Extent of resection and Carmustine wafer implantation safely improve survival in patients with a newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a single center experience of the current practice

Contemporary strategies in glioblastoma therapy: Recent developments and innovations

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) represents one of the most prevailing and aggressive primary brain tumors among adults. Despite advances in therapeutic approaches, the complex microenvironment of GBM poses significant challenges in its optimal therapy, which are attributed to immune evasion, tumor repopulation by stem cells, and limited drug penetration across the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Nanotechnology has emerged as a promising avenue for GBM treatment, offering biosafety, sustained drug release, enhanced solubility, and improved BBB penetrability. In this review, a comprehensive overview of recent advancements in nanocarrier-based drug delivery systems for GBM therapy is emphasized. The conventional and novel treatment modalities for GBM and the potential of nanocarriers to overcome existing limitations are comprehensively covered. Furthermore, the updates in the clinical landscape of GBM therapeutics are presented in addition to the current status of drugs and patents in the same context. Through a critical evaluation of existing literature, the therapeutic prospect and limitations of nanocarrier-based drug delivery strategies are highlighted offering insights into future research directions and clinical translation.

Is Carmustine Wafer Implantation in Progressive High-Grade Gliomas a Relevant Therapeutic Option? Complication Rate, Predictors of Complications and Onco-Functional Outcomes in a Series of 53 Cases

Background/Objectives: The aim was to determine the complication rate and the predictors of complications and survival in high-grade glioma surgically managed at progression with implantation of Carmustine wafers. Methods: A retrospective series of 53 consecutive patients operated on between 2017 and 2022 was built. Results: The median age was 55 ± 10.9 years. The rates of global and infectious complications were 35.8% and 18.9%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, patients with a preoperative neurological deficit were more prone to develop a postoperative complication (HR = 5.35 95% CI 1.49-19.26, p = 0.01). No predictor of infectious complication was identified. In the grade 4 glioma subgroup (n = 44), progression-free and overall survival (calculated starting from the reresection) reached 3.95 months, 95% CI 2.92-5.21 and 11.51 months, 95% CI 9.11-17.18, respectively. Preoperative KPS > 80% (HR = 0.97 95% CI 0.93-0.99, p = 0.04), Gross Total Resection (HR = 0.38 95% CI 0.18-0.80, p = 0.01), and 3-month postoperative KPS > 80% (HR = 0.35 95% CI 0.17-0.72, p = 0.004) were predictors of prolonged overall survival. Conclusions: Surgical resection is a relevant option in high-grade gliomas at progression, especially in patients with a preoperative KPS > 80%, without preoperative neurological deficit, and amenable to complete resection. In patients elected for surgery, Carmustine wafer implantation is associated with a high rate of complications. It is consequently critical to closely monitor the patients for whom this option is chosen.

Improving glioma drug delivery: A multifaceted approach for glioma drug development

Glioma is one of the most common central nervous system (CNS) cancers that can be found within the brain and the spinal cord. One of the pressing issues plaguing the development of therapeutics for glioma originates from the selective and semipermeable CNS membranes: the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and blood-spinal cord barrier (BSCB). It is difficult to bypass these membranes and target the desired cancerous tissue because the purpose of the BBB and BSCB is to filter toxins and foreign material from invading CNS spaces. There are currently four varieties of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drug treatment for glioma; yet these therapies have limitations including, but not limited to, relatively low transmission through the BBB/BSCB, despite pharmacokinetic characteristics that allow them to cross the barriers. Steps must be taken to improve the development of novel and repurposed glioma treatments through the consideration of pharmacological profiles and innovative drug delivery techniques. This review addresses current FDA-approved glioma treatments' gaps, shortcomings, and challenges. We then outline how incorporating computational BBB/BSCB models and innovative drug delivery mechanisms will help motivate clinical advancements in glioma drug delivery. Ultimately, considering these attributes will improve the process of novel and repurposed drug development in glioma and the efficacy of glioma treatment.

Prognostic significance of MRI contrast enhancement in newly diagnosed glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype according to WHO 2021 classification

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Contrast enhancement in glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype is common but not systematic. In the era of the WHO 2021 Classification of CNS Tumors, the prognostic impact of a contrast enhancement and the pattern of contrast enhancement is not clearly elucidated.

METHODS

We performed an observational, retrospective, single-centre cohort study at a tertiary neurosurgical oncology centre (January 2006 - December 2022). We screened adult patients with a newly-diagnosed glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype in order to assess the prognosis role of the contrast enhancement and the pattern of contrast enhancement.

RESULTS

We included 1149 glioblastomas, IDH-wildtype: 26 (2.3%) had a no contrast enhancement, 45 (4.0%) had a faint and patchy contrast enhancement, 118 (10.5%) had a nodular contrast enhancement, and 960 (85.5%) had a ring-like contrast enhancement. Overall survival was longer in non-contrast enhanced glioblastomas (26.7 months) than in contrast enhanced glioblastomas (10.9 months) (p < 0.001). In contrast enhanced glioblastomas, a ring-like pattern was associated with shorter overall survival than in faint and patchy and nodular patterns (10.0 months versus 13.0 months, respectively) (p = 0.033). Whatever the presence of a contrast enhancement and the pattern of contrast enhancement, surgical resection was an independent predictor of longer overall survival, while age ≥ 70 years, preoperative KPS score < 70, tumour volume ≥ 30cm3, and postoperative residual contrast enhancement were independent predictors of shorter overall survival.

