1
|
Acute Hematological Toxicity during Cranio-Spinal Proton Therapy in Pediatric Brain Embryonal Tumors. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14071653. [PMID: 35406425 PMCID: PMC8997073 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2022] [Revised: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Embryonal tumors represent a heterogeneous entity of brain tumors that need a multidisciplinary treatment including cranio-spinal irradiation (CSI), with a known impact on the acute toxicity. Proton therapy (PT) boasts a reduction in acute hematological toxicity. METHODS We retrospectively examined 20 pediatric patients affected by high-risk medulloblastoma and other rare embryonal brain tumors subjected to CSI with PT from September 2016 to April 2020. Before CSI, all patients received induction chemotherapy, and three patients additionally received two high-dose courses with thiotepa, followed by an autologous haemopoietic stem cell transplantation. We recorded the total white blood cell count, absolute neutrophil count, platelets, and hemoglobin levels for all patients during PT. RESULTS Leucocytes and neutrophils decreased directly after the beginning of treatment, reaching a complete recovery at the end of treatment. Hemoglobin values remained constant over the treatment course. The median platelet value decreased until reaching a plateau around halfway through therapy, followed by a slow increase. No cases of febrile neutropenia or severe infections were reported. No treatment discontinuation due to hematological toxicity was necessary. CONCLUSIONS CSI with PT was proven to be safe in this setting of pediatric patients. Our study showed that despite all patients having undergone chemotherapy prior to irradiation, no serious hematological toxicity was reported at the end of the treatment with PT, and, therefore, no treatment was discontinued or delayed.
Collapse
|
2
|
Agrawal R, Goel V, Anand A, Arora RS. Deviation from delivery of radiation therapy to childhood cancer patients: A retrospective audit. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2022; 69:e29462. [PMID: 34842336 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.29462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Planning and coordination of the delivery of radiation therapy (RT) can be challenging in resource-limited settings. In this retrospective study, we describe the profile of children undergoing radiation and analyze deviation from some accepted norms. PROCEDURE Data on all children (<18 years of age) with cancer who completed RT from January 2009 to December 2019 were retrieved. Diagnostic groups with more than five patients were included in the analysis for deviations in RT (time to start [TTS]; total dose delivered [TDD] in gray; and time to complete [TTC]). We investigated reasons for deviation. RESULTS Two hundred seven children received RT as front-line treatment (68% Indian, 59% male). Most common diagnoses were brain tumors (44%), lymphomas (13%), leukemias, and soft tissue sarcomas (10% each). TTS deviation was seen in 23.6%, TTD in 6.0%, and TTC in 24.7%, while 43.4% had at least one deviation in any of these three parameters. Deviation in TTS varied significantly by location of preceding treatment and by cancer (greatest deviation in sarcomas), with issues around access to health care being the most common reason. Deviation in TTC varied significantly by cancer (greatest deviation in sarcomas and medulloblastoma), with myelotoxicity being the most common reason. CONCLUSIONS Our study adds to the limited literature on RT quality for children with cancer in resource-limited settings. Certain cancers (sarcomas and medulloblastomas) and patient groups (preceding treatment outside our institute) had the maximum deviation. Barriers to accessing care and myelotoxicity were the two main reasons for this deviation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rashi Agrawal
- Max Institute of Cancer Care, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Vaishali, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Vineeta Goel
- Max Institute of Cancer Care, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Shalimar Bagh, New Delhi, India
| | - Anil Anand
- Max Institute of Cancer Care, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Saket, New Delhi, India
| | - Ramandeep Singh Arora
