Early relapses in primary CNS lymphoma after response to polychemotherapy without intraventricular treatment: results of a phase II study

Primary central nervous system lymphoma

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a diffuse large B cell lymphoma in which the brain, spinal cord, leptomeninges and/or eyes are exclusive sites of disease. Pathophysiology is incompletely understood, although a central role seems to comprise immunoglobulins binding to self-proteins expressed in the central nervous system (CNS) and alterations of genes involved in B cell receptor, Toll-like receptor and NF-κB signalling. Other factors such as T cells, macrophages or microglia, endothelial cells, chemokines, and interleukins, probably also have important roles. Clinical presentation varies depending on the involved regions of the CNS. Standard of care includes methotrexate-based polychemotherapy followed by age-tailored thiotepa-based conditioned autologous stem cell transplantation and, in patients unsuitable for such treatment, consolidation with whole-brain radiotherapy or single-drug maintenance. Personalized treatment, primary radiotherapy and only supportive care should be considered in unfit, frail patients. Despite available treatments, 15-25% of patients do not respond to chemotherapy and 25-50% relapse after initial response. Relapse rates are higher in older patients, although the prognosis of patients experiencing relapse is poor independent of age. Further research is needed to identify diagnostic biomarkers, treatments with higher efficacy and less neurotoxicity, strategies to improve the penetration of drugs into the CNS, and roles of other therapies such as immunotherapies and adoptive cell therapies.

European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) guidelines for treatment of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL)

The management of primary central nervous system (PCNSL) is one of the most controversial topics in neuro-oncology because of the complexity of the disease and the limited number of controlled studies available. In 2021, given recent advances and the publication of practice-changing randomized trials, the European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) created a multidisciplinary task force to update the previously published evidence-based guidelines for immunocompetent adult patients with PCNSL and added a section on immunosuppressed patients. The guideline provides consensus considerations and recommendations for the treatment of PCNSL, including intraocular manifestations and specific management of the elderly. The main changes from the previous guideline include strengthened evidence for the consolidation with ASCT in first-line treatment, prospectively assessed chemotherapy combinations for both young and elderly patients, clarification of the role of rituximab even though the data remain inconclusive, of the role of new agents, and the incorporation of immunosuppressed patients and primary ocular lymphoma. The guideline should aid the clinicians in everyday practice and decision making and serve as a basis for future research in the field.

Central Nervous System Lymphoma: Approach to Diagnosis and Treatment

Central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL) is a rare form of extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Central nervous system lymphoma can be primary (isolated to the central nervous space) or secondary in the setting of systemic disease. Treatment of CNSL has improved since the introduction of high-dose methotrexate and aggressive consolidation regimens. However, results after treatment are durable in only half of patients, and long-term survivors may experience late neurotoxicity, impacting quality of life. Given the rarity of this disease, few randomized prospective trials exist. This leaves many questions unanswered regarding optimal first-line and salvage treatments. Recent advances in the knowledge of pathophysiology of CNSL will hopefully help the development of future treatments. This review gives an overview of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of immunocompetent patients with CNSL.

Complications of intracerebroventricular chemotherapy via subgaleal reservoir in primary central nervous system lymphoma: A single-institution experience on 1247 installations in 94 consecutive patients

The implantation of a subgaleal reservoir intracerebroventricular (ICV port) in order to apply ICV chemotherapy in patients with leptomeningeal cancer may be complicated by misplacement of the device, pericatheter leucencephalopathy, hemorrhage and iatrogenic ventriculitis/meningitis. Here we analyzed the occurrence of such complications in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) treated with systemic and ICV methotrexate- and cytarabine-based chemotherapy. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 94 consecutive patients (1247 installations), who had received an ICV port for intraventricular chemotherapy for treatment of histologically confirmed PCNSL at our institution between September 2005 and October 2018. Infectious and noninfectious complications were systematically recorded including clinical, laboratory, and imaging data. In 9/94 patients (9.6%), a misplacement of the ICV port seen on the postoperative computed tomography scan was corrected immediately and chemotherapy was then continued as planned. In 5/94 patients (5.3%), symptomatic noninfectious complications were observed (four patients with symptomatic pericatheter leucencephalopathy and one patient with surgical scar dehiscence with CSF leak). In 8/94 patients (8.5%), asymptomatic white matter lesions around the catheter were visible on cerebral magnetic resonance imaging after completion of therapy. The rate of infectious complications was 6/94 patients (6.4%). No complication was lethal or required intensive care monitoring. This retrospective study shows that complications of ICV treatment have to be expected in a fraction of patients, however, in this series these complications were manageable and did not result in long-term deficits.

HDMTX-based polychemotherapy including intraventricular therapy in elderly patients with primary CNS lymphoma: a single center series

BACKGROUND

To investigate outcome and toxicity of high-dose systemic methotrexate (HDMTX)-based polychemotherapy and intracerebroventricular (ICV) chemotherapy via an Ommaya reservoir in elderly patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis on patients ⩾65 years with first diagnosis of PCNSL admitted to our center between January 2015 and December 2019. These patients were treated with a standardized chemotherapy protocol in case of absent contraindications for HDMTX-based chemotherapy. The protocol contained induction therapy with systemic rituximab, methotrexate and ifosfamide and consolidation treatment with systemic cytarabine (AraC) and ICV methotrexate, prednisolone and AraC.

