18F-FET-PET as a biomarker for therapy response in non-contrast enhancing glioma following chemotherapy

PET-based response assessment criteria for diffuse gliomas (PET RANO 1.0): a report of the RANO group

Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) response criteria have been established and were updated in 2023 for MRI-based response evaluation of diffuse gliomas in clinical trials. In addition, PET-based imaging with amino acid tracers is increasingly considered for disease monitoring in both clinical practice and clinical trials. So far, a standardised framework defining timepoints for baseline and follow-up investigations and response evaluation criteria for PET imaging of diffuse gliomas has not been established. Therefore, in this Policy Review, we propose a set of criteria for response assessment based on amino acid PET imaging in clinical trials enrolling participants with diffuse gliomas as defined in the 2021 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. These proposed PET RANO criteria provide a conceptual framework that facilitates the structured implementation of PET imaging into clinical research and, ultimately, clinical routine. To this end, the PET RANO 1.0 criteria are intended to encourage specific investigations of amino acid PET imaging of gliomas.

18F-Fluoroethyl-L Tyrosine Positron Emission Tomography Radiomics in the Differentiation of Treatment-Related Changes from Disease Progression in Patients with Glioblastoma

The follow-up of glioma patients after therapeutic intervention remains a challenging topic, as therapy-related changes can emulate true progression in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. 18F-fluoroethyl-tyrosine (18F-FET) is a radiopharmaceutical that accumulates in glioma cells due to an increased expression of L-amino acid transporters and, contrary to gadolinium, does not depend on blood-brain barrier disruption to reach tumoral cells. It has demonstrated a high diagnostic value in the differentiation of tumoral viability and pseudoprogression or any other therapy-related changes, especially when combining traditional visual analysis with modern radiomics. In this review, we aim to cover the potential role of 18F-FET positron emission tomography in everyday clinical practice when applied to the follow-up of patients after the first therapeutical intervention, early response evaluation, and the differential diagnosis between therapy-related changes and progression.

Delineation and agreement of FET PET biological volumes in glioblastoma: results of the nuclear medicine credentialing program from the prospective, multi-centre trial evaluating FET PET In Glioblastoma (FIG) study-TROG 18.06

PURPOSE

The O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) PET in Glioblastoma (FIG) trial is an Australian prospective, multi-centre study evaluating FET PET for glioblastoma patient management. FET PET imaging timepoints are pre-chemoradiotherapy (FET1), 1-month post-chemoradiotherapy (FET2), and at suspected progression (FET3). Before participant recruitment, site nuclear medicine physicians (NMPs) underwent credentialing of FET PET delineation and image interpretation.

METHODS

Sites were required to complete contouring and dynamic analysis by ≥ 2 NMPs on benchmarking cases (n = 6) assessing biological tumour volume (BTV) delineation (3 × FET1) and image interpretation (3 × FET3). Data was reviewed by experts and violations noted. BTV definition includes tumour-to-background ratio (TBR) threshold of 1.6 with crescent-shaped background contour in the contralateral normal brain. Recurrence/pseudoprogression interpretation (FET3) required assessment of maximum TBR (TBRmax), dynamic analysis (time activity curve [TAC] type, time to peak), and qualitative assessment. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) assessed volume agreement, coefficient of variation (CoV) compared maximum/mean TBR (TBRmax/TBRmean) across cases, and pairwise analysis assessed spatial (Dice similarity coefficient [DSC]) and boundary agreement (Hausdorff distance [HD], mean absolute surface distance [MASD]).

RESULTS

Data was accrued from 21 NMPs (10 centres, n ≥ 2 each) and 20 underwent review. The initial pass rate was 93/119 (78.2%) and 27/30 requested resubmissions were completed. Violations were found in 25/72 (34.7%; 13/12 minor/major) of FET1 and 22/74 (29.7%; 14/8 minor/major) of FET3 reports. The primary reasons for resubmission were as follows: BTV over-contour (15/30, 50.0%), background placement (8/30, 26.7%), TAC classification (9/30, 30.0%), and image interpretation (7/30, 23.3%). CoV median and range for BTV, TBRmax, and TBRmean were 21.53% (12.00-30.10%), 5.89% (5.01-6.68%), and 5.01% (3.37-6.34%), respectively. BTV agreement was moderate to excellent (ICC = 0.82; 95% CI, 0.63-0.97) with good spatial (DSC = 0.84 ± 0.09) and boundary (HD = 15.78 ± 8.30 mm; MASD = 1.47 ± 1.36 mm) agreement.

