Upregulation of the α1-adrenoceptor-induced phosphoinositide and inotropic response in hypothyroid rat heart

Modelling of alpha1-adrenoceptor-mediated temporal dynamics of inotropic response in rat heart to assess ligand binding and signal transduction parameters

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In order to use the transient response to an antagonist (prazosin) to evaluate properties of agonist interactions with the alpha(1)-adrenoceptor system, an integrative mechanistic model of cardiac uptake of prazosin and its competitive interaction with phenylephrine at the receptor site was developed. Based on the operational model of agonism, the aim was to evaluate both the receptor binding and signal transduction process as determinants of the inotropic effect of phenylephrine.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

In Langendorff-perfused rat hearts, prazosin outflow concentration and left ventricular developed pressure were measured, first in the presence of 12.3 micromol x L(-1) phenylephrine following a 1 min infusion of 1.27 nmol [(3)H]-prazosin, and second, when after 30 min the phenylephrine concentration in perfusate was reduced to 6.1 micromol x L(-1), the 1 min infusion of 1.27 nmol [(3)H]-prazosin was repeated.

KEY RESULTS

The kinetic model accounted for cardiac uptake and receptor binding kinetics of prazosin (dissociation constant, mean +/- SD: 0.057 +/- 0.012 nmol.L(-1)), assuming that the competitive displacement of phenylephrine (dissociation constant: 101 +/- 13 nmol x L(-1)) reduced the receptor occupation by the agonist and, consequently, contractility. This competitive binding process appeared to be the rate-determining step in response generation. The relationship between receptor occupancy and inotropic response was described by an efficacy parameter (tau, ratio of receptor density and coupling efficiency) of 4.9.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Mechanistic pharmacodynamic modelling of the kinetics of antagonism by prazosin allows quantitative assessment of the alpha(1)-adrenoceptor system both at the receptor and post-receptor levels.

Signal transduction and regulation: are all alpha1-adrenergic receptor subtypes created equal?

The current manuscript reviews the evidence whether and how subtypes of alpha(1)-adrenergic receptors, i.e. alpha(1A)-, alpha(1B)- and alpha(1D)-adrenergic receptors, differentially couple to signal transduction pathways and exhibit differential susceptibility to regulation. In both regards studies in tissues or cells natively expressing the subtypes are hampered because the relative expression of the subtypes is poorly controlled and the observed effects may be cell-type specific. An alternative approach, i.e. transfection of multiple subtypes into the same host cell line overcomes this limitation, but it often remains unclear whether results in such artificial systems are representative for the physiological situation. The overall evidence suggests that indeed subtype-intrinsic and cell type-specific factors interact to direct alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor signaling and regulation. This may explain why so many apparently controversial findings have been reported from various tissues and cells. One of the few consistent themes is that alpha(1D)-adrenergic receptors signal less effectively upon agonist stimulation than the other subtypes, most likely because they exhibit spontaneous internalization.