Stereotactic biopsy of brainstem lesions: 21 years experiences of a single center

Stereotactic frame-based biopsy of infratentorial lesions via the suboccipital-transcerebellar approach with the Zamorano-Duchovny stereotactic system-a retrospective analysis of 79 consecutive cases

OBJECTIVE

Lesions of the posterior fossa (brainstem and cerebellum) are challenging in diagnosis and treatment due to the fact that they are often located eloquently and total resection is rarely possible. Therefore, frame-based stereotactic biopsies are commonly used to asservate tissue for neuropathological diagnosis and further treatment determination. The aim of our study was to assess the safety and diagnostic success rate of frame-based stereotactic biopsies for lesions in the posterior fossa via the suboccipital-transcerebellar approach.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective database analysis of all frame-based stereotactic biopsy cases at our institution since 2007. The aim was to identify all surgical cases for infratentorial lesion biopsies via the suboccipital-transcerebellar approach. We collected clinical data regarding outcomes, complications, diagnostic success, radiological appearances, and stereotactic trajectories.

RESULTS

A total of n = 79 cases of stereotactic biopsies for posterior fossa lesions via the suboccipital-transcerebellar approach (41 female and 38 male) utilizing the Zamorano-Duchovny stereotactic system were identified. The mean age at the time of surgery was 42.5 years (± 23.3; range, 1-87 years). All patients were operated with intraoperative stereotactic imaging (n = 62 MRI, n = 17 CT). The absolute diagnostic success rate was 87.3%. The most common diagnoses were glioma, lymphoma, and inflammatory disease. The overall complication rate was 8.7% (seven cases). All patients with complications showed new neurological deficits; of those, three were permanent. Hemorrhage was detected in five of the cases having complications. The 30-day mortality rate was 7.6%, and 1-year survival rate was 70%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggests that frame-based stereotactic biopsies with the Zamorano-Duchovny stereotactic system via the suboccipital-transcerebellar approach are safe and reliable for infratentorial lesions bearing a high diagnostic yield and an acceptable complication rate. Further research should focus on the planning of safe trajectories and a careful case selection with the goal of minimizing complications and maximizing diagnostic success.

The risk factors of hemorrhage in stereotactic needle biopsy for brain lesions in a large cohort: 10 years of experience in a single center

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to identify the risk factors for hemorrhage from a large cohort who underwent stereotactic needle biopsy for brain lesions at a single center over a 10-year period.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of consecutive patients who underwent stereotactic biopsy at our institute between January 2010 and December 2019. Demographic characteristics and clinical variables were collected and analyzed to identify risk factors for postbiopsy hemorrhage using the chi-square test and univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 3196 patients were included in this study; of these, a histological diagnosis was eventually made for 2938 (91.93%) patients. Hemorrhage occurred in 149 (4.66%) patients, and symptomatic hemorrhage occurred in 46 (1.44%) patients. In multivariable logistic regression analyses, the presence of deep-seated lesions (OR 1.272, p = 0.035), concomitant edema and enhancement on MR imaging scans (OR 1.827, p = 0.002), intraoperative hypertension without a past history (OR 1.012, p = 0.024), and the presence of high-grade glioma (OR 0.306, p = 0.003) were identified as independent predictors of hemorrhage after biopsy.

CONCLUSION

Stereotactic needle biopsy is a safe and effective way to obtain tissue from brain lesions for histological diagnosis. The presence of deep-seated lesions, concomitant edema, and enhancement on MR imaging scans and the presence of high-grade glioma are independent predictors of hemorrhage after stereotactic biopsy.

A Case Series of Stereotactic Biopsy of Brainstem Lesions through the Transfrontal Approach

Background and Importance Brainstem lesions may be unresectable or unapproachable. Regardless, the histopathological diagnosis is fundamental to determine the most appropriate treatment. We present our experience with transfrontal stereotactic biopsy technique for brainstem lesions as a safe and effective surgical route even when contralateral transhemispheric approach is required for preservation of eloquent tissue.

Clinical Presentation Twenty-five patients underwent surgery by transfrontal approach. Medical records were reviewed for establishing the number of patients who had postoperative histopathological diagnosis and postoperative complications. Twenty-four patients (18 adults and 7 children) had histopathological diagnosis. There were 18 astrocytomas documented, of which 12 were high grade and 6 low grade. The other diagnoses included viral encephalitis, post–renal transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, nonspecific chronic inflammation, Langerhans cell histiocytosis, and two metastases. No case was hindered by cerebrospinal fluid loss or ventricular entry. Complications included a case of mesencephalic hemorrhage with upper limb monoparesis and a case of a partially compromised third cranial nerve in another patient without associated bleeding.