CONCLUSION

The FIG study credentialing program has increased expertise across study sites. TBRmax and TBRmean were robust, with considerable variability in BTV delineation and image interpretation observed.

Prediction of response to lomustine-based chemotherapy in glioma patients at recurrence using MRI and FET PET

BACKGROUND

We evaluated O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine (FET) PET and MRI for early response assessment in recurrent glioma patients treated with lomustine-based chemotherapy.

METHODS

Thirty-six adult patients with WHO CNS grade 3 or 4 gliomas (glioblastoma, 69%) at recurrence (median number of recurrences, 1; range, 1-3) were retrospectively identified. Besides MRI, serial FET PET scans were performed at baseline and early after chemotherapy initiation (not later than two cycles). Tumor-to-brain ratios (TBR), metabolic tumor volumes (MTV), the occurrence of new distant hotspots with a mean TBR >1.6 at follow-up, and the dynamic parameter time-to-peak were derived from all FET PET scans. PET parameter thresholds were defined using ROC analyses to predict PFS of ≥6 months and OS of ≥12 months. MRI response assessment was based on RANO criteria. The predictive values of FET PET parameters and RANO criteria were subsequently evaluated using univariate and multivariate survival estimates.

RESULTS

After treatment initiation, the median follow-up time was 11 months (range, 3-71 months). Relative changes of TBR, MTV, and RANO criteria predicted a significantly longer PFS (all P ≤ .002) and OS (all P ≤ .045). At follow-up, the occurrence of new distant hotspots (n ≥ 1) predicted a worse outcome, with significantly shorter PFS (P = .005) and OS (P < .001). Time-to-peak changes did not predict a significantly longer survival. Multivariate survival analyses revealed that new distant hotspots at follow-up FET PET were most potent in predicting non-response (P < .001; HR, 8.578).

CONCLUSIONS

Data suggest that FET PET provides complementary information to RANO criteria for response evaluation of lomustine-based chemotherapy early after treatment initiation.

Amino Acid PET in Neurooncology

For decades, several amino acid PET tracers have been used to optimize diagnostics in patients with brain tumors. In clinical routine, the most important clinical indications for amino acid PET in brain tumor patients are differentiation of neoplasm from nonneoplastic etiologies, delineation of tumor extent for further diagnostic and treatment planning (i.e., diagnostic biopsy, resection, or radiotherapy), differentiation of treatment-related changes such as pseudoprogression or radiation necrosis after radiation or chemoradiation from tumor progression at follow-up, and assessment of response to anticancer therapy, including prediction of patient outcome. This continuing education article addresses the diagnostic value of amino acid PET for patients with either glioblastoma or metastatic brain cancer.

Clinical applications and prospects of PET imaging in patients with IDH-mutant gliomas

PET imaging using radiolabeled amino acids in addition to MRI has become a valuable diagnostic tool in the clinical management of patients with brain tumors. This review provides a comprehensive overview of PET studies in glioma patients with a mutation in the isocitrate dehydrogenase gene (IDH). A considerable fraction of these tumors typically show no contrast enhancement on MRI, especially when classified as grade 2 according to the World Health Organization classification of Central Nervous System tumors. Major diagnostic challenges in this situation are differential diagnosis, target definition for diagnostic biopsies, delineation of glioma extent for treatment planning, differentiation of treatment-related changes from tumor progression, and the evaluation of response to alkylating agents. The main focus of this review is the role of amino acid PET in this setting. Furthermore, in light of clinical trials using IDH inhibitors targeting the mutated IDH enzyme for treating patients with IDH-mutant gliomas, we also aim to give an outlook on PET probes specifically targeting the IDH mutation, which appear potentially helpful for response assessment.

