1
|
Tiller JM, Stott A, Finlay K, Boughtwood T, Madelli EO, Horton A, Winship I, Nowak K, Otlowski M. Direct notification by health professionals of relatives at-risk of genetic conditions (with patient consent): views of the Australian public. Eur J Hum Genet 2024; 32:98-108. [PMID: 37280361 PMCID: PMC10242214 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-023-01395-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Genetic risk information for medically actionable conditions has relevance for patients' blood relatives. However, cascade testing uptake in at-risk families is <50%, and the burden of contacting relatives is a significant barrier to dissemination of risk information. Health professionals (HPs) could notify at-risk relatives directly, with patients' consent. This practice is supported by international literature, including strong public support. However, there is little exploration of the Australian public's views about this issue. We surveyed Australian adults using a consumer research company. Respondents were provided a hypothetical scenario and asked about views and preferences regarding direct contact by HPs. 1030 members of the public responded, with median age 45 y and 51% female. The majority would want to be told about genetic risk for conditions that can be prevented/treated early (85%) and contacted directly by a HP (68%). Most preferred a letter that included specific information about the genetic condition in the family (67%) and had no privacy concerns about HPs sending a letter using contact details provided by a relative (85%). A minority (< 5%) had significant privacy concerns, mostly about use of personal contact information. Concerns included ensuring information was not shared with third parties. Almost 50% would prefer that a family member contacted them before the letter was sent, while about half did not prefer this or were unsure. The Australian public supports (and prefers) direct notification of relatives at risk of medically actionable genetic conditions. Guidelines would assist with clarifying clinicians' discretion in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane M Tiller
- Australian Genomics, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| | - Ami Stott
- Australian Genomics, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Keri Finlay
- Australian Genomics, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Tiffany Boughtwood
- Australian Genomics, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Evanthia O Madelli
- Australian Genomics, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Ari Horton
- Department of Paediatrics, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Ingrid Winship
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Kristen Nowak
- Office of Population Health Genomics, WA Department of Health, East Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Margaret Otlowski
- Centre for Law and Genetics, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Winchester B, Cragun D, Redlinger-Grosse K, Walters ST, Ash E, Baldry E, Zierhut H. Application of motivational interviewing strategies with the extended parallel process model to improve risk communication for parents of children with familial hypercholesterolemia. J Genet Couns 2022; 31:847-859. [PMID: 35150174 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2021] [Revised: 01/10/2021] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Current genetic counseling practice has not been found to significantly increase risk communication between family members. A more diverse set of genetic counseling approaches may be needed. A genetic counseling intervention based on motivational interviewing principles and the extended parallel process model was utilized to increase cascade outcomes within families with familial hypercholesterolemia, a common, underdiagnosed, and treatable condition. Parents of children with familial hypercholesterolemia were invited to participate in an online pre-survey, single-session genetic counseling intervention, and post-intervention surveys as a part of the CHEERS (Cholesterol Evaluation to Explore Risk Screening) intervention. This study investigated the efficacy of a genetic counselor delivered motivational interviewing intervention and how parents of children with familial hypercholesterolemia react by assessing family member cholesterol screening and risk communication to at-risk relatives. Transcripts were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for change talk using the Motivational Interviewing Skill Code version 2.1. Participant surveys were analyzed for self-reported extended parallel process constructs and motivations. Coincidence analysis was conducted to explore differences between those with and without positive cascade outcomes within 12 months after the intervention. On average, change talk increased during the session in order of the extended parallel process constructs (perceived severity, susceptibility, response efficacy, self-efficacy). Coincidence analysis revealed that 6 of the 7 cases with positive cascade outcomes were explained by either the presence of high change talk during the intervention or presence of positive motivations shortly after, while 5 of the 5 cases without a positive outcome lacked both of these key factors that were associated with cascade outcomes. Results of this study suggest that incorporating motivational interviewing and the extended parallel process model increases change talk and that the presence of either high levels of change talk or positive motivations is associated with positive cascade outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bridget Winchester
- Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, & Development, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Deborah Cragun
- College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Krista Redlinger-Grosse
- Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, & Development, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Scott T Walters
- School of Public Health, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, USA
| | - Erin Ash
- Genetic Counseling Program, Sarah Lawrence College, Bronxville, New York, USA
| | - Emma Baldry
- Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, & Development, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Heather Zierhut
- Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, & Development, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cook CB, Slomp C, Austin J. Parents' perspectives, experiences, and need for support when communicating with their children about the psychiatric manifestations of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11DS). J Community Genet 2021; 13:91-101. [PMID: 34783994 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-021-00558-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop a theoretical model to explain how parents think about the process of communicating with their affected child about the psychiatric manifestations of 22q11DS. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with parents of children with 22q11DS, who had all received psychiatric genetic counseling. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed concurrently with data collection, using interpretive description. Identified themes were used to inductively develop a model of how parents think about communicating with their child about psychiatric risk in 22q11DS. RESULTS From interviews with 10 parents, we developed a model representing the communication of psychiatric risk in 22q11DS as a process where various dynamic contextual factors (e.g., perception of risk, desire to normalize) act as either motivators or barriers to communication. Parents described challenges with the content, process, and outcome of these conversations. Parents wanted hands on, practical, personalized, and ongoing support from health professionals around communication about these issues. CONCLUSION This model may help equip genetics professionals to support parents to communicate effectively with their children in order to improve health outcomes and family adaptation to 22q11DS. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Our findings may apply not only to 22q11DS, but also to other genetic conditions where psychiatric manifestations occur.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney B Cook
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4H4, Canada
| | - Caitlin Slomp
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4H4, Canada
| | - Jehannine Austin
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4H4, Canada. .,Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4H4, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Smit AK, Bartley N, Best MC, Napier CE, Butow P, Newson AJ, Tucker K, Ballinger ML, Thomas DM, Jacobs C, Meiser B, Goldstein D, Savard J, Juraskova I. Family communication about genomic sequencing: A qualitative study with cancer patients and relatives. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2021; 104:944-952. [PMID: 33129629 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.10.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Revised: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/15/2020] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study explored family communication about undertaking genomic sequencing, and intentions to communicate pertinent heritable results to family members. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with cancer patients (n = 53) and their relatives (n = 20) who underwent germline genome sequencing or molecular tumor testing. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Key themes relevant to family communication about undertaking sequencing included: perceiving family member interest, delaying discussion until results were received, having shared capacity to understand and cope, and having open communication in the family. Intended communication subsequent to receiving results was affected by: disease severity, risk management options, degree of closeness in the family, sense of responsibility, and potential adverse impacts on family. Resource and support needs varied based on the complexity of test results, health professionals' availability, and disease severity. Unique subthemes were identified for specific subgroups. CONCLUSION Current findings support the need to assess the impact and resource needs specific to each clinical application of genomic sequencing. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Increasingly sophisticated and complex clinical genomic sequencing warrants development of family-centered interventions and resources to facilitate preference-sensitive communication about genomic sequencing, including disseminating relevant information to family members.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelia K Smit
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Sydney, Australia; The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Health Ethics, Sydney, Australia; The University of Sydney, Melanoma Institute Australia, Australia.