CONCLUSION

A contrast enhancement is present in the majority (97.7%) of glioblastomas, IDH-wildtype and, regardless of the pattern, is associated with a shorter overall survival. The ring-like pattern of contrast enhancement is typical in glioblastomas, IDH-wildtype (85.5%) and remains an independent predictor of shorter overall survival compared to other patterns (faint and patchy and nodular).

Local therapy in glioma: An evolving paradigm from history to horizons (Review)

Despite the implementation of multimodal treatments after surgery, glioblastoma (GBM) remains an incurable disease, posing a significant challenge in neuro-oncology. In this clinical setting, local therapy (LT), a developing paradigm, has received significant interest over time due to its potential to overcome the drawbacks of conventional therapy options for GBM. The present review aimed to trace the historical development, highlight contemporary advances and provide insights into the future horizons of LT in GBM management. In compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols criteria, a systematic review of the literature on the role of LT in GBM management was conducted. A total of 2,467 potentially relevant articles were found and, after removal of duplicates, 2,007 studies were screened by title and abstract (Cohen's κ coefficient=0.92). Overall, it emerged that 15, 10 and 6 clinical studies explored the clinical efficiency of intraoperative local treatment modalities, local radiotherapy and local immunotherapy, respectively. GBM recurrences occur within 2 cm of the radiation field in 80% of cases, emphasizing the significant influence of local factors on recurrence. This highlights the urgent requirement for LT strategies. In total, three primary reasons have thus led to the development of numerous LT solutions in recent decades: i) Intratumoral implants allow the blood-brain barrier to be bypassed, resulting in limited systemic toxicity; ii) LT facilitates bridging therapy between surgery and standard treatments; and iii) given the complexity of GBM, targeting multiple components of the tumor microenvironment through ligands specific to various elements could have a synergistic effect in treatments. Considering the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of GBM, the disease prognosis could be significantly improved by a combination of therapeutic strategies in the era of precision medicine.

The effects of the combination therapy of chemotherapy drugs on the fluctuations of genes involved in the TLR signaling pathway in glioblastoma multiforme therapy

One of the most lethal and aggressive types of malignancies with a high mortality rate and poor response to treatment is glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). This means that modernizing the medications used in chemotherapy, in addition to medicines licensed for use in other illnesses and chosen using a rationale process, can be beneficial in treating this illness. Meaningly, drug combination therapy with chemical or herbal originations or implanting a drug wafer in tumors to control angiogenesis is of great importance. Importantly, the primary therapeutic hurdles in GBM are the development of angiogenesis and the blood-brain barrier (BBB), which keeps medications from getting to the tumor. This malignancy can be controlled if the drug's passage through the BBB and the VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor), which promotes angiogenesis, are inhibited. In this way, the effect of combination therapy on the genes of different main signaling pathways like TLRs may be indicated as an impressive therapeutic strategy for treating GBM. This article aims to discuss the effects of chemotherapeutic drugs on the expression of various genes and associated translational factors involved in the TLR signaling pathway.

Emerging Therapies for Glioblastoma

Glioblastoma is most commonly a primary brain tumor and the utmost malignant one, with a survival rate of approximately 12-18 months. Glioblastoma is highly heterogeneous, demonstrating that different types of cells from the same tumor can manifest distinct gene expression patterns and biological behaviors. Conventional therapies such as temozolomide, radiation, and surgery have limitations. As of now, there is no cure for glioblastoma. Alternative treatment methods to eradicate glioblastoma are discussed in this review, including targeted therapies to PI3K, NFKβ, JAK-STAT, CK2, WNT, NOTCH, Hedgehog, and TGFβ pathways. The highly novel application of oncolytic viruses and nanomaterials in combating glioblastoma are also discussed. Despite scores of clinical trials for glioblastoma, the prognosis remains poor. Progress in breaching the blood-brain barrier with nanomaterials and novel avenues for targeted and combination treatments hold promise for the future development of efficacious glioblastoma therapies.

Current Photodynamic Therapy for Glioma Treatment: An Update

Research on the development of photodynamic therapy for the treatment of brain tumors has shown promise in the treatment of this highly aggressive form of brain cancer. Analysis of both in vivo studies and clinical studies shows that photodynamic therapy can provide significant benefits, such as an improved median rate of survival. The use of photodynamic therapy is characterized by relatively few side effects, which is a significant advantage compared to conventional treatment methods such as often-used brain tumor surgery, advanced radiotherapy, and classic chemotherapy. Continued research in this area could bring significant advances, influencing future standards of treatment for this difficult and deadly disease.

Efficacy and Safety of Carmustine Wafer Implantation After Ventricular Opening in Glioblastomas, Isocitrate Dehydrogenase-Wildtype, in Adults

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

We assessed the impact of ventricular opening on postoperative complications and survival of carmustine wafer implantation during surgery of newly diagnosed supratentorial glioblastomas, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype in adults.

