1
|
Di Mattia M, Mauro A, Citeroni MR, Dufrusine B, Peserico A, Russo V, Berardinelli P, Dainese E, Cimini A, Barboni B. Insight into Hypoxia Stemness Control. Cells 2021; 10:cells10082161. [PMID: 34440930 PMCID: PMC8394199 DOI: 10.3390/cells10082161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Revised: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Recently, the research on stemness and multilineage differentiation mechanisms has greatly increased its value due to the potential therapeutic impact of stem cell-based approaches. Stem cells modulate their self-renewing and differentiation capacities in response to endogenous and/or extrinsic factors that can control stem cell fate. One key factor controlling stem cell phenotype is oxygen (O2). Several pieces of evidence demonstrated that the complexity of reproducing O2 physiological tensions and gradients in culture is responsible for defective stem cell behavior in vitro and after transplantation. This evidence is still worsened by considering that stem cells are conventionally incubated under non-physiological air O2 tension (21%). Therefore, the study of mechanisms and signaling activated at lower O2 tension, such as those existing under native microenvironments (referred to as hypoxia), represent an effective strategy to define if O2 is essential in preserving naïve stemness potential as well as in modulating their differentiation. Starting from this premise, the goal of the present review is to report the status of the art about the link existing between hypoxia and stemness providing insight into the factors/molecules involved, to design targeted strategies that, recapitulating naïve O2 signals, enable towards the therapeutic use of stem cell for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Di Mattia
- Unit of Basic and Applied Biosciences, Faculty of Bioscience and Agro-Food and Environmental Technology, University of Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy; (M.D.M.); (M.R.C.); (A.P.); (V.R.); (P.B.); (E.D.); (B.B.)
| | - Annunziata Mauro
- Unit of Basic and Applied Biosciences, Faculty of Bioscience and Agro-Food and Environmental Technology, University of Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy; (M.D.M.); (M.R.C.); (A.P.); (V.R.); (P.B.); (E.D.); (B.B.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-086-1426-6888; Fax: +39-08-6126-6860
| | - Maria Rita Citeroni
- Unit of Basic and Applied Biosciences, Faculty of Bioscience and Agro-Food and Environmental Technology, University of Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy; (M.D.M.); (M.R.C.); (A.P.); (V.R.); (P.B.); (E.D.); (B.B.)
| | - Beatrice Dufrusine
- Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine & Dentistry, University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy;
- Center of Advanced Studies and Technology (CAST), 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Alessia Peserico
- Unit of Basic and Applied Biosciences, Faculty of Bioscience and Agro-Food and Environmental Technology, University of Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy; (M.D.M.); (M.R.C.); (A.P.); (V.R.); (P.B.); (E.D.); (B.B.)
| | - Valentina Russo
- Unit of Basic and Applied Biosciences, Faculty of Bioscience and Agro-Food and Environmental Technology, University of Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy; (M.D.M.); (M.R.C.); (A.P.); (V.R.); (P.B.); (E.D.); (B.B.)
| | - Paolo Berardinelli
- Unit of Basic and Applied Biosciences, Faculty of Bioscience and Agro-Food and Environmental Technology, University of Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy; (M.D.M.); (M.R.C.); (A.P.); (V.R.); (P.B.); (E.D.); (B.B.)
| | - Enrico Dainese
- Unit of Basic and Applied Biosciences, Faculty of Bioscience and Agro-Food and Environmental Technology, University of Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy; (M.D.M.); (M.R.C.); (A.P.); (V.R.); (P.B.); (E.D.); (B.B.)
| | - Annamaria Cimini
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy;
- Sbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine and Center for Biotechnology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA
| | - Barbara Barboni
- Unit of Basic and Applied Biosciences, Faculty of Bioscience and Agro-Food and Environmental Technology, University of Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy; (M.D.M.); (M.R.C.); (A.P.); (V.R.); (P.B.); (E.D.); (B.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dromel PC, Singh D, Christoff-Tempesta T, Martheswaran T, Alexander-Katz A, Spector M, Young M. Controlling Growth Factor Diffusion by Modulating Water Content in Injectable Hydrogels. Tissue Eng Part A 2021; 27:714-723. [PMID: 33256564 DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2020.0313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent advancements in the delivery of therapeutics for retinal diseases include the development of injectable hydrogels, networks of one or more hydrophilic polymers that contain a high-volume fraction of water. These systems are of particular interest due to their biocompatibility, permeability to water-soluble metabolites, and function as minimally invasive injectable delivery vehicles. Recently, hydrogels for ophthalmic applications have been developed that display a controlled release of factors necessary for cellular survival and proliferation. Understanding the relationship between the volume water fraction and the physical, chemical, and diffusion properties of the hydrogel scaffold could aid in the improvement of existing drug delivery treatments for retinal regeneration. In this study, we compared the diffusion and release of human epidermal growth factor (hEGF) encapsulated in different injectable homogenous and heterogenous hydrogels, namely gelatin-hydroxyphenyl propionic acid (Gtn-HPA) and hyaluronic acid-tyramine (HA-Tyr)-based hydrogels. These experimental results were compared with the measured stiffness and water content of these hydrogels and applied to different diffusion theories of polymers to determine the model of best fit. We find that the normalized diffusion and release of hEGF increases with free water content in injectable hydrogels: ranging from 0.176 at 41% free water in HA-Tyr to 0.2 at 53% free water in Gtn-HPA, whereas it decreases with hydrogel stiffness: 600 Pa for Gtn-HPA and 1440 Pa for HA-Tyr. Further, we compared our experimental data with theoretical diffusion models. We found that homogeneous theoretical models, notably the hydrodynamic model (giving a normalized diffusion close to 0.2), provide the most suitable explanation for the measured solute diffusion coefficient. Impact statement Diffusion in a three-dimensional system is a key factor in designing new hydrogel-based materials. It allows to control and predict diffusion in implants and delivery systems. However, very little is done to explore and test the diffusion since it is a complex process. Many models can predict solute diffusion; however, practical application using these models has not yet been done. We have shown the variation of these models in a practical extent, which could have a tremendous impact on designing biomaterial for biological application as it allows one to understand the diffusion of injected drugs and growth factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre C Dromel
- Department of Material Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.,Schepens Eye Research Institute of Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Deepti Singh
- Schepens Eye Research Institute of Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ty Christoff-Tempesta
- Department of Material Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Tanisha Martheswaran
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alfredo Alexander-Katz
- Department of Material Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Myron Spector
- VA Boston Healthcare System, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael Young
- Schepens Eye Research Institute of Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|