RESULTS

Of a total of 46 patients seen in this period, 3 did not qualify for HDMTX. Thus, 43 patients were included in this analysis. Median age was 74 years (range 65-86), median Karnofsky performance score was 50 (range 20-90). Of the 43 patients, 32 (74.4%) completed treatment including ICV therapy. Complete remission/complete remission unconfirmed was achieved in 26 of 43 patients (60.5%), partial response (PR) in 3 (7%); 5 (11.6%) had progressive disease, and 3 (7.0%) died due to treatment-related complications; in the remaining 6 (14.0%) therapy could not be completed. Median progression free survival was 16 months (95% confidence interval 8-24 months) and median overall survival had not been reached after a median follow up of 23 months (range 1-52 months); the 75th percentile survival time was 12 months. No Ommaya reservoir infection was observed. Complications of ICV treatment were pericatheter leucencephalopathy in two patients and surgical scar dehiscence with cerebrospinal fluid leak in one patient.

CONCLUSION

Toxicity of HDMTX plus ICV chemotherapy for elderly patients with PCNSL was manageable and outcome was excellent for patients treated with this protocol.

HDMTX-based induction therapy followed by consolidation with conventional systemic chemotherapy and intraventricular therapy (modified Bonn protocol) in primary CNS lymphoma: a monocentric retrospective analysis

Background

To evaluate outcome and toxicity of High-dose methotrexate (HDMTX)-based induction therapy followed by consolidation with conventional systemic chemotherapy and facultative intraventricular therapy (modified Bonn protocol) in patients with primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL).

Methods

Between 01/2005 and 12/2013 113 patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL presented at our center; 98 of those qualified for HDMTX based chemotherapy, received a modified Bonn protocol and were included in the analysis. The treatment regimen was based on the “Bonn protocol”, but modified by omission of systemic drugs not able to cross the intact blood brain barrier. Intraventricular therapy was postponed until completion of three induction chemotherapy cycles or was replaced by intrathecal liposomal AraC and rituximab was added to induction from 2010 onwards.

Results

Median patient age was 67 years (range 38–83). Complete response/complete response unconfirmed (CR/CRu) was achieved in 59/98 patients (60%), partial response (PR) in 9/98 patients (9%). Twenty-four patients (23%) had progressive disease (PD), 6 (6%) died on therapy. Median progression-free survival (PFS) for all patients was 11.4 months, median overall survival (OS) 29.1 months. A trend to better outcome for intraventricular therapy versus intrathecal liposomal AraC was found in patients < 65 years (HR 0.53 [0.19–1.47] for OS and 0.46 [0.21–1.02] for PFS. Ommaya reservoir infection occurred in 3/33 patients (9%).

Conclusions

The data of this single center experience suggest that the outcome with a modified Bonn protocol was comparable to that of the previous regimen, showed fewer Ommaya reservoir infections and may have a trend for better outcome with intraventricular therapy.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s42466-019-0024-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Rituximab in patients with primary CNS lymphoma (HOVON 105/ALLG NHL 24): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 intergroup study

BACKGROUND

The prognosis for primary CNS lymphoma has improved with the use of high-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy, but patient outcomes remain poor. Rituximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody that targets the CD20 cell surface protein, has substantial activity in systemic CD20-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, but its efficacy in primary CNS lymphoma is unknown and low penetration of the large rituximab molecule through the blood-brain barrier could limit its effect. We aimed to investigate the addition of rituximab to a high-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy regimen in patients with newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma.

METHODS

This intergroup, multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 study was done at 23 hospitals in the Netherlands, Australia, and New Zealand. Non-immunocompromised patients aged 18-70 years with newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive methotrexate-based chemotherapy with or without intravenous rituximab. We used a web-based randomisation system with stratification by centre, age, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-WHO performance status, and a minimisation procedure. All group assignment was open label and neither investigators nor patients were masked to allocation. All patients were treated with two 28-day cycles of induction chemotherapy, consisting of intravenous methotrexate 3 g per m² on days 1 and 15, intravenous carmustine 100 mg per m² on day 4, intravenous teniposide 100 mg per m² on days 2 and 3, and oral prednisone 60 mg per m² on days 1-5, with (R-MBVP) or without (MBVP) intravenous rituximab 375 mg per m² on days 0, 7, 14, and 21 in cycle one and days 0 and 14 in cycle two. Patients with response at the end of induction subsequently received high-dose cytarabine and, in patients aged 60 years or younger, low-dose whole-brain radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was event-free survival, with events defined as not reaching complete response or complete response unconfirmed at the end of treatment, or progression or death after response; analysis was adjusted for age and performance score. Patients were analysed on a modified intention-to-treat basis. This trial is registered with the Nederlands Trial Register, number NTR2427, and the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, number ACTRN12610000908033. The trial was closed on May 27, 2016, after achieving complete accrual, and follow-up is ongoing.

