1
|
White S, Turbitt E, Rogers K, Tucker K, McEwen A, Best M, Phillips JL, Jacobs C. A survey of genetic and palliative care health professionals' views of integrating genetics into palliative care. Eur J Hum Genet 2024; 32:109-116. [PMID: 37344570 PMCID: PMC10772073 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-023-01409-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Revised: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Genetic counselling and testing have utility for people with palliative care needs and their families. However, genetic and palliative care health professionals have described difficulties initiating palliative-genetic discussions. Between March and July 2022, we received n = 73 surveys (6% response rate) from genetic and palliative care health professionals in Australia and New Zealand that assessed and compared barriers and facilitators. The main perceived barrier to both groups was palliative care health professionals' lack of genetic knowledge (44%). Most palliative care health professionals were 'not at all confident' performing several activities, including discussing DNA banking (52%) and knowing their legal responsibilities when sharing genetic information (58%). The most frequently selected facilitator for genetic health professionals was fostering close relationships with palliative care health professionals (52%), while palliative care health professionals indicated a genetic referral template (51%) would be of assistance. Almost all participants agreed genetic discussions do not undermine the central ethos of palliative care (87%). Fewer palliative care health professionals considered themselves well situated to have genetic discussions with a palliative patient's family compared to genetic health professionals (p = 0.014). Our results suggest that genetic and palliative care health professionals support integrating genetics into palliative care, although refinement of the palliative care health professionals' role in this process is required. We have identified intervention targets to overcome barriers related to knowledge and confidence, which ought to be integrated into future interventions designed to support health professionals deliver the benefits of genetic information to people with palliative care needs and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie White
- Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia.
| | - Erin Turbitt
- Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
| | - Kris Rogers
- Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
| | - Kathy Tucker
- Hereditary Cancer Centre, Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, Division of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Alison McEwen
- Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
| | - Megan Best
- Institute for Ethics and Society, University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jane L Phillips
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Chris Jacobs
- Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
White S, Turbitt E, Phillips JL, Jacobs C. Approaching discussions about genetics with palliative patients and their families: a qualitative exploration with genetic health professionals. Eur J Hum Genet 2022:10.1038/s41431-022-01179-7. [PMID: 36064787 PMCID: PMC9441822 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01179-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Revised: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Genetic information can provide clinical benefits to families of palliative patients. However, integration of genetics into mainstream medicine has not focused on palliative populations. We explored the views and experiences of genetic health professionals in addressing genetics with palliative patients, and their families. We conducted an interpretive descriptive qualitative study with genetic counsellors and clinical geneticists using interviews and focus groups. Findings were generated using reflexive thematic analysis. Three themes were identified: (1) Focusing on the benefit to the family, (2) The discomfort of addressing genetics near end-of-life and (3) "It's always on the back-burner": Challenges to getting genetics on the palliative care agenda. Participants discussed the familial benefit of genetics in palliative care alongside the challenges when patients are near end-of-life. They perceived genetics as low priority for palliative care due to misunderstandings related to the value of genetic information. Acknowledging the challenges in the palliative care context, genetic health professionals want improved service leadership and awareness of the familial benefits of palliative genetic testing. Strong leadership to support genetic health professionals in addressing these barriers is needed for the benefits of genetic information to be realised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie White
- Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Erin Turbitt
- Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jane L Phillips
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Chris Jacobs
- Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Huang SJ, Amendola LM, Sternen DL. Variation among DNA banking consent forms: points for clinicians to bank on. J Community Genet 2022; 13:389-397. [PMID: 35834113 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-022-00601-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) banking is an important laboratory service that preserves the option of future genetic testing. DNA bank consent forms are a critical tool to facilitate thorough and valid informed consent. The objectives of this study were to assess the level of consistency of current clinical DNA banking consent forms with the American Society of Human Genetics (ASHG) and the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidance and to explore variation among the forms. The content analysis matrix included key points identified from the ASHG and ACMG documents (including benefits/risks, sample storage, access, disposition, and communication) and additional points beyond the ASHG and ACMG documents identified from the consent forms themselves during the analysis process. Forms were assessed for language addressing each point. Five consent forms were identified and analyzed for twelve key points and eight additional points. The average consistency for key points was 10.8/12 (range 8/12 to 12/12). The range for additional points was 1/8 to 5/8. There was variation across forms in the details provided related to key and additional points. Gaps in clinical DNA banking consent forms are barriers to achieving informed consent. Clinicians can consider the consent key and additional points discussed here to supplement and enrich their clinical DNA banking informed consent discussions, promote stewardship, and maximize downstream utility of banked DNA. The identification of multiple additional points beyond the ASHG and ACMG documents' key points indicates a need for this guidance to be updated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel J Huang
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Laura M Amendola
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Darci L Sternen
- Department of Laboratories, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Views and experiences of palliative care clinicians in addressing genetics with individuals and families: a qualitative study. Support Care Cancer 2021; 30:1615-1624. [PMID: 34549349 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06569-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/11/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE A proportion of people with palliative care needs unknowingly have a genetic predisposition to their disease, placing relatives at increased risk. As end-of-life nears, the opportunity to address genetics for the benefit of their family narrows. Clinicians face numerous barriers addressing genetic issues, but there is limited evidence from the palliative care clinician perspective. Our aims are to (1) explore the views and experiences of palliative care clinicians in addressing genetics with patients and their families and (2) generate suggested strategies that support integration of genetics into palliative care. METHODS An interpretive descriptive qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with palliative care doctors and nurses (N = 14). RESULTS Three themes were identified: (1) Harms and benefits of raising genetics: a delicate balancing act, (2) Navigating genetic responsibility within the scope of palliative care and (3) Overcoming practice barriers: a multipronged approach. Participants described balancing the benefits of addressing genetics in palliative care against potential harms. Responsibility to address genetic issues depends on perceptions of relevance and the scope of palliative care. Suggestions to overcome practice barriers included building genetic-palliative care relationships and multi-layered genetics education, developing clinical resources and increasing organisational support. CONCLUSIONS Integrating aspects of genetics is feasible, but must be balanced against potential harms and benefits. Palliative care clinicians were uncertain about their responsibility to navigate these complex issues to address genetics. There are opportunities to overcome barriers and tailor support to ensure people nearing end-of-life have a chance to address genetic issues for the benefit of their families.