- Max Institute of Cancer Care, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Saket, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hau P, Frappaz D, Hovey E, McCabe MG, Pajtler KW, Wiestler B, Seidel C, Combs SE, Dirven L, Klein M, Anazodo A, Hattingen E, Hofer S, Pfister SM, Zimmer C, Kortmann RD, Sunyach MP, Tanguy R, Effeney R, von Deimling A, Sahm F, Rutkowski S, Berghoff AS, Franceschi E, Pineda E, Beier D, Peeters E, Gorlia T, Vanlancker M, Bromberg JEC, Gautier J, Ziegler DS, Preusser M, Wick W, Weller M. Development of Randomized Trials in Adults with Medulloblastoma-The Example of EORTC 1634-BTG/NOA-23. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13143451. [PMID: 34298664 PMCID: PMC8303185 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13143451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Medulloblastoma is rare after puberty. Among several molecular subgroups that have been described, the sonic hedgehog (SHH) subgroup is highly overrepresented in the post-pubertal population and can be targeted with smoothened (SMO) inhibitors. However, no practice-changing prospective clinical trials have been published in adults to date. Tumors often recur, and treatment toxicity is relevant. Thus, the EORTC 1634-BTG/NOA-23 trial for post-pubertal patients with standard risk medulloblastoma will aim to increase treatment efficacy and to decrease treatment toxicity. Patients will be randomized between standard-dose vs. reduced-dosed radiotherapy, and SHH-subgroup patients will also be randomized between the SMO inhibitor sonidegib (OdomzoTM,, Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries, Inc., New York, USA) in addition to standard radio-chemotherapy vs. standard radio-chemotherapy alone. In ancillary studies, we will investigate tumor tissue, blood and cerebrospinal fluid samples, magnetic resonance images, and radiotherapy plans to gain information that may improve future treatment. Patients will also be monitored long-term for late side effects of therapy, health-related quality of life, cognitive function, social and professional live outcomes, and reproduction and fertility. In summary, EORTC 1634-BTG/NOA-23 is a unique multi-national effort that will help to council patients and clinical scientists for the appropriate design of treatments and future clinical trials for post-pubertal patients with medulloblastoma. Abstract Medulloblastoma is a rare brain malignancy. Patients after puberty are rare and bear an intermediate prognosis. Standard treatment consists of maximal resection plus radio-chemotherapy. Treatment toxicity is high and produces disabling long-term side effects. The sonic hedgehog (SHH) subgroup is highly overrepresented in the post-pubertal and adult population and can be targeted by smoothened (SMO) inhibitors. No practice-changing prospective randomized data have been generated in adults. The EORTC 1634-BTG/NOA-23 trial will randomize patients between standard-dose vs. reduced-dosed craniospinal radiotherapy and SHH-subgroup patients between the SMO inhibitor sonidegib (OdomzoTM, Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries, Inc., New York, USA) in addition to standard radio-chemotherapy vs. standard radio-chemotherapy alone to improve outcomes in view of decreased radiotherapy-related toxicity and increased efficacy. We will further investigate tumor tissue, blood, and cerebrospinal fluid as well as magnetic resonance imaging and radiotherapy plans to generate information that helps to further improve treatment outcomes. Given that treatment side effects typically occur late, long-term follow-up will monitor classic side effects of therapy, but also health-related quality of life, cognition, social and professional outcome, and reproduction and fertility. In summary, we will generate unprecedented data that will be translated into treatment changes in post-pubertal patients with medulloblastoma and will help to design future clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Hau
- Wilhelm Sander-NeuroOncology Unit, Regensburg University Hospital, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Regensburg University Hospital, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-941-944-18750
| | - Didier Frappaz
- Neuro-Oncology Unit, Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France;
| | - Elizabeth Hovey
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sydney 2052, Australia;
- Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Cancer Centre, Sydney 2031, Australia;
| | - Martin G. McCabe
- Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M20 4GJ, UK;
| | - Kristian W. Pajtler
- Hopp-Children’s Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (K.W.P.); (S.M.P.)