| | - Nicci Bartley
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, Sydney, Australia
| | - Megan C Best
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Health Ethics, Sydney, Australia; The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, Sydney, Australia
| | - Christine E Napier
- The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
| | - Phyllis Butow
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, Sydney, Australia
| | - Ainsley J Newson
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Health Ethics, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kathy Tucker
- Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Mandy L Ballinger
- The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia; St Vincent's Clinical School, University of NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - David M Thomas
- The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia; St Vincent's Clinical School, University of NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - Chris Jacobs
- University of Technology Sydney, Graduate School of Health, Sydney, Australia; Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - Bettina Meiser
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - David Goldstein
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Ilona Juraskova
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Leighton S, Forrest LE, Young MA, Delatycki MB, Lynch E. Social media usage in family communication about genetic information: 'I no longer speak with my sister but she needed to know'. J Genet Couns 2020; 30:180-190. [PMID: 32648349 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2020] [Revised: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
The use of social media has become a ubiquitous form of communication. Little is known about whether social media is used in families to assist with the communication of genetic information. This study aimed to understand if and why individuals use social media to communicate genetic information to at-risk relatives. Individuals with either a pathogenic variant in a cancer-predisposing gene or a heterozygous pathogenic variant in an autosomal or X-linked recessive gene were surveyed about communicating genetic information to their at-risk relatives and their use of social media to assist this process. Surveys were sent to 323 individuals from a reproductive carrier screening program and 250 individuals from a familial cancer center. The 128 responses (response rate 25.2%) showed that while most participants (79.0%) did not use social media to communicate genetic information, those that did use social media (21.0%) found it to be helpful as it was easy, accessible and allowed individuals to overcome communication barriers. Genetic professionals should be aware that social media is being used by individuals to assist family communication about genetic information and should discuss this method of communication with individuals who are faced with communicating genetic information with their family.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Leighton
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia.,Tasmanian Clinical Genetics Service, Hobart, Tas., Australia
| | - Laura E Forrest
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Parkville, Vic., Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia
| | - Mary-Anne Young
- Kinghorn Centre for Clinical Genomics, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | - Martin B Delatycki
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia.,Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Parkville, Vic., Australia.,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Vic., Australia
| | - Elly Lynch
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Parkville, Vic., Australia.,Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Parkville, Vic., Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dawson L. Human Immunodeficiency Virus Transmission Risk in Analytical Treatment Interruption Studies: Relational Factors and Moral Responsibility. J Infect Dis 2020; 220:S12-S15. [PMID: 31264689 DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiz090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2018] [Accepted: 05/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Analytical treatment interruption (ATI) is becoming common in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) cure-related research, but its use is controversial. ATI raises concerns about risks of HIV transmission to sexual partners of study participants. Researchers may have difficulty addressing these risks, given that study participants' private behavior is implicated, the partners are not enrolled in the research, and behavioral HIV risk mitigation strategies usually fall outside the study objectives. This analysis argues that researchers should assume some responsibility for partners' risks, based on the importance of partner relationships for the study participants themselves, and out of concern for the partners' welfare. Adding this responsibility is reasonable since the risk is created in part by research procedures, and since concern for third parties is often part of professional standards for healthcare providers. Study participants and their partners also bear some responsibility. Specific recommendations for measures to address risk are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liza Dawson