Collapse
|
5
|
Prudent J, Lopez E, Dorshorst D, Cox HC, Bodurtha JN. Demographic and socioeconomic trends in DNA banking utilization in the USA. J Community Genet 2021; 12:593-602. [PMID: 34185264 PMCID: PMC8239484 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-021-00533-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Demographic and clinical information from de-identified individuals utilizing a single DNA banking service over a 22-year period was assessed using descriptive statistics. The socioeconomic characteristics of the study population were estimated using a zip code–level analysis of US Census data and compared to national US Metrics for 2016. Samples from 4,874 individuals were deposited to a single commercial DNA bank from 1997 to 2019. Samples originated from 31 countries across 6 continents, with the majority of samples originating from the United States (US; 97.37%; n = 4,746). A higher proportion of individuals identifying as females (55.58%; n = 2,709) utilized the service compared to males (41.18%; n = 2,007). The age distribution was bimodal, peaking around 5 years of age and again around 65 years of age. Whole blood was the preferred specimen for submission. Sample deposits peaked in 2015 with 559 annual deposits. Clinical genetic counselors were the most common referral source (41.73%; n = 2,034). Individuals utilizing DNA banking services are estimated to reside in wealthier, more educated and less racially diverse zip codes compared to national metrics. Although direct to consumer DNA banking is being utilized by the general public and clinical genetic counselors in the US, it is not widespread.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Prudent
- Department of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe St., Blalock 1012, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Esthermarie Lopez
- Ponce Health Sciences University, 388 Zona Industrial Reparada 2, Ponce, PR, 00716, Puerto Rico
| | - Donna Dorshorst
- Prevention Genetics LLC, 3800 S. Business Park Avenue, WI, 54,449, Marshfield, USA
| | - Hannah C Cox
- Prevention Genetics LLC, 3800 S. Business Park Avenue, WI, 54,449, Marshfield, USA.
| | - Joann N Bodurtha
- Department of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe St., Blalock 1012, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
What do cancer patients' relatives think about addressing cancer family history and performing genetic testing in palliative care? Eur J Hum Genet 2019; 28:213-221. [PMID: 31527859 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-019-0505-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2019] [Revised: 08/19/2019] [Accepted: 08/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Palliative care may be an opportunity to discuss cancer family history and familial cancer risks with patients' relatives. It may also represent the last opportunity to collect, from dying patients, clinical data and biospecimens that will inform cancer risk assessment and prevention in their surviving relatives. This study aims to explore the perspectives of cancer patients' relatives about cancer heritability, addressing cancer family history, and performing genetic testing in palliative care settings. Thirteen first-degree relatives of cancer patients who died in palliative care participated in the study. Two focus groups were conducted and transcribed verbatim. Two independent coders conducted a thematic content analysis. The themes included: (1) Knowledge of cancer heritability; (2) Experiences and expectations regarding cancer family history discussions, and (3) Views on genetic testing in palliative care patients and DNA biobanking. Participants seemed aware that cancer family history is a potential risk factor for developing the disease. They considered the palliative care period an inappropriate moment to discuss cancer heritability. They also did not consider palliative care providers as appropriate resources to consult for such matters as they are not specialized in this field. Participants welcomed DNA biobanking and genetic testing conducted at the palliative care patients' request. Cancer occurrence within families raises concerns among relatives about cancer heritability, but the palliative care period is not considered the most appropriate moment to address this issue. However, discussions about the risk to cancer patients' relatives might need to be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Collapse
|