1
|
Pfund RA, Forman DP, Whalen SK, Zech JM, Ginley MK, Peter SC, McAfee NW, Whelan JP. Effect of cognitive-behavioral techniques for problem gambling and gambling disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction 2023; 118:1661-1674. [PMID: 37381589 PMCID: PMC10524575 DOI: 10.1111/add.16221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To measure the effect of cognitive-behavioral techniques (CBTs) on gambling disorder severity and gambling behavior at post-treatment and follow-up. METHOD Seven databases and two clinical trial registries were searched to identify peer-reviewed studies and unpublished studies of randomized controlled trials. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool assessed risk of bias in the included studies. A random effect meta-analysis with robust variance estimation was conducted to measure the effect of CBTs relative to minimally treated or no treatment control groups. RESULTS Twenty-nine studies representing 3991 participants were identified. CBTs significantly reduced gambling disorder severity (g = -1.14, 95% CI = -1.68, -0.60, 95% prediction interval [PI] = -2.97, 0.69), gambling frequency (g = -0.54, 95% CI = -0.80, -0.27, 95% PI = -1.48, 0.40) and gambling intensity (g = -0.32, 95% CI = -0.51, -0.13, 95% PI = -0.76, 0.12) at post-treatment relative to control. CBTs had no significant effect on follow-up outcomes. Analyses supported the presence of publication bias and high heterogeneity in effect size estimates. CONCLUSIONS Cognitive-behavioral techniques are a promising treatment for reducing gambling disorder and gambling behavior; however, the effect of cognitive-behavioral techniques on gambling disorder severity and gambling frequency and intensity at post-treatment is overestimated, and cognitive-behavioral techniques may not be reliably efficacious for all individuals seeking treatment for problem gambling and gambling disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rory A Pfund
- Department of Psychology, The University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
- Tennessee Institute for Gambling Education & Research, Tennessee, USA
| | - David P Forman
- Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - Shelby K Whalen
- Department of Psychology, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee, USA
| | - James M Zech
- Department of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Meredith K Ginley
- Tennessee Institute for Gambling Education & Research, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Psychology, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - Nicholas W McAfee
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA
| | - James P Whelan
- Department of Psychology, The University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
- Tennessee Institute for Gambling Education & Research, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wall H, Magnusson K, Hellner C, Andersson G, Jayaram-Lindström N, Rosendahl I. The evaluation of a brief ICBT program with therapist support for individuals with gambling problems in the context of a gambling helpline: a randomized pilot trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2023; 9:26. [PMID: 36805024 PMCID: PMC9936663 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-023-01257-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Gambling helplines are a natural way of first contact for individuals with gambling problems. However, few studies have evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of brief interventions in a gambling helpline. To reduce this knowledge gap, this study evaluated the feasibility of an online cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) program in the context of a gambling helpline as a first step towards a full-scale RCT. DESIGN This is a two-group parallel randomized controlled pilot trial where the participants were randomized to either a brief four-module ICBT program (n = 22) or a control group (n = 21). Participants were followed up weekly during the intervention, post intervention, and 6 weeks upon completion of intervention. PARTICIPANTS A total of 43 self-identified individuals with gambling problems (scoring 3 or more on the Problem Gambling Severity Index) were recruited via the Swedish national gambling helpline, 59% females, mean age 43.7 years. MEASUREMENTS Feasibility of the procedure and intervention (i.e., recruitment pace, attrition, program engagement, and satisfaction) were the primary outcomes; treatment effect (net gambling losses) was the secondary outcome. RESULTS Approximately 2 participants per week were randomized, and retention was low, with 47% lost to follow-up at the 6-week follow-up time-point. Most participants engaged in the online modules (86%) and rated their overall satisfaction with the program as high (7.5 out of 10). Both groups decreased their weekly gambling losses at both follow-up time-points, but the between-group comparisons were inconclusive. CONCLUSION It is not advisable to conduct a full-scale RCT based on the results from this pilot study. Future studies in a gambling helpline should consider interventions that are more suited to be incorporated in a gambling helpline and identify ways to increase participant engagement. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was retrospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT04609007 , 29/10/2020).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Håkan Wall