Conclusion Stereotactic biopsy of brainstem lesions by transfrontal ipsilateral or transfrontal transhemispheric contralateral approaches is a safe and effective surgical approach in achieving a histopathological diagnosis in both pediatric and adult populations.

Roles and outcomes of stereotactic biopsy for adult patients with brainstem lesion

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the benefit-risk ratio by determining diagnostic yield and safety of brainstem biopsies in adult patients. The secondary objectives were (i) to compare brainstem biopsy safety and postbiopsy patients' outcomes and survival with those of patients biopsied for a brain or cerebellar lesion, and (ii) to assess the impact of brainstem biopsy on final diagnosis and further therapeutic management.

METHODS

Among 1784 stereotactic biopsies performed in adult patients at a tertiary center between April 2009 and October 2020, we retrospectively examined 50 consecutive brainstem biopsies. We compared variables regarding diagnostic yield, safety and post-biopsy outcomes between brainstem biopsy patients and brain/cerebellum biopsy patients.

RESULTS

Brainstem biopsy led to a diagnosis in 86% of patients (94.6% in patients with suspected tumor). Lesion contrast enhancement on imaging was the sole predictor of obtaining a diagnosis. Rates of symptomatic complications and mortality were significantly higher in brainstem biopsy patients compared to brain/cerebellum biopsy patients (20% vs 0%; p < 0.001 and 6% vs 0%; p = 0.01, respectively). Transfrontal trajectory and prebiopsy swallowing disorders were predictors of brainstem biopsy-related symptomatic complications. Brainstem biopsy findings led to diagnostic change in 22% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Stereotactic biopsy in adult patients with brainstem lesion has a high diagnostic yield. Although stereotactic brainstem biopsy is associated with more functional and fatal complications than biopsies targeting the brain/cerebellum, its safety profile appears acceptable. Thus, the benefit-risk ratio of stereotactic biopsy in patients with brainstem lesion is favorable but should nevertheless be carefully weighted on a case-by-case basis.

The Role of Stereotactic Frame-Based Biopsy for Brainstem Tumors in the Era of Molecular-Based Diagnosis and Treatment Decisions

Stereotactic frame-based brain tumor biopsy (SFB) is a potent diagnostic tool considering its minimal invasiveness, though its diagnostic power and safety for brainstem lesions remain to be discussed. Here, we aimed to examine the usefulness of SFB for brainstem tumors. Twenty-two patients with brainstem tumors underwent 23 SFBs at our institution during 2002–2021. We retrospectively analyzed patient characteristics, tumor pathology, surgical procedures, and outcomes, including surgery-related complications and the diagnostic value. Seven (32%) tumors were located from the midbrain to the pons, eleven (50%) in the pons only, and four (18%) from the pons to the medulla oblongata. The target lesions were in the middle cerebellar peduncles in sixteen procedures (70%), the cerebellum in four (17%), the inferior cerebellar peduncles in two (9%), and the superior cerebellar peduncles in one (4%). A definitive diagnosis was made in 21 patients (95%) at the first SFB. The diagnoses were glioma in seventeen (77%) cases, primary central nervous system lymphoma in four (18%), and a metastatic brain tumor in one (5%). The postoperative complications (cranial nerve palsy in three [13%] cases, ataxia in one [4%]) were all transient. SFB for brainstem tumors yields a high diagnostic rate with a low risk of morbidity.

Indicators of correct targeting in stereotactic biopsy of intracranial lesions

Background:

Confirmation of whether a stereotactic biopsy was performed in the correct site is usually dependent on the frozen section or on novel tumor-specific markers that are not widely available. Immediate postoperative computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) is routinely performed in our service after biopsy. In this retrospective study, we have carefully analyzed these images in an attempt to determine the presence of markers that indicate appropriate targeting.

Methods:

Medical records and neuroimages of patients who underwent stereotactic biopsy of intracranial lesions were reviewed. The following variables were assessed: age, sex, anatomopathology, lesion site, complications, diagnostic accuracy, and the presence of image markers.

Results:

Twenty-nine patients were included in this case series. About 96.6% of the biopsies were accurate according to the permanent section. Of the 86.2% of patients with intralesional pneumocephalus on the postoperative images, 51.7% additionally presented petechial hemorrhage. In 13.8% of the cases, no image markers were identified.

Conclusion:

This is the first report of intralesional pneumocephalus and petechial hemorrhage as indicators of appropriate targeting in stereotactic biopsy. In the majority of the cases, an immediate postoperative head CT, which is widely available, can estimate how adequate the targeting is. To use intralesional pneumocephalus/ petechial hemorrhages as not only postoperative but also as intraoperative markers of appropriate targeting, it is advised that the surgical wound should be temporarily closed and dressed after the biopsy so that the patient can undergo a CT/MR scan and be checked for the presence of theses markers before removing the stereotactic frame.

