A quasi-experimental design to assess the effectiveness of the federal healthy start in reducing preterm birth among obese mothers

Impact of a Large Healthy Start Program on Perinatal Outcomes, South Carolina, 2009-2019

Using linked birth and death certificates for participants served by a Healthy Start program in South Carolina and community controls, we found that the Healthy Start program contributed to significant improvements in prenatal care, breastfeeding initiation, and participation in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children and significant reductions in inadequate weight gain and large-for-gestational-age births. However, Healthy Start participants were more likely to gain excessive weight during pregnancy, and there were no significant differences in perinatal outcomes. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print March 9, 2023:e1-e5. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2023.307232).

A Methodological Approach for Evaluating the Enterprise Community Healthy Start Program in Rural Georgia: An Analysis Using Linked PRAMS, Birth Records and Program Data

INTRODUCTION

Community Healthy Start program evaluations are often limited by a lack of robust data and rigorous study designs. This study describes an enhanced methodological approach using local program data linked with existing population-level datasets for external comparison to evaluate the Enterprise Community Healthy Start (ECHS) program in two rural Georgia counties and presents results from the evaluation.

METHODS

ECHS program data were linked to birth records and the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) for 869 women who delivered a live birth in Burke and McDuffie counties from 2010 to 2011. Multivariate logistic regressions with and without propensity score methods modeled the association between ECHS participation and maternal health indicators and pregnancy outcomes.

RESULTS

107 ECHS participants and 726 non-participants responded to PRAMS and met eligibility criteria. Compared with non-participants, ECHS participants were younger, completed fewer years of education, and were more likely to be non-Hispanic Black, unmarried, insured with Medicaid, participating in WIC, and having an unintended pregnancy. Models with and without propensity score weighting derived similar results: there was a positive association between ECHS participation and receiving adequate or adequate plus prenatal care (p < 0.05); no statistically significant associations were observed between ECHS participation and any other health behaviors, health care access and utilization measures or pregnancy outcomes.

DISCUSSION

Rigorous evaluation of a local Healthy Start program using linked PRAMS and birth records with a population-based external comparison group and propensity score methods is an enhanced and feasible approach that can be applied in other local and state jurisdictions.

Associations Between a Healthy Start Program Prenatal Risk Screening Tool and Adverse Birth Outcomes: A Study Using the Mother/Infant Dyad Screening Cohort

Background: Florida's Healthy Start Program is a statewide prenatal screening program that aims to identify pregnant women at risk of adverse birth outcomes. However, the effectiveness of this legislatively mandated prenatal risk screening tool in predicting poor birth outcomes is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate associations between risk factors self-reported on this screening tool and adverse birth outcomes. Materials and Methods: A 1-year retrospective birth cohort at a large academic referral center was created. Risk factors reported on the tool by mothers who had a preterm or low-birthweight (LBW) infant were compared with those reported by mothers who delivered full-term non-LBW infants in bivariate and multivariate analyses. All data were extracted from maternal or infant electronic health records. Results: The Mother/Infant Dyad Screening cohort consisted of 528 dyads. We identified two items on the screening tool that significantly associated with adverse birth outcomes, but which do not currently contribute to the total risk score used to identify women for referral to preventive social services. These items were feeling alone and thinking it was not a good time to be pregnant. Conclusions: Comprehensive prenatal risk screening is an underutilized strategy in medicine. Florida's mandatory self-reported, prenatal survey can identify women at risk for poor neonatal outcomes. A more nuanced understanding how women are interpreting survey items and a re-evaluation of scoring practices may allow the tool to better serve as a model for other programs seeking to identify pregnant women at risk of poor birth outcomes.