PET Imaging in Neuro-Oncology: An Update and Overview of a Rapidly Growing Area

Simple Summary

Positron emission tomography (PET) is a functional imaging technique which plays an increasingly important role in the management of brain tumors. Owing different radiotracers, PET allows to image different metabolic aspects of the brain tumors. This review outlines currently available PET radiotracers and their respective indications in neuro-oncology. It specifically focuses on the investigation of gliomas, meningiomas, primary central nervous system lymphomas as well as brain metastases. Recent advances in the production of PET radiotracers, image analyses and translational applications to peptide radionuclide receptor therapy, which allow to treat brain tumors with radiotracers, are also discussed. The objective of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of PET imaging’s potential in neuro-oncology as an adjunct to brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Abstract

PET plays an increasingly important role in the management of brain tumors. This review outlines currently available PET radiotracers and their respective indications. It specifically focuses on ¹⁸F-FDG, amino acid and somatostatin receptor radiotracers, for imaging gliomas, meningiomas, primary central nervous system lymphomas as well as brain metastases. Recent advances in radiopharmaceuticals, image analyses and translational applications to therapy are also discussed. The objective of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of PET imaging’s potential in neuro-oncology as an adjunct to brain MRI for all medical professionals implicated in brain tumor diagnosis and care.

A systematic review of amino acid PET in assessing treatment response to temozolomide in glioma

The response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) criteria have been the gold standard for monitoring treatment response in glioblastoma (GBM) and differentiating tumor progression from pseudoprogression. While the RANO criteria have played a key role in detecting early tumor progression, their ability to identify pseudoprogression is limited by post-treatment damage to the blood-brain barrier (BBB), which often leads to contrast enhancement on MRI and correlates poorly to tumor status. Amino acid positron emission tomography (AA PET) is a rapidly growing imaging modality in neuro-oncology. While contrast-enhanced MRI relies on leaky vascularity or a compromised BBB for delivery of contrast agents, amino acid tracers can cross the BBB, making AA PET particularly well-suited for monitoring treatment response and diagnosing pseudoprogression. The authors performed a systematic review of PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase through December 2021 with the search terms “temozolomide” OR “Temodar,” “glioma” OR “glioblastoma,” “PET,” and “amino acid.” There were 19 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Thirteen studies utilized [¹⁸F]FET, five utilized [¹¹C]MET, and one utilized both. All studies used static AA PET parameters to evaluate TMZ treatment in glioma patients, with nine using dynamic tracer parameters in addition. Throughout these studies, AA PET demonstrated utility in TMZ treatment monitoring and predicting patient survival.

What Does PET Imaging Bring to Neuro-Oncology in 2022? A Review

Simple Summary

Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging is increasingly used to supplement MRI in the management of patient with brain tumors. In this article, we provide a review of the current place and perspectives of PET imaging for the diagnosis and follow-up of from primary brain tumors such as gliomas, meningiomas and central nervous system lymphomas, as well as brain metastases. Different PET radiotracers targeting different biological processes are used to accurately depict these brain tumors and provide unique metabolic and biologic information. Radiolabeled amino acids such as [¹⁸F]FDOPA or [¹⁸F]FET are used for imaging of gliomas while both [¹⁸F]FDG and amino acids can be used for brain metastases. Meningiomas can be seen with a high contrast using radiolabeled ligands of somatostatin receptors, which they usually carry. Unconventional tracers that allow the study of other biological processes such as cell proliferation, hypoxia, or neo-angiogenesis are currently being studied for brain tumors imaging.