FINDINGS

Between Aug 3, 2010, and May 27, 2016, we recruited 200 patients (109 men and 91 women; median age was 61 years [IQR 55-67]). We randomly assigned 100 patients to MBVP and 99 patients to R-MBVP. One patient was randomly assigned to the R-MBVP group but found to be ineligible because of an incorrect diagnosis and was excluded from all analyses. After a median follow-up of 32·9 months (IQR 23·9-51·5), 98 patients had had an event (51 in the MBVP group and 47 in the R-MBVP group), of whom 79 had died (41 in the MBVP group and 38 in the R-MBVP group). Event-free survival at 1 year was 49% (95% CI 39-58) in the MBVP group (no rituximab) and 52% (42-61) in the R-MBVP group (with rituximab; hazard ratio 1·00, 95% CI 0·70-1·43, p=0·99). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 58 (58%) patients in the MBVP group and 63 (64%) patients in the R-MBVP group, with infections (24 [24%] patients receiving MBVP vs 21 [21%] patients receiving R-MBVP), haematological toxicity (15 [15%] vs 12 [12%]), and nervous system disorders (ten [10%] vs 15 [15%]) being the most common. Life-threatening or fatal serious adverse events occurred in 12 (12%) patients in the MBVP group and ten (10%) patients in the R-MBVP group, and five (5%) patients in the MBVP group and three (3%) in the R-MBVP group died from treatment-related causes.

INTERPRETATION

We found no clear benefit of addition of rituximab to methotrexate, carmustine, teniposide, and prednisone chemotherapy in primary CNS lymphoma. Therefore, the results of this study do not support the use of rituximab as a component of standard treatment in primary CNS lymphoma.

FUNDING

Roche, the Dutch Cancer Society, and Stichting STOPhersentumoren.

Management of primary central nervous system lymphoma

A rare tumor, primary central nervous system lymphoma can affect immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients. While sensitive to radiotherapy or chemotherapy crossing the blood-brain barrier, it often recurs. Modern treatment consists of high-dose methotrexate-based induction chemotherapy, often followed by consolidation with either radiotherapy or further chemotherapy. Neurotoxicity is however a concern with radiotherapy, especially for patients older than 60 years. The benefit of the addition of rituximab to chemotherapy is unclear. Targeted therapies and immunotherapy have been effective in some patients and are tested on a larger scale. Survival has improved in the last decade, but remains poor in older patients.

The Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary CNS Lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Primary central nervous system lymphoma is a diffuse large B-celllymphoma with exclusive manifestation in the central nervous system (CNS), leptomeninges, and eyes. Its incidence is 0.5 per 100 000 persons per year.Currently, no evidence-based standard of care exists.

METHODS

This review is based on pertinent publications (2000-2017) retrieved by aselective search in PubMed.

RESULTS

The clinical and neuroradiological presentation of primary CNS lymphoma isoften nonspecific, and histopathological confirmation is obligatory. The disease, if left un- treated, leads to death within weeks or months. If the patient's general condition permits, treatment should consist of a high-dose chemotherapy based on methotrexate (HD- MTX) combined with rituximab and other cytostatic drugs that penetrate the blood-brain barrier. Long-term survival can be achieved in patients under age 70 by adding non- myeloablative consolidation chemotherapy or high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (HD-AST) to the induction therapy. Clinical trials comparing the efficacy and toxicity of these two treatment strategies are currently underway. Con- solidation whole-brain radiotherapy is associated with the risk of severe neurotoxicity and should be reserved for patients who do not qualify for systemic treatment. Some 30% of patients are refractory to primary treatment, and at least 50% relapse. In patients who are still in good general condition, relapse can be managed with HD-AST. Re- exposure to conventional HD-MTX-based polychemotherapy is another option, if the initial response was durable. The 5-year survival rate of all treated patients is 31%,according to registry data.

CONCLUSION

Current recommendations for the treatment of primary CNS lymphomaare based on only a small number of prospective clinical trials. Patients with this disease should be treated by interdisciplinary teams in experienced centers, andpreferably as part of a controlled trial.

Challenges and prospects in the diagnosis and treatment of primary central nervous system lymphoma

Introduction: Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) retains peculiar biological and clinical characteristics and a worse prognosis with respect to other comparable lymphomas. The need for high doses of chemotherapy to achieve valid drug concentrations in cerebral tissues and/or radiotherapy results in severe treatment-related toxicities, mainly neurologic, which are frequently as disabling as the disease itself.Areas covered: Several emerging combined therapies are addressed that focus on treating PCNSL. The prognosis has improved in the last years but several questions remain unanswered and the research of more effective therapies goes on. Information and data were obtained from direct authors' experience and a PubMed search of recent peer-reviewed original articles, review articles, and clinical guidelines.Expert commentary: The substantial progress observed in PCNSL has to be ascribed to a carefully combination of standard chemotherapeutic drugs. High-dose methotrexate-based polychemotherapy followed by mainteinance therapy offers one of the best chances to control the disease. Major issues that deserve many efforts by researchers are the definition of optimal consolidation treatment and a shared management of specific conditions such as elderly population and intra-ocular localization.