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden. .,Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Norra Stationsgatan 69, 11364, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Kristoffer Magnusson
- grid.465198.7Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden ,grid.425979.40000 0001 2326 2191Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Norra Stationsgatan 69, 11364 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Clara Hellner
- grid.465198.7Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden ,grid.425979.40000 0001 2326 2191Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Norra Stationsgatan 69, 11364 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gerhard Andersson
- grid.465198.7Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden ,grid.425979.40000 0001 2326 2191Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Norra Stationsgatan 69, 11364 Stockholm, Sweden ,grid.5640.70000 0001 2162 9922Department of Behavioral Sciences and Learning, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Nitya Jayaram-Lindström
- grid.465198.7Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden ,grid.425979.40000 0001 2326 2191Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Norra Stationsgatan 69, 11364 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ingvar Rosendahl
- grid.465198.7Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden ,grid.425979.40000 0001 2326 2191Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Norra Stationsgatan 69, 11364 Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dowling NA, Merkouris SS, Youssef GJ, Lubman DI, Bagot KL, Hawker CO, Portogallo HJ, Thomas AC, Rodda SN. GAMBLINGLESS IN-THE-MOMENT: Protocol for a micro-randomised trial of a gambling Just-In-Time Adaptive Intervention (Preprint). JMIR Res Protoc 2022; 11:e38958. [PMID: 35998018 PMCID: PMC9449828 DOI: 10.2196/38958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The presence of discrete but fluctuating precipitants, in combination with the dynamic nature of gambling episodes, calls for the development of tailored interventions delivered in real time, such as just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs). JITAIs leverage mobile and wireless technologies to address dynamically changing individual needs by providing the type and amount of support required at the right time and only when needed. They have the added benefit of reaching underserved populations by providing accessible, convenient, and low-burden support. Despite these benefits, few JITAIs targeting gambling behavior are available. Objective This study aims to redress this gap in service provision by developing and evaluating a theoretically informed and evidence-based JITAI for people who want to reduce their gambling. Delivered via a smartphone app, GamblingLess: In-The-Moment provides tailored cognitive-behavioral and third-wave interventions targeting cognitive processes explicated by the relapse prevention model (cravings, self-efficacy, and positive outcome expectancies). It aims to reduce gambling symptom severity (distal outcome) through short-term reductions in the likelihood of gambling episodes (primary proximal outcome) by improving craving intensity, self-efficacy, or expectancies (secondary proximal outcomes). The primary aim is to explore the degree to which the delivery of a tailored intervention at a time of cognitive vulnerability reduces the probability of a subsequent gambling episode. Methods GamblingLess: In-The-Moment interventions are delivered to gamblers who are in a state of receptivity (available for treatment) and report a state of cognitive vulnerability via ecological momentary assessments 3 times a day. The JITAI will tailor the type, timing, and amount of support for individual needs. Using a microrandomized trial, a form of sequential factorial design, each eligible participant will be randomized to a tailored intervention condition or no intervention control condition at each ecological momentary assessment across a 28-day period. The microrandomized trial will be supplemented by a 6-month within-group follow-up evaluation to explore long-term effects on primary (gambling symptom severity) and secondary (gambling behavior, craving severity, self-efficacy, and expectancies) outcomes and an acceptability evaluation via postintervention surveys, app use and engagement indices, and semistructured interviews. In all, 200 participants will be recruited from Australia and New Zealand. Results The project was funded in June 2019, with approval from the Deakin University Human Research Ethics Committee (2020-304). Stakeholder user testing revealed high acceptability scores. The trial began on March 29, 2022, and 84 participants have been recruited (as of June 24, 2022). Results are expected to be published mid-2024. Conclusions GamblingLess: In-The-Moment forms part of a suite of theoretically informed and evidence-based web-based and mobile gambling interventions. This trial will provide important empirical data that can be used to facilitate the JITAI’s optimization to make it a more effective, efficient, and scalable tailored intervention. Trial Registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12622000490774; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=380757&isClinicalTrial=False International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/38958
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicki A Dowling