Management and outcome of pediatric brainstem and cerebellar peduncular low-grade gliomas: a retrospective analysis of 62 cases

PURPOSE

This study was designed to present our experience and recommendations regarding the management of pediatric brainstem and peduncular low-grade gliomas (LGGs).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was performed for pathologically proven brainstem or cerebellar peduncular LGGs in patients admitted between 2014 and 2019. These lesions were classified into the dorsal exophytic, focal brainstem, cervicomedullary, lower peduncular, and upper peduncular groups, and this classification was the basis for the surgical approach for the lesions.

RESULTS

Sixty-two pediatric patients were included, and their distribution among the aforementioned groups were as follows: 12, 12, 3, 16, and 19 cases in the dorsal exophytic, focal brainstem, cervicomedullary, upper peduncular, and lower peduncular groups, respectively. Stereotactic biopsy was performed for all cases in the focal brainstem group, whereas other groups underwent open excision. Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 20 cases (40%), near-total resection (NTR) was achieved in 17 cases (34%), and subtotal resection (STR) was achieved in 13 cases (26%). The extent of GTR and NTR for the upper peduncular, lower peduncular, dorsal exophytic, and cervicomedullary groups were 81.2%, 68.4%,75%, and 66.6%, respectively. Then, 32 cases received chemotherapy. The 3- and 5-year progression-free survival rates were 95% (95% confidence interval (CI) 89.5-100%) and 90.3% (95% CI 79.9-100%), respectively. A significant difference in the 3-year progression-free survival rate was observed between the GTR and NTR groups (p = 0.06; 100% vs. 88.2% (95% CI 72.9-100%)).

CONCLUSION

Surgery plays a definitive curative role in grossly resected cases. Additionally, the role of surgical debulking should be considered, even if GTR is impossible. Meanwhile, chemotherapy showed a beneficial role in patients with focal brainstem lesions and progressive lesions, those with STR, and some patients with NTR.

Frameless robot-assisted stereotactic biopsies for lesions of the brainstem-a series of 103 consecutive biopsies

PURPOSE

Targeted treatment for brainstem lesions requires above all a precise histopathological and molecular diagnosis. In the current technological era, robot-assisted stereotactic biopsies represent an accurate and safe procedure for tissue diagnosis. We present our center's experience in frameless robot-assisted biopsies for brainstem lesions.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients benefitting from a frameless robot-guided stereotactic biopsy at our University Hospital, from 2001 to 2017. Patients consented to the use of data and/or images. The NeuroMate® robot (Renishaw™, UK) was used. We report on lesion location, trajectory strategy, histopathological diagnosis and procedure safety.

RESULTS

Our series encompasses 96 patients (103 biopsies) treated during a 17 years period. Mean age at biopsy: 34.0 years (range 1-78). Most common location: pons (62.1%). Transcerebellar approach: 61 procedures (59.2%). Most common diagnoses: diffuse glioma (67.0%), metastases (7.8%) and lymphoma (6.8%). Non conclusive diagnosis: 10 cases (9.7%). After second biopsy this decreased to 4 cases (4.1%). Overall biopsy diagnostic yield: 95.8%. Permanent disability was recorded in 3 patients (2.9%, all adults), while transient complications in 17 patients (17.7%). Four cases of intra-tumoral hematoma were recorded (one case with rapid decline and fatal issue). Adjuvant targeted treatment was performed in 72.9% of patients. Mean follow-up (in the Neurosurgery Department): 2.2 years.

CONCLUSION

Frameless robot-assisted stereotactic biopsies can provide the initial platform towards a safe and accurate management for brainstem lesions, offering a high diagnostic yield with low permanent morbidity.

Stereotactic Biopsy for Brainstem Lesions: A Meta-analysis with Noncomparative Binary Data

Objectives

To evaluate the diagnostic yield and safety of brainstem stereotactic biopsy for brainstem lesions.

Methods

We performed a meta-analysis of English articles retrieved from the PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and APA psycInfo databases up to May 12, 2021. A binary fixed-effect model, the inverse variance method, or a binary random-effect model, the Dersimonian Laird method, were utilized for pooling the data. This meta-analysis was registered with INPLASY, INPLASY202190034.