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Benedikt Wiestler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, TUM School of Medicine, 81675 Munich, Germany; (B.W.); (C.Z.)
| | - Clemens Seidel
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (C.S.); (R.-D.K.)
| | - Stephanie E. Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, TUM School of Medicine, 81675 Munich, Germany;
| | - Linda Dirven
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands;
- Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, 2501 CK The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Martin Klein
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
- Brain Tumor Center Amsterdam at Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Antoinette Anazodo
- Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Cancer Centre, Sydney 2031, Australia;
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Sydney 2031, Australia;
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2031, Australia
| | - Elke Hattingen
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany;
| | - Silvia Hofer
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; (S.H.); (M.W.)
| | - Stefan M. Pfister
- Hopp-Children’s Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (K.W.P.); (S.M.P.)
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Claus Zimmer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, TUM School of Medicine, 81675 Munich, Germany; (B.W.); (C.Z.)
| | - Rolf-Dieter Kortmann
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (C.S.); (R.-D.K.)
| | - Marie-Pierre Sunyach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Leon Berard, 69008 Lyon, France; (M.-P.S.); (R.T.)
| | - Ronan Tanguy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Leon Berard, 69008 Lyon, France; (M.-P.S.); (R.T.)
| | - Rachel Effeney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane 4029, Australia;
| | - Andreas von Deimling
- Department of Neuropathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (A.v.D.); (F.S.)
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), German Cancer Research, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix Sahm
- Department of Neuropathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (A.v.D.); (F.S.)
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), German Cancer Research, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Rutkowski
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany;
| | - Anna S. Berghoff
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (A.S.B.); (M.P.)
| | - Enrico Franceschi
- Medical Oncology Department, Azienda USL/IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, 40139 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Estela Pineda
- Barcelona Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapeutics in Solid Tumors Group, Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Dagmar Beier
- Department of Neurology, Odense University Hospital, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark;
| | - Ellen Peeters
- EORTC Headquarters, 1200 Brussels, Belgium; (E.P.); (T.G.); (M.V.)
| | - Thierry Gorlia
- EORTC Headquarters, 1200 Brussels, Belgium; (E.P.); (T.G.); (M.V.)
| | | | - Jacoline E. C. Bromberg
- Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Department of Neuro-Oncology, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Julien Gautier
- Clinical Research Department, Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France;
| | - David S. Ziegler
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Sydney 2031, Australia;
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2031, Australia
- Children’s Cancer Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2031, Australia
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (A.S.B.); (M.P.)
| | - Wolfgang Wick
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuro-Oncology, German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), German Cancer Research, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; (S.H.); (M.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu IC, Holtzman AL, Rotondo RL, Indelicato DJ, Gururangan S, Cavaliere R, Carter B, Morris CG, Tavanaiepour D, Rutenberg MS. Proton therapy for adult medulloblastoma: Acute toxicity and disease control outcomes. J Neurooncol 2021; 153:467-476. [PMID: 34105033 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-021-03783-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We report disease control, survival outcomes, and treatment-related toxicity among adult medulloblastoma patients who received proton craniospinal irradiation (CSI) as part of multimodality therapy. METHODS We reviewed 20 adults with medulloblastoma (≥ 22 years old) who received postoperative proton CSI ± chemotherapy between 2008 and 2020. Patient, disease, and treatment details and prospectively obtained patient-reported acute CSI toxicities were collected. Acute hematologic data were analyzed. RESULTS Median age at diagnosis was 27 years; 45% of patients had high-risk disease; 75% received chemotherapy, most (65%) after CSI. Eight (40%) patients received concurrent vincristine with radiotherapy. Median CSI dose was 36GyE with a median tumor bed boost of 54GyE. Median duration of radiotherapy was 44 days. No acute ≥ grade 3 gastrointestinal or hematologic toxicities attributable to CSI occurred. Grade 2 nausea and vomiting affected 25% and 5% of patients, respectively, while 36% developed acute grade 2 hematologic toxicity (36% grade 2 leukopenia and 7% grade 2 neutropenia). Those receiving concurrent chemotherapy with CSI had a 38% rate of grade 2 hematologic toxicity compared to 33% among those not receiving concurrent chemotherapy. Among patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 13), 100% completed ≥ 4 cycles and 85% completed all planned cycles. With a median follow-up of 3.1 years, 4-year actuarial local control, disease-free survival, and overall survival rates were 90%, 90%, and 95%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Proton CSI in adult medulloblastoma patients is very well tolerated and shows promising disease control and survival outcomes. These data support the standard use of proton CSI for adult medulloblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I-Chia Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, 2015 North Jefferson Street, Jacksonville, FL, 32206, USA