Abstract

PET imaging is being increasingly used to supplement MRI in the clinical management of brain tumors. The main radiotracers implemented in clinical practice include [¹⁸F]FDG, radiolabeled amino acids ([¹¹C]MET, [¹⁸F]FDOPA, [¹⁸F]FET) and [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR, targeting glucose metabolism, L-amino-acid transport and somatostatin receptors expression, respectively. This review aims at addressing the current place and perspectives of brain PET imaging for patients who suffer from primary or secondary brain tumors, at diagnosis and during follow-up. A special focus is given to the following: radiolabeled amino acids PET imaging for tumor characterization and follow-up in gliomas; the role of amino acid PET and [¹⁸F]FDG PET for detecting brain metastases recurrence; [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET for guiding treatment in meningioma and particularly before targeted radiotherapy.

Worse prognosis for IDH wild-type diffuse gliomas with larger residual biological tumor burden

OBJECTIVE

The association of overall survival (OS) with tumor burden, including contrast enhanced (CE) volume on CE T1-weighted images, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) hyperintense volume, and 3, 4-dihydroxy-6-[¹⁸F]-fluoro-L-phenylalanine (FDOPA) hypermetabolic volume, in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type gliomas remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the association between biological tumor burden in pre- and post-operative status and OS in IDH wild-type gliomas, and evaluated which volume was the best predictor of OS.

METHODS

Thirty-four patients with treatment-naïve IDH wild-type gliomas (WHO grade II 6, III 15, IV 13) were retrospectively included. Three pre-operative tumor regions of interest (ROIs) were segmented based on the CE, FLAIR hyperintense, and FDOPA hypermetabolic regions. Resected ROIs were segmented from the post-operative images. Residual CE, FLAIR hyperintense, and FDOPA hypermetabolic ROIs were created by subtracting resected ROIs from pre-operative ROIs. Cox regression analysis was conducted to investigate the association of OS with the volume of each ROI, and Akaike information criterion was used to assess the fitness.

RESULTS

Residual CE volume had a significant association with OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.26, p = 0.039], but this effect disappeared when controlling for tumor grade. Residual FDOPA hypermetabolic volume best fit the regression model and was significantly associated with OS (HR = 1.18, p = 0.008), even when controlling for tumor grade. FLAIR hyperintense volume showed no significant association with OS.

CONCLUSION

Residual FDOPA hypermetabolic burden predicted OS for IDH wild-type gliomas, regardless of the tumor grade. Furthermore, removing hypermetabolic and CE regions may improve the prognosis.

Use of PET Imaging in Neuro-Oncological Surgery

Simple Summary

The use of positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in neuro-oncological surgery is an exciting field with thriving perspectives. Increasing evidence exists for amino acid-based PET to facilitate interpretation of imaging findings following therapeutic interventions in patients with glioma and brain metastases. In meningioma patients, radiolabeled somatostatin receptor ligands provide an improved tumor tissue visualization in lesions located in the vicinity of the skull base and differentiate between scar tissue and tumor recurrence. Moreover, they can be applied as an individual treatment option in recurrent atypical and anaplastic meningioma not eligible for further surgery and radiotherapy. With a focus on its clinical application, this review provides an overview of the emerging field of PET imaging in neuro-oncological surgery.

Abstract

This review provides an overview of current applications and perspectives of PET imaging in neuro-oncological surgery. The past and future of PET imaging in the management of patients with glioma and brain metastases are elucidated with an emphasis on amino acid tracers, such as O-(2-[¹⁸F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (¹⁸F-FET). The thematic scope includes surgical resection planning, prognostication, non-invasive prediction of molecular tumor characteristics, depiction of intratumoral heterogeneity, response assessment, differentiation between tumor progression and treatment-related changes, and emerging new tracers. Furthermore, the role of PET using specific somatostatin receptor ligands for the management of patients with meningioma is discussed. Further advances in neuro-oncological imaging can be expected from promising new techniques, such as hybrid PET/MR scanners and the implementation of artificial intelligence methods, such as radiomics.