METHODS

We performed an observational, retrospective, single-center cohort study at a tertiary surgical neuro-oncological center between January 2006 and December 2021.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-four patients who benefited from a first-line surgical resection with carmustine wafer implantation were included. Seventy patients (36.1%) had a ventricular opening. We showed that ventricular opening (1) did not increase overall postoperative complication rates (P = .201); (2) did not worsen the early postoperative Karnofsky Performance Status score (P = .068); (3) did not increase the time interval from surgery to adjuvant oncological treatment (P = .458); (4) did not affect the completion of the standard radiochemotherapy protocol (P = .164); (5) did not affect progression-free survival (P = .059); and (6) did not affect overall survival (P = .142).

CONCLUSION

In this study, ventricular opening during first-line surgical resection did not affect the survival and postoperative complications after use of carmustine wafer implantation in adult patients with a newly diagnosed supratentorial glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype. This warrants a prospective and multicentric study to clearly assess the impact of the ventricular opening after carmustine wafer implantation in glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype.

Carmustine wafer implantation for supratentorial glioblastomas, IDH-wildtype in "extreme" neurosurgical conditions

We assessed the feasibility of Carmustine wafer implantation in "extreme" conditions (i.e. patients > 80 years and Karnofsky Performance Status score < 50) and of implantation ≥ 12 Carmustine wafers in adult patients harbouring a newly diagnosed supratentorial glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype. We performed an observational, retrospective single-centre cohort study at a tertiary surgical neuro-oncological centre between January 2006 and December 2021. Four hundred eighty patients who benefited from a surgical resection at first-line treatment were included. We showed that Carmustine wafer implantation in patients > 80 years, in patients with a Karnofsky performance status score < 50, and that implantation ≥ 12 Carmustine wafers (1) did not increase overall postoperative complication rates, (2) did not affect the completion of standard radiochemotherapy protocol, (3) did not worsen the postoperative Karnofsky Performance Status scores, and (4) did not significantly affect the time to oncological treatment. We showed that the implantation of ≥ 12 Carmustine wafers improved progression-free survival (31.0 versus 10.0 months, p = 0.025) and overall survival (39.0 versus 16.5 months, p = 0.041) without increasing postoperative complication rates. Carmustine wafer implantation during the surgical resection of a newly diagnosed supratentorial glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype is safe and efficient in patients > 80 years and in patients with preoperative Karnofsky Performance Status score < 50. The number of Carmustine wafers should be adapted (up to 16 in our experience) to the resection cavity to improve survival without increasing postoperative overall complication rates.

Newly Diagnosed High-Grade Glioma Surgery with Carmustine Wafers Implantation. A Long-Term Nationwide Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Widespread use of carmustine wafers (CWs) to treat high-grade gliomas (HGG) has been limited by uncertainties about their efficacy. We sought to assess the outcome of patients after newly diagnosed HGG surgery with CW implantation and search for associated factors.

METHODS

We processed the French medico-administrative national database between 2008 and 2019 to retrieve ad hoc cases. Survival methods were implemented.

RESULTS

In total, 1608 patients who had CW implantation after HGG resection at 42 different institutions between 2008 and 2019 were identified; 36.7% were female and, median age at HGG resection with CW implantation was 61.5 years, interquartile range (IQR) [52.9-69.1]. A total of 1460 patients (90.8%) had died at data collection at a median age at death of 63.5 years, IQR [55.3-71.2]. Median overall survival (OS) was 1.42 years, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35-1.49, i.e., 16.8 months. Median age at death was 63.5 years, IQR [55.3-71.2]. OS at 1, 2, and, 5 years was 67.4%, 95% CI 65.1-69.7; 33.1%, 95% CI 30.9-35.5; and 10.7%, 95% CI 9.2-12.4, respectively. In the adjusted regression, sex (hazard ratio [HR] 0.82, 95% CI 0.74-0.92, P < 0.001), age at HGG surgery with CW implantation (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.02-1.03, P < 0.001), adjuvant radiotherapy (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.7-0.86, P < 0.001), chemotherapy by temozolomide (HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.63-0.79, P < 0.001), and redo surgery for HGG recurrence (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.69-0.94, P = 0.005) remained significantly associated with the outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

OS of patients with newly diagnosed HGG who underwent surgery with CW implantation is better in young patients, those of the female sex, and for those who complete concomitant chemoradiotherapy. Redo surgery for HGG recurrence also was associated with prolonged survival.

Carmustine Wafers Implantation in Patients With Newly Diagnosed High Grade Glioma: Is It Still an Option?

Background

The implantation protocol for Carmustine Wafers (CWs) in high grade glioma (HGG) was developed to offer a bridge between surgical resection and adjuvant treatments, such as radio- and chemotherapy. In the last years, however, a widespread use of CWs has been limited due to uncertainties regarding efficacy, in addition to increased risk of infection and elevated costs of treatment.

Objective

The aims of our study were to investigate the epidemiology of patients that underwent surgery for HGG with CW implantation, in addition to the assessment of related complications, long-term overall survival (OS), and associated prognostic factors.

Methods

Three different medical databases were screened for conducting a systematic review of the literature, according to the PRISMA statement guidelines, evaluating the role of BCNU wafer implantation in patients with newly diagnosed HGG. The search query was based on a combination of medical subject headings (MeSH): “high grade glioma” [MeSH] AND “Carmustine” [MeSH] and free text terms: “surgery” OR “BCNU wafer” OR “Gliadel” OR “systemic treatment options” OR “overall survival.”