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- Melbourne Graduate School of Education, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | | - Dan I Lubman
- Turning Point and Monash Addiction Research Centre, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Chloe O Hawker
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | | | - Anna C Thomas
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Simone N Rodda
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- Psychology and Neuroscience, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
- School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Grafton, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Intranasal as needed naloxone in the treatment of gambling disorder: A randomised controlled trial. Addict Behav 2022; 125:107127. [PMID: 34634640 DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.107127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Revised: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gambling disorder (GD) is a global phenomenon affecting millions of people. GD can result in severe social and financial difficulties and efficacious treatments are warranted. Psychosocial treatments form the basis of treatment. Opioid antagonists (OAs) have however shown promise in previous studies. In a recent imaging study intranasal naloxone was found to rapidly and fully occupy brain μ-opioid receptors. This trial investigates the effect and safety of as needed naloxone in the treatment of gambling disorder. METHODS This was a 12-week double blind, randomised control trial comparing intranasal naloxone to placebo. The primary endpoint was gambling urge measured by the Gambling symptom Assessment Scale (G-SAS). Secondary outcome measures were gambling severity measures (PGSI) as well as quality of life (WHO:EUROHIS-8), alcohol consumption (AUDIT), depression (MARDS) and internet use (IDS-9SF). In addition, safety of treatment was assessed. Both treatment groups received psychosocial support. RESULTS 126 participants were randomised to treatment groups in a 1:1 ratio. 106 patients completed the study. Gambling urge (GSAS) and other gambling related measured improved in both groups, but no statistically significant difference could be found. Intranasal naloxone was well tolerated, no subjects discontinued the study due to adverse events. No serious adverse drug reactions were observed. CONCLUSIONS This study found no difference between the as-needed administration of intranasal naloxone and placebo in reducing gambling urge in persons with GD. Intranasal naloxone was safe and well tolerated.
Collapse
|
5
|
Diaz-Sanahuja L, Campos D, Mira A, Castilla D, García-Palacios A, Bretón-López JM. Efficacy of an internet-based psychological intervention for problem gambling and gambling disorder: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Internet Interv 2021; 26:100466. [PMID: 34646753 PMCID: PMC8501496 DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Revised: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
UNLABELLED Gambling Disorder is a prevalent non-substance use disorder, which contrasts with the low number of people requesting treatment. Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) could help to enhance the dissemination of evidence-based treatments and considerably reduce the costs. The current study seeks to assess the efficacy of an online psychological intervention for people suffering from gambling problems in Spain. The proposed study will be a two-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. A total of 134 participants (problem and pathological gamblers) will be randomly allocated to a waiting list control group (N = 67) or an intervention group (N = 67). The intervention program includes 8 modules, and it is based on motivational interviewing, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), and extensions and innovations of CBT. It includes several complementary tools that are present throughout the entire intervention. Therapeutic support will be provided once a week through a phone call with a maximum length of 10 min. The primary outcome measure will be gambling severity and gambling-related cognitions, and secondary outcome measures will be readiness to change, and gambling self-efficacy. Other variables that will be considered are depression and anxiety symptoms, positive and negative affect, difficulties in emotion regulation strategies, impulsivity, and quality of life. Individuals will be assessed at baseline, post-treatment, and 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups. During the treatment, participants will also respond to a daily Ecological Momentary Intervention (EMI) in order to evaluate urges to gamble, self-efficacy to cope with gambling urges, gambling urge frequency, and whether gambling behaviour occurs. The EMI includes immediate automatic feedback depending on the participant's responses. Treatment acceptance and satisfaction will also be assessed. The data will be analysed both per protocol and by Intention-to-treat. As far as we know, this is the first randomized controlled trial of an online psychological intervention for gambling disorder in Spain. It will expand our knowledge about treatments delivered via the Internet and contribute to improving treatment dissemination, reaching people suffering from this problem who otherwise would not receive help. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04074681. Registered 22 July 2019.