Extent and prognostic value of MGMT promotor methylation in glioma WHO grade II

MGMT promotor methylation is associated with favourable outcome in high-grade glioma. In glioma WHO grade II, it is unclear whether the extent of MGMT promotor methylation and its prognostic role is independent from other molecular markers. We performed a retrospective analysis of 155 patients with glioma WHO grade II. First, all 155 patients were assigned to three molecular groups according to the 2016 WHO classification system: (1) oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant and 1p19q co-deleted (n = 81); (2) astrocytoma, IDH-mutant and 1p19q non-codeleted (n = 54); (3) astrocytoma, IDH-wildtype (n = 20). MGMT promotor methylation was quantified using Sanger sequencing of the CpG sites 74–98 within the MGMT promotor region. Highest numbers of methylated CpG sites were found for oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant and 1p19q co-deleted. When 1p19q co-deletion was absent, numbers of methylated CpG sites were higher in the presence of IDH-mutation. Accordingly, lowest numbers were seen in the IDH-wildtype subpopulation. In the entire cohort, larger numbers of methylated CpG sites were associated with favourable outcome. When analysed separately for the three WHO subgroups, a similar association was only retained in astrocytoma, IDH-wildtype. Collectively, extent of MGMT promotor methylation was strongly associated with other molecular markers and added prognostic information in astrocytoma, IDH-wildtype. Evaluation in prospective cohorts is warranted.

Multiparametric MR-PET measurements in hypermetabolic regions reflect differences in molecular status and tumor grade in treatment-naïve diffuse gliomas

PURPOSE

To assess whether hypermetabolically-defined regions of interest (ROIs) on 3,4-dihydroxy-6-[18F]-fluoro-L-phenylalanine (FDOPA) positron emission tomography (PET) could be used to evaluate physiological features and whether there are measurable differences between molecular subtypes and tumor grades.

METHODS

Sixty-eight treatment-naïve glioma patients who underwent FDOPA PET and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were retrospectively included. Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery hyperintense regions (FLAIR_ROI) were segmented. FDOPA hypermetabolic regions (FDOPA_ROI, tumor-to-striatum ratios > 1) within FLAIR_ROI were extracted. Normalized maximum standardized uptake value (nSUV_max), volume of each ROI, and median relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) within FLAIR_ROI or FDOPA_ROI were calculated. Imaging metrics were compared using Students t or Mann-Whitney U tests. Area under the curve (AUC) of receiver-operating characteristic curves were used to determine whether imaging metrics within FLAIR_ROI or FDOPA_ROI can discriminate different molecular statuses or grades.

RESULTS

Using either FLAIR_ROI or FDOPA_ROI, the nSUV_max and rCBV were significantly higher and the ADC was lower in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type than mutant gliomas, and in higher-grade gliomas (HGGs) than lower-grade gliomas (LGGs). The FDOPA_ROI volume was significantly higher in 1p19q codeleted than non-codeleted gliomas, and in HGGs than LGGs. Although not significant, imaging metrics extracted by FDOPA_ROI discriminated molecular status and tumor grade more accurately than those extracted by FLAIR_ROI (AUC of IDH status, 0.87 vs. 0.82; 1p19q status, 0.78 vs. 0.73; grade, 0.87 vs. 0.76).

CONCLUSION

FDOPA hypermetabolic ROI may extract useful imaging features of gliomas, which can illuminate biological differences between different molecular status or tumor grades.

Current Landscape and Emerging Fields of PET Imaging in Patients with Brain Tumors

The number of positron-emission tomography (PET) tracers used to evaluate patients with brain tumors has increased substantially over the last years. For the management of patients with brain tumors, the most important indications are the delineation of tumor extent (e.g., for planning of resection or radiotherapy), the assessment of treatment response to systemic treatment options such as alkylating chemotherapy, and the differentiation of treatment-related changes (e.g., pseudoprogression or radiation necrosis) from tumor progression. Furthermore, newer PET imaging approaches aim to address the need for noninvasive assessment of tumoral immune cell infiltration and response to immunotherapies (e.g., T-cell imaging). This review summarizes the clinical value of the landscape of tracers that have been used in recent years for the above-mentioned indications and also provides an overview of promising newer tracers for this group of patients.

