Gemcitabine induced myositis in patients with pancreatic cancer: case reports and topic review

Paraneoplastic myopathy-related rhabdomyolysis and pancreatic cancer: A case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Rhabdomyolysis is a life-threatening condition, often leading to progressive renal failure and death. It is caused by destruction of skeletal muscle and the release of myoglobin and other intracellular contents into the circulation. The most frequent cause of this condition is "crush syndrome", although several others have been described and paraneoplastic inflammatory myopathies associated with various types of cancer are repeatedly reported.

CASE SUMMARY

We describe a rare case of a patient with pancreatic cancer who developed rhabdomyolysis early on, possibly due to paraneoplastic myositis leading to acute renal failure and eventually to rapid death. A 78-year-old Caucasian woman was referred to our hospital for obstructive jaundice and weight loss due to a lesion in the pancreatic head. She presented increasingly severe renal insufficiency with anuria, a dramatic increase in creatine phosphokinase (36000 U/L, n.v. 20-180 U/L) and myoglobin (> 120000 μg/L, n.v. 12-70 μg/L). On clinical examination, the patient showed increasing pain in the lower limbs associated with muscle weakness which was severe enough to immobilize her. Paraneoplastic myopathy linked to the malignant lesion of the pancreatic head was suspected. The patient was treated with hemodialysis and intravenous methylprednisolone. Despite all the efforts to prepare the patient for surgery, her general condition rapidly deteriorated and she eventually died 30 d after hospital admission.

CONCLUSION

The possible causes of rhabdomyolysis in this patient with pancreatic cancer are discussed, the development of paraneoplastic myopathy being the most likely. Clinicians should bear in mind that these syndromes may become clinically manifest at any stage of the cancer course and their early diagnosis and treatment could improve the patient's prognosis.

Gemcitabine-Induced Myositis in a Luminal B Breast Cancer patient: A Case Report

Human epidermal growth factor receptor-positive breast cancer is an aggressive cancer which represents approximately a quarter of all breast cancers worldwide. Recent advances have led to the development of targeted therapies, such as trastuzumab (H), which have significantly improved prognosis. Such therapies are currently used alongside other chemotherapeutic agents, such as paclitaxel (P) and gemcitabine (G). The most common side effects of PGH combination therapy include thrombocytopenia and anemias. However, there have been no previous reports of myositis resulting from this combination. We report the case of a 54-year-old metastatic breast cancer patient on PGH therapy who developed muscle weakness. The patient was initially treated with trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and paclitaxel. However, pertuzumab was changed to gemcitabine due to severe diarrhea. After the fourth cycle of PGH, the patient presented with muscle weakness and creatine kinase levels of up to 6755 U/L. Magnetic resonance imaging of the femur and pelvis revealed diffuse bilateral myositis, suggesting a diagnosis of gemcitabine-induced myositis. The patient was placed on intravenous fluids and corticosteroids, which resolved her condition. To our knowledge, this is the first report of gemcitabine-induced myositis in a breast cancer patient. Further studies are needed to determine the underlying mechanisms of gemcitabine-induced myositis and develop preventative measures.

Anticancer Drugs and the Nervous System

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews the clinical features, prognosis, and treatment of neurotoxicity from anticancer drugs, including conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy, biologics, and targeted therapies, with a focus on the newer immunotherapies (immune checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor T cells).

RECENT FINDINGS

Whereas neurologic complications from traditional chemotherapy are widely recognized, newer cancer therapies, in particular immunotherapies, have unique and distinct patterns of neurologic adverse effects. Anticancer drugs may cause central or peripheral nervous system complications. Neurologic complications of therapy are being seen with increasing frequency as patients with cancer are living longer and receiving multiple courses of anticancer regimens, with novel agents, combinations, and longer duration. Neurologists must know how to recognize treatment-related neurologic toxicity since discontinuation of the offending agent or dose adjustment may prevent further or permanent neurologic injury. It is also imperative to differentiate neurologic complications of therapy from cancer progression into the nervous system and from comorbid neurologic disorders that do not require treatment dose reduction or discontinuation.

SUMMARY

Neurotoxicity from cancer therapy is common, with effects seen on both the central and peripheral nervous systems. Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy are new cancer treatments with distinct patterns of neurologic complications. Early recognition and appropriate management are essential to help prevent further neurologic injury and optimize oncologic management.

Gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel for pediatric relapsed/refractory sarcomas

BACKGROUND

Pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory sarcomas have poor outcomes and need novel therapies that provide disease control while maintaining an acceptable quality of life. The activity and toxicity of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in combination has not been reported in pediatrics.

PROCEDURE

We reviewed the records of fifteen relapsed/refractory patients and one treatment-naïve patient who received gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel at our institution.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients (median age 13.5 years, range 3-19 years) received 53 cycles of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel. Twenty-nine cycles (55%) resulted in ≥Grade 3 toxicity, with nonhematologic Grade ≥3 toxicities occurring in only eight of 53 cycles (15%). Patients received red blood cell and platelet transfusions in 23% and 4% of cycles, respectively. Grade ≥3 infectious toxicities occurred in 4% of cycles. Of 14 patients with measurable disease, there were no complete responses (CR), one partial response (PR; 7%), and six patients (43%) with stable disease (SD; median SD: 4.5 months, range: 2-19 months). In total, 31% of the patients derived clinical benefit (CR + PR + SD ≥ 4 months). Median time to progression was 72 days with a 4-month progression-free survival of 31% ± 12% and 1-year overall survival of 19% ± 10%. With a median follow-up for all 16 patients of 21 months from the first treatment with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, one (6%) remains alive with disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel is a relatively safe regimen with mainly hematologic toxicities. It offers a well-tolerated, palliative option providing clinical benefit in a subset of patients. A phase I trial of this combination is underway.

Cancer-treatment-induced neurotoxicity--focus on newer treatments

Neurotoxicity caused by traditional chemotherapy and radiotherapy is widely recognized in patients with cancer. The adverse effects of newer therapeutics, such as biological and immunotherapeutic agents, are less well established, and are associated with considerable neurotoxicity in the central and peripheral nervous systems. This Review addresses the main neurotoxicities of cancer treatment with a focus on the newer therapeutics. Recognition of these patterns of toxicity is important because drug discontinuation or dose adjustment might prevent further neurological injury. Knowledge of these toxicities also helps to differentiate treatment-related symptoms from progression of cancer or its involvement of the nervous system. Familiarity with the neurological syndromes associated with cancer treatments enables clinicians to use the appropriate treatment for the underlying malignancy while minimizing the risk of neurological damage, which might preserve patients' quality of life.

Gemcitabine-induced radiation recall myositis

Radiation recall is an uncommon phenomenon in which administration of a chemotherapeutic agent induces an acute inflammatory reaction in previously irradiated tissues, often weeks to years after completion of radiotherapy. This entity is well known to medical and radiation oncologists, however only three cases have been reported in radiology journals. We present a case of gemcitabine-induced radiation recall that manifested as myositis with associated dermatitis in the posterior thigh of a patient with remote history of localized radiotherapy for biopsy-proven breast cancer metastasis. We also present a brief literature review to update the topic of radiation recall in imaging, and emphasize the importance of knowledge of this phenomenon when considering the differential diagnosis of myositis/dermatitis in a patient who has received cancer treatment.

Gemcitabine-induced myopathy

BACKGROUND

There have been few studies on muscle injury caused by cytotoxic agents used in cancer. In particular, only four cases of muscle manifestations have been reported in patients who received gemcitabine as single chemotherapy without adjuvant radiotherapy. In only one of these observations gemcitabine was considered to be the causative agent.

METHODS

We report the case of a patient without comorbidity treated with gemcitabine monotherapy for 2 months for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, who developed a proximal motor deficiency of the lower limbs and myolysis (creatinine kinase 1858 IU/L) associated with an erythema of both thighs.

RESULTS

Muscle MRI revealed the presence of edema on both the quadriceps muscles. A muscle biopsy showed post-necrotic regeneration and significant vascular proliferation. Only three small inflammatory infiltrates were observed, while expression of the major histocompatibility complex class I in muscle fibers was normal. There was no recurrence of cancer, anti-TIF-1γ antibodies tested negative, and discontinuation of gemcitabine, without further treatment, resulted in complete disappearance of symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

The present observation suggests that gemcitabine monotherapy without adjuvant radiotherapy can cause myopathy through vascular lesions, a mechanism which also underlies the more common side effects of this treatment. These findings have obvious therapeutic implications.