An Evidence-Based, Community-Engaged Approach to Develop an Interactive Deliberation Tool for Pediatric Neuromuscular Trials

Lessons Learned From Clinical Studies in Centronuclear Myopathies: The Patient Perspective-A Qualitative Study

BACKGROUND

Since 2014, several clinical studies focusing on centronuclear myopathies have been conducted, including a prospective natural history study, a gene transfer clinical trial and a clinical trial using an antisense oligonucleotide. Dedicated patient organizations have played an important role in this process. The experience of members of these organizations, either as a study participant, parent or as a patient organization member communicating with the sponsors are potentially very informative for future trial design.

METHODS

We investigated the burden of and the lessons learned from the first natural history studies and clinical trials from a patient perspective using a qualitative approach. We arranged 4 focus groups with a total of 37 participants from 3 large international patient organizations: ZNM-ZusammenStark!, the Myotubular Trust, and the MTM-CNM Family Connection. 4 themes, based on a systematic literature search were discussed: Expectations and preparation, Clinical study participation, Communication and Recommendations for future clinical trials. The focus group recordings were transcribed, anonymized, and uploaded to Atlas-ti version 8.1 software. The data were analyzed using a thematic content analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, participants were realistic in their expectations, hoping for small improvements of function and quality of life. The realization that trial participation does not equate to a treatment was challenging. Participating in a clinical study had a huge impact on many aspects of daily life, both for patients and their immediate families. First-hand insights into the burden of the design and its possible effect on performance were provided, resulting in numerous compelling recommendations for future clinical studies. Furthermore, participants stressed the importance of clear communication, which was considered to be especially vital in cases of severe adverse events. Finally, while patients were understanding of the importance of adhering to the regulations of good clinical practice, they indicated that they would strongly appreciate a greater understanding and/or acknowledgment of the patient perspective and a reflection of this perspective in future clinical trial design.

CONCLUSION

The acknowledgment and inclusion of patients' perspectives and efficient and effective communication is expected to improve patient recruitment and retention in future clinical studies, as well as more accurate assessment of the patient performance related to suitable planning of the study visits.

The experience of clinical study and trial participation in rare diseases: A scoping review of centronuclear myopathy and other neuromuscular disorders

The design of a clinical trial for a rare disease can be challenging. An optimal study design is required to effectively study the clinical outcomes for possible therapies for these types of disorders. Understanding the study participants' experiences as well as barriers and facilitators of participation are important to optimize future research and to inform clinical trial management. Centronuclear myopathies (CNMs) including X-linked myotubular myopathy (XLMTM) are a group of rare congenital myopathies for which there is no cure currently. Since 2014, a number of natural history studies and clinical trials have been conducted in CNMs. Two trials have been prematurely terminated because of severe adverse events. Since no research has been conducted regarding trial experience in CNM, we performed a scoping literature research on clinical trial experience of patients with neuromuscular disorders in general. The most common barriers to trial participation of patients comprise concerns about potential harmful effects, opportunity loss and the expected burden on daily life. The most common facilitators were an expected benefit on the disease course, altruism and collateral benefit. While several results are in line with trial experiences of other types of patients, for example oncological patients, distinctions can be made for patients with CNM and other neuromuscular disorders. However, the limited availability of relevant literature suggests that future (qualitative) research should focus on trial experiences in CNM patients.

Free Online Decision Tools to Support Parents Making Decisions About Their Children's Chronic Health Condition: An Environmental Scan

BACKGROUND

Medical decisions parents make on their children's behalf can be challenging. Free online decision support tools are created to help parents faced with these decisions.

OBJECTIVE

We used an environmental scan to identify free, online tools that support parents in making decisions about their children's chronic health condition. We described the tools and assessed their potential to harm, content, development process, readability, and whether their use changed decision makers' knowledge and alignment of their preferences with their final decision.

DATA SOURCES AND ELIGIBILITY

Decision aid repositories, Google searches, and key informants identified decision support tools. Eligible tools were freely available online and for parents of children with chronic health conditions.

APPRAISAL METHODS

Two reviewers independently assessed the tools' quality based on the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS). Tool readability was assessed using the Flesch Reading Ease test.

RESULTS

From 21 free, online decision support tools, 14 (67%) provided sufficient detail for making a specific decision (IPDAS qualifying criteria). None sufficiently met IPDAS certification criteria necessary to reduce the possibility of patient harms when using the tool. Three (14%) were fairly easy or easy to read. Of those evaluated by developers (n = 6), 2 improved knowledge and 4 improved alignment of preferences with the available options.

LIMITATIONS

Google searches and key informant sources are not replicable.

CONCLUSIONS

Free, online decision support tools for parents of children with chronic health conditions are of variable quality, most are difficult to read, and there is limited evidence their use achieves intended outcomes.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

Registered with Open Science Framework 20 July 2021(AEST) osf.io/b94yj.

Parent clinical trial priorities for fragile X syndrome: a best-worst scaling

An expansion in the availability of clinical drug trials for genetic neurodevelopmental conditions is underway. Delineating patient priorities is key to the success of drug development and clinical trial design. There is a lack of evidence about parent decision-making in the context of clinical drug trials for genetic neurodevelopmental conditions. We assessed parents' priorities when making a decision whether to enroll their child with fragile X syndrome (FXS) in a clinical drug trial. An online survey included a best-worst scaling method for parents to prioritize motivating and discouraging factors for child enrollment. Parents were recruited through the National Fragile X Foundation and FRAXA. Sequential best-worst with conditional logit analysis was used to determine how parents prioritize motivating and discouraging factors about trial enrollment decisions. Respondents (N = 354) were largely biological mothers (83%) of an individual with FXS who ranged in age from under 5 to over 21 years. The highest motivating factor was a trial to test a drug targeting the underlying FXS mechanism (coeff = 3.28, p < 0.001), followed by the potential of the drug to help many people (coeff = 3.03, p < 0.001). Respondents rated requirement of blood draws (coeff = -3.09, p < 0.001), loss of access to the drug post trial (coeff = -3.01, p < 0.001), and drug side effects (coeff = -2.96, p < 0.001) as most discouraging. The priorities defined by parents can be incorporated into evidence-based trial design and execution to enhance the enrollment process.

