2
|
Diagnosis and Treatment of Pineal Region Tumors in Adults: A EURACAN Overview. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14153646. [PMID: 35954310 PMCID: PMC9367474 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14153646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Revised: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Pineal region tumors are rare intracranial tumors. A deeper knowledge of these tumors’ molecular mechanisms has been gained in recent years, which has led to a new classification and new potential systemic treatments. Surgery remains the mainstay of treatment, while radiotherapy and systemic therapy depend on histological, molecular, and clinical characteristics. This paper highlights recent developments in the diagnosis and treatment of these tumors. Abstract Pineal region tumors are rare intracranial tumors, accounting for less than 1% of all adult intracranial tumor lesions. These lesions represent a histologically heterogeneous group of tumors. Among these tumors, pineal parenchymal tumors and germ cell tumors (GCT) represent the most frequent types of lesions. According to the new WHO 2021 classification, pineal parenchymal tumors include five distinct histotypes: pineocytoma (PC), pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation (PPTID), papillary tumor of the pineal region (PTPR), pinealoblastoma (PB), and desmoplastic myxoid tumor of the pineal region, SMARCB1-mutant; GCTs include germinoma, embryonal carcinoma, yolk sac tumor, choriocarcinoma, teratoma, mixed GCTs. Neuroradiological assessment has a pivotal role in the diagnostic work-up, surgical planning, and follow-up of patients with pineal masses. Surgery can represent the mainstay of treatment, ranging from biopsy to gross total resection, yet pineal region tumors associated with obstructive hydrocephalus may be surgically managed via ventricular internal shunt or endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Radiotherapy remains an essential component of the multidisciplinary treatment approach for most pineal region tumors; however, treatment volumes depend on the histological subtypes, grading, extent of disease, and the combination with chemotherapy. For localized germinoma, the current standard of care is chemotherapy followed by reduced-dose whole ventricular irradiation plus a boost to the primary tumor. For pinealoblastoma patients, postoperative radiation has been associated with higher overall survival. For the other pineal tumors, the role of radiotherapy remains poorly studied and it is usually reserved for aggressive (grade 3) or recurrent tumors. The use of systemic treatments mainly depends on histology and prognostic factors such as residual disease and metastases. For pinealoblastoma patients, chemotherapy protocols are based on various alkylating or platinum-based agents, vincristine, etoposide, cyclophosphamide and are used in association with radiotherapy. About GCTs, their chemosensitivity is well known and is based on cisplatin or carboplatin and may include etoposide, cyclophosphamide, or ifosfamide prior to irradiation. Similar regimens containing platinum derivatives are also used for non-germinomatous GCTs with very encouraging results. However, due to a greater understanding of the biology of the disease’s various molecular subtypes, new agents based on targeted therapy are expected in the future. On behalf of the EURACAN domain 10 group, we reviewed the most important and recent developments in histopathological characteristics, neuro-radiological assessments, and treatments for pineal region tumors.