Updates on Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is an aggressive malignancy confined to the brain, spinal cord, leptomeninges, and eyes. Due to its rarity, there is a paucity of randomized trials and a varied approach to its management in the oncologic community. This review summarizes recent literature guiding current clinical practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

The presentation, work up, and management of PCNSL are discussed. Induction therapy incorporates a methotrexate-based chemotherapy regimen and is generally followed by a consolidation regimen including high dose chemotherapy (with or without autologous stem cell rescue). Whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) is a potential additional consolidation strategy. Management of relapsed and refractory disease poses a special challenge due to poor outcomes. Immunotherapy and targeted treatments are promising novel strategies for recurrent/refractory patients. Currently, there is little consensus in the management of PCNSL. Treatment recommendations should be tailored to the individual patient, with consideration for risk of neurotoxicity. New, exciting strategies are in development and when feasible, enrollment in a clinical trial should be considered.

Therapy of primary CNS lymphoma: role of intensity, radiation, and novel agents

Primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphomas represent a subgroup of malignancies with specific characteristics, an aggressive course, and unsatisfactory outcome in contrast with other lymphomas comparable for tumor burden and histological type. Despite the high sensitivity to conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy, remissions are frequently short lasting. Treatment efficacy is limited by several factors, including the biology and microenvironment of this malignancy and the "protective" effect of the blood-brain barrier, which limits the access of most drugs to the CNS. Patients who survive are at high risk of developing treatment-related toxicity, mainly disabling neurotoxicity, raising the question of how to balance therapy intensification with the control of side effects. Recent therapeutic progress and effective international cooperation have resulted in a significantly improved outcome over the past 2 decades, with a higher proportion of patients receiving treatment with curative intent. Actual front-line therapy consists of high-dose methotrexate-based polychemotherapy. Evidence supporting the addition of an alkylating agent and rituximab is growing, and a recent randomized trial demonstrated that the combination of methotrexate, cytarabine, thiotepa, and rituximab (MATRix regimen) is associated with a significantly better overall survival. Whole-brain irradiation and high-dose chemotherapy supported by autologous stem cell transplantation are 2 effective consolidation strategies in patients with a disease responsive to induction chemotherapy. Different strategies such as alkylating maintenance, conservative radiotherapy, and nonmyeloablative consolidation are being addressed in large randomized trials and a more accurate knowledge of the molecular and biological characteristics of this malignancy are leading to the development of target therapies in refractory/relapsing patients, with the overall aim to incorporate new active agents as part of first-line treatment. The pros and cons of these approaches together with the best candidates for each therapy are outlined in this article.

Challenges and opportunities in primary CNS lymphoma: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Historically, high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) plus consolidation chemotherapy and/or whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has been the gold standard on Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma (PCNSL) management. We sought to examine and summarize the data, on clinical trial (CT) setting, investigating multi-modality treatment to PCNSL.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of electronic databases (Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Database and clinicaltrials.gov) and a manual search to identify original PCNSL phase 2 and phase 3 CT from the last 10years. After a 4stage Prisma based selection process, 32 published (3 Randomized CT and 29 phases 2 CT) studies ultimately were selected for review. Four ongoing clinical trials found on clinicaltrial.gov were reviewed. Two investigators reviewed titles, abstracts, and articles independently. Two investigators abstracted data sequentially and evaluated each study independently.

FINDINGS

Treatment of PCNSL requires a multidisciplinary approach. HD-MTX represents the most accepted standard of care induction therapy for newly diagnosed PCNSL. When HD-MTX is given with WBRT for consolidation delayed neurotoxicity can be an important complication, particularly in elderly patients. Studies have suggested that WBRT may be deferred until relapse without compromising survival and deferring WBRT may be the best approach in elderly patients. Results from dose-reduced WBRT and consolidative HD-Ara-C are encouraging. High-dose chemotherapy in combination with autologous stem cell transplantation (HDC-ASCT) as chemotherapy alone has emerged as an important consolidative treatment for selected population. The optimal salvage therapy is still to be defined.

CONCLUSION

WBRT for consolidation is a well-studied modality; however emerging options to selected population such as HDC-ASCT, dose-reduced WBRT or chemotherapy alone are associated with similar survival outcome and less neurotoxicity in selected series. Ongoing and future clinical trials will better define the best approach on this rare disease.

Partial-brain radiotherapy for primary central nervous system lymphoma: multi-institutional experience

Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has been an important component of treatment for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), but delayed neurotoxicity has been a matter of concern. We have employed partial-brain radiotherapy (PBRT) with wide margins for PCNSL patients with a single lesion or a few lesions. In this study, we evaluated the treatment outcome in PCNSL patients undergoing PBRT. Between 2003 and 2014, 24 patients were treated with PBRT; 16 received high-dose-methotrexate (MTX) -containing chemotherapy before PBRT. Conventional fractionation with a median dose of 54 Gy was used. For reference, 15 patients undergoing MTX-based chemotherapy and WBRT were also analyzed. The 3-year overall survival rate was 60% for all 24 patients undergoing PBRT and 68% for the 16 patients undergoing MTX-based chemotherapy plus PBRT. The 3-year progression-free survival rate was 41% for all 24 patients undergoing PBRT and 36% for the 16 patients undergoing MTX-based chemotherapy. The in-field recurrence rate was 26% and the out-of-field recurrence rate was 15% at 3 years for all 24 patients undergoing PBRT. The rates for in-field recurrence and the out-of-field recurrence were 27% and 21%, respectively, for the 16 patients undergoing MTX-based chemotherapy. CNS-recurrence rates were similar in patients undergoing MTX-based chemotherapy and PBRT to the rates in those undergoing MTX-based chemotherapy and WBRT. Neurocognitive dysfunction developed in 3 of the 16 patients undergoing MTX + PBRT and in 4 of 15 patients undergoing MTX + WBRT (P = 0.68). PBRT seems to be a feasible treatment option for solitary PCNSL. Further investigations are warranted to evaluate the advantages of PBRT over WBRT.

