Surgery for temporal glioblastoma: lobectomy outranks oncosurgical-based gross-total resection

Supratotal Resection: An Emerging Concept of Glioblastoma Multiforme Surgery-Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The severe neurologic tumor known as glioblastoma (GBM), also referred to as a grade IV astrocytoma, is rapidly progressive and debilitating. Supratotal resection (SpTR) is an emerging concept within glioma surgery, which aims to achieve a more extensive resection of the tumor than is possible with conventional techniques.

METHODS

We performed a language-independent search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL to identify all available literature up to August 2022 of patients undergoing SpTR assessing survival outcomes in comparison to other surgical modalities.

RESULTS

After screening for exclusion, a total of 13 studies, all retrospective in design, were identified and included in our meta-analysis. SpTR was associated with significantly increased overall survival (hazard ratio 0.77, 95% CI 0.71-0.84; P < 0.01, I2 = 96%) and progression-free survival (hazard ratio 0.2, 95% CI 0.07-0.56; P = 0.002, I2 = 88%).

CONCLUSION

SpTR is associated with greater overall survival and PFS when compared with other glioblastoma surgeries like GTR or SubTR.

Lobectomy versus gross total resection for glioblastoma multiforme: A systematic review and individual-participant data meta-analysis

Overall survival (OS)for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) has a known association with the extent of tumor resection with gross total resection (GTR) typically considered as the upper limit. In certain regions such as the anterior temporal lobe, more extensive resection by means of a lobectomy may be feasible. In our systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to compare the outcomes of lobectomy and GTR for GBM. PubMed and Embase were queriedfor studies that compared the outcomes after lobectomy or GTR for GBM. The primary outcomes were OS, progression-free survival (PFS), and Karnofksy Performance Status (KPS) score at the latest follow-up. The secondary outcomes were seizure control at the latest follow-up and complication rates. Meta-analysis for OS and PFS was performed using individual-participant data reconstructed from published Kaplan-Meier curves. Random-effect meta-analysis was performed for KPS. The secondary outcomes were pooled using descriptive statistics. Of the 795 records screened, 6 were included in our study. Meta-analysis revealed that anterior temporal, frontal, or occipital lobectomy was associated with significantly better OS (p < 0.001) and PFS (p < 0.001) than GTR, but not KPS (MD = 6.37; 95% CI=(-13.80, 26.54); p = 0.536). Anterior temporal lobectomy was associated with significantly better seizure control rates than GTR for temporal GBM (OR = 27; 95% CI=(1.4, 515.9); p = 0.002). There was no statistically significant difference in complication rates between anterior temporal, frontal, or occipital lobectomy and GTR. In conclusion, lobectomy was associated with significantly better OS, PFS, and seizure control than GTR for GBM.

Supramaximal Resection for Glioblastoma: Redefining the Extent of Resection Criteria and Its Impact on Survival

Glioblastomas (GBMs) are the most common and aggressive primary brain tumors, and despite advances in treatment, prognosis remains poor. The extent of resection has been widely recognized as a key factor affecting survival outcomes in GBM patients. The surgical principle of "maximal safe resection" has been widely applied to balance tumor removal and neurological function preservation. Historically, T1-contrast enhanced (T1CE) extent of resection has been the focus of research; however, the "supramaximal resection" concept has emerged, advocating for even greater tumor resection while maintaining neurological function. Recent studies have demonstrated potential survival benefits associated with resection beyond T1CE extent in GBMs. This review explores the developing consensus and newly established criteria for "supramaximal resection" in GBMs, with a focus on T2-extent of resection. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on supramaximal resection are summarized, and the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) resect group classification for extent of resection is introduced. The evolving understanding of the role of supramaximal resection in GBMs may lead to improved patient outcomes and more objective criteria for evaluating the extent of tumor resection.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Supramarginal Resection versus Gross Total Resection in Glioblastoma: Can We Enhance Progression-Free Survival Time and Preserve Postoperative Safety?