Results

The analysis of the meta-data demonstrated that there was a significant advantage in using CWs in newly diagnosed GBM in terms of OS, and a very low heterogeneity among the included studies [mean difference 2.64 (95% CI 0.85, 4.44); p = 0.004; I2149 = 0%]. Conversely, no significant difference between the two treatment groups in terms of PFS wad detected (p = 0.55). The analysis of complications showed a relatively higher rate in Carmustine implanted patients, although this difference was not significant (p = 0.53).

Conclusions

This meta-analysis seems to suggest that CWs implantation plays a significant role in improving the OS, when used in patients with newly diagnosed HGG. To minimize the risk of side effects, however, a carful patient selection based mainly on patient age and tumor volume should be desirable.

Discriminating surgical bed cysts from bacterial brain abscesses after Carmustine wafer implantation in newly diagnosed IDH-wildtype glioblastomas

Carmustine wafers can be implanted in the surgical bed of high-grade gliomas, which can induce surgical bed cyst formation, leading to clinically relevant mass effect. An observational retrospective monocentric study was conducted including 122 consecutive adult patients with a newly diagnosed supratentorial glioblastoma who underwent a surgical resection with Carmustine wafer implantation as first line treatment (2005-2018). Twenty-two patients (18.0%) developed a postoperative contrast-enhancing cyst within the surgical bed: 16 surgical bed cysts and six bacterial abscesses. All patients with a surgical bed cyst were managed conservatively, all resolved on imaging follow-up, and no patient stopped the radiochemotherapy. Independent risk factors of formation of a postoperative surgical bed cyst were age ≥ 60 years (p = 0.019), number of Carmustine wafers implanted ≥ 8 (p = 0.040), and partial resection (p = 0.025). Compared to surgical bed cysts, the occurrence of a postoperative bacterial abscess requiring surgical management was associated more frequently with a shorter time to diagnosis from surgery (p = 0.009), new neurological deficit (p < 0.001), fever (p < 0.001), residual air in the cyst (p = 0.018), a cyst diameter greater than that of the initial tumor (p = 0.027), and increased mass effect and brain edema compared to early postoperative MRI (p = 0.024). Contrast enhancement (p = 0.473) and diffusion signal abnormalities (p = 0.471) did not differ between postoperative bacterial abscesses and surgical bed cysts. Clinical and imaging findings help discriminate between surgical bed cysts and bacterial abscesses following Carmustine wafer implantation. Surgical bed cysts can be managed conservatively. Individual risk factors will help tailor their steroid therapy and imaging follow-up.

An Evaluation of the Tolerability and Feasibility of Combining 5-Amino-Levulinic Acid (5-ALA) with BCNU Wafers in the Surgical Management of Primary Glioblastoma

Simple Summary

This reseach explored the safety and feasibility of combining local chemotherapy with fluorescence-guided resection in patients with a brain cancer, glioblastoma. The aim was to determine if the combination of fluorescence-guided surgery using 5-aminolevulinic acid and BCNU wafers left in the tumour cavity at the end of the operation was safe and did not prevent patients getting subsequent chemo-radiotherapy. The results showed that combining local chemotherapy with fluorescence-guided resection was tolerable in terms of surgical morbidity and overall toxicity. However, any potential therapeutic benefit requires further investigation, preferably with improved local delivery technologies.

Abstract

Background Glioblastoma (GBM) is the commonest primary malignant brain tumour in adults and effective treatment options are limited. Combining local chemotherapy with enhanced surgical resection using 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) could improve outcomes. Here we assess the safety and feasibility of combining BCNU wafers with 5-ALA-guided surgery. Methods We conducted a multicentre feasibility study of 5-ALA with BCNU wafers followed by standard-of-care chemoradiotherapy (chemoRT) in patients with suspected GBM. Patients judged suitable for radical resection were administered 5-ALA pre-operatively and BCNU wafers at the end resection. Post-operative treatment continued as per routine clinical practice. The primary objective was to establish if combining 5-ALA and BCNU wafers is safe without compromising patients from receiving standard chemoRT. Results Seventy-two patients were recruited, sixty-four (88.9%) received BCNU wafer implants, and fifty-nine (81.9%) patients remained eligible following formal histological diagnosis. Seven (11.9%) eligible patients suffered surgical complications but only two (3.4%) were not able to begin chemoRT, four (6.8%) additional patients did not begin chemoRT within 6 weeks of surgery due to surgical complications. Eleven (18.6%) patients did not begin chemoRT for other reasons (other toxicity (n = 3), death (n = 3), lost to follow-up/withdrew (n = 3), clinical decision (n = 1), poor performance status (n = 1)). Median progression-free survival was 8.7 months (95% CI: 6.4–9.8) and median overall survival was 14.7 months (95% CI: 11.7–16.8). Conclusions Combining BCNU wafers with 5-ALA-guided surgery in newly diagnosed GBM patients is both feasible and tolerable in terms of surgical morbidity and overall toxicity. Any potential therapeutic benefit for the sequential use of 5-ALA and BCNU with chemoRT requires further investigation with improved local delivery technologies.

Implantation of Carmustine wafers after resection of malignant glioma with and without opening of the ventricular system

OBJECTIVE

Implantation of biodegradable Carmustine wafers in patients with malignant glioma is not generally recommended when the ventricular system is opened during tumor resection. Thrombin/fibrinogenn-covered collagen fleeces showed promising results in sufficiently closing ventricular defects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the postoperative morbidity in patients with implanted Carmustine wafers either with opened or intact ventricular system.

