Neurocognitive evaluation of brain metastases patients treated with post-resection stereotactic radiosurgery: a prospective single arm clinical trial

Survival and Yield of Surveillance Imaging in Long-Term Survivors of Brain Metastasis Treated with Stereotactic Radiosurgery

OBJECTIVES

The optimal frequency of surveillance brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in long-term survivors with brain metastases after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is unknown. Our aim was to identify the optimal frequency of surveillance imaging in long-term survivors with brain metastases after SRS.

METHODS

Eligible patients were identified from a cohort treated with SRS definitively or postoperatively at our institution from 2014 to 2019 with no central nervous system (CNS) failure within 12 months from SRS. Time to CNS disease failure diagnosis and cost per patient were estimated using theoretical MRI schedules of 2, 3, 4, and 6 months starting 1 year after SRS until CNS failure. Time to diagnosis was calculated from the date of CNS progression to the theoretical imaging date on each schedule.

RESULTS

This cohort included 55 patients (median follow-up from SRS: 2.48 years). During the study period, 20.0% had CNS disease failure (median: 2.26 years from SRS treatment). In this cohort, a theoretical 2-month, 3-month, 4-month, and 6-month MRI brain surveillance schedule produced a respective estimated time to diagnosis of CNS disease failure of 1.11, 1.74, 1.65, and 3.65 months. The cost of expedited diagnosis for the cohort (dollars/month) for each theoretical imaging schedule compared with a 6-month surveillance schedule was $6600 for a 2-month protocol, $4496 for a 3-month protocol, and $2180 for a 4-month protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on cost-benefit, a 4-month MRI brain schedule should be considered in patients with metastatic disease to the brain treated definitively or postoperatively with SRS without evidence of CNS recurrence at 1 year.

Health related quality of life trajectories after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Health related quality of life (HRQoL) is often used as an outcome measure of cancer treatment. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a mainstay treatment of brain metastases (BMs) with constantly improving treatment envelope. The goal of this systematic review was to evaluated HRQoL trajectories after SRS, identify important predictors of HRQoL after SRS, and to evaluate clinical importance of post-SRS HRQoL trajectories of BM patients treated with SRS.

METHODS

A systematic literature review according to the PRISMA guidelines analyzing HRQoL trajectories after SRS for BM published in the Pubmed/MEDLINE database before January, 2022.

RESULTS

We identified 18 studies that evaluated HRQoL before and at least once after SRS for BMs. The majority of studies were single-institution retrospective series and included patients with different cancer types. Different instruments were used to assess HRQoL. In the majority of studies (n = 10) at group level, there was no significant change in global HRQoL after SRS. Stability, improvement, and deterioration of HRQoL global and subscale scores at individual patient level were common. Post-SRS HRQoL deterioration was predicted by worse functional status, greater number of BMs, delayed SRS, symptomatic BMs, and presence of seizures and cognitive impairment. Shorter post-SRS survival and adverse radiation effects (AREs) were associated with worse HRQoL.

CONCLUSIONS

SRS for BMs is often associated with sustained preservation of HRQoL. Individual variation of HRQoL domains after SRS is common. Shorter survival and AREs are associated with worse HRQoL. Worse functional status and greater disease burden predict unfavorable HRQoL trajectories after SRS for BMs.

Neurological and Medical Complications in Brain Tumor Patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patients with brain tumors are susceptible to multiple complications that can affect their survival or quality of life. The scope of these complications is widening due to prolonged overall survival and improved therapies. In this review, we discuss the most common complications in this patient population focusing on the recent literature. We specifically concentrated on tumor-related epilepsy, vasogenic edema, infectious, vascular, chemotherapeutic, radiation, endocrine, and cognitive complications.

RECENT FINDINGS

Molecular biomarkers play a role in epileptogenicity in brain tumor patients, and anti-epileptic drugs may cause neuro-cognitive side effects independent of other factors. The pathophysiology of vasogenic edema remains complex and poorly understood. Limited data suggest that newer oral anticoagulants appear to be safe and effective in venous and arterial thromboembolic complications. Brain tumor patients are prone to a wide variety of complications, including some related to new therapies. Optimal management of these complications improves quality of life, and in some cases overall survival.

Prospective memory and brain metastases: a relevant target for rehabilitation in post-operative patients?

PURPOSE

The study investigated the prospective memory (PM) functioning among patients with brain metastases (BM), eligible for neurosurgy/radiosurgery, and its relationships with depression and quality of life (QoL).