Collapse
|
4
|
von Hoff K, Haberler C, Schmitt-Hoffner F, Schepke E, de Rojas T, Jacobs S, Zapotocky M, Sumerauer D, Perek-Polnik M, Dufour C, van Vuurden D, Slavc I, Gojo J, Pickles JC, Gerber NU, Massimino M, Gil-da-Costa MJ, Garami M, Kumirova E, Sehested A, Scheie D, Cruz O, Moreno L, Cho J, Zeller B, Bovenschen N, Grotzer M, Alderete D, Snuderl M, Zheludkova O, Golanov A, Okonechnikov K, Mynarek M, Juhnke BO, Rutkowski S, Schüller U, Pizer B, Zezschwitz BV, Kwiecien R, Wechsung M, Konietschke F, Hwang EI, Sturm D, Pfister SM, von Deimling A, Rushing EJ, Ryzhova M, Hauser P, Łastowska M, Wesseling P, Giangaspero F, Hawkins C, Figarella-Branger D, Eberhart C, Burger P, Gessi M, Korshunov A, Jacques TS, Capper D, Pietsch T, Kool M. Therapeutic implications of improved molecular diagnostics for rare CNS-embryonal tumor entities: results of an international, retrospective study. Neuro Oncol 2021; 23:1597-1611. [PMID: 34077956 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Only few data are available on treatment-associated behavior of distinct rare CNS-embryonal tumor entities previously treated as "CNS-primitive neuroectodermal tumors" (CNS-PNET). Respective data on specific entities, including CNS neuroblastoma, FOXR2 activated (CNS NB-FOXR2), and embryonal tumor with multi-layered rosettes (ETMR) are needed for development of differentiated treatment strategies. METHODS Within this retrospective, international study, tumor samples of clinically well-annotated patients with the original diagnosis of CNS-PNET were analyzed using DNA methylation arrays (n=307). Additional cases (n=66) with DNA methylation pattern of CNS NB-FOXR2 were included irrespective of initial histological diagnosis. Pooled clinical data (n=292) were descriptively analyzed. RESULTS DNA methylation profiling of "CNS-PNET" classified 58(19%) cases as ETMR, 57(19%) as HGG, 36(12%) as CNS NB-FOXR2, and 89(29%) cases were classified into 18 other entities. Sixty-seven (22%) cases did not show DNA methylation patterns similar to established CNS tumor reference classes. Best treatment results were achieved for CNS NB-FOXR2 patients (5-year PFS: 63%±7%, OS: 85%±5%, n=63), with 35/42 progression-free survivors after upfront craniospinal irradiation (CSI) and chemotherapy. The worst outcome was seen for ETMR and HGG patients with 5-year PFS of 18%±6% and 22%±7%, and 5-year OS of 24%±6% and 25%±7%, respectively. CONCLUSION The historically reported poor outcome of CNS-PNET patients becomes highly variable when tumors are molecularly classified based on DNA methylation profiling. Patients with CNS NB-FOXR2 responded well to current treatments and a standard-risk-CSI based regimen may be prospectively evaluated. The poor outcome of ETMR across applied treatment strategies substantiates the necessity for evaluation of novel treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katja von Hoff
- Department of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christine Haberler
- Division of Neuropathology and Neurochemistry, Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Felix Schmitt-Hoffner
- Hopp Children´s Cancer Center (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,Faculty of Biosciences, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elizabeth Schepke
- The Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Teresa de Rojas
- Pediatric OncoGenomics Unit, Children's University Hospital Niño Jesús, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sandra Jacobs
- Department of Pediatrics, KU Leuven and University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Michal Zapotocky
- Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - David Sumerauer
- Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Marta Perek-Polnik
- Department of Oncology, The Children's Memorial Health Institute, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Christelle Dufour
- Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology, Villejuif, France.,Paris-Saclay University, INSERM, Molecular predictors and New targets in Oncology, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Irene Slavc
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine and Comprehensive Center for Pediatrics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Johannes Gojo
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine and Comprehensive Center for Pediatrics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jessica C Pickles
- Developmental Biology and Cancer Research & Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.,Department of Histopathology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Nicolas U Gerber
- Department of Oncology, University Children's Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Maura Massimino
- Pediatric Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale die Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Miklos Garami
- 2nd Department of Pediatrics, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Ella Kumirova
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center for Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Astrid Sehested
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - David Scheie
- Department of Pathology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Frederik Vs vej 11, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ofelia Cruz
- Pediatric Oncology Department. Hospital Sant Joan de Deu. Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lucas Moreno
- Paediatric Haematology & Oncology Division, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jaeho Cho
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Bernward Zeller
- Division of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Niels Bovenschen
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Grotzer
- Department of Oncology, University Children's Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Alderete
- Service of Hematology/Oncology, Hospital JP Garrahan, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Matija Snuderl
- Department of Pathology, NYU Langone Health and School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Olga Zheludkova
- Department of Neurooncology, Russian Scientific Center of Radiology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Andrey Golanov
- Department of Neuroradiology, Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute, Moscow, Russia
| | - Konstantin Okonechnikov
- Hopp Children´s Cancer Center (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Mynarek
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg
| | - B Ole Juhnke
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg
| | - Stefan Rutkowski
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg
| | - Ulrich Schüller