Findings

A total of 41 eligible studies with 2792 participants were included. The weighted average diagnostic yield was 97.0% (95% confidential interval [CI], 96.0-97.9%). The weighted average proportions of temporary complications, permanent deficits, and deaths were 6.2% (95% CI, 4.5–7.9%), .5% (95% CI, .2–.8%), and .3% (95% CI, .1–.5%), respectively. The subgroup analysis indicated a nearly identical weighted average diagnostic yield between MRI-guided stereotactic biopsy and CT-guided stereotactic biopsy (95.9% vs 95.8%) but slightly increased proportions of temporary complications (7.9% vs 6.0%), permanent deficits (1.9% vs .2%), and deaths (1.1% vs .4%) in the former compared to the latter. Moreover, a greater weighted average diagnostic yield (99.2% vs 97.6%) and lower proportions of temporary complications (5.1% vs 6.8%) and deaths (.7% vs 1.5%) were shown in the pediatric patient population than in the adult patient population.

Conclusions

Brainstem stereotactic biopsy demonstrates striking accuracy plus satisfying safety in the diagnosis of brainstem lesions. The diagnostic yield, morbidity, and mortality mildly vary based on the diversity of assistant techniques and subject populations.

Severity, timeline, and management of complications after stereotactic brain biopsy

OBJECTIVE

The literature shows discrepancies in stereotactic brain biopsy complication rates, severities, and outcomes. Little is known about the timeline of postbiopsy complications. This study aimed to analyze 1) complications following brain biopsies, using a graded severity scale, and 2) a timeline of complication occurrence. The secondary objectives were to determine factors associated with an increased risk of complications and to assess complication-related management and extra costs.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively examined 1500 consecutive stereotactic brain biopsies performed in adult patients at their tertiary medical center between April 2009 and April 2019.

RESULTS

Three hundred eighty-one biopsies (25.4%) were followed by a complication, including 88.2% of asymptomatic hemorrhages. Symptomatic complications involved 3.0% of the biopsies, and 0.8% of the biopsies were fatal. The severity grading scale had a 97.6% interobserver reproducibility. Twenty-three (51.1%) of the 45 symptomatic complications occurred within the 1st hour following the biopsy, while 75.6% occurred within the first 6 hours. Age ≥ 65 years, second biopsy procedures, gadolinium-enhanced lesions, glioblastomas, and lymphomas were predictors of biopsy-related complications. Brainstem biopsy-targeted lesions and cerebral toxoplasmosis were predictive of mortality. Asymptomatic hemorrhage was associated with delayed (> 6 hours) symptomatic complications. Symptomatic complications led to extended hospitalization in 86.7% of patients. The average extra cost for management of a patient with postbiopsy symptomatic complication was $35,702.

CONCLUSIONS

Symptomatic complications from brain biopsies are infrequent but associated with substantial adverse effects and cost implications for the healthcare system. The use of a severity grading scale, as the authors propose in this article, helps to classify complications according to the therapeutic consequences and the patient's outcome. Because this study indicates that most complications occur within the first few hours following the biopsy, postbiopsy monitoring can be tailored accordingly. The authors therefore recommend systematic monitoring for 2 hours in the recovery unit and a CT scan 2 hours after the end of the biopsy procedure. In addition, they propose a modern algorithm for optimal postoperative management of patients undergoing stereotactic biopsy.

Stereotactic biopsies of brainstem lesions: which approach?

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic biopsies for brainstem lesions are frequently performed to yield an accurate diagnosis and help guide subsequent management. In this study, we summarize our experience with different stereotactic approaches to brainstem lesions of different locations and discuss possible implications for safety and diagnostic yield.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 23 adult patients who underwent a stereotactic biopsy for brainstem lesions between October 2011 and December 2019. Depending on the location supra- or infratentorial, trajectories were planned. We assessed the postoperative complications during the hospital stay as well as the diagnostic yield.

RESULTS

A supratentorial transfrontal approach was used in 16 (70%) cases, predominantly for lesions in the midbrain, upper pons, and medulla oblongata. An infratentorial, transcerebellar-transpeduncular approach was used in 7 (30%) cases mainly for lesions within the lower pons. All biopsies were confirmed to represent pathological tissue and a definitive diagnosis was achieved in 21 cases (91%). Three patients (13%) had transient weakness in the contralateral part of the body in the immediate postoperative period, which improved spontaneously. There was no permanent morbidity or mortality in this series of patients.

CONCLUSION

Lesions of various locations within the brainstem can be successfully targeted via either a supratentorial transfrontal or an infratentorial transcerebellar transpeduncular approach. Our high diagnostic yield of over 90% and the low rate of complications underlines the diagnostic importance of this procedure in order to guide the medical management of these patients.