METHODS

This case-healthy-control, cross-sectional study, comprised 160 participants, including 49 patients with BM from various cancers treated with neurosurgery or radiosurgery. They were compared with 111 matched controls on a set of neuropsychological tests, including the MoCA global cognitive test and an experimental PM task 'PROMESSE'. Participants also completed a depression scale (BDI-II), a generic (SF-12) and a specific (QLQ-C30) QoL instrument for cancer patients. Multivariate analyses were conducted on various PM outcomes, in particular on event-based (EBPM) and time-based (TBPM) PM performances.

RESULTS

After adjusting for age and socio-cultural level, patients with BM performed worse than the control on the PM task (p < .0001) [OR 1.05; 95%CI (1.01-1.08)], whatever the location of BM (frontal versus temporal lobe). Patients with infratentorial BM exhibited better TBPM performances than patients with supratentorial BM (p = .02). The global PM performance was positively correlated with the MoCA (r = .45) and the SF-12 global score (r = .34), and negatively with the BDI-II score (r = - .20), the number of BM (r = - .34) and the volumetric of the BM (r = - 29). The TBPM performance was linked to the global QoL (r = .40) in patients.

CONCLUSION

The study showed a significant PM deficit in patients with BM eligible for a neurosurgy/radiosurgery, which is linked to damaged QoL and which likely maintains some depressive affects. Prospective memory rehabilitation program should especially focus on TBPM for post-operative patients with BM.

Cognitive functioning and predictors thereof in patients with 1-10 brain metastases selected for stereotactic radiosurgery

PURPOSE

Information on predictive factors of cognitive functioning in patients with (multiple) brain metastases (BM) selected for radiosurgery may allow for more individual care and may play a role in predicting cognitive outcome after radiosurgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate cognitive performance, and predictors thereof, in patients with 1-10 BM before radiosurgery.

METHODS

Cognition was measured before radiosurgery using a standardized neuropsychological test battery in patients with 1-10 BM (expected survival > 3 months; KPS ≥ 70; no prior BM treatment). Regression formulae were constructed to calculate sociodemographically corrected z scores. Group and individual cognitive functioning was analyzed. Multivariable regression was used to explore potential predictors.

RESULTS

Patients (N = 92) performed significantly worse than controls (N = 104) on all 11 test variables (medium-large effect sizes for 8 variables). Percentages of impairment were highest for information processing (55.3%), dexterity (43.2%) and cognitive flexibility (28.7%). 62% and 46% of patients had impairments in at least two, or three test variables, respectively. Models including combinations of clinical and psychological variables were predictive of verbal memory, psychomotor speed, information processing and dexterity. Neither number nor volume of metastases predicted patients' test performance.

CONCLUSIONS

Already before radiosurgery, almost half of the patients suffered from severe cognitive deficits in at least three test variables. At group and individual level, information processing, cognitive flexibility, and dexterity were most affected. These cognitive impairments may impair daily functioning and patients' ability to make (shared) treatment decisions. Both clinical (symptomatic BM; timing of BM diagnosis) and psychological (mental fatigue) characteristics influenced cognitive performance.

CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION

Cognition and Radiation Study A (CAR-Study A; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02953756; Medical Ethics Committee file number: NL53472.028.15/P1515).

Cognitive functioning following brain irradiation as part of cancer treatment: Characterizing better cognitive performance

OBJECTIVE

Although brain radiation therapy (RT) impacts cognitive function, little is known about the subset of survivors with minimal cognitive deficits. This study compares the characteristics of patients receiving brain irradiation as part of cancer treatment with minimal cognitive deficits to those with poorer cognitive functioning.

METHODS

Adults at least 6 months postbrain RT (N = 198) completed cognitive measures of attention, memory, and executive functions. Cognitive functioning was categorized into better- and poorer-performing groups, with better-performing survivors scoring no worse than 1.5 standard deviations below the published normative mean on all cognitive measures. Logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with better-performing group membership.

RESULTS

Approximately 25% of the sample met the criteria for the better-performing group. In unadjusted analyses, RT type (whole brain irradiation and partial brain irradiation), sedating medications, and fatigue were independently associated with cognition. Sociodemographic and other clinical characteristics were not significant. In adjusted analyses, only fatigue remained significantly associated with group membership (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.01-1.09, P = .009).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a subgroup of survivors with minimal long-term cognitive deficits despite undergoing a full course of brain RT as part of cancer treatment. Lower fatigue had the strongest association with better cognitive performance. Interventions targeting cancer-related fatigue may help buffer the neurotoxic effects of brain RT.