A focus on pharmacotherapy for primary central nervous system lymphoma

The prognosis of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is still poor compared to other diffuse large B-cell lymphomas. High-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy plays a central role in the management of PCNSL; however, the optimal regimen has not been established thus far. Consolidating whole-brain radiotherapy is currently not routinely being performed at most centers due to lack of survival advantage in a randomized Phase III trial and increased risk of cognitive impairment. Promising results with the combination of high-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy with the CD20 antibody rituximab and consolidating the primary chemotherapy by other non-cross-resistant conventional chemotherapy or high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation have been reported in non-comparative studies. Results of well-designed randomized trials must be awaited to better define the optimal management of PCNSL.

Primary CNS lymphoma

Primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) of the central nervous system is an aggressive malignancy that exhibits unique biological features and characteristic clinical behaviour, with overall long-term survival rates of around 20–40 %. Clinical outcome has improved following the advent of chemoradiation protocols incorporating high-dose methotrexate in the mid-1980s, but disease relapse and adverse neurocognitive sequelae remain major clinical challenges. To address this, investigators have focused on improving drug therapy with novel cytotoxic combinations, monoclonal antibody therapy, and intensive chemotherapy consolidation approaches, in an attempt to improve disease control whilst reducing the requirement for whole-brain radiotherapy. Outcomes for patients that are older, immunocompromised, or have relapsed/refractory disease remain unsatisfactory and there is a paucity of clinical trial data to guide treatment of these groups. This review highlights recent advances in pathobiology, imaging, and clinical management of PCNSL and looks ahead to research priorities for this rare and challenging lymphoid malignancy.

Methotrexate and temozolomide versus methotrexate, procarbazine, vincristine, and cytarabine for primary CNS lymphoma in an elderly population: an intergroup ANOCEF-GOELAMS randomised phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

No standard chemotherapy regimen exists for primary CNS lymphoma, reflecting an absence of randomised studies. We prospectively tested two promising methotrexate-based regimens, one more intensive and a milder regimen, for primary CNS lymphoma in the elderly population, who account for most patients.

METHODS

In this open-label, randomised phase 2 trial, done in 13 French institutions, we enrolled immunocompetent patients who had neuroimaging and histologically confirmed newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma, were aged 60 years and older, and had a Karnofsky performance scale score of 40 or more. Participants were stratified by Karnofsky performance scale score (<60 vs ≥60) and treating institution and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive methotrexate (3·5 g/m(2)) with temozolomide (150 mg/m(2)) or methotrexate (3·5 g/m(2)), procarbazine (100 mg/m(2)), vincristine (1·4 mg/m(2)), and cytarabine (3 mg/m(2)). Neither regimen included radiotherapy; both included prophylactic G-CSF and corticosteroids. The primary endpoint was 1-year progression-free survival. Analysis was intent to treat, in a non-comparative phase 2 trial design. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00503594.

FINDINGS

Between July 16, 2007, and March 25, 2010, 98 patients were enrolled, of whom 95 were randomly assigned and analysed; 48 to methotrexate with temozolomide and 47 to methotrexate, procarbazine, vincristine, and cytarabine. 1-year progression-free survival was 36% (95% CI 22-50) in the methotrexate, procarbazine, vincristine, and cytarabine group and 36% (22-50) in the methotrexate with temozolomide group; median progression-free survival was 9·5 months (95% CI 5·3-13·8) versus 6·1 months (3·8-11·9), respectively. Objective responses were noted in 82% (95% CI 68-92) of patients in the methotrexate, procarbazine, vincristine, and cytarabine group versus 71% (55-84) of patients in the methotrexate with temozolomide group. Median overall survival was 31 months (95% CI 12·2-35·8) in the methotrexate, procarbazine, vincristine, and cytarabine group and 14 months (8·1-28·4) in the methotrexate with temozolomide group. No differences were noted in toxic effects between the two groups. The most common grades 3 and 4 toxicities in both groups were liver dysfunction (21 [4%] in the the methotrexate and temozolomide group and 18 [38%] in the methotrexate, procarbazine, vincristine, and cytarabine group), lymphopenia (14 [29%] and 14 [30%]), and infection (six [13%] and seven [15%]). To date, 33 (69%) patients in the methotrexate and temozolomide group have died, versus 31 (55%) in the methotrexate, procarbazine, vincristine and cytarabine group. Quality-of-life evaluation (QLQ-C30 and BN20) showed improvements in most domains (p=0·01-0·0001) compared with baseline in both groups. Prospective neuropsychological testing showed no evidence of late neurotoxicity.

INTERPRETATION

In this study of two different methotrexate-based combination regimens in elderly patients, the efficacy endpoints tended to favour the methotrexate, procarbazine, vincristine, and cytarabine group. Both regimens were associated with similar, moderate toxicity, but quality of life improved with time, suggesting pursuing treatment in these poor prognosis patients is worthwhile. New alternatives are needed to improve response duration in this population.