- Division of AIDS, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Conley CC, Ketcher D, Reblin M, Kasting ML, Cragun D, Kim J, Ashing KT, Knott CL, Hughes-Halbert C, Pal T, Vadaparampil ST. The big reveal: Family disclosure patterns of BRCA genetic test results among young Black women with invasive breast cancer. J Genet Couns 2020; 29:410-422. [PMID: 31912597 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2019] [Revised: 11/04/2019] [Accepted: 11/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Despite higher incidence and mortality of breast cancer among younger Black women, genetic testing outcomes remain severely understudied among Blacks. Past research on disclosure of genetic testing results to family members has disproportionately focused on White, educated, high socioeconomic status women. This study addresses this gap in knowledge by assessing (a) to whom Black women disclose genetic test results and (b) if patterns of disclosure vary based on test result (e.g., BRCA1/2 positive, negative, variant of uncertain significance [VUS]). Black women (N = 149) with invasive breast cancer diagnosed age ≤50 years from 2009 to 2012 received free genetic testing through a prospective, population-based study. At 12 months post-testing, women reported with whom they shared their genetic test results. The exact test by binomial distribution was used to examine whether disclosure to female relatives was significantly greater than disclosure to male relatives, and logistic regression analyses tested for differences in disclosure to any female relative, any male relative, parents, siblings, children, and spouses by genetic test result. Most (77%) women disclosed their results to at least one family member. Disclosure to female relatives was significantly greater than disclosure to males (p < .001). Compared to those who tested negative or had a VUS, BRCA1/2-positive women were significantly less likely to disclose results to their daughters (ORBRCA positive = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.07-0.94, p = .041) by 12 months post-genetic testing. Genetic test result did not predict any other type of disclosure (all ps > 0.12). Results suggest that in Black families, one benefit of genetic testing-to inform patients and their family about cancer risk information-is not being realized. To increase breast cancer preventive care among high-risk Black women, the oncology care team should prepare Black BRCA1/2-positive women to share genetic test results with family members and, in particular, their daughters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire C Conley
- Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Dana Ketcher
- Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Maija Reblin
- Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Monica L Kasting
- Department of Health and Kinesiology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| | - Deborah Cragun
- College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jongphil Kim
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Kimlin Tam Ashing
- Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Cheryl L Knott
- School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | - Chanita Hughes-Halbert
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Tuya Pal
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Susan T Vadaparampil
- Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Xu XF, Wang Y, Wang YY, Song M, Xiao WG, Bai Y. Role-playing is an effective instructional strategy for genetic counseling training: an investigation and comparative study. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2016; 16:235. [PMID: 27589999 PMCID: PMC5010759 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-016-0756-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2015] [Accepted: 08/25/2016] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genetic diseases represent a significant public health challenge in China that will need to be addressed by a correspondingly large number of professional genetic counselors. However, neither an official training program for genetic counseling, nor formal board certification, was available in China before 2015. In 2009, a genetic counseling training program based on role-playing was implemented as a pilot study at the Third Military Medical University to train third-year medical students. METHODS Questionnaires on participant attitudes to the program and role-playing were randomly administered to 324 students after they had finished their training. Pre- and post-training instructional tests, focusing on 42 key components of genetic counseling, were administered randomly to 200 participants to assess mastery of each component. Finally, scores in final examinations of 578 participants from 2009 to 2011 were compared to scores obtained by 614 non-participating students from 2006 to 2008 to further assess program efficacy. RESULTS Both the training program and the instructional strategy of role-playing were accepted by most participants. Students believed that role-playing improved their practice of genetic counseling and medical genetics, enhanced their communication skills, and would likely contribute to future professional performance. The average understanding of 40 of the key points in genetic counseling was significantly improved, and most students approached excellent levels of mastery. Scores in final examinations and the percentages of students scoring above 90 were also significantly elevated. CONCLUSIONS Role-playing is a feasible and effective instructional strategy for training genetic counselors in China as well as in other developing countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-feng Xu
- Department of Medical Genetics, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038 People’s Republic of China
| | - Yan Wang
- Department of Medical Genetics, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038 People’s Republic of China
| | - Yan-yan Wang
- Department of Medical Genetics, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038 People’s Republic of China
| | - Ming Song
- Department of Neurology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400010 People’s Republic of China
| | - Wen-gang Xiao
- College of Basic Medical Sciences, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038 People’s Republic of China
| | - Yun Bai
- Department of Medical Genetics, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038 People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sturm AC. Cardiovascular Cascade Genetic Testing: Exploring the Role of Direct Contact and Technology. Front Cardiovasc Med 2016; 3:11. [PMID: 27148542 PMCID: PMC4835441 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2016.00011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2016] [Accepted: 04/05/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Amy C Sturm