| | - Adam L Holtzman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, 2015 North Jefferson Street, Jacksonville, FL, 32206, USA
| | - Ronny L Rotondo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Daniel J Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, 2015 North Jefferson Street, Jacksonville, FL, 32206, USA
| | - Sridharan Gururangan
- Department of Neurosurgery and the Preston A. Wells Jr. Center for Brain Tumor Therapy, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | | | - Bridgette Carter
- University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Christopher G Morris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, 2015 North Jefferson Street, Jacksonville, FL, 32206, USA
| | - Daryoush Tavanaiepour
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida College of Medicine Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Michael S Rutenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, 2015 North Jefferson Street, Jacksonville, FL, 32206, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ala RT, Yener G, Özer E, Men S, Bülbül HM, Yaman A, Söylev Bajin M, Colakoglu BD, Akdal G, Halmágyi GM. Adult Spinal Primary Leptomeningeal Medulloblastoma Presenting as Pseudotumour Cerebri Syndrome. Neuroophthalmology 2020; 45:205-210. [PMID: 34194127 DOI: 10.1080/01658107.2020.1791191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
A previously well 34-year-old man presented with severe pseudotumour cerebri. Imaging showed that he had a cauda equina tumour which proved to be a medulloblastoma. There was no tumour mass in the posterior fossa so we assume that this was a primary leptomeningeal medulloblastoma. In patients with somewhat atypical pseudotumour, spinal imaging should always be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahmi Tümay Ala
- Department of Neurology, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Görsev Yener
- Department of Neurology, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir, Turkey.,Department of Neurology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Erdener Özer
- International Biomedicine and Genome Center, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Süleyman Men
- Department of Pathology, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir, Turkey
| | | | - Aylin Yaman
- Department of Radiology, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir, Turkey
| | | | | | - Gülden Akdal
- Department of Neurology, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir, Turkey.,Department of Ophthalmology, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Gábor Michael Halmágyi
- Department of Neuroscience, Institute of Health Sciences, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lőcsei Z, Farkas R, Borbásné Farkas K, Sebestyén K, Sebestyén Z, Musch Z, Vojcek Á, Benedek N, Mangel L, Ottóffy G. Assessment of the results and hematological side effects of 3D conformal and IMRT/ARC therapies delivered during craniospinal irradiation of childhood tumors with a follow-up period of five years. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:702. [PMID: 32727407 PMCID: PMC7388493 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07168-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2019] [Accepted: 07/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) of childhood tumors with the RapidArc technique is a new method of treatment. Our objective was to compare the acute hematological toxicity pattern during 3D conformal radiotherapy with the application of the novel technique. Methods Data from patients treated between 2007 and 2014 were collected, and seven patients were identified in both treatment groups. After establishing a general linear model, acute blood toxicity results were obtained using SPSS software. Furthermore, the exposure dose of the organs at risk was compared. Patients were followed for a minimum of 5 years, and progression-free survival and overall survival data were assessed. Results After assessment of the laboratory parameters in the two groups, it may be concluded that no significant differences were detected in terms of the mean dose exposures of the normal tissues or the acute hematological side effects during the IMRT/ARC and 3D conformal treatments. Laboratory parameters decreased significantly compared to the baseline values during the treatment weeks. Nevertheless, no significant differences were detected between the two groups. No remarkable differences were confirmed between the two groups regarding the five-year progression-free survival or overall survival, and no signs of serious organ toxicity due to irradiation were observed during the follow-up period in either of the groups. Conclusion The RapidArc technique can be used safely even in the treatment of childhood tumors, as the extent of the exposure dose in normal tissues and the amount of acute hematological side effects are not higher with this technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoltán Lőcsei
- Clinical Center, Department of Oncotherapy, University of Pécs, Édesanyák útja 17, Pécs, 7624, Hungary.
