1
|
Bennett AS, Guarino H, Britton PC, O'Brien-Mazza D, Cook SH, Taveras F, Cortez J, Elliott L. U.S. Military veterans and the opioid overdose crisis: a review of risk factors and prevention efforts. Ann Med 2022; 54:1826-1838. [PMID: 35792749 PMCID: PMC9262363 DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2092896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
U.S. military veterans have been heavily impacted by the opioid overdose crisis, with drug overdose mortality rates increasing by 53% from 2010-2019. Risk for overdose among veterans is complex and influenced by ongoing interaction among physiological/biological, psychological, and socio-structural factors. A thorough understanding of opioid-related overdose among veterans, one that goes beyond simple pharmacological determinism, must examine the interplay of pain, pain treatment, and stress, as well as psychological and social experiences-before, during, and after military service. Comprehensive efforts to tackle the overdose crisis among veterans require interventions that address each of these dimensions. Promising interventions include widespread naloxone distribution and increased provision of low-threshold wrap-around services, including medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and holistic/complementary approaches. Interventions that are delivered by peers - individuals who share key experiential or sociodemographic characteristics with the population being served - may be ideally suited to address many of the barriers to opioid-related risk mitigation common among veterans. Community care models could be beneficial for the large proportion of veterans who are not connected to the Veterans Health Administration and for veterans who, for various reasons including mental health problems and the avoidance of stigma, are socially isolated or reluctant to use traditional substance use services. Interventions need to be tailored in such a way that they reach those more socially isolated veterans who may not have access to naloxone or the social support to help them in overdose situations. It is important to incorporate the perspectives and voices of veterans with lived experience of substance use into the design and implementation of new overdose prevention resources and strategies to meet the needs of this population. Key messagesU.S. military veterans have been heavily impacted by the opioid overdose crisis, with drug overdose mortality rates increasing by 53% from 2010-2019.The risks for overdose that veterans face need to be understood as resulting from an ongoing interaction among biological/physiological, psychological, and social/structural factors.Addressing drug overdose in the veteran population requires accessible and non-judgemental, low threshold, wraparound, and holistic solutions that recognise the complex aetiology of overdose risk for veterans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex S Bennett
- School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA.,Center for Drug Use and HIV/HCV Research (cduhr.org), New York, NY, USA
| | - Honoria Guarino
- Center for Drug Use and HIV/HCV Research (cduhr.org), New York, NY, USA.,CUNY Graduate School of Public Health & Health Policy, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter C Britton
- VA Center for Excellence, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | | | - Stephanie H Cook
- School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA.,Center for Drug Use and HIV/HCV Research (cduhr.org), New York, NY, USA
| | - Franklin Taveras
- School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Juan Cortez
- OnPoint, New York Harm Reduction Educators/Washington Heights Corner Project, New York, NY, USA
| | - Luther Elliott
- School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA.,Center for Drug Use and HIV/HCV Research (cduhr.org), New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Plotkin Amrami G. Rethinking the moral in narrating trauma: Ethnographic insights on clinical reasoning. Transcult Psychiatry 2022; 59:214-224. [PMID: 34665062 DOI: 10.1177/13634615211041200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
This article explores the moral dimensions of the clinical narration of suffering in a highly political context. Based on an ethnographic analysis of psychotherapists' discussions of a clinical case related to the Israeli evacuation from Gaza, I illustrate how the care providers navigate competing moral logics while explaining the reasons for the patient's experience. Capturing moments of the simultaneous appearance of different explanatory models, informed by contradictory moral grammars, during the process of clinical reasoning allowed me to obtain a complex and nuanced picture of social reality in which the experience of the patient simultaneously appeared as both a success and a failure of communal education. The ethnographic observation and analysis of clinical reasoning challenge the assumed connection between practitioners' ideological identifications and their narration of suffering, and allow moving beyond the idea of coherent moral subjects who act according to a priori moral values informed by political ideology. This perspective is particularly significant for the field of traumatic suffering because it questions the moral grammar of trauma narratives that imply unambiguous and idealized distinctions between victims, perpetrators, and witnesses, revealing the complex dynamics of suffering and caring.
Collapse
|
3
|
Eikenaar T. Relating to moral injuries: Dutch mental health practitioners on moral injury among military and police workers. Soc Sci Med 2022; 298:114876. [PMID: 35278976 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Revised: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
In recent years the concept of moral injury has become a common term to describe the lasting impact of moral transgressions on frontline workers. This article aims to broaden the largely clinical debate by involving the views of a diverse group of mental health practitioners who support military and police personnel in the Netherlands. These practitioners are chaplains, confidential counsellors, social workers, psychologists and integrity officers. How do these practitioners describe the moral injuries of servicemen and police officers and how do they think these should be approached? Through interviews with thirty different practitioners this study shows that definitions of moral injuries diverge considerably. In addition, the article analyses six different approaches to moral injuries. These range from framing moral injury as an exceptional problem that requires specific expertise, to seeing it as a broad issue that places workers in a larger moral community. An analysis of this variety both serves as an indication of possible ways to deal with moral injuries, and as a basis for a critical reflection on the implications of various approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teun Eikenaar
- Centre for International Conflict Analysis and Management (CICAM), Radboud University Nijmegen, Postbus 9108, 6500, HK, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|