METHODS

A consecutive series of patients who underwent resection of malignant glioma with implantation of Carmustine wafers was analyzed. In case of opening of the ventricular system, the defect in the ventricle wall was sealed using a collagen sponge coated with fibrinogen and thrombin prior to the implantation of the wafers. Postoperative adverse events (AE) and Karnofsky performance status scale (KPS) at follow up were compared between both groups.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients were included. The ventricular system was opened in 33 patients and remained intact in 21 patients. Both groups were comparable in terms of age, rate of primary and recurrent glioma, preoperative KPS, rate of gross total resection and number of implanted wafers. Postoperative AEs occurred in 9/33 patients (27.3%) with opened and in 5/21 patients (23.8%) with intact ventricular system (p = 0.13). At follow-up assessments, KPS was not significantly different between both groups (p = 0.18). Opened ventricular system was not associated with a higher incidence of postoperative AEs (p = 0.98).

CONCLUSION

Appropriate closure of opened ventricular system during resection of malignant glioma allows for a safe implantation of Carmustine wafers and is not associated with a higher incidence of postoperative AEs.

Functional Outcomes and Health-Related Quality of Life Following Glioma Surgery

Functional outcome following glioma surgery is defined as how the patient functions or feels. Functional outcome is a coprimary end point of surgery in patients with diffuse glioma, together with oncological outcome. In this review, we structure the functional outcome measurements following glioma surgery as reported in the last 5 yr. We review various perspectives on functional outcome of glioma surgery with available measures, and offer suggestions for their use. From the recent neurosurgical literature, 160 publications were retrieved fulfilling the selection criteria. In these publications, neurological outcomes were reported most often, followed by activities of daily living, seizure outcomes, neurocognitive outcomes, and health-related quality of life or well-being. In more than a quarter of these publications functional outcome was not reported. A minimum essential consensus set of functional outcome measurements would benefit comparison across neurosurgical reports. The consensus set should be based on a combination of clinician- and patient-reported outcomes, assessed at a predefined time before and after surgery. The selected measurements should have psychometric properties supporting the intended use including validity-related evidence, reliability, and sensitivity to detect meaningful change with minimal burden to ensure compliance. We circulate a short survey as a start towards reporting guidelines. Many questions remain to better understand, report, and improve functional outcome following glioma surgery.

Viral Gene Therapy for Glioblastoma Multiforme: A Promising Hope for the Current Dilemma

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), as one of the most common malignant brain tumors, was limited in its treatment effectiveness with current options. Its invasive and infiltrative features led to tumor recurrence and poor prognosis. Effective treatment and survival improvement have always been a challenge. With the exploration of genetic mutations and molecular pathways in neuro-oncology, gene therapy is becoming a promising therapeutic approach. Therapeutic genes are delivered into target cells with viral vectors to act specific antitumor effects, which can be used in gene delivery, play an oncolysis effect, and induce host immune response. The application of engineering technology makes the virus vector used in genetics a more prospective future. Recent advances in viral gene therapy offer hope for treating brain tumors. In this review, we discuss the types and designs of viruses as well as their study progress and potential applications in the treatment of GBM. Although still under research, viral gene therapy is promising to be a new therapeutic approach for GBM treatment in the future.

Between-hospital variation in rates of complications and decline of patient performance after glioblastoma surgery in the dutch Quality Registry Neuro Surgery

Introduction

For decisions on glioblastoma surgery, the risk of complications and decline in performance is decisive. In this study, we determine the rate of complications and performance decline after resections and biopsies in a national quality registry, their risk factors and the risk-standardized variation between institutions.

Methods

Data from all 3288 adults with first-time glioblastoma surgery at 13 hospitals were obtained from a prospective population-based Quality Registry Neuro Surgery in the Netherlands between 2013 and 2017. Patients were stratified by biopsies and resections. Complications were categorized as Clavien-Dindo grades II and higher. Performance decline was considered a deterioration of more than 10 Karnofsky points at 6 weeks. Risk factors were evaluated in multivariable logistic regression analysis. Patient-specific expected and observed complications and performance declines were summarized for institutions and analyzed in funnel plots.

Results

For 2271 resections, the overall complication rate was 20 % and 16 % declined in performance. For 1017 biopsies, the overall complication rate was 11 % and 30 % declined in performance. Patient-related characteristics were significant risk factors for complications and performance decline, i.e. higher age, lower baseline Karnofsky, higher ASA classification, and the surgical procedure. Hospital characteristics, i.e. case volume, university affiliation and biopsy percentage, were not. In three institutes the observed complication rate was significantly less than expected. In one institute significantly more performance declines were observed than expected, and in one institute significantly less.

Conclusions

Patient characteristics, but not case volume, were risk factors for complications and performance decline after glioblastoma surgery. After risk-standardization, hospitals varied in complications and performance declines.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11060-021-03697-8.

Congress of neurological surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines update on the role of emerging developments in the management of newly diagnosed glioblastoma

TARGET POPULATION

These recommendations apply to adult patients with newly diagnosed or suspected glioblastoma.

IMAGING

Question What imaging modalities are in development that may be able to provide improvements in diagnosis, and therapeutic guidance for individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastoma?