To date, gross total resection (GTR) of the contrast-enhancing area of glioblastoma (GB) is the benchmark treatment regarding surgical therapy. However, GB infiltrates beyond those margins, and most tumors recur in close proximity to the initial resection margin. It is unclear whether a supramarginal resection (SMR) enhances progression-free survival (PFS) time without increasing the incidence of postoperative surgical complications. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to investigate SMR with regard to PFS and postoperative surgical complications. We searched for eligible studies comparing SMR techniques with conventional GTR in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Medline databases. From 3158 initially identified records, 11 articles met the criteria and were included in our meta-analysis. Our results illustrate significantly prolonged PFS time in SMR compared with GTR (HR: 11.16; 95% CI: 3.07–40.52, p = 0.0002). The median PFS of the SMR arm was 8.44 months (95% CI: 5.18–11.70, p < 0.00001) longer than the GTR arm. The rate of postoperative surgical complications (meningitis, intracranial hemorrhage, and CSF leaks) did not differ between the SMR group and the GTR group. SMR resulted in longer median progression-free survival without a negative postoperative surgical risk profile. Multicentric prospective randomized trials with a standardized definition of SMR and analysis of neurologic functioning and health-related quality of life are justified and needed to improve the level of evidence.

Unplanned intensive care unit readmission after surgical treatment in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma - forfeiture of surgically achieved advantages?

Postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) monitoring is an established option to ensure patient safety after resection of newly diagnosed glioblastoma. In contrast, secondary unplanned ICU readmission following complicating events during the initial postoperative course might be associated with severe morbidity and impair initially intended surgical benefit. In the present study, we assessed the prognostic impact of secondary ICU readmission and aimed to identify preoperatively ascertainable risk factors for the development of such adverse events in patients treated surgically for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Between 2013 and 2018, 240 patients were surgically treated for newly diagnosed glioblastoma at the authors' neuro-oncological center. Secondary ICU readmission was defined as any unplanned admission to the ICU during initial hospital stay. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify preoperatively measurable risk factors for unplanned ICU readmission. Nineteen of 240 glioblastoma patients (8%) were readmitted to the ICU. Median overall survival of patients with unplanned ICU readmission was 9 months compared to 17 months for patients without secondary ICU readmission (p=0.008). Multivariable analysis identified "preoperative administration of dexamethasone > 7 days" (p=0.002) as a significant and independent predictor of secondary unplanned ICU admission. Secondary ICU readmission following surgery for newly diagnosed glioblastoma is significantly associated with poor survival and thus may negate surgically achieved prerequisites for further treatment. This underlines the indispensability of precise patient selection as well as the importance of further scientific debate on these highly relevant aspects for patient safety.

The tentative application of en bloc concept in the pediatric brain tumor: Experience from a large pediatric center in china

Background

Children are more susceptible to the higher rate of massive blood transfusion because of the less allowable blood loss and lower intraoperative tolerance to blood loss during the resection of brain tumors. The surgical concept of en bloc resection, which is widely used in other tumors, may contribute to the improvement of brain tumor resection. However, there is still a lack of comprehensive research on its application in pediatric brain tumors.

Objective

The aim of this study is to investigate the outcomes of the en bloc concept and the factors associated with the application of the en bloc concept in pediatric brain tumors.

Methods

According to the surgical concept involved, the patients were divided into three subgroups: complete en bloc concept, partial en bloc concept, and piecemeal concept. The matching comparison (complete and partial en bloc concept groups vs. piecemeal concept group) was conducted to investigate the effect of the en bloc concept on the outcomes. Then, the patient data from January 2018, when the en bloc concept was routinely integrated into the brain tumor surgery in our medical center, were reviewed and analyzed to find out the predictors associated with the application of en bloc concept.

Results

In the en bloc group, the perioperative parameters, such as hospital stay (p = 0.001), pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) stay (p = 0.003), total blood loss (p = 0.015), transfusion rate (p = 0.005), and complication rate (p = 0.039), were all significantly improved. The multinomial logistic regression analysis showed that tumor volume, bottom vessel, and imaging features, such as encasing nerve or pass-by vessel, finger-like attachment, ratio of “limited line”, and ratio of “clear line”, were independent predictors for the application of the en bloc concept in our medical center.

Conclusion

This study supports the application of complete and partial en bloc concept in the pediatric brain tumor surgery based on the preoperative evaluation of imaging features, and compared with the piecemeal concept, the en bloc concept can improve the short outcomes without significant increases in the neurological complications. Large-series and additional supportive pieces of evidence are still warranted.