Outpatient stereotactic brain biopsies

Outpatient neurosurgery is rising popularity leading to patients’ satisfaction and cost-savings. Although several North-American teams have shown the safety of outpatient stereotactic brain biopsies, few data from other countries with different health care systems are available. We therefore conducted a feasibility and safety study on the outpatient stereotactic brain biopsies. We prospectively examined all the consecutive stereotactic brain biopsies performed in an outpatient setting at our tertiary medical center, between June 2018 and September 2020. Among the 437 patients who underwent stereotactic brain biopsy during the study period, 40 (9.2%) patients were enrolled for an outpatient management. The sex ratio was 1 and the median age on biopsy day was 55 [41–66] years. The median distance from patients’ home to hospital was 17 km [3–47]. 95% of patients had pre-biopsy ASA score of 1 or 2 and mRs equal to 2 or less. The rate of same-day discharge was 100%. No patient experienced post-biopsy symptomatic complication necessitating readmission within the month following the biopsy. One patient (2.5%) resorted to an unplanned consultation. Histological findings obtained from brain biopsy led to a diagnosis in all patients; the most frequently found were neoplastic lesions (77.5%). Stereotactic brain biopsies can therefore be safely achieved on an outpatient setting in carefully selected patients. This process could be more widely adopted in other neurosurgical centers, without affecting the quality of patient’s health care and safety. In this article, we propose management guidelines and pre-biopsy checklist for performing ambulatory stereotactic brain biopsies.

The potential of cerebrospinal fluid-based liquid biopsy approaches in CNS tumors

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) may be the best hope for minimally invasive diagnosis and treatment monitoring of central nervous system (CNS) malignancies. Discovery/validation of cell-free nucleic acid and protein biomarkers has the potential to revolutionize CNS cancer care, paving the way for presurgical evaluation, earlier detection of recurrence, and the selection of targeted therapies. While detection of mutations, changes in RNA and miRNA expression, epigenetic alterations, and elevations of protein levels have been detected in the CSF of patients with CNS tumors, most of these biomarkers remain unvalidated. In this review, we focus on the molecular changes that have been identified in a variety of CNS tumors and profile the approaches used to detect these alterations in clinical samples. We further emphasize the importance of systemic collection of CSF and the establishment of standardized collection protocols that will lead to better cross-study biomarker validation and hopefully FDA-approved clinical markers.

Complications of stereotactic biopsy of lesions in the sellar region, pineal gland, and brainstem: A retrospective, single-center study

Stereotactic biopsy (STB) is commonly used in the pathological diagnosis of intracranial lesions. The associated complication and mortality rates are low, but few reports with large sample sizes have assessed the complications of STB for lesions in the brain midline.To evaluate the complications of STB of lesions in the sellar region, pineal region, and brainstem.This was a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent STB of lesions in the sellar region, pineal region, and brainstem at the Neurosurgery Department, Sixth Medical Center, PLA General Hospital, China, between January 2015 and December 2017. The rates of and possible reasons for surgical complications (including bleeding) and mortality were analyzed.A total of 145 patients underwent STB of midline brain lesions, including 16 (11.0%) in the sellar region, 18 (12.4%) in the pineal region, and 111 (76.6%) in the brainstem. Successful biopsy of the sellar region, pineal region, and brainstem was achieved in 16/16 (100%), 18/18 (100%), and 107/111 (96.4%) patients, respectively. There were no complications following STB of lesion in the sellar or pineal regions. Complications occurred in 17/111 patients (15.3%) during/after brainstem biopsy, three of whom died (2.7%). The main clinical manifestations were facioplegia, facial pain, changes in blood pressure and heart rate, and difficulty breathing.STB of lesions in the sellar region, pineal region, and brainstem had a high success rate, but mortality was 2.7%. The occurrence of complications (15.3%) was closely related to the anatomical and functional characteristics of the region biopsied.

Complications after frame-based stereotactic brain biopsy: a systematic review

Stereotactic frame-based brain biopsy is one of the most used procedures to obtain brain tissue. This procedure is usually considered as mini-invasive, quick, efficient, and safe even if results of the different studies are widely heterogenous. The objective of this review of the literature is to describe and analyze the complications of stereotactic frame-based brain biopsy. About 132 articles were found after a research in the Medline database. We only considered English references published between 1994 and June 2019. Additional studies were found by using the references from articles identified in the original search. This systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. After applying exclusion criteria, we eventually considered 25 relevant studies. The mortality rate varies from 0.7 to 4%. Overall morbidity ranges from 3 to 13%. Most of the complications are revealed by the following symptoms: neurological impairment (transient or permanent), seizure, and unconsciousness. Symptomatic hemorrhage range varies from 0.9 to 8.6%, whereas considering asymptomatic bleeding, the range may be up to 59.8%. Complications were clinically evident within minutes to a few hours after the biopsy. Corrective surgeries are very rare (< 1%). Complications occurring after a frame-based stereotactic brain biopsy are rare but with serious side effects. It rarely leads to death or to permanent neurological impairment. Description and classification of complications are often heterogeneous in the literature. The use of a grading scale could help comparisons between series from around the world. Future studies should establish a score that allows neurosurgeon to predict post-biopsy complications.

