Assessing robustness of designs for random effects parameters for nonlinear mixed-effects models

Optimal sample selection applied to information rich, dense data

Dense data can be classified into superdense information-poor data (type 1 dense data) and dense information-rich data (type 2 dense data). Arbitrary, random, or optimal thinning may be applied to type 1 dense data to minimise computational burden and statistical issues (such as autocorrelation). In contrast, a prospective or retrospective optimal design can be applied to type 2 dense data to maximise information gain from limited resources (capital and/or time). Here we describe a retrospective optimal selection strategy for quantification of unbound drug concentration from a discrete set of plasma samples where the total drug concentration has been measured.

Tutorial for $DESIGN in NONMEM: Clinical trial evaluation and optimization

This NONMEM tutorial shows how to evaluate and optimize clinical trial designs, using algorithms developed in design software, such as PopED and PFIM 4.0. Parameter precision and model parameter estimability is obtained by assessing the Fisher Information Matrix (FIM), providing expected model parameter uncertainty. Model parameter identifiability may be uncovered by very large standard errors or inability to invert an FIM. Because evaluation of FIM is more efficient than clinical trial simulation, more designs can be investigated, and the design of a clinical trial can be optimized. This tutorial provides simple and complex pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic examples on obtaining optimal sample times, doses, or best division of subjects among design groups. Robust design techniques accounting for likely variability among subjects are also shown. A design evaluator and optimizer within NONMEM allows any control stream first developed for trial design exploration to be subsequently used for estimation of parameters of simulated or clinical data, without transferring the model to another software. Conversely, a model developed in NONMEM could be used for design optimization. In addition, the $DESIGN feature can be used on any model file and dataset combination to retrospectively evaluate the model parameter uncertainty one would expect given that the model generated the data, particularly if outliers of the actual data prevent a reasonable assessment of the variance‐covariance. The NONMEM trial design feature is suitable for standard continuous data, whereas more elaborate trial designs or with noncontinuous data‐types can still be accomplished in optimal design dedicated software like PopED and PFIM.