of SCI (P = 0.033) were significant predictors of the doctor LOC category at inpatient discharge (overall classification accuracy 76%). Similarly, >12 years of education (P = 0.055), cervical level of SCI at inpatient discharge (P = 0.033) and higher self-esteem at 1-year post-SCI (P = 0.113) were significant predictors of the doctor LOC category at 1-year post-SCI (overall classification accuracy 78%). We conclude that health LOC remains stable over the 1st year after SCI with the majority of individuals believing that the control over outcomes of their health is in the hands of doctors. These findings have implications for the provision of rehabilitation services after SCI.

A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Three Brief Group Interventions for Individuals With Tinnitus

Background

Tinnitus (ie, ear or head noises not caused by external sounds) is common among the general population and is the most prevalent service-connected disability in the United States’ Department of Veterans Affairs system. While numerous clinical interventions have been created to systematically address the range of issues caused by tinnitus, only a few tinnitus interventions have focused on both teaching and assessing coping strategies. The present pilot study involved a randomized clinical trial comparing 3 brief group interventions to a usual-care (UC) group (ie, a wait-list control group): the first intervention based on acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), a second based on cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), and a third based on coping effectiveness training (CET). Each intervention group also received tinnitus-related audiological education.

Participants

Forty individuals met the eligibility requirements and were randomized into 1 of the 4 groups (ACT, CBT, CET, or UC). An intent-to-treat analysis was used in this study.

Measures

The Brief COPE scale was used to assess coping. Coping was assessed at 3 time points (pre-intervention, post-intervention, and at 4-week follow-up). The outcomes were 3 coping factors (engagement coping, disengagement coping, and social support coping).

Results

When examining differences among the groups on mean coping scores over time, significant group differences were found on social support coping, with the CET group scores significantly higher than the UC group.

Discussion

While all 3 brief interventions teach stress-reduction techniques, ACT and CBT focus primarily on managing one’s unwanted thoughts and emotions. CET teaches participants both a range of coping strategies (eg, stress-management approaches) to more effectively manage stressors that cannot be changed, as well as coping strategies (eg, such as problem-solving) that can be used to eliminate stressors that can be changed. CET also teaches communication skills for telling others about one’s tinnitus-related issues. CET instructs individuals on how to select coping strategies that are appropriate for different kinds of stressors and how to seek social support, which is a skill not explicitly taught by ACT or CBT. Results of this study were derived from a small sample size, and thus, future research should focus on replicating the results among a larger sample. In addition, future research could focus on adapting the CET intervention to a different delivery format.

Posttraumatic stress following spinal cord injury: a systematic review of risk and vulnerability factors

OBJECTIVES

To summarise quantitatively the available evidence relating to pretraumatic, peritraumatic and posttraumatic characteristics that may increase or decrease the risk of developing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) following spinal cord injury (SCI).

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

Seventeen studies were identified from the PubMed, PsycInfo, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science and PILOTS databases. Effect size estimates (r) with associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs), P-values and fail-safe Ns were calculated.

RESULTS

Individual studies reported medium-to-large associations between factors that occurred before (psychiatric history r=0.48 (95% CI, 0.23-0.79) P=0.01) or at the time of injury (tetraplegia r=-0.36 (95% CI, -0.50 to -0.19) P<0.01). Postinjury factors had the strongest pooled effects: depressed mood (r_w=0.64, (95% CI, 0.54-0.72)), negative appraisals (r_w=0.63 (95% CI, 0.52-0.72)), distress (r_w=0.57 (95% CI, 0.50-0.62)), anxiety (r_w=0.56 (95% CI, 0.49-0.61)) and pain severity (r_w=0.35 (95% CI, 0.27-0.43)) were consistently related to worsening PTSD symptoms (P<0.01). Level of injury significantly correlated with current PTSD severity for veteran populations (Q_B (1)=18.25, P<0.001), although this was based on limited data.

CONCLUSION

Combinations of peri- and post-injury factors appear to be influential in the development of PTSD among persons with SCI. Further studies are needed to extrapolate these findings to the broader spinal cord-injured population. More longitudinal research, driven by multicausal models of causation such as the diathesis-stress model, is also needed to determine the temporality of PTSD risk factors.

Psychosocial correlates of depression following spinal injury: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Spinal cord injury (SCI) studies have identified a range of psychosocial risk and protective factors for depression post-injury. This study presents the first systematic and quantitative review of this body of research.

METHODS

Twenty-four studies (N=3172 participants) were identified through electronic database searches. Studies were evaluated according to recommended guidelines on Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE). The significance and magnitude of the relationships between standardised measures of depression and psychosocial outcome were examined using Pearson's effect size r, 95% confidence intervals and fail-safe Ns. Effect sizes were categorised according to the ICF psychosocial domains.

RESULTS

STROBE ratings indicated discrepancies in procedural detail and statistical analyses. Individual personal variables including affective feelings, and thoughts and beliefs specific to SCI demonstrated the strongest relationship with depression self-ratings. Life satisfaction, disability acceptance, environmental supports and community participation had a medium to strong association, helping to reduce vulnerability to depression. Longitudinal studies revealed that symptoms of depression continued to impact on psychosocial outcome up to 10 years post-injury, although this was based on limited data.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of psychosocial factors in the acute stages of SCI rehabilitation can inform evidence-based interventions to treat and manage depressive symptomatology in the short to longer-term. Future studies would benefit from adopting a unified approach to the measurement of depression post-SCI to help inform targeted treatment.