| | - Róbert Farkas
- Oncoradiology Center, Uzsoki Hospital, Uzsoki u. 29-41, Budapest, 1145, Hungary
| | - Kornélia Borbásné Farkas
- Unicersity of Pécs, Medical School, Institute of Bioanalysis, Szigeti út 12, Pécs, 7624, Hungary
| | - Klára Sebestyén
- Clinical Center, Department of Oncotherapy, University of Pécs, Édesanyák útja 17, Pécs, 7624, Hungary
| | - Zsolt Sebestyén
- Clinical Center, Department of Oncotherapy, University of Pécs, Édesanyák útja 17, Pécs, 7624, Hungary
| | - Zoltán Musch
- Clinical Center, Department of Oncotherapy, University of Pécs, Édesanyák útja 17, Pécs, 7624, Hungary
| | - Ágnes Vojcek
- Oncology Unit, Clinical Center, Department of Pediatrics Pécs, University of Pécs, József Attila út 7, Pécs, 7623, Hungary
| | - Noémi Benedek
- Oncology Unit, Clinical Center, Department of Pediatrics Pécs, University of Pécs, József Attila út 7, Pécs, 7623, Hungary
| | - László Mangel
- Clinical Center, Department of Oncotherapy, University of Pécs, Édesanyák útja 17, Pécs, 7624, Hungary
| | - Gábor Ottóffy
- Oncology Unit, Clinical Center, Department of Pediatrics Pécs, University of Pécs, József Attila út 7, Pécs, 7623, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Madan R, Kumar N, Gupta A, Gupta K, Salunke P, Khosla D, Yadav BS, Kapoor R. Effect of prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) on acute hematological toxicity in medulloblastoma patients during craniospinal irradiation (CSI). Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2020; 196:105975. [PMID: 32505868 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2020] [Revised: 02/24/2020] [Accepted: 05/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Haematological toxicity and treatment breaks are common during cranio-spinal irradiation (CSI) due to irradiation of large volume of bone marrow. We conducted this study to see the effect of prophylactic granulocyte colony stimulating factor (GCSF) in reducing treatment breaks. PATIENTS AND METHODS The study was conducted over a period of 15 months from August 2017 to November 2018. Histopathologically proven Medulloblastoma patients received prophylactic GCSF during CSI. Acute hematological toxicities and treatment breaks were noted and effect of age and pretreatment blood counts were analyzed by SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) version 23. RESULTS A total of 28 patients were included in the study. During CSI, hematological toxicity leading to treatment breaks was observed in 11 (39.3 %) patients, of which grade 3 and 2 toxicities were seen in ten and one patients respectively. Younger age (<10 years) at diagnosis was significantly associated with the development of hematological toxicity (p = 0.028, Chi-Square). No correlation was found with pre-treatment blood counts. CONCLUSION Prophylactic use of GCSF may be effective in preventing radiation induced hematological toxicity and treatment breaks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Madan
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | - N Kumar
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
| | - A Gupta
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | - K Gupta
- Department of Pathology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | - P Salunke
- Department of Neurosurgery, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | - D Khosla
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | - B S Yadav
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | - R Kapoor
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nie YH, Liu XD, Huang R, Xie DF, Yin WJ, Guan H, Yu ZJ, Zhou PK. Analysis of mRNA Expression Patterns in Peripheral Blood Cells of 3 Patients With Cancer After the First Fraction of 2 Gy Irradiation: An Integrated Case Report and Systematic Review. Dose Response 2019; 17:1559325819833474. [PMID: 30833875 PMCID: PMC6393837 DOI: 10.1177/1559325819833474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2018] [Revised: 12/12/2018] [Accepted: 01/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Radiation therapy induces acute and chronic radiological toxicity, in particular hematological toxicity (HT). This study aimed to explore the mechanistic clue and potential predictors at the messenger RNA (mRNA) level. Materials and Methods Peripheral blood was collected from 3 patients with cervical cancer (CC), nasopharynx cancer (NC), and tongue cancer (TC) after the first 2 Gy fraction of radiotherapy (RT). High-throughput sequencing was used to assess mRNA profiles. Results Eleven genes, such as ALAS2(5-aminolevulinate synthase), SLC4A1(solute carrier family 4 member 1), HBG2(hemoglobin subunit gamma 2), TNFAIP3 (TNF α-induced protein 3), PER1 (period circadian clock 1), CCDC136 (coiled-coil domain containing 136), C9orf84 (chromosome 9 open reading frame 84), IL1B (interleukin 1β), FOSB (FosB protooncogene), NR4A2 (nuclear receptor subfamily 4), PARP15 (polymerase family member 15), had overlapping expression changes in all 3 cancers of which 3 (ALAS2, FOSB, and HBG2) are suggested as potential predictors for the early diagnosis of HT after RT. Conclusions ALAS2, FOSB, and HBG2 may be useful predictors of HT in patients after RT. Eleven overlapping expression mRNAs among 3 cancers might be potential predictors for early diagnosis of radiation toxicity in patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue-Hua Nie
- Department of Tumor Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital, University of South China, Hengyang, China
| | - Xiao-Dan Liu
- Department of Radiation Biology, Beijing Key Laboratory for Radiobiology, Beijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Ruixue Huang
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Da-Fei Xie
- Department of Radiation Biology, Beijing Key Laboratory for Radiobiology, Beijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Wen-Jun Yin
- Department of Tumor Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital, University of South China, Hengyang, China
| | - Hua Guan
- Department of Radiation Biology, Beijing Key Laboratory for Radiobiology, Beijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Zi-Jian Yu
- Department of Tumor Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital, University of South China, Hengyang, China
| | - Ping-Kun Zhou
- Department of Radiation Biology, Beijing Key Laboratory for Radiobiology, Beijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, Beijing, China.,Institute for Chemical Carcinogenesis, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
2-O, 3-O desulfated heparin mitigates murine chemotherapy- and radiation-induced thrombocytopenia. Blood Adv 2019; 2:754-761. [PMID: 29599195 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2017013672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2017] [Accepted: 01/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Thrombocytopenia is a significant complication of chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Platelet factor 4 (PF4; CXCL4) is a negative paracrine of megakaryopoiesis. We have shown that PF4 levels are inversely related to steady-state platelet counts, and to the duration and severity of chemotherapy- and radiation-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT and RIT, respectively). Murine studies suggest that blocking the effect of PF4 improves megakaryopoiesis, raising nadir platelet counts and shortening the time to platelet count recovery. We examined the ability of 2-O, 3-O desulfated heparin (ODSH), a heparin variant with little anticoagulant effects, to neutralize PF4's effects on megakaryopoiesis. Using megakaryocyte colony assays and liquid cultures, we show that ODSH restored megakaryocyte proliferation in PF4-treated Cxcl4-/- murine and human CD34+-derived megakaryocyte cultures (17.4% megakaryocyte colonies, P < .01 compared with PF4). In murine CIT and RIT models, ODSH, started 24 hours after injury, was examined for the effect on hematopoietic recovery demonstrating higher platelet count nadirs (9% ± 5% treated vs 4% ± 4% control) and significantly improved survival in treated animals (73% treated vs 36% control survival). Treatment with ODSH was able to reduce intramedullary free PF4 concentrations by immunohistochemical analysis. In summary, ODSH mitigated CIT and RIT in mice by neutralizing the intramedullary negative paracrine PF4. ODSH, already in clinical trials in humans as an adjuvant to chemotherapy, may be an important, clinically relevant therapeutic for CIT and RIT.