Disconnecting multicellular networks in brain tumours

Cancer cells can organize and communicate in functional networks. Similarly to other networks in biology and sociology, these can be highly relevant for growth and resilience. In this Perspective, we demonstrate by the example of glioblastomas and other incurable brain tumours how versatile multicellular tumour networks are formed by two classes of long intercellular membrane protrusions: tumour microtubes and tunnelling nanotubes. The resulting networks drive tumour growth and resistance to standard therapies. This raises the question of how to disconnect brain tumour networks to halt tumour growth and whether this can make established therapies more effective. Emerging principles of tumour networks, their potential relevance for tumour types outside the brain and translational implications, including clinical trials that are already based on these discoveries, are discussed.

A consensus definition of supratotal resection for anatomically distinct primary glioblastoma: an AANS/CNS Section on Tumors survey of neurosurgical oncologists

INTRODUCTION

Supratotal resection (SpTR) of glioblastoma may be associated with improved survival, but published results have varied in part from lack of consensus on the definition and appropriate use of SpTR. A previous small survey of neurosurgical oncologists with expertise performing SpTR found resection 1-2 cm beyond contrast enhancement was an acceptable definition and glioblastoma involving the right frontal and bilateral anterior temporal lobes were considered most amenable to SpTR. The general neurosurgical oncology community has not yet confirmed the practicality of this definition.

METHODS

Seventy-six neurosurgical oncology members of the AANS/CNS Tumor Section were surveyed, representing 34.0% of the 223 members who were administered the survey. Participants were presented with 11 definitions of SpTR and rated each definition's appropriateness. Participants additionally reviewed magnetic resonance imaging for 10 anatomically distinct glioblastomas and assessed the tumor location's eloquence, perceived equipoise of enrolling patients in a randomized trial comparing gross total to SpTR, and their personal treatment plans.

RESULTS

Most neurosurgeons surveyed agree that gross total plus resection of some non-contrast enhancement (n = 57, 80.3%) or resection 1-2 cm beyond contrast enhancement (n = 52, 73.2%) are appropriate definitions for SpTR. Cases were divided into three anatomically distinct groups by perceived equipoise between gross total and SpTR. The best clinical trial candidates were thought to be right anterior temporal (n = 58, 76.3%) and right frontal (n = 55, 73.3%) glioblastomas.

CONCLUSION

Support exists among neurosurgical oncologists with varying familiarity performing SpTR to adopt the proposed consensus definition of SpTR of glioblastoma and to potentially investigate the utility of SpTR to treat right anterior temporal and right frontal glioblastomas in a clinical trial. A smaller proportion of general neurosurgical oncologists than SpTR experts would personally treat a left anterior temporal glioblastoma with SpTR.

Temporal lobe epilepsy surgery: Piriform cortex resection impacts seizure control in the long-term

Objective

Recently, we showed that resection of at least 27% of the temporal part of piriform cortex (PiC) strongly correlated with seizure freedom 1 year following selective amygdalo‐hippocampectomy (tsSAHE) in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (mTLE). However, the impact of PiC resection on long‐term seizure outcome following tsSAHE is currently unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of PiC resection on long‐term seizure outcome in patients with mTLE treated with tsSAHE.

Methods

Between 2012 and 2017, 64 patients were included in the retrospective analysis. Long‐term follow‐up (FU) was defined as at least 2 years postoperatively. Seizure outcome was assessed according to the International League against Epilepsy (ILAE). The resected proportions of hippocampus, amygdala, and PiC were volumetrically assessed.

Results

The mean FU duration was 3.75 ± 1.61 years. Patients with ILAE class 1 revealed a significantly larger median proportion of resected PiC compared to patients with ILAE class 2–6 [46% (IQR 31–57) vs. 16% (IQR 6–38), p = 0.001]. Resected proportions of hippocampus and amygdala did not significantly differ for these groups. Among those patients with at least 27% resected proportion of PiC, there were significantly more patients with seizure freedom compared to the patients with <27% resected proportion of PiC (83% vs. 39%, p = 0.0007).

Conclusions

Our results show a strong impact of the extent of PiC resection on long‐term seizure outcome following tsSAHE in mTLE. The authors suggest the PiC to constitute a key target volume in tsSAHE to achieve seizure freedom in the long term.