RECOMMENDATION

Level III: It is suggested that techniques utilizing magnetic resonance imaging for diffusion weighted imaging, and to measure cerebral blood and magnetic spectroscopic resonance imaging of N-acetyl aspartate, choline and the choline to N-acetyl aspartate index to assist in diagnosis and treatment planning in patients with newly diagnosed or suspected glioblastoma.

SURGERY

Question What new surgical techniques can be used to provide improved tumor definition and resectability to yield better tumor control and prognosis for individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastoma?

RECOMMENDATIONS

Level II: The use of 5-aminolevulinic acid is recommended to improve extent of tumor resection in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Level II: The use of 5-aminolevulinic acid is recommended to improve median survival and 2 year survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients with clinical characteristics suggesting poor prognosis. Level III: It is suggested that, when available, patients be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials assessing the value of diffusion tensor imaging in improving the safety of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma undergoing surgery.

NEUROPATHOLOGY

Question What new pathology techniques and measurement of biomarkers in tumor tissue can be used to provide improved diagnostic ability, and determination of therapeutic responsiveness and prognosis for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas?

RECOMMENDATIONS

Level II: Assessment of tumor MGMT promoter methylation status is recommended as a significant predictor of a longer progression free survival and overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed with glioblastoma. Level II: Measurement of tumor expression of neuron-glia-2, neurofilament protein, glutamine synthetase and phosphorylated STAT3 is recommended as a predictor of overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed with glioblastoma. Level III: Assessment of tumor IDH1 mutation status is suggested as a predictor of longer progression free survival and overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed with glioblastoma. Level III: Evaluation of tumor expression of Phosphorylated Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase protein, EGFR protein, and Insulin-like Growth Factor-Binding Protein-3 is suggested as a predictor of overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed with glioblastoma.

RADIATION

Question What radiation therapy techniques are in development that may be used to provide improved tumor control and prognosis for individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastomas?

RECOMMENDATIONS

Level III: It is suggested that patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma undergo pretreatment radio-labeled amino acid tracer positron emission tomography to assess areas at risk for tumor recurrence to assist in radiation treatment planning. Level III: It is suggested that, when available, patients be with newly diagnosed glioblastomas be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials of radiation dose escalation, altered fractionation, or new radiation delivery techniques.

CHEMOTHERAPY

Question What emerging chemotherapeutic agents or techniques are available to provide better tumor control and prognosis for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas?

RECOMMENDATION

Level III: As no emerging chemotherapeutic agents or techniques were identified in this review that improved tumor control and prognosis it is suggested that, when available, patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials of chemotherapy.

MOLECULAR AND TARGETED THERAPY

Question What new targeted therapy agents are available to provide better tumor control and prognosis for individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastomas?

RECOMMENDATION

Level III: As no new molecular and targeted therapies have clearly provided better tumor control and prognosis it is suggested that, when available, patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials of molecular and targeted therapies IMMUNOTHERAPY: Question What emerging immunotherapeutic agents or techniques are available to provide better tumor control and prognosis for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas?

RECOMMENDATION

Level III: As no immunotherapeutic agents have clearly provided better tumor control and prognosis it is suggested that, when available, patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials of immunologically-based therapies.

NOVEL THERAPIES

Question What novel therapies or techniques are in development to provide better tumor control and prognosis for individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastomas?

RECOMMENDATIONS

Level II: The use of tumor-treating fields is recommended for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma who have undergone surgical debulking and completed concurrent chemoradiation without progression of disease at the time of tumor-treating field therapy initiation. Level II: It is suggested that, when available, enrollment in properly designed studies of vector containing herpes simplex thymidine kinase gene and prodrug therapies be considered in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Congress of neurological surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines update on the role of chemotherapeutic management and antiangiogenic treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in adults

QUESTION

What is the role of temozolomide in the management of adult patients (aged 65 and under) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma?

TARGET POPULATION

These recommendations apply to adult patients diagnosed with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

RECOMMENDATION

Level I: Concurrent and post-irradiation Temozolomide (TMZ) in combination with radiotherapy and post-radiotherapy as described by Stupp et al. is recommended to improve both PFS and OS in adult patients with newly diagnosed GBM. There is no evidence that alterations in the dosing regimen have additional beneficial effect.

QUESTION

Is there benefit to adjuvant temozolomide treatment in elderly patients (> 65 years old?).

TARGET POPULATION

These recommendations apply to adult patients diagnosed with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

RECOMMENDATION

Level III: Adjuvant TMZ treatment is suggested as a treatment option to improve PFS and OS in adult patients (over 70 years of age) with newly diagnosed GBM.

QUESTION

What is the role of local regional chemotherapy with BCNU biodegradable polymeric wafers in adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma?

TARGET POPULATION

These recommendations apply to adult patients diagnosed with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

RECOMMENDATION

Level III: There is insufficient evidence for the use of BCNU wafers following resection in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma who undergo the Stupp protocol after surgery. Further studies of higher quality are suggested to understand the role of BCNU wafer and other locoregional therapy in the setting of Stupp Protocol.

QUESTION

What is the role of bevacizumab in the adult patient with newly diagnosed glioblastoma?

TARGET POPULATION

These recommendations apply to adult patients diagnosed with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

RECOMMENDATION

Level I: Bevacizumab in general is not recommended in the initial treatment of adult patients with newly diagnosed GBM. It continues to be strongly recommended that patients with newly diagnosed GBM be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials to assess the benefit of novel chemotherapeutic agents compared to standard therapy.