"Be an ambassador for change that you would like to see": a call to action to all stakeholders for co-creation in healthcare and medical research to improve quality of life of people with a neuromuscular disease

Background

Patient and public involvement for co-creation is increasingly recognized as a valuable strategy to develop healthcare research targeting patients’ real needs. However, its practical implementation is not as advanced and unanimously accepted as it could be, due to cultural differences and complexities of managing healthcare programs and clinical studies, especially in the rare disease field.

Main body

The European Neuromuscular Centre, a European foundation of patient organizations, involved its key stakeholders in a special workshop to investigate the position of the neuromuscular patient community with respect to healthcare and medical research to identify and address gaps and bottlenecks. The workshop took place in Milan (Italy) on January 19–20, 2018, involving 45 participants who were mainly representatives of the patient community, but also included experts from clinical centers, industry and regulatory bodies. In order to provide practical examples and constructive suggestions, specific topics were identified upfront. The first set of issues concerned the quality of life at specific phases of a patient’s life, such as at the time of diagnosis or during pediatric to adult transition, and patient involvement in medical research on activities in daily living including patient reported outcome measures. The second set of issues concerned the involvement of patients in the management of clinical research tools, such as registries and biobanks, and their participation in study design or marketing authorization processes. Introductory presentations were followed by parallel working group sessions, to gain constructive contributions from all participants. The concept of shared decision making was used to ensure, in discussions, a partnership-based identification of the wishes and needs of all stakeholders involved, and the “ladder of participation” tool served as a model to evaluate the actual and the desired level of patients’ involvement in all topics addressed. A general consensus on the outcome of the meeting was collected during the final plenary session.

This paper reports the outcome of the workshop and the specific suggestions derived from the analysis of the first set of topics, related to quality of life. The outcomes of the second set of topics are reported elsewhere and are only briefly summarized herein for the sake of completeness.

Conclusions

The neuromuscular community proved to be very active and engaged at different levels in the healthcare initiatives of interest. The workshop participants critically discussed several topics, providing practical examples where different stakeholders could play a role in making a change and bridging gaps. Overall, they indicated the need for education of all stakeholders for better communication, where everyone should become an ambassador to promote real change. Support should also come from institutions and healthcare bodies both at structural and economic level.

Priorities when deciding on participation in early-phase gene therapy trials for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a best-worst scaling experiment in caregivers and adult patients

PURPOSE

Several gene therapy trials for Duchenne muscular dystrophy initiated in 2018. Trial decision making is complicated by non-curative, time-limited benefits; the progressive, fatal course; and high unmet needs. Here, caregivers and patients prioritize factors influencing decision making regarding participation in early-phase gene therapy trials.

METHODS

We conducted a best-worst scaling experiment among U.S. caregivers and adults with Duchenne (N = 274). Participants completed 11 choice sets, choosing features they cared about most and least when deciding whether to participate in a hypothetical gene therapy trial. We analyzed the data using sequential conditional logistic regression.

RESULTS

Participants prioritized improved muscle function in trial decision making. Concerns about participation limiting later use of gene transfer and editing were also important, as were improved lung and heart function. Low risk of death fell near the middle. Participants cared least about muscle biopsies and potential for randomization to placebo. Adults with Duchenne and caregivers of non-ambulatory children significantly prioritized improved lung function compared to caregivers of ambulatory children.

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrate prioritization of anticipated benefits and opportunity costs relative to potential harms and procedures in gene therapy trial decision making. Such data inform protocol development, education and advocacy efforts, and informed consent.

Gene therapy as a potential therapeutic option for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: A qualitative preference study of patients and parents

Objectives

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a rare neuromuscular disorder that causes progressive weakness and early death. Gene therapy is an area of new therapeutic development. This qualitative study explored factors influencing parents’ and adult patients’ preferences about gene therapy.

Methods

We report qualitative data from 17 parents of children with DMD and 6 adult patients. Participants responded to a hypothetical gene therapy vignette with features including non-curative stabilizing benefits to muscle, cardiac and pulmonary function; a treatment-related risk of death; and one-time dosing with time-limited benefit of 8–10 years. We used NVivo 11 to code responses and conduct thematic analyses.

Results

All participants placed high value on benefits to skeletal muscle, cardiac, and pulmonary functioning, with the relative importance of cardiac and pulmonary function increasing with disease progression. More than half tolerated a hypothetical 1% risk of death when balanced against Duchenne progression and limited treatment options. Risk tolerance increased at later stages. Participants perceived a ‘right time’ to initiate gene therapy. Most preferred to wait until a highly-valued function was about to be lost.

Conclusion

Participants demonstrated a complex weighing of potential benefits against harms and the inevitable decline of untreated Duchenne. Disease progression increased risk tolerance as participants perceived fewer treatment options and placed greater value on maintaining remaining function. In the context of a one-time treatment like gene therapy, our finding that preferences about timing of initiation are influenced by disease state suggest the importance of assessing ‘lifetime’ preferences across the full spectrum of disease progression.