Supramarginal Resection for Glioblastoma: It Is Time to Set Boundaries! A Critical Review on a Hot Topic

Glioblastoma are the most common primary malignant brain tumors with a highly infiltrative behavior. The extent of resection of the enhancing component has been shown to be correlated to survival. Recently, it has been proposed to move the resection beyond the contrast-enhanced portion into the MR hyper intense tissue which typically surrounds the tumor, the so-called supra marginal resection (SMR). Though it should be associated with better overall survival (OS), a potential harmful resection must be avoided in order not to create new neurological deficits. Through this work, we aimed to perform a critical review of SMR in patients with Glioblastoma. A Medline database search and a pooled meta-analysis of HRs were conducted; 19 articles were included. Meta-analysis revealed a pooled OS HR of 0.64 (p = 0.052). SMR is generally considered as the resection of any T1w gadolinium-enhanced tumor exceeding FLAIR volume, but no consensus exists about the amount of volume that must be resected to have an OS gain. Equally, the role and the weight of several pre-operative features (tumor volume, location, eloquence, etc.), the intraoperative methods to extend resection, and the post-operative deficits, need to be considered more deeply in future studies.

The Evolving Role of Neurosurgical Intervention for Central Nervous System Tumors

Since its inception, greater than a century ago, neurosurgery has represented the fundamental trait-d'union between clinical management, scientific investigation, and therapeutic advancements in the field of brain tumors. During the years, oncological neurosurgery has evolved as a self-standing subspecialty, due to technical progress, equipment improvement, evolution of therapeutic paradigms, and the progressively crucial role that it plays in the execution of complex therapeutic strategies and modern clinical trials.

The Surgical Management of Brain Metastases in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Identification of the Early Laboratory and Clinical Determinants of Survival

Background: Brain metastases (BM) indicate advanced states of cancer disease and cranial surgery represents a common treatment modality. In the present study, we aimed to identify the risk factors for a reduced survival in patients receiving a surgical treatment of BM derived from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: A total of 154 patients with NSCLC that had been surgically treated for BM at the authors’ institution between 2013 and 2018 were included for a further analysis. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify the predictors of a poor overall survival (OS). Results: The median overall survival (mOS) was 11 months (95% CI 8.2–13.8). An age > 65 years, the infratentorial location of BM, elevated preoperative C-reactive protein levels, a perioperative red blood cell transfusion, postoperative prolonged mechanical ventilation (>48 h) and the occurrence of postoperative adverse events were identified as independent factors of a poor OS. Conclusions: The present study identified several predictors for a worsened OS in patients that underwent surgery for BM of NSCLC. These findings might guide a better risk/benefit assessment in the course of metastatic NSCLC therapy and might help to more sufficiently cope with the challenges of cancer therapy in these advanced stages of disease.

Perioperative red blood cell transfusion is associated with poor functional outcome and overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma

The influence of perioperative red blood cell (RBC) transfusion on prognosis of glioblastoma patients continues to be inconclusive. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association between perioperative blood transfusion (PBT) and overall survival (OS) in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Between 2013 and 2018, 240 patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma underwent surgical resection of intracerebral mass lesion at the authors’ institution. PBT was defined as the transfusion of RBC within 5 days from the day of surgery. The impact of PBT on overall survival was assessed using Kaplan–Meier analysis and multivariate regression analysis. Seventeen out of 240 patients (7%) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma received PBT. The overall median number of blood units transfused was 2 (95% CI 1–6). Patients who received PBT achieved a poorer median OS compared to patients without PBT (7 versus 18 months; p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis identified “age > 65 years” (p < 0.0001, OR 6.4, 95% CI 3.3–12.3), “STR” (p = 0.001, OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.6–6.1), “unmethylated MGMT status” (p < 0.001, OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.7–6.4), and “perioperative RBC transfusion” (p = 0.01, OR 6.0, 95% CI 1.5–23.4) as significantly and independently associated with 1-year mortality. Perioperative RBC transfusion compromises survival in patients with glioblastoma indicating the need to minimize the use of transfusions at the time of surgery. Obeying evidence-based transfusion guidelines provides an opportunity to reduce transfusion rates in this population with a potentially positive effect on survival.