Carmustine as a Supplementary Therapeutic Option for Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive type of primary malignant brain tumor. Carmustine is used by intravenous injection or local implantation in the resection cavity for gliomas, including GBMs. However, the therapeutic potential of carmustine is not well-recognized. This analysis aimed to evaluate the survival benefits of carmustine in glioma patients, especially those with GBM. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies regarding carmustine for glioma treatment were searched in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase from January 1979 to March 2020. Quality assessment was conducted with Jadad and Newcastle-Ottawa scales (NOS). Statistical analysis was conducted by the Revman 5.3 software. Results: Twenty-two eligible RCTs and cohort studies involving 5,821 glioma patients were included. Overall, glioma patients receiving carmustine as an adjuvant therapy had better progression-free survival [PFS; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.77-0.94, P = 0.002] and overall survival (OS; HR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.79-0.92, P < 0.0001) than those without carmustine treatment. Subgroup analysis showed that the OS benefit was observed in GBM (HR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.78-0.91, P < 0.00001) but not in anaplastic glioma patients (HR = 1.20, 95% CI = 0.70-2.07, P = 0.50). Additionally, both newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM patients who received carmustine treatment showed better OS (HR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.79-0.95, P = 0.002; HR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.67-0.89, P = 0.0002, respectively). Both carmustine implantation in resection cavity and intravenous administration significantly prolonged OS (HR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.78-0.92, P < 0.0001; HR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.75-0.99, P = 0.04, respectively). Moreover, GBM patients receiving a combined carmustine and temozolomide (TMZ) therapy had longer OS than those receiving TMZ alone (HR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.63-0.97, P = 0.03). Conclusion: Carmustine implantation in resection cavity provides survival benefit for GBM patients, and it may be a promising supplement to standard therapeutic protocol by offering a bridge between surgical resection and onset of TMZ therapy.

Met-PET uptake index for total tumor resection: identification of 11C-methionine uptake index as a goal for total tumor resection including infiltrating tumor cells in glioblastoma

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is largely due to glioma stem cells (GSCs) that escape from total resection of gadolinium (Gd)-enhanced tumor on MRI. The aim of this study is to identify the imaging requirements for maximum resection of GBM with infiltrating GSCs. We investigated the relationship of tumor imaging volume between MRI and ¹¹C-methionine (Met)-PET and also the relationship between Met uptake index and tumor activity. In ten patients, tumor-to-contralateral normal brain tissue ratio (TNR) was calculated to evaluate metabolic activity of Met uptake areas which were divided into five subareas by the degrees of TNR. In each GBM, tumor tissue was obtained from subareas showing the positive Met uptake. Immunohistochemistry was performed to examine the tumor proliferative activity and existence of GSCs. In all patients, the volume of Met uptake area at TNR ≦ 1.4 was larger than that of the Gd-enhanced area. The Met uptake area at TNR 1.4 beyond the Gd-enhanced tumor was much wider in high invasiveness-type GBMs than in those of low invasiveness type, and survival was much shorter in the former than the latter types. Immunohistochemistry revealed the existence of GSCs in the area showing Met uptake at TNR 1.4 and no Gd enhancement. Areas at TNR > 1.4 included active tumor cells with relatively high Ki-67 labeling index. In addition, it was demonstrated that GSCs could exist beyond the border of Gd-enhanced tumor. Therefore, to obtain maximum resection of GBMs, including infiltrating GSCs, aggressive surgical excision that includes the Met-positive area at TNR 1.4 should be considered.

Implantation of carmustine wafers (Gliadel®) for high-grade glioma treatment. A 9-year nationwide retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Carmustine wafers (CW) are approved to treat newly or recurrent high-grade gliomas (HGG). Widespread use has been limited regarding some doubtful uncertainties about their efficacy, related increased risk of infection and expensive cost.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the epidemiology of CW implantation, search for related complications, long-term survival and associated prognostic factors.

METHODS

We processed the French medico-administrative national database to retrieve appropriate cases operated between 2010 and 2018. A survival analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

We identified 1659 patients treated in 39 institutions. Median age at CW implantation was 61 years and there was an over-representation of male (63.5%). 491 patients (29.6%) had previous diagnosis of glioma. Time between the first surgery and CW implantation was 0.9 years, IQR[0.6, 1.6]. The frontal lobe was the most frequently involved 29%. 131 patients (7.9%) had to be re operated on for a complication of which 121 for surgical site infection. At one year, 514 patients (31%) had died. Median overall survival (OS) was 1.4 years, _95% CI [1.3, 1.5]. OS at 1 and 2 year was 66%, _95%CI [63.7, 68.5], 32.3%, _95%CI [29.9, 35]. In the adjusted Cox regression, male gender & age at CW implantation were established as independent factors of OS in all three groups. Patients with recurrent HGG have a significant worse prognosis (HR = 0.71, _95% CI [0.62, 0.80] p < 0.001). A post-operative diagnosis of infection or intracranial bleeding eventually leading to a redo surgery was not associated with a decrease OS.

CONCLUSION

Over the past 9 years, there is a significant decrease utilisation of CW in France. OS after CW implantation is significantly variable as influenced by many factors such as age, gender or recurrent disease but not by post-operative complications. Compare to previous results, CW may increase the OS and this effect seems more pronounced when adjuvant RT/TMZ is given.