Clinical tolerance of corticospinal tracts in convection-enhanced delivery to the brainstem

OBJECTIVE

Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) has been explored as a therapeutic strategy for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG). Variables that may affect tolerance include infusate volume, infusion rate, catheter trajectory, and target position. Supratentorial approaches for catheter placement and infusate distribution patterns may conflict with corticospinal tracts (CSTs). The clinical relevance of these anatomical constraints has not been described. The authors report their experience using CED in the brainstem as it relates to anatomical CST conflict and association with clinical tolerance.

METHODS

In a phase I clinical trial of CED for DIPG (clinical trial registration no. NCT01502917, clinicaltrials.gov), a flexible infusion catheter was placed with MRI guidance for infusion of 124I-8H9, a radioimmunotherapeutic agent. Intra- and postprocedural MR images were analyzed to identify catheter trajectories and changes in T2-weighted signal intensity to approximate volume of distribution (Vd). Intersection of CST by the catheter and overlap between Vd and CST were recorded and their correlation with motor deficits was evaluated.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients with a mean age of 7.6 years (range 3.2-18 years) underwent 39 catheter insertions for CED between 2012 and 2017. Thirty catheter insertions had tractography data available for analysis. The mean trajectory length was 105.5 mm (range 92.7-121.6 mm). The mean number of intersections of CST by catheter was 2.2 (range 0-3) and the mean intersecting length was 18.9 mm (range 0-44.2 mm). The first 9 infusions in the highest dose level (range 3.84-4.54 ml infusate) were analyzed for Vd overlap with CST. In this group, the mean age was 7.6 years (range 5.8-10.3 years), the mean trajectory length was 109.5 mm (range 102.6-122.3 mm), and the mean overlap between Vd and CST was 5.5 cm3. For catheter placement-related adverse events, 1 patient (3%) had worsening of a contralateral facial nerve palsy following the procedure with two CST intersections, an intersecting distance of 31.7 mm, and an overlap between Vd and CST of 3.64 cm3. For infusion-related adverse events, transient postinfusion deficits were noted in 3 patients in the highest dose level, with a mean number of 2 intersections of CST by catheter, mean intersecting length of 12.9 mm, and mean overlap between Vd and CST of 6.3 cm3.

CONCLUSIONS

A supratentorial approach to the brainstem crossing the CST resulted in one worsened neurological deficit. There does not appear to be a significant risk requiring avoidance of dominant motor fiber tracts with catheter trajectory planning. There was no correlation between Vd-CST overlap and neurological adverse events in this cohort.Clinical trial registration no.: NCT01502917 (clinicaltrials.gov).

MRI-guided frame-based stereotactic brainstem biopsy procedure: A single-center experience

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

This study aims at presenting our experience of the MRI-guided frame-based stereotactic brainstem biopsy method, and evaluating the outcomes of the procedure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The current study involved 18 cases that underwent MRI-guided frame-based stereotactic biopsy for brainstem lesions between 2011 and 2018 in our clinic. The relevant data regarding the technique of the biopsy procedure, morbidity, histopathological diagnosis it yields and diagnostic accuracy was retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Stereotactic biopsy procedure was performed on 18 patients, including 16 adults and two children. MRI was used as guidance for the biopsy procedure in all patients. The adult patients had the biopsy under local anesthesia; as for the pediatric patients local anesthesia plus sedation was used. All patients received diagnosis based on the histopathological examination of their biopsy samples. No equivocal or negative results, and no major morbidity or mortality was seen in the patients after the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI-guided frame-based stereotactic biopsy can be considered as a safe and efficient diagnostic method for brainstem lesions when its diagnostic yield and its morbidity and/or mortality rates are evaluated. Choosing the best trajectory for each lesion, using MRI as guidance for targeting, taking a limited number of biopsy samples are valuable criteria for the decreased morbidity rates in stereotactic brainstem biopsy procedures.

How is stereotactic brain biopsy evolving? A multicentric analysis of a series of 421 cases treated in Rome over the last sixteen years

OBJECTIVE

In recent decades, frame-based (FBB) and frame-less stereotactic brain biopsy (FLB) have played a crucial role in defining the diagnosis and management of expanding intracranial lesions in critical areas. During the same period, there have been significant advances in diagnostic imaging, a shift in surgical strategies towards extensive resection in gliomas and new molecular classification of brain tumors. Taking these advances into account, we have evaluated whether significant changes have occurred over the last sixteen years of our clinical practice in terms of frequency, indications, target selection, and the histologic results of stereotactic brain biopsy (SBB) procedures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed a series of 421 SBB cases treated between January 2002 and June 2017 in three major neurosurgical institutes in Rome, serving a total of 1.5 million people. Within this series, 94.8% of patients underwent FBB, while, more recently, FLB was performed in 5.2% of cases. The entire period under consideration, running from 2002 to 2017, has been further stratified into four-year time-frames (2002-2005, 2006-2009, 2010-2013, 2014-2017) for the purpose of analysis.