A Crowdsourced Consensus on Supratotal Resection Versus Gross Total Resection for Anatomically Distinct Primary Glioblastoma

BACKGROUND

Gross total resection (GTR) of contrast-enhancing tumor is associated with increased survival in primary glioblastoma. Recently, there has been increasing interest in performing supratotal resections (SpTRs) for glioblastoma.

OBJECTIVE

To address the published results, which have varied in part due to lack of consensus on the definition and appropriate use of SpTR.

METHODS

A crowdsourcing approach was used to survey 21 neurosurgical oncologists representing 14 health systems nationwide. Participants were presented with 11 definitions of SpTR and asked to rate the appropriateness of each definition. Participants reviewed T1-weighed postcontrast and fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery magnetic resonance imaging for 22 anatomically distinct glioblastomas. Participants were asked to assess the tumor location's eloquence, the perceived equipoise of enrolling patients in a randomized trial comparing gross total to SpTR, and their personal treatment plans.

RESULTS

Most neurosurgeons surveyed (n = 18, 85.7%) agree that GTR plus resection of some noncontrast enhancement is an appropriate definition for SpTR. Overall, moderate inter-rater agreement existed regarding eloquence, equipoise, and personal treatment plans. The 4 neurosurgeons who had performed >10 SpTRs for glioblastomas in the past year were more likely to recommend it as their treatment plan (P < .005). Cases were divided into 3 anatomically distinct groups based upon perceived eloquence. Anterior temporal and right frontal glioblastomas were considered the best randomization candidates.

CONCLUSION

We established a consensus definition for SpTR of glioblastoma and identified anatomically distinct locations deemed most amenable to SpTR. These results may be used to plan prospective trials investigating the potential clinical utility of SpTR for glioblastoma.

MR-Imaging and Histopathological Diagnostic Work-Up of Patients with Spontaneous Lobar Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Results of an Institutional Prospective Registry Study

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a frequently disabling or fatal disease. The localization of ICH often allows an etiological association. However, in atypical/lobar ICH, the cause of bleeding is less obvious. Therefore, we present prospective histopathological and radiological studies which were conducted within the diagnostic workup to identify causes for lobar ICH other than hypertension. From 2016 to 2018, 198 patients with spontaneous, non-traumatic ICH requiring neurosurgical monitoring were enrolled in an institutional prospective patient registry. Patients with deep-seated ICH and/or hemorrhagically transformed cerebral infarcts were excluded from further analysis. Data to evaluate the source of bleeding based on histopathological and/or radiological workup were prospectively evaluated and analyzed. After applying the inclusion criteria and excluding patients with incomplete diagnostic workup, a total of 52 consecutive patients with lobar ICH were further analyzed. Macrovascular disease was detected in 14 patients with lobar ICH (27%). In 11 patients, diagnostic workup identified cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related ICH (21%). In addition, five patients with tumor-related ICH (10%) and six patients with ICH based on infectious pathologies (11%) were identified. In four patients, the cause of bleeding remained unknown despite extensive diagnostic workup (8%). The present prospective registry study demonstrates a higher probability to identify a cause of bleeding other than hypertension in patients with lobar ICH. Therefore, a thorough diagnostic work-up in patients with ICH is essential to accelerate treatment and further improve outcome or prevent rebleeding.

Seizure outcome in temporal glioblastoma surgery: lobectomy as a supratotal resection regime outclasses conventional gross-total resection

Introduction

The postoperative seizure freedom represents an important secondary outcome measure in glioblastoma surgery. Recently, supra-total glioblastoma resection in terms of anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) has gained growing attention with regard to superior long-term disease control for temporal-located glioblastoma compared to conventional gross-total resections (GTR). However, the impact of ATL on seizure outcome in these patients is unknown. We therefore analyzed ATL and GTR as differing extents of resection in regard of postoperative seizure control in patients with temporal glioblastoma and preoperative symptomatic seizures.

Methods

Between 2012 and 2018, 33 patients with preoperative seizures underwent GTR or ATL for temporal glioblastoma at the authors’ institution. Seizure outcome was assessed postoperatively and 6 months after tumor resection according to the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) classification and stratified into favorable (ILAE class 1) versus unfavorable (ILAE class 2–6).