Collapse
|
10
|
El Shafie RA, Böhm K, Weber D, Lang K, Schlaich F, Adeberg S, Paul A, Haefner MF, Katayama S, Sterzing F, Hörner-Rieber J, Löw S, Herfarth K, Debus J, Rieken S, Bernhardt D. Outcome and prognostic factors following palliative craniospinal irradiation for leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. Cancer Manag Res 2019; 11:789-801. [PMID: 30697071 PMCID: PMC6340499 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s182154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC) is a severe complication of metastatic tumor spread to the central nervous system. Prognosis is dismal with a median overall survival (OS) of ~10–15 weeks. Treatment options include radiotherapy (RT) to involved sites, systemic chemo- or targeted therapy, intrathecal chemotherapy and best supportive care with dexamethasone. Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) is a more aggressive radiotherapeutic approach, for which very limited data exists. Here, we report on our 10-year experience with palliative CSI of selected patients with LC. Patients and methods Twenty-five patients received CSI for the treatment of LC at our institution between 2008 and 2018. Patients were selected individually for CSI based on clinical performance, presenting symptoms and estimated benefit. Median patient age was 53 years (IQR: 45–59), and breast cancer was the most common primary. Additional brain metastases were found in 18 patients (72.0%). RT was delivered at a TomoTherapy machine, using helical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). The most commonly prescribed dose was 36 Gy in 20 fractions, corresponding to a median biologically equivalent dose of 40.8 Gy (IQR: 39.0–2.5). Clinical performance and neurologic function were assessed before and in response to therapy, and deficits were retrospectively quantified on the 5-point neurologic function scale (NFS). A Cox proportional hazards model with univariate and multivariate analyses was fitted for survival. Results Twenty-one patients died and four were alive at the time of analysis. Median OS from LC diagnosis was 19.3 weeks (IQR: 9.3–34.0, 95% CI: 11.0–32.0). In univariate analysis, a Karnofsky performance scale index (KPI) ≥70% (P=0.001), age ≤55 years at LC diagnosis (P=0.022), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein <100 mg/dL (P=0.018) and no more than mild or moderate neurologic deficits (NFS ≤2; P=0.007) were predictive of longer OS. So were the neurologic response to treatment (P=0.018) and the application of systemic therapy after RT completion (P=0.029). The presence of CSF flow obstruction was predictive of shorter OS (P=0.026). In multivariate analysis, age at LC diagnosis (P=0.018), KPI (P<0.001) and neurologic response (P=0.037) remained as independent prognostic factors for longer OS. Treatment-associated toxicity was manageable and mostly grades I and II according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0. Eight patients (32%) developed grade III myelosuppression. Neurologic symptom stabilization could be achieved in 40.0% and a sizeable improvement in 28.0% of all patients. Conclusion CSI for the treatment of LC is feasible and may have therapeutic value in carefully selected patients, alleviating symptoms or delaying neurologic deterioration. OS after CSI was comparable to the rates described in current literature for patients with LC. The use of modern irradiation techniques such as helical IMRT is warranted to limit toxicity. Patient selection should take into account prognostic factors such as age, clinical performance, neurologic function and the availability of systemic treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rami A El Shafie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany,
| | - Karina Böhm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany,
| | - Dorothea Weber
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics (IMBI), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Kristin Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany,
| | - Fabian Schlaich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany,
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany,
| | - Angela Paul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,Heavy Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Matthias F Haefner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany,
| | - Sonja Katayama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany,
| | - Florian Sterzing
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Kempten, Kempten 87439, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany,
| | - Sarah Löw
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,Heavy Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,Heavy Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,Heavy Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Denise Bernhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany,
| |
Collapse
|