RESULTS

The diagnostic yield was 97%. Final diagnoses revealed tumors in 90% of cases and non-neoplastic masses in 7%, while 3% of cases were not conclusive. The morbidity rate was 3% (12 cases) and mortality was 0.7% (3 cases). Intra-operative frozen sections were made in 78% of biopsies. In our three institutes, the number of SBBs decreased steadily throughout the time-frames under consideration. We have also observed a statistically significant reduction in biopsy procedures in lobar lesions, while those performed on the basal ganglia increased and the number of SBBs of multiple masses and lesions of the corpus callosum remained stable. Primary central nervous system diagnosis of lymphomas (PCNSL) was the sole diagnosis whose incidence increased significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Over the last sixteen years, we have witnessed a significant decrease in SBB procedures and a modification in target selection and histologic results. Despite the significant evolution of neuroimaging, an accurate non-invasive diagnosis of intracranial expanding lesions has not yet been achieved. Furthermore, the most recent WHO classification of brain tumors (2016), which incorporates molecular and morphological features, has boosted the need for molecular processing of tissue samples in all expanding brain lesions. For these reasons, it is likely that SBBs will continue to be performed in specific cases, playing a significant role in diagnostic confirmation by providing tissue samples, so as to better assess the biology and the prognosis of cerebral lesions, as well as their sensitivity to standard radio-chemotherapy or to new molecular target therapies.

Stereotactic Drainage of Brainstem Abscess With the BrainLab Varioguide™ System and the Airo™ Intraoperative CT Scanner: Technical Case Report

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE

Stereotactic biopsies or needle aspirations of posterior fossa lesions are technically challenging. Here we report a novel technique for performing these procedures employing the Airo™ intraoperative computed tomographic (CT) scanner and the VarioGuide™ articulated arm (BrainLab, Munich, Germany).

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

A 62-yr-old woman presented with an irregularly shaped, enhancing lesion of the left pons/middle cerebellar peduncle. Slowed diffusion on magnetic resonance imaging suggested an abscess, but no definitive infectious agent/source could be identified. When the patient deteriorated despite broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy, she was taken to the operating room for stereotactic drainage of the abscess employing the described technique. A specific infectious agent (Eikenella corrodens) was identified from the aspirate, allowing for tailored antibiotic therapy. The procedure was well tolerated and the patient made a full recovery with minimal neurological sequelae.

CONCLUSION

The combination of the Airo™ intraoperative CT and the Varioguide™ articulated arm allows for safe, accurate, and efficient targeting of posterior fossa lesions.

Stereotactic biopsy of cerebellar lesions: straight versus oblique frame positioning

OBJECTIVE

Biospies of brain lesions with unknown entity are an everyday procedure among many neurosurgical departments. Biopsies can be performed frame-guided or frameless. However, cerebellar lesions are a special entity with a more complex approach. All biopsies in this study were performed stereotactically frame guided. Therefore, only biopsies of cerebellar lesions were included in this study. We compared whether the frame was attached straight versus oblique and we focused on diagnostic yield and complication rate.

METHODS

We evaluated 20 patients who underwent the procedure between 2009 and 2017. Median age was 56.5 years. 12 (60%) Patients showed a left sided lesion, 6 (30%) showed a lesion in the right cerebellum and 2 (10%) patients showed a midline lesion.

RESULTS

The stereotactic frame was mounted oblique in 12 (60%) patients and straight in 8 (40%) patients. Postoperative CT scan showed small, clinically silent blood collection in two (10%) of the patients, one (5%) patient showed haemorrhage, which caused a hydrocephalus. He received an external ventricular drain. In both patients with small haemorrhage the frame was positioned straight, while in the patient who showed a larger haemorrhage the frame was mounted oblique. In all patients a final histopathological diagnosis was established.

CONCLUSION

Cerebellar lesions of unknown entity can be accessed transcerebellar either with the stereotactic frame mounted straight or oblique. Also for cerebellar lesions the procedure shows a high diagnostic yield with a low rate of severe complications, which need further treatment.

