Evaluation of the bacterial anti-adhesive properties of polyacrylic acid, chitosan and heparin-modified medical grade Silicone rubber substrate

Co-effects of C/Ag dual ion implantation on enhancing antibacterial ability and biocompatibility of silicone rubber

Although silicone implants are the most popular choice around the world for breast augmentation, reconstruction, and revision, due to the poor antibacterial properties and limited biocompatibility of silicone rubber (SR), one of the major complications, capsule contracture, is a lingering problem. To overcome the two main shortcomings, a dual ion implantation technique was applied to modify the surface of SR with the basic skeleton element of organic matter, carbon (C) and the broad-spectrum bactericide, silver (Ag). We present surface characterization, toxicological effects, and evaluation of the mechanical, antibacterial and biocompatible properties of C and Ag co-implanted SR (C/Ag-SRs). After ion implantation, surface roughness and tensile strength of these new materials increased. Biotoxicity was fully assessed by in vitro experiments on human fibroblasts and in vivo experiments on rats, showing that the low-Ag groups met safety standards. Both the anti-bacterial adhesion and bactericidal abilities of C/Ag-SRs were superior to those of SR, which had few antibacterial activities, especially against Staphylococcus epidermidis. With respect to biocompatibility, the adhesion of fibroblasts was promoted, while their proliferation was moderately inhibited on ion-implanted surfaces. After subcutaneous implantation in rats for 7, 30, 90 and 180 d, the capsular thickness around C/Ag-SRs was significantly lower than that around the SR. Additionally, there was no difference in the inflammatory reaction after 7 d of retention in vivo between C/Ag-SRs and SR. The results demonstrate that C/Ag-SRs are desirable shell materials for breast implants.

Biomaterials, Current Strategies, and Novel Nano-Technological Approaches for Periodontal Regeneration

Periodontal diseases involve injuries to the supporting structures of the tooth and, if left untreated, can lead to the loss of the tooth. Regenerative periodontal therapies aim, ideally, at healing all the damaged periodontal tissues and represent a significant clinical and societal challenge for the current ageing population. This review provides a picture of the currently-used biomaterials for periodontal regeneration, including natural and synthetic polymers, bioceramics (e.g., calcium phosphates and bioactive glasses), and composites. Bioactive materials aim at promoting the regeneration of new healthy tissue. Polymers are often used as barrier materials in guided tissue regeneration strategies and are suitable both to exclude epithelial down-growth and to allow periodontal ligament and alveolar bone cells to repopulate the defect. The problems related to the barrier postoperative collapse can be solved by using a combination of polymeric membranes and grafting materials. Advantages and drawbacks associated with the incorporation of growth factors and nanomaterials in periodontal scaffolds are also discussed, along with the development of multifunctional and multilayer implants. Tissue-engineering strategies based on functionally-graded scaffolds are expected to play an ever-increasing role in the management of periodontal defects.