FUNDING

Schering-Plough/Merck and French Government.

Constant pattern of relapse in primary central nervous lymphoma patients treated with high-dose methotrexate combinations. A Finnish retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare brain tumour with a dismal prognosis. Several phase II studies with high-dose methotrexate-based regimens have shown promising early results, but in all hospital-based data published so far, the disease outcome is poor.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a hospital-based retrospective analysis to evaluate the long-term results of the Nordic type of Bonn chemotherapy regimen in PCNSL patients. The study included 54 patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL who received chemotherapy with curative intent as their first-line treatment.

RESULTS

We found promising response rates, 76% of the patients achieving CR and 22% patients achieving PR, with corresponding two-year EFS 53% and OS 76%. However, with longer follow-up a constant pattern of relapses was observed with only one patient remaining in primary remission after 60 months.

DISCUSSION

The finding suggests that basic biological differences exist between PCNSL and systemic diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and there is a need for consolidation or maintenance therapy after achieving a remission in patients with PCNSL.

Primary central nervous system lymphoma: current state of anti-CD20 therapy and appraisal of reported response criteria

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is an aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma which is confined to the central nervous system and may also affect intraocular structures. Despite high initial rates of response to methotrexate-based chemotherapy, more than 50% of patients will experience relapse and about 10% have disease that is refractory to chemotherapy. Outcome in patients who fail treatment is very poor, and therefore new therapeutic approaches that may increase the rate of complete response and the proportion of durable remission are sought. Based on the pivotal role that anti-CD20 therapy now plays in the treatment outcome of aggressive systemic B-cell lymphomas, a similar approach is commonly being adapted for PCNSL despite the lack of evidence for its effectiveness. This review examines the current status and level of evidence for the use of monoclonal antibodies against the CD20 surface antigen, which is present on normal and malignant B-cells in PCNSL. The review covers both systemic and local (intracerebrospinal fluid or intravitreal) administration of CD20 monoclonal antibodies in PCNSL. In addition, it scrutinizes the response criteria commonly reported for evaluation of treatment outcome. The importance of differentiating unconfirmed complete response from partial response is outlined and the lack of consensus on response criteria for atypical imaging presentations of PCNSL is delineated.

Successful change of treatment strategy in elderly patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma by de-escalating induction and introducing temozolomide maintenance: results from a phase II study by the Nordic Lymphoma Group

The Nordic Lymphoma Group has conducted a phase ll trial in newly diagnosed primary central nervous system lymphoma patients applying an age-adjusted multi-agent immunochemotherapy regimen, which in elderly patients included temozolomide maintenance treatment. Patients aged 18-75 years were eligible. Thirty-nine patients aged 18-65 years and 27 patients aged 66-75 years were enrolled. The median age of the two age groups was 55 and 70 years, respectively. The overall response rate was 73.8% for the entire cohort: 69.9% in the younger and 80.8% in the elderly subgroup. With a median follow up of 22 months, the 2-year overall survival probability was 60.7% in patients aged 65 years or under and 55.6% in patients aged over 65 years (P=0.40). The estimated progression-free survival at two years was 33.1% (95%CI: 19.1%-47.9%) in patients aged under 65 years and 44.4% (95%CI: 25.6%-61.8%) in the elderly subgroup (P=0.74). Median duration of response was ten months in the younger subgroup, and not reached in the elderly patient subgroup (P=0.33). Four patients aged 64-75 years (6%) died from treatment-related complications. Survival in the two age groups was similar despite a de-escalation of induction treatment in patients aged over 65 years. Duration of response in elderly patients receiving maintenance temozolomide was longer than in the younger age subgroup. While toxicity during induction is still of concern, especially in the elderly patients, we conclude from these data that de-escalation of induction therapy in elderly primary central nervous system lymphoma patients followed by maintenance treatment seems to be a promising treatment strategy. (clinicaltrials.gov identifier:01458730).

[Primary central nervous lymphoma: what is the role for radiotherapy?]

Primary central nervous system lymphoma is a rare extranodal form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma with an aggressive course and unsatisfactory outcome. Historically, whole-brain radiotherapy was the sole treatment for patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma, with high response rates but typically, this did not result in long-lasting remissions. The addition of high-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy regimens to whole-brain radiotherapy has significantly improved patients' outcome, but has resulted in a higher incidence of late neurotoxicity, particularly in elderly patients. To date, the role of consolidation radiotherapy is controversial, and some investigators have developed alternative strategies aiming at avoiding immediate irradiation or using a reduced radiotherapy dose to the whole-brain with promising results.

The role of radiation therapy in the management of primary central nervous system lymphoma

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is an aggressive neoplasm with a poor prognosis. Early studies of whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) alone revealed a robust initial response but high rates of local recurrence with long-term follow-up. The addition of high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX)-based chemotherapy improved the durability of disease control. However, delayed neurotoxicity emerged as an important complication, mainly in elderly patients. Therefore, researchers have investigated eliminating WBRT or reducing its dose. Multiple studies of chemotherapy alone have demonstrated inferior disease control. On the other hand, a phase III trial reported that WBRT may be deferred until relapse without compromising survival; however, this trial is fraught with flaws. A recent study of immunochemotherapy and dose-reduced WBRT demonstrated excellent outcomes. Currently, this regimen is being studied in a multi-institutional trial by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. WBRT maintains an important position in the armamentarium against PCNSL. This article aims to describe its evolving role.