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Human Genetics, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA; Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Dorothy M. Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mendes Á, Paneque M, Sousa L, Clarke A, Sequeiros J. How communication of genetic information within the family is addressed in genetic counselling: a systematic review of research evidence. Eur J Hum Genet 2016; 24:315-25. [PMID: 26264439 PMCID: PMC4755382 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2015] [Revised: 06/20/2015] [Accepted: 07/03/2015] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Supporting consultands to communicate risk information with their relatives is key to obtaining the full benefits of genetic health care. To understand how health-care professionals address this issue in clinical practice and what interventions are used specifically to assist consultands in their communication of genetic information to appropriate relatives, we conducted a systematic review. Four electronic databases and four subject-specific journals were searched for papers published, in English, between January 1997 and May 2014. Of 2926 papers identified initially, 14 papers met the inclusion criteria for the review and were heterogeneous in design, setting and methods. Thematic data analysis has shown that dissemination of information within families is actively encouraged and supported by professionals. Three overarching themes emerged: (1) direct contact from genetic services: sending letters to relatives of mutation carriers; (2) professionals' encouragement of initially reluctant consultands to share relevant information with at-risk relatives and (3) assisting consultands in communicating genetic information to their at-risk relatives, which included as subthemes (i) psychoeducational guidance and (ii) written information aids. Findings suggest that professionals' practice and interventions are predicated on the need to proactively encourage family communication. We discuss this in the context of what guidance of consultands by professionals might be appropriate, as best practices to facilitate family communication, and of the limits to non-directiveness in genetic counselling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Álvaro Mendes
- i3S –Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, and Centre for Predictive and Preventive Genetics, IBMC –Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
| | - Milena Paneque
- i3S –Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, and Centre for Predictive and Preventive Genetics, IBMC –Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
- ICBAS, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Liliana Sousa
- CINTESIS, Center for Health Technology and Services Research, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
| | - Angus Clarke
- Institute of Cancer and Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Wales, UK
| | - Jorge Sequeiros
- i3S –Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, and Centre for Predictive and Preventive Genetics, IBMC –Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
- ICBAS, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Outcomes of a randomised controlled trial of a complex genetic counselling intervention to improve family communication. Eur J Hum Genet 2015; 24:356-60. [PMID: 26130486 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2015] [Revised: 04/30/2015] [Accepted: 05/06/2015] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
When an inherited genetic condition is diagnosed in an individual it has implications for other family members. Privacy legislation and ethical considerations can restrict health professionals from communicating directly with other family members, and so it is frequently the responsibility of the first person in a family to receive the diagnosis (the proband) to share this news. Communication of genetic information is challenging and many at-risk family members remain unaware of important information that may be relevant to their or their children's health. We conducted a randomised controlled trial in six public hospitals to assess whether a specifically designed telephone counselling intervention improved family communication about a new genetic diagnosis. Ninety-five probands/parents of probands were recruited from genetics clinics and randomised to the intervention or control group. The primary outcome measure was the difference between the proportion of at-risk relatives who contacted genetics services for information and/or genetic testing. Audit of the family genetic file after 18 months revealed that 25.6% of intervention group relatives compared with 20.9% of control group relatives made contact with genetic services (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.30, 95% confidence interval 0.70-2.42, P=0.40). Although no major difference was detected overall between the intervention and control groups, there was more contact in the intervention group where the genetic condition conferred a high risk to offspring (adjusted OR 24.0, 95% confidence interval 3.4-168.5, P=0.001). The increasing sophistication and scope of genetic testing makes it imperative for health professionals to consider additional ways of supporting families in communicating genetic information.
Collapse
|
12
|
George R, Kovak K, Cox SL. Aligning policy to promote cascade genetic screening for prevention and early diagnosis of heritable diseases. J Genet Couns 2015; 24:388-99. [PMID: 25577298 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9805-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2014] [Accepted: 12/01/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Cascade genetic screening is a methodology for identifying and testing close blood relatives of individuals at increased risk for heritable conditions and follows a sequential process, minimizing testing costs and the number of family members who need to be tested. It offers considerable potential for cost savings and increased awareness of heritable conditions within families. CDC-classified Tier 1 genomic applications for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC), Lynch Syndrome (LS), and familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) are recommended for clinical use and support the use of cascade genetic screening. Most individuals are unaware of their increased risk for heritable conditions such as HBOC, LS, and FH. Consistent implementation of cascade genetic screening could significantly increase awareness and prevention of heritable conditions. Limitations to effective implementation of cascade genetic screening include: insufficient genetic risk assessment and knowledge by a majority of healthcare providers without genetics credentials; a shortage of genetic specialists, especially in rural areas; a low rate of reimbursement for comprehensive genetic counseling services; and an individual focus on prevention by clinical guidelines and insurance coverage. The family-centric approach of cascade genetic screening improves prevention and early diagnosis of heritable diseases on a population health level. Cascade genetic screening could be better supported and augmented through changes in health policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rani George