Prognostic value of 18F-FET PET/CT in newly diagnosed WHO 2016 high-grade glioma

O-(2-[F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (F-FET PET/CT) is well known in brain tumor management. Our study aimed to identify the prognostic value of F-FET PET/CT in high-grade gliomas (HGG) according the current 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification.Patients with histologically proven WHO 2016 HGG were prospectively included. A dynamic F-FET PET/CT was performed allowing to obtain 2 static PET frames (static frame 1: 20-40 minutes and static frame 2: 2-22 minutes). We analyzed static parameters (standard uptake value [SUV]max, SUVmean, SUVpeak, TBRmax, TBRmean, tumoral lesion glycolysis, and metabolic tumoral volume) for various isocontours (from 10% to 90%). PET parameters, clinical features, and molecular biomarkers were compared with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in univariate and multivariate analysis.Twenty-nine patients were included (grade III n = 3, grade IV n = 26). Mean PFS and OS were, respectively, 8.8 and 13.9 months. According to univariate analysis, SUVmean, SUVpeak, TBRmax, and TBRmean were significantly correlated with OS. In static 1 analysis, TBRmax seemed to be the best OS prognostic parameter (P = .004). In static 2 analysis, TBRmean was the best parameter (P = .01). In static 1 analysis, only SUVpeak was significant (P = .05) for PFS. Good performance status (PS < 2; P < .0001) and extent of resection (P = .019) identified the subgroup of patients with the best OS. Only TBRmax (P = .026) and extent of resection (P = .025) remained significant parameters in multivariate analysis.Our data suggested that high TBRmax seemed to be the most significant OS independent prognostic factor in patients with newly diagnosed HGG.

Non-invasive tumor decoding and phenotyping of cerebral gliomas utilizing multiparametric 18F-FET PET-MRI and MR Fingerprinting

OBJECTIVES

The introduction of the 2016 WHO classification of CNS tumors has made the combined molecular and histopathological characterization of tumors a pivotal part of glioma patient management. Recent publications on radiogenomics-based prediction of the mutational status have demonstrated the predictive potential of imaging-based, non-invasive tissue characterization algorithms. Hence, the aim of this study was to assess the potential of multiparametric ¹⁸F-FET PET-MRI including MR fingerprinting accelerated with machine learning and radiomic algorithms to predict tumor grading and mutational status of patients with cerebral gliomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

42 patients with suspected primary brain tumor without prior surgical or systemic treatment or biopsy underwent an ¹⁸F-FET PET-MRI examination. To differentiate the mutational status and the WHO grade of the cerebral tumors, support vector machine and random forest were trained with the radiomics signature of the multiparametric PET-MRI data including MR fingerprinting. Surgical sampling served as a gold standard for histopathological reference and assessment of mutational status.

RESULTS

The 5-fold cross-validated area under the curve in predicting the ATRX mutation was 85.1%, MGMT mutation was 75.7%, IDH1 was 88.7%, and 1p19q was 97.8%. The area under the curve of differentiating low-grade glioma vs. high-grade glioma was 85.2%.

CONCLUSION

¹⁸F-FET PET-MRI and MR fingerprinting enable high-quality imaging-based tumor decoding and phenotyping for differentiation of low-grade vs. high-grade gliomas and for prediction of the mutational status of ATRX, IDH1, and 1p19q. These initial results underline the potential of ¹⁸F-FET PET-MRI to serve as an alternative to invasive tissue characterization.

Current status of PET imaging in neuro-oncology

Over the past decades, a variety of PET tracers have been used for the evaluation of patients with brain tumors. For clinical routine, the most important clinical indications for PET imaging in patients with brain tumors are the identification of neoplastic tissue including the delineation of tumor extent for the further diagnostic and therapeutic management (ie, biopsy, resection, or radiotherapy planning), the assessment of response to a certain anticancer therapy including its (predictive) effect on the patients’ outcome and the differentiation of treatment-related changes (eg, pseudoprogression and radiation necrosis) from tumor progression at follow-up. To serve medical professionals of all disciplines involved in the diagnosis and care of patients with brain tumors, this review summarizes the value of PET imaging for the latter-mentioned 3 clinically relevant indications in patients with glioma, meningioma, and brain metastases.