Methotrexate re-challenge for recurrent primary central nervous system lymphoma

The prognosis of primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) recurring after methotrexate is poor (objective response rates [ORR] = 26-53 %; 1-year overall survival [OS] = 35-57 %). Salvage PCNSL chemotherapies have been based on the use of different agents to avoid cross-resistance; however, methotrexate is the most active agent in PCNSL, and methotrexate re-challenge may be an effective strategy for recurrent disease. We report our experience with methotrexate re-challenge in PCNSL. We reviewed 39 patients with histologically confirmed PCNSL who responded to methotrexate at initial diagnosis, experienced disease relapse and received methotrexate re-challenge. At the time of re-challenge, median age was 66 and median Karnofsky performance score (KPS) was 70. Median time from initial diagnosis was 26 m. Twenty-six patients were at first relapse and 13 at second or later relapse. At re-challenge, methotrexate was given in combination with other agents to 33 patients and as a single agent to six. The objective response rate was 85 %, with a complete response in 29 (75 %) patients, partial response in four (10 %) and disease progression in six (15 %). At median follow-up of 26 m, the median progression-free survival was 16 m; 1-year OS was 79 % (95 % CI 63-89) and median OS was 41 m. KPS was a prognostic factor for progression free survival (p = 0.04). In this population selected by previous methotrexate response, methotrexate re-challenge was a safe and effective strategy, indicating chemosensitivity was retained. Efficacy compared favorably to other salvage treatments suggesting methotrexate re-challenge should be considered in recurrent PCNSL patients who previously responded to methotrexate.

Recent advances in treatment of primary central nervous system lymphoma

OPINION STATEMENT

Therapeutic options are limited in primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) with no uniform consensus on optimal management and few published, randomized trials. High-dose methotrexate in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents forms the mainstay of treatment. There hasn't been much progress beyond high-dose methotrexate in this disease, and although results from trials using high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplant seem promising, these need to be further validated. Moreover, the role of whole brain radiation in the upfront setting remains to be determined. However, international efforts in this direction are underway, with ongoing randomized trials in newly diagnosed PCNSL, more research on the molecular pathogenesis and biomarkers, and the use of novel agents in salvage therapy. There also is emphasis on quality of life parameters and neurocognitive status. Future treatment options should optimize high-efficacy rates while minimizing the risk of neurotoxicity.

Rituximab, methotrexate, procarbazine, and vincristine followed by consolidation reduced-dose whole-brain radiotherapy and cytarabine in newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma: final results and long-term outcome

PURPOSE

A multicenter phase II study was conducted to assess the efficacy of rituximab, methotrexate, procarbazine, and vincristine (R-MPV) followed by consolidation reduced-dose whole-brain radiotherapy (rdWBRT) and cytarabine in primary CNS lymphoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received induction chemotherapy with R-MPV (five to seven cycles); those achieving a complete response (CR) received rdWBRT (23.4 Gy), and otherwise, standard WBRT was offered (45 Gy). Consolidation cytarabine was given after the radiotherapy. The primary end point was 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) in patients receiving rdWBRT. Exploratory end points included prospective neuropsychological evaluation, analysis of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) white matter changes using the Fazekas scale, and evaluation of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) as a prognostic factor.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients were enrolled, with median age of 60 years (range, 30 to 79 years) and median Karnofsky performance score of 70 (range, 50 to 100). Thirty-one patients (60%) achieved a CR after R-MPV and received rdWBRT. The 2-year PFS for this group was 77%; median PFS was 7.7 years. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached (median follow-up for survivors, 5.9 years); 3-year OS was 87%. The overall (N = 52) median PFS was 3.3 years, and median OS was 6.6 years. Cognitive assessment showed improvement in executive function (P < .01) and verbal memory (P < .05) after chemotherapy, and follow-up scores remained relatively stable across the various domains (n = 12). All examined MRIs (n = 28) displayed a Fazekas score of ≤ 3, and no patient developed scores of 4 to 5; differences in ADC values did not predict response (P = .15), PFS (P = .27), or OS (P = .33).

CONCLUSION

R-MPV combined with consolidation rdWBRT and cytarabine is associated with high response rates, long-term disease control, and minimal neurotoxicity.

Prevention of central nervous system relapses in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: which patients and how?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review analyzes most recent data on the risk of central nervous system (CNS) dissemination and the efficacy of current strategies for CNS prophylaxis in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

RECENT FINDINGS

CNS dissemination still remains a rare but usually fatal complication of DLBCL. Although risk models for CNS involvement in DLBCL have been postulated on the basis of clinical findings such as more than one extranodal site, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status greater than 1, lactate dehydrogenase elevation in serum, B-symptoms, high international prognostic index score and involvement of specific sites their predictive value is relatively low. The choice of drugs and time-point for prophylaxis still remain to be defined; however, there is some evidence supporting the role of systemic CNS-penetrating chemotherapy, in particular high-dose methotrexate (>1 g/m) in the early course of disease. A role for systemic rituximab has been postulated, however, with ambiguous results among studies.