- Oregon Genetics Program, Oregon Health Authority, 800 NE Oregon St, Ste. 370, Portland, OR, 97232, USA,
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Vavolizza RD, Kalia I, Erskine Aaron K, Silverstein LB, Barlevy D, Wasserman D, Walsh C, Marion RW, Dolan SM. Disclosing Genetic Information to Family Members About Inherited Cardiac Arrhythmias: An Obligation or a Choice? J Genet Couns 2014; 24:608-15. [PMID: 25400212 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9783-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2013] [Accepted: 09/29/2014] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Inherited cardiac arrhythmias such as long QT syndrome and Brugada syndrome, present clinical as well as ethical, legal, and social challenges. Many individuals who carry a deleterious mutation are largely asymptomatic and therefore may not be diagnosed until after the occurrence of a personal or family member's cardiac event. The familial nature of inherited genetic information raises numerous ethical, legal, and social issues regarding the sharing of genetic information, particularly when an individual found to carry a deleterious mutation refuses to disclose his or her results to at-risk family members who could benefit from life-saving treatments. This qualitative study sought to understand the experiences with genetic testing for individuals (n = 50) with a personal or family history of cardiac events or sudden death. Unstructured in-person focus groups or interviews were conducted for each participant in the study. The recordings of these interviews were transcribed verbatim and subsequently analyzed and coded. Participants' comments regarding sharing of genetic information centered around four main themes: (1) motivation to disclose; (2) extent of disclosure; (3) effect of disclosure on family dynamics; and (4) reasons for not sharing genetic information. The majority of individuals believed that affected individuals are obligated to disclose genetic information to family members. In the era of personalized medicine, the disclosure of genetic information provides individuals the opportunities to learn about the genetics, disease characteristics, and treatment options in order to reduce morbidity and mortality in themselves and their family members. Further research is necessary to identify and explore the barriers to sharing genetic information with at-risk family members.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rick D Vavolizza
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/ Montefiore Medical Center, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Block 634, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Batte B, Sheldon JP, Arscott P, Huismann DJ, Salberg L, Day SM, Yashar BM. Family communication in a population at risk for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Genet Couns 2014; 24:336-48. [PMID: 25304619 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9774-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2014] [Accepted: 09/09/2014] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Encouraging family communication is an integral component of genetic counseling; therefore, we sought to identify factors impacting communication to family members at risk for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM). Participants (N = 383) completed an online survey assessing: 1) demographics (gender, genetic test results, HCM family history, and disease severity); 2) illness representations; 3) family functioning and cohesiveness; 4) coping styles; 5) comprehension of HCM autosomal dominant inheritance; and 6) communication of HCM risk information to at-risk relatives. Participants were a national sample of individuals with HCM, recruited through the Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Association. Data from 183 participants were analyzed using a logistic regression analysis, with family communication as a dichotomous dependent variable. We found that female gender and higher comprehension of autosomal dominant inheritance were significant predictors of participants' communication of HCM risk information to all their siblings and children. Our results suggest that utilizing interventions that promote patient comprehension (e.g., a teaching-focused model of genetic counseling) are important and may positively impact family communication within families with HCM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany Batte
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bodurtha JN, McClish D, Gyure M, Corona R, Krist AH, Rodríguez VM, Maibauer AM, Borzelleca J, Bowen DJ, Quillin JM. The KinFact intervention - a randomized controlled trial to increase family communication about cancer history. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2014; 23:806-16. [PMID: 25321314 PMCID: PMC4195404 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2014.4754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Knowing family history is important for understanding cancer risk, yet communication within families is suboptimal. Providing strategies to enhance communication may be useful. METHODS Four hundred ninety women were recruited from urban, safety-net, hospital-based primary care women's health clinics. Participants were randomized to receive the KinFact intervention or the control handout on lowering risks for breast/colon cancer and screening recommendations. Cancer family history was reviewed with all participants. The 20-minute KinFact intervention, based in communication and behavior theory, included reviewing individualized breast/colon cancer risks and an interactive presentation about cancer and communication. Study outcomes included whether participants reported collecting family history, shared cancer risk information with relatives, and the frequency of communication with relatives. Data were collected at baseline, 1, 6, and 14 months. RESULTS Overall, intervention participants were significantly more likely to gather family cancer information at follow-up (odds ratio [OR]: 2.73; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.01, 3.71) and to share familial cancer information with relatives (OR: 1.85; 95% CI: 1.37, 2.48). Communication frequency (1=not at all; 4=a lot) was significantly increased at follow-up (1.67 vs. 1.54). Differences were not modified by age, race, education, or family history. However, effects were modified by pregnancy status and genetic literacy. Intervention effects for information gathering and frequency were observed for nonpregnant women but not for pregnant women. Additionally, intervention effects were observed for information gathering in women with high genetic literacy, but not in women with low genetic literacy. CONCLUSIONS The KinFact intervention successfully promoted family communication about cancer risk. Educating women to enhance their communication skills surrounding family history may allow them to partner more effectively with their families and ultimately their providers in discussing risks and prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joann N. Bodurtha
- McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Donna McClish
- Department of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Maria Gyure
- Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Rosalie Corona
- Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Alexander H. Krist
- Department of Family Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Vivian M. Rodríguez
- Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Alisa M. Maibauer
- Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Joseph Borzelleca
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Deborah J. Bowen
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - John M. Quillin
- Department of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hodgson JM, Metcalfe SA, Aitken M, Donath SM, Gaff CL, Winship IM, Delatycki MB, Skene LLC, McClaren BJ, Paul JL, Halliday JL. Improving family communication after a new genetic diagnosis: a randomised controlled trial of a genetic counselling intervention. BMC MEDICAL GENETICS 2014; 15:33. [PMID: 24628824 PMCID: PMC3995589 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2350-15-33] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2014] [Accepted: 03/04/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genetic information given to an individual newly diagnosed with a genetic condition is likely to have important health implications for other family members. The task of communicating with these relatives commonly falls to the newly diagnosed person. Talking to relatives about genetic information can be challenging and is influenced by many factors including family dynamics. Research shows that many relatives remain unaware of relevant genetic information and the possible impact on their own health. This study aims to evaluate whether a specific genetic counselling intervention for people newly diagnosed with a genetic condition, implemented over the telephone on a number of occasions, could increase the number of at-risk relatives who make contact with genetics services after a new genetic diagnosis within a family. METHODS This is a prospective, multi-centre randomised controlled trial being conducted at genetics clinics at five public hospitals in Victoria, Australia. A complex genetic counselling intervention has been developed specifically for this trial. Probands (the first person in a family to present with a diagnosis of a genetic condition) are being recruited and randomised into one of two arms - the telephone genetic counselling intervention arm and the control arm receiving usual care. The number of at-risk relatives for each proband will be estimated from a family pedigree collected at the time of diagnosis. The primary outcome will be measured by comparing the proportion of at-risk relatives in each arm of the trial who make subsequent contact with genetics services. DISCUSSION This study, the first randomised controlled trial of a complex genetic counselling intervention to enhance family communication, will provide evidence about how best to assist probands to communicate important new genetic information to their at-risk relatives. This will inform genetic counselling practice in the context of future genomic testing. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Register (ANZCTR): ANZCTRN12608000642381.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan M Hodgson
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, MCRI, 5th Floor Royal Childrens Hospital, Melbourne 3052, Australia
| | - Sylvia A Metcalfe
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, MCRI, 5th Floor Royal Childrens Hospital, Melbourne 3052, Australia
| | - MaryAnne Aitken
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, MCRI, 5th Floor Royal Childrens Hospital, Melbourne 3052, Australia
| | - Susan M Donath
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, MCRI, 5th Floor Royal Childrens Hospital, Melbourne 3052, Australia
| | - Clara L Gaff
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, MCRI, 5th Floor Royal Childrens Hospital, Melbourne 3052, Australia
- Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ingrid M Winship
- Genetic Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Martin B Delatycki
- Bruce LeFroy Centre for Genetic Health Research, MCRI, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Genetics, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Loane LC Skene
- Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Belinda J McClaren
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, MCRI, 5th Floor Royal Childrens Hospital, Melbourne 3052, Australia
| | - Jean L Paul
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, MCRI, 5th Floor Royal Childrens Hospital, Melbourne 3052, Australia
| | - Jane L Halliday
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, MCRI, 5th Floor Royal Childrens Hospital, Melbourne 3052, Australia
| |
Collapse
|