Comparison of stroke mortality in Finnish-born migrants living in Sweden 1970-1999 and in Swedish-born individuals

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Associations between Immigration Status and Stroke Incidence and Mortality

Background and Objectives. Increasing global migration to Western Europe, North America, and other high-income countries makes a study of stroke risk in the immigrant population important. This study is aimed at evaluating the associations between immigration status and stroke risks and determining the risk factors for stroke in immigrant groups. Methods. We thoroughly searched PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE databases for the literature on stroke risk for immigrants and host populations by January 2022. Fourteen relevant cohort studies from eight countries met the inclusion criteria, and their data were included in this meta-analysis. Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed. Results. The results showed that the immigrant groups suffered from a lower incidence rate of stroke compared with the host populations ( $\text{HR}=0.81$ , 95% CI 0.71–0.91, $P=0.001$ ), but there was nonsignificant higher mortality of stroke in immigrants ( $\text{HR}=1.07$ ; 95% CI 0.84–1.36). However, the pooled adjusted incidence HR reduced to 0.67 (95% CI 0.60–0.75) after adjustment for publication bias. Immigrants had a lower stroke incidence compared to long-term residents, but the association varied with the country of origin, socioeconomic status, residence (urban vs. rural), and comorbid conditions. Discussion. The present systematic review and meta-analysis implicated that stroke risks are different for immigrants and the host populations; therefore, this knowledge may be useful for developing targeted stroke prevention strategies.

Mortality outcomes for Chinese and Japanese immigrants in the USA and countries of origin (Hong Kong, Japan): a comparative analysis using national mortality records from 2003 to 2011

BACKGROUND

With immigration and minority populations rapidly growing in the USA, it is critical to assess how these populations fare after immigration, and in subsequent generations. Our aim is to compare death rates and cause of death across foreign-born, US-born and country of origin Chinese and Japanese populations.

METHODS

We analysed all-cause and cause-specific age-standardised mortality rates and trends using 2003-2011 US death record data for Chinese and Japanese decedents aged 25 or older by nativity status and sex, and used the WHO Mortality Database for Hong Kong and Japan decedents in the same years. Characteristics such as age at death, absolute number of deaths by cause and educational attainment were also reported.

RESULTS

We examined a total of 10 458 849 deaths. All-cause mortality was highest in Hong Kong and Japan, intermediate for foreign-born, and lowest for US-born decedents. Improved mortality outcomes and higher educational attainment among foreign-born were observed compared with developed Asia counterparts. Lower rates in US-born decedents were due to decreased cancer and communicable disease mortality rates in the US heart disease mortality was either similar or slightly higher among Chinese-Americans and Japanese-Americans compared with those in developed Asia counterparts.

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality advantages in the USA were largely due to improvements in cancer and communicable disease mortality outcomes. Mortality advantages and higher educational attainments for foreign-born populations compared with developed Asia counterparts may suggest selective migration. Findings add to our limited understanding of the racial and environmental contributions to immigrant health disparities.

Risk of cardiovascular events and mortality among a population-based cohort of immigrants and long-term residents with diabetes: Are all immigrants healthier and if so, for how long?

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular events are responsible for half of all deaths among individuals with diabetes. Immigrants to Western countries may experience an acceleration of cardiovascular risk in the first 10 years of arrival because of a sedentary lifestyle, poor diet, or barriers to accessing care, leading to higher levels of obesity and diabetes.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the risk of cardiovascular events and mortality between immigrants to Canada and long-term residents with diabetes and to assess whether immigrants experience acceleration in risk after arrival.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study using linked health and immigration data from Ontario, Canada, of 87,707 immigrants who immigrated to Canada between 1985 and 2005 matched to 87,707 long-term residents with diabetes (age ≥20 years). Individuals were followed up from April 1, 2005, until February 29, 2012, for the primary composite outcome of a cardiovascular event (acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, congestive heart failure, transient ischemic attack, stroke) or all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

There was a lower adjusted risk of cardiovascular events or mortality among immigrants (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.76, 95% CI 0.74-0.78) after accounting for differences in baseline age, gender, socioeconomic status, neighborhood, and health care utilization-which persisted beyond 10 years from immigration. However, this healthy immigrant advantage was not found among more recent refugees (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.81-1.08), immigrants with no previous education (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.84-1.40), and those who were unmarried (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.62-1.03).

CONCLUSION

Immigrants with diabetes are at lower risk for cardiovascular events and mortality compared with long-term residents, an effect that persists more than 10 years after arrival. Not all immigrants demonstrate this health advantage.