Collapse
Key Words
- A, Action
- C, Contemplation
- CBT
- CBT, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
- CIDI, Composite International Diagnostic Interview
- CONSORT-EHEALTH, Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials of Electronic and Mobile Health Applications and Online Telehealth
- DERS, Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale
- DGOJ, Directorate General for the Regulation of Gambling
- DSM-5, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition
- DSM-III-R, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd Edition Revised
- DSM-IV, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition
- EDBs, Emotion Driven Behaviours
- EMA, Ecological Momentary Assessment
- EMI, Ecological Momentary Intervention
- Efficacy
- Emotion regulation
- G-SAS, The Gambling Symptom Assessment Scale
- GD, Gambling Disorder
- GE, Gambling Expectancies
- GI, Gambling history interview and current gambling situation and related variables assessment
- GRCS-S, Gambling-Related Cognitions Scale
- GSEQ, Gambling Self-Efficacy Questionnaire
- Gambling
- HADS, Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale
- IB, Interpretative Bias
- IC, Illusion of Control
- ICD-10, International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision
- ISG, Perceived Inability to Stop Gambling
- Internet
- M, Maintenance
- MFS, Monitoring, Feedback and Support
- MI, Motivational Interviewing
- MINI, Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview
- NA, Negative Affect
- NODS, NORC DSM-IV Screen for Gambling Problems
- OASIS, The Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale
- ODSIS, The Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale
- P, Precontemplation
- PA, Positive Affect
- PANAS, The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule
- PC, Predictive Control
- PFIs, Personal Feedback Interventions
- QLI, Quality Life Index
- RCT, Randomized Controlled Trial
- SCID-P, The Structured Clinical Interview
- SPIRIT, Standard Protocol Items Recommendations for Interventional Trials
- SUS, System Usability Scale
- UPPS-P, The Short UPPS-P Impulsivity Scale
- URICA, The University of Rhode Island Change Assessment Scale
- WL, Waiting List
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Diaz-Sanahuja
- Universitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain
- Corresponding author at: Department of Basic Psychology, Clinical and Psychobiology, Universitat Jaume I, Avenida de Vicent Sos Baynat, s/n, 12071 Castellón, (Spain).
| | - Daniel Campos
- Universidad de Zaragoza, Huesca, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón (IISAragon), Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | - Diana Castilla
- Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
- CIBER Fisiopatología Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERObn), Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Azucena García-Palacios
- Universitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain
- CIBER Fisiopatología Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERObn), Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juana María Bretón-López
- Universitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain
- CIBER Fisiopatología Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERObn), Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hodgins DC, Cunningham JA, Murray R, Hagopian S. Online Self-Directed Interventions for Gambling Disorder: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Gambl Stud 2019; 35:635-651. [PMID: 30701377 DOI: 10.1007/s10899-019-09830-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Self-directed treatments for gambling disorder have been developed to attract individuals who are reluctant to seek formal treatment. Self-directed treatments provide individuals with information and support to initiate a recovery program without attending formal treatment. In this study, an online version of a previously evaluated telephone-based intervention package is compared to a brief online normative feedback intervention called Check Your Gambling. In a randomized controlled trial design, participants with gambling problems who were not interested in formal treatment (N = 181) were recruited through media announcements. After a baseline telephone assessment, participants were assigned to have access to either the brief Check Your Gambling, or the extended self-management tools intervention. Follow-up assessments were conducted at 3, 6, and 12 months post baseline by blinded interviewers. Participant nominated collaterals were contacted to validate self-reported gambling involvement. The follow-up rate at 12 months was 78%. Participants in both conditions showed significant reductions in days of gambling and problem severity but no differences between conditions were found, contrary to the primary hypothesis. Lack of previous treatment for gambling and higher baseline self-efficacy predicted fewer days of gambling in both conditions. Self-efficacy increased over time but did not appear to mediate changes in gambling. Participants who were most engaged in the extended online program showed better outcomes. Those with low engagement showed a slower trajectory of change but equivalent improvements by 12 months. The extended online intervention was not associated with better outcomes than the brief Check Your Gambling intervention. Future research needs to explore the attractiveness, uptake, and effectiveness of online interventions with and without therapist support to understand their potential role in gambling disorder treatment systems.Trial Registration ISRCTN06220098.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Robert Murray
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To assess recent developments in self-directed interventions for gambling disorder and at-risk gambling. RECENT FINDINGS Relevant reviews and meta-analyses were published during 2017 and 2018. These reviews assess the nature and efficacy of self-directed and largely self-directed interventions including self-change, assisted self-change and mutual aid support groups. Additional reviews cover government and industry strategies to reduce harm including gambling venue and site self-exclusion and a variety of responsible gambling and consumer protection measures. Further studies were published that advanced understanding of self-directed and related interventions and identified priorities for development and research. SUMMARY There is variable support for the effectiveness of the foregoing interventions. Some appear to achieve outcomes comparable with professionally delivered therapies. Research is required using more robust designs, larger and more diverse samples and longer follow-up to demonstrate effectiveness and provide a basis for matching at-risk and problem gamblers to interventions of different types and intensity.
Collapse
|