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg.,Institute of Neuropathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,Research Institute Children's Cancer Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Barry Pizer
- Institute of Translational Research, University of Liverpool, UK
| | - Barbara V Zezschwitz
- Department of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Robert Kwiecien
- Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Maximilian Wechsung
- Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité University Medicine and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Frank Konietschke
- Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité University Medicine and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Eugene I Hwang
- Department of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Center for Cancer and Immunology Research and Neuroscience Research, Children's National Medical Center, Washington DC, USA
| | - Dominik Sturm
- Hopp Children´s Cancer Center (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Pediatric Glioma Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology & Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan M Pfister
- Hopp Children´s Cancer Center (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology & Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andreas von Deimling
- Department of Neuropathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elisabeth J Rushing
- Institute of Neuropathology, University Medical Center Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Marina Ryzhova
- Department of Neuropathology, Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute, Moscow, Russia
| | - Peter Hauser
- 2nd Department of Pediatrics, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Maria Łastowska
- Department of Pathomorphology, Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Pieter Wesseling
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Amsterdam University Medical Center / VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Felice Giangaspero
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomopathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.,IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli (IS), Italy
| | - Cynthia Hawkins
- Division of Pathology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Dominique Figarella-Branger
- Aix-Marseille Univ, APHM, CNRS, INP, Inst Neurophysiopathol, CHU Timone, Service d'Anatomie Pathologique et de Neuropathologie, Marseille, France
| | - Charles Eberhart
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Peter Burger
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Marco Gessi
- Neuropathology Unit, Division of Pathology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A.Gemelli" IRCCS, Università Cattolica S.Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrey Korshunov
- Department of Neuropathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tom S Jacques
- Department of Histopathology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - David Capper
- Department of Neuropathology, Charité University Medicine, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Torsten Pietsch
- Department of Neuropathology, DGNN Brain Tumor Reference Center, University of Bonn, DZNE German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Bonn, Germany
| | - Marcel Kool
- Hopp Children´s Cancer Center (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Huo XL, Wang B, Zhang GJ, Ma JP, Wang L, Zhang LW, Xu XY, Li XJ, Li H, Li D, Zhang JT, Wu Z. Adverse Factors of Treatment Response and Overall Survival in Pediatric and Adult Patients with Pineoblastoma. Cancer Manag Res 2020; 12:7343-7351. [PMID: 32884348 PMCID: PMC7443452 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s258476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2020] [Accepted: 07/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Intracranial pineoblastomas are rare neoplasms with poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to describe the independent prognostic factors and treatment strategies for overall survival in pediatric and adult patients. METHODS Sixty-four patients were surgically treated between January 2012 and December 2018. RESULTS The series included 37 (57.8%) males and 27 (42.2%) females. Gross total resection was achieved in 41 (64.1%) cases, and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year rates of overall survival were 86.3, 52.3, and 36.6%, respectively. In the pediatric group (n=42), 28 patients (66.7%) were male, with the median, and the mean age was 4 and 6.2±4.7 years, respectively. After a median follow-up of 25.0 months, twenty-six patients (61.9%) died, and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year rates of overall survival were 84.9, 46.4, and 26.7%, respectively. Postoperative radiotherapy (p=0.058) and postoperative chemotherapy (p=0.183) had a positive influence on the increased overall survival. Meanwhile, postoperative radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy following surgery had a positive impact on overall survival (p=0.174, Log rank). In the adult group, the mean overall survival was 67.3±9.3 months (range, 0.8-95.3 months), and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year rates of overall survival were 89.5, 64.4, and 64.4%, respectively. In this group, no statistical association was observed between clinical factors and outcomes. However, patients who received postoperative radiotherapy (60.7 vs 57.6 month, mean survival; p=0.510, Log rank) or chemotherapy (63.0 vs 59.9 month, mean survival; p=0.404, Log rank) had better survival rates compared with those who declined. CONCLUSION In the pediatric group, surgery with postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy was a favorable factor for overall survival. In the adult group, a positive trend in overall survival was found when patients received radiation and/or chemotherapy following surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xu-Lei Huo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Bo Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Gui-Jun Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu610041, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jun-Peng Ma
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Liang Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Li-Wei Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiao-Ying Xu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiao-Jie Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Huan Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Da Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jun-Ting Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhen Wu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|