Structural and Biological Investigations for a Series of N-5 Substituted Pyrrolo[3,2-d]pyrimidines as Potential Anti-Cancer Therapeutics

Pyrrolo[3,2-d]pyrimidines have been studied for many years as potential lead compounds for the development of antiproliferative agents. Much of the focus has been on modifications to the pyrimidine ring, with enzymatic recognition often modulated by C2 and C4 substituents. In contrast, this work focuses on the N5 of the pyrrole ring by means of a series of novel N5-substituted pyrrolo[3,2-d]pyrimidines. The compounds were screened against the NCI-60 Human Tumor Cell Line panel, and the results were analyzed using the COMPARE algorithm to elucidate potential mechanisms of action. COMPARE analysis returned strong correlation to known DNA alkylators and groove binders, corroborating the hypothesis that these pyrrolo[3,2-d]pyrimidines act as DNA or RNA alkylators. In addition, N5 substitution reduced the EC50 against CCRF-CEM leukemia cells by up to 7-fold, indicating that this position is of interest in the development of antiproliferative lead compounds based on the pyrrolo[3,2-d]pyrimidine scaffold.

A Meta-Analysis of Survival Outcomes Following Reoperation in Recurrent Glioblastoma: Time to Consider the Timing of Reoperation

Background: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) inevitably recurs, but no standard regimen has been established for recurrent patients. Reoperation at recurrence alleviates mass effects, and the survival benefit has been reported in many studies. However, in most studies, the effect of reoperation timing on survival benefit was ignored. The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate whether reoperation provided similar survival benefits in recurrent GBM patients when it was analyzed as a fixed or time-dependent covariate.

Methods: A systematic literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was performed to identify original articles that evaluated the associations between reoperation and prognosis in recurrent GBM patients.

Results: Twenty-one articles involving 8,630 patients were included. When reoperation was considered as a fixed covariate, it was associated with better overall survival (OS) and post-progression survival (PPS) (OS: HR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.61-0.71, p < 0.001, I² = 0%; PPS: HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.57–0.88, p < 0.01, I² = 70.2%). However, such a survival benefit was not observed when reoperation was considered as a time-dependent covariate (OS: HR = 2.19, 95% CI 1.47–3.27, p < 0.001; PPS: HR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.82–1.10, p = 0.51, I² = 0%). The estimate bias caused by ignoring the time-dependent nature of reoperation was further demonstrated by the re-analysis of survival data in three included studies.

Conclusions: The timing of reoperation may have an impact on the survival outcome in recurrent GBM patients, and survival benefits of reoperation in recurrent GBM may be overestimated when analyzed as fixed covariates. Proper analysis methodology should be used in future work to confirm the clinical benefits of reoperation.

Comparison of Survival Outcomes Between Partial Resection and Biopsy for Primary Glioblastoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

OBJECTIVES

Gross total resection for glioblastoma (GBM) has been associated with better prognosis. However, it is not always feasible, and the threshold for the extent of resection required for better prognosis has been controversial. Therefore, we compared the survival and clinical outcomes of patients with GBM who had undergone partial resection (PR) or biopsy.

METHODS

Of the 110 patients, 32 and 78, who had undergone PR and biopsy, respectively, were enrolled to identify any differences in clinical outcomes. No differences were found in patient demographics between the 2 groups, except for tumor location and mean tumor volume (P = 0.02 and P < 0.01, respectively). Propensity score matching between the PR and biopsy groups was performed, in which 20 patients each in the PR and biopsy groups were matched.

RESULTS

The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) did not differ significantly between the PR and biopsy groups (P = 0.84 and P = 0.48, respectively). After propensity score matching, the differences in OS and PFS between the 2 groups were still not statistically significant (P = 0.51 and P = 0.75, respectively). The hazard ratios for OS and PFS for the PR group compared with biopsy were 0.98 and 0.73, respectively; however, the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.96 and P = 0.39, respectively). The surgical complication rate was greater in the PR group (14 of 32; 43.7%) than in the biopsy group (9 of 78; 11.5%; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

PR failed to improve survival compared with biopsy for patients with GBM. Moreover, the surgical complication rate in the PR group was greater than that in the biopsy group.

Combining Clinical and Molecular Data to Predict the Benefits of Carmustine Wafers in Newly Diagnosed High-Grade Gliomas

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the use of carmustine wafers (CWs) in the management of high-grade gliomas (HGGs). The data from our monoinstitutional series was compared with studies reported in the literature. Special emphasis was placed on the evaluation of side effects and the analysis of extent of resection and molecular profile as risk factors.

RECENT FINDINGS

The implantation of CWs into the resection cavity during HGG treatment to deliver localized chemotherapy, followed by the Stupp protocol, remains debated in a clinical setting, largely due to the lack of appropriate phase III studies. Given the high expense and poorly characterized side effects associated with CW treatment, identification of patients most likely to benefit from this therapy could be clinically relevant. CWs may represent an effective and safe first-line treatment for patients with HGG that exhibit complete tumor resection and harboring a methylated MGMT promoter. Our investigation showed a much larger group of patients exhibiting long-term survival (> = 36 months), strongly supporting a potential survival benefit conferred via CW treatment. The pre-surgical definition of the MGMT promoter status could be of clinical use in identifying "good responders" to CW implantation.