SUMMARY

Better identification of risk factors and disease variables associated with CNS involvement in DLBCL including biological and molecular parameters is urgently needed to reduce CNS recurrences through a well designed prophylaxis regimen and to avoid unnecessary intensive and toxic treatments.

Diagnosis and treatment of primary CNS lymphoma

Primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare lymphoma that is confined to the CNS, with low tendency for systemic dissemination and a relatively aggressive course. Outcome in patients with PCNSL is often poor. Owing to its low incidence, current knowledge about optimal treatment of PCNSL is fragmentary. Chemotherapy regimens based on high-dose methotrexate are currently standard treatment for all patients with PCNSL who can tolerate such drugs. Whole-brain radiotherapy alone can lead to remission in up to 90% of patients, but often results in poor long-term disease control when given alone, and in delayed neurotoxicity when given after high-dose methotrexate. In this Review, we describe current approaches to diagnosis and treatment of PCNSL, and discuss novel therapeutic approaches that are currently in development, such as the use of rituximab and high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation. The possible use of intrathecal and intraventricular chemotherapy, optimal salvage treatment, and specific treatment approaches in elderly, paediatric and immunocompromised patients, are also considered.

Primary CNS lymphoma: a clinician's guide

Primary CNS lymphoma is a high malignant disease of the brain which can lead rapidly to death if diagnosis and/or the start of treatment is delayed. The age at time of diagnosis is a strong factor influencing prognosis so that in younger patients <65 years of age long-term survival may be achieved in a substantial percentage of patients, while in elderly patients long-term survival is seen much more rarely. First-line therapy consists of high-dose methotrexate-based (poly)chemotherapy. This review provides an overview of clinical presentation, steps to diagnosis, detailed information about current treatment concepts and specific information for particular clinical situations.

Association of transcobalamin c. 776C>G with overall survival in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma

Background:

Chemotherapy for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is based on methotrexate (MTX), which interferes with both nucleic acid synthesis and methionine metabolism. We have reported previously that genetic variants with influence on methionine metabolism are associated with MTX side effects, that is, the occurrence of white matter lesions as a sign of MTX neurotoxicity. Here, we investigated whether such variants are associated with MTX efficacy in terms of overall survival in MTX-treated PCNSL patients.

Methods:

We analysed seven genetic variants influencing methionine metabolism in 68 PCNSL patients treated with systemic and facultative intraventricular MTX-based polychemotherapy (Bonn protocol).

Results:

Median age at diagnosis was 59 years (range: 28–77), 32 patients were female. Younger age (Wald=8.9; P=0.003) and the wild-type C (CC) allele of the genotype transcobalamin c (Tc2). 776C>G (Wald=6.7; P=0.010) were associated with longer overall survival in a multivariate COX regression analysis.

Conclusion:

This observation suggests that the missense variant Tc2. 776C>G influences both neurotoxicity and efficacy of MTX in the Bonn PCNSL protocol.

Pathogenesis and management of primary CNS lymphoma

Primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL), a rare variant of extranodal non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, may cause various neurological symptoms and signs. The best therapeutic strategy is still a matter of debate. High-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) is the most active compound and should be used as the backbone for any chemotherapy applied. Several other chemotherapeutic drugs have been assessed in combination with HD-MTX, but no standard has yet been defined. Whole-brain radiotherapy is active against PCNSL, but typically does not confer long-lasting remission and is associated with significant neurotoxicity in many patients. The recently published G-PCNSL-SG1 trial has shown that consolidating whole-brain radiotherapy after HD-MTX-based chemotherapy does not prolong overall survival and may therefore be deferred. Combined systemic and intraventricular polychemotherapy, or high-dose chemotherapy followed by stem cell transplantation may offer cures to younger patients. Improving treatment regimens without adding significant (neuro-)toxicity should be the focus of ongoing and future studies.

Prognostic impact of meningeal dissemination in primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL): experience from the G-PCNSL-SG1 trial

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the frequency and prognostic impact of meningeal dissemination (MD) in immunocompetent adult patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma treated in a randomized phase III trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

MD was evaluated at study entry and defined by lymphoma proof in the meningeal compartment detected by at least one of the following methods: cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytomorphology, detection of clonal B cells by IgH PCR in CSF or contrast enhancement of the leptomeninges on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

RESULTS

Data on MD were available in 415 patients, of those, MD was detected in 65 (15.7%): in 44/361 (12.2%) by CSF cytomorphology, in 16/152 (10.5%) by PCR and in 17/415 (4.1%) by MRI. Major patients' characteristics and therapy did not significantly differ between patients with MD (MD+) versus those without MD (MD-). There was a significant correlation of MD with CSF pleocytosis (>5/μl; P < 0.0001), but no correlation with CSF protein elevation (>45 mg/dl). Median progression-free survival was 6.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 0-14.5] in MD+ and 8.3 months (5.7-10.8) in MD- patients (P = 0.95); median overall survival was 21.5 months (95% CI 16.8-26.1) and 24.9 months (17.5-32.3), respectively (P = 0.98).

CONCLUSION

MD was detected infrequently and had no impact on outcome in this trial.