Biopsies of pediatric brainstem lesions display low morbidity but strong impact on further treatment decisions

OBJECTIVE

The course of malignant brain stem gliomas in childhood is rarely positive. Because of limited therapeutic options and potentially hazardous biopsies oncologist often relay on MRI diagnoses only for further therapy decisions. In this study we show that brain stem biopsies display a low morbidity rate and neuropathological assessment has a considerable impact on further treatment decision.

METHODS

Within 18-months five children with brainstem symptoms and the radiological diagnosis of a malignant brainstem glioma, were identified. From this time point it was possible to analyze all samples with the 450K methylome analysis. Other neuropathological techniques included classical histology with immunohistochemistry. Surgery was performed as biopsy, either microsurgical, frame-guided (Leksell), robot-assisted (ROSA) or navigated (BrainLab, two children).

RESULTS

Mean age of the children was 7.5years (range: newborn to 12years). There was no biopsy-related morbidity or mortality. The mean number of taken samples was 12 (range: 1-25). Histologic diagnosis could be established in all children, however, 450K methylome diagnosis was positive in only two out of five patients.

CONCLUSION

Despite the technically difficult biopsies, all specimens were sufficient for immunohistochemical diagnosis, however, 450K methylome analysis could only be better established where multiple small samples were taken, instead of few larger ones. Based on the preoperative radiological diagnosis suggesting malignant brainstem glioma, all children would have been treated with combined radiation and temozolomid chemotherapy. Nevertheless, due to the availability of histology and molecular diagnostics, individualized therapy could be performed, preventing in two out of five children from unnecessary radiation and chemotherapy.

Benefit and Complications of Frame-Based Stereotactic Biopsy in Old and Very Old Patients

OBJECTIVE

Stereotactic biopsy is an everyday procedure implemented in numerous neurosurgical departments. The procedure is performed to obtain tumor tissue of unclear diagnosis. Going in hand with low complication rates and high diagnostic yield, stereotactic biopsies can be performed in adults and children likewise for histopathologic evaluation of lesions in eloquent localizations. However, little is known about whether aged patients do benefit from stereotactic biopsy or rather the therapy that is derived from histopathologic results. In this study, we therefore focused on old (80-84 years) and very old patients (85 years and older) to evaluate whether stereotactic biopsy should be performed leading to further therapy. We also assessed the complication rates of the procedure in this aged population.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of our database and included all patients older than 80 years who underwent stereotactic biopsy at our department from October 2005 until May 2016. Forty-seven patients were included in this study. These patients were divided into 2 subgroups: group 1 consisted of patients from 80 to 84 years old and group 2 of patients aged 85 years and older. All patients underwent stereotactic biopsy to establish histopathologic diagnosis. We excluded patients who underwent cyst puncture or puncture of a hemorrhage because the procedure was not performed for diagnostic purposes. We assessed gender, neuroradiologic diagnosis, Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS), number of tissue samples taken, histopathologic diagnosis, localization, postoperative hemorrhage, modality of anesthesia anticoagulation, and further therapy.

RESULTS

Group 1 consisted of 34 patients and group 2 of 13 patients. KPS was 80 and 70, respectively. A histopathologic diagnosis was possible in all but 1 patient. In group 1, 61.8% of the patients agreed to further postoperative therapy (radiation, 35.3%; chemotherapy, 11.8%; combined radiochemotherapy, 11.8%; complication that prevented therapy, 2.9%), as did 53.8% of the patients in group 2 (resection, 7.7%; radiation, 15.4%; combined radiochemotherapy, 30.7%). In group 1, 38.2% declined further therapy, as did 64.1% in group 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Also in old and very old patients, a final histopathologic diagnosis should be established to provide adequate therapy. Our data show that most of these aged patients want to be treated.

Robot-Assisted Stereotactic Biopsy of Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma: A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is a childhood tumor with a dismal prognosis. Emerging molecular signatures have paved the way for stereotactic biopsy in selected centers. We present our experience in DIPG stereotactic needle biopsy using the Robotic Stereotactic-Assisted system (ROSA) in a series of consecutive pediatric patients.

METHODS

All stereotactic biopsy procedures for DIPG performed during the last year at our institution were considered. All procedures were carried out using the ROSA surgical assistant through a precoronary approach. All children underwent a postoperative computed tomography scan to document possible surgical complications and confirm the site of biopsy. Postoperative clinical changes were recorded to test morbidity of the procedure.

RESULTS

In the last year, we performed 7 pontine needle biopsies. Specimens were diagnostic and useful for molecular analysis in all cases. No surgical complications were observed. One child showed a transient neurologic worsening related to the biopsy that resolved within 2 weeks. The combination of the precoronary approach and use of the stereotactic ROSA system allowed single-session surgeries in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Pontine biopsy for DIPG is a safe procedure in selected centers. The advantages of the single-session procedure we described might be of particular interest in the pediatric setting.