Results

Overall, 23 out of 33 patients (70%) with preoperative seizures achieved favorable seizure outcome following resection of temporal located glioblastoma. For the ATL group, postoperative seizure freedom was present in 13 out of 13 patients (100%). In comparison, respective rates for the GTR group were 10 out of 20 patients (50%) (p = 0.002; OR 27; 95% CI 1.4–515.9).

Conclusions

ATL in terms of a supra-total resection strategy was associated with superior favorable seizure outcome following temporal glioblastoma resection compared to GTR. Regarding above mentioned survival benefit following ATL compared to GTR, ATL as an aggressive supra-total resection regime might constitute the surgical modality of choice for temporal-located glioblastoma.

Postoperative Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma-An Unrecognized Prognostic Factor

Objective

Although the treatment of glioblastoma patients is well established in neuro-oncological surgery, precious scarce data is available on patients with glioblastoma requiring postoperative prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV). Therefore, the aim of the present study was to determine the influence of PMV on overall survival (OS) in patients with glioblastoma.

Methods

Patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma who had undergone surgical therapy and complete subsequent neuro-oncological treatment at the authors’ neuro-oncological center from January 2013 to December 2018 were selected and included in the further analysis. PMV was defined as mechanical ventilation for more than 24 h after surgery. Survival analyses were performed, including established prognostic factors such as age, Karnofsky performance score, MGMT-promoter methylation status and extent of resection.

Results

A total of 240 patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and subsequent surgical treatment were identified. 13 patients (5%) suffered from PMV during the treatment course of glioblastoma. All but one patient were successfully weaned from mechanical ventilation. Patients suffering from PMV achieved significantly less often favorable functional outcome after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months compared to patients without PMV. Multivariate analysis revealed PMV to constitute a significant prognostic factor for OS, independent of other prognostic factors (p<0.0001, OR 6.7, 95% CI 3.2–13.8).

Conclusions

The present study identifies PMV as significantly associated with impaired functional outcome and poor OS in patients suffering from newly diagnosed glioblastoma. These findings encourage further efforts to investigate/assess this prognostic factor in future studies.

Extent of resection affects prognosis for patients with glioblastoma in non-eloquent regions

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a malignant cerebral neoplasm carrying poor prognosis. The importance of extent of resection (EoR) in GBM patient outcomes has been argued in the literature. Previous studies included tumors in eloquent regions of the brain. This confounds the role of EoR by including patients with intrinsically worse outcomes but will be over-represented in the reduced EoR category. In a homogenous group of patients in whom GTR was considered achievable, we investigated the effect of increasing EoR on survival. A retrospective review of 51 patients was undertaken. Quantitative, volumetric analysis of pre-operative and post-operative magnetic resonance image was compared with corresponding clinical details. The primary outcome measured was post-operative overall survival. Median overall survival was 18.3 months for GTR patients compared to 11.6 months for non-GTR (p = 0.025). Median pre-operative contrast-enhancing tumor volume for GTR patients was 54.7 cm³ and 24.9 cm³ for non-GTR. Post-operative median residual tumor volume was 1.1 cm³ in the non-GTR cohort. In multivariate analyses, GTR (HR [95% CI] = 0.973 [0.954-0.994], p = 0.00559) and increasing EoR (HR [95% CI] = 0.964 [0.944-0.985], p = 0.000665) remained predictors of survival. Centile dichotomization of EoR revealed 74% (HR [95% CI] = 0.351 [0.128-0.958], p = 0.0409) as the lowest threshold conferring statistically significant survival benefit. Where technically feasible, both GTR and EoR remained as independent prognostic factors for survival. GTR remains the gold standard for surgical treatment of GBM in patients, 74% being the minimum EoR required to confer survival benefit.

Newly diagnosed glioblastoma in geriatric (65 +) patients: impact of patients frailty, comorbidity burden and obesity on overall survival

Object

Increasing age is a known negative prognostic factor for glioblastoma. However, a multifactorial approach is necessary to achieve optimal neuro-oncological treatment. It remains unclear to what extent frailty, comorbidity burden, and obesity might exert influence on survival in geriatric glioblastoma patients. We have therefore reviewed our institutional database to assess the prognostic value of these factors in elderly glioblastoma patients.

Methods

Between 2012 and 2018, patients aged ≥ 65 years with newly diagnosed glioblastoma were included in this retrospective analysis. Patients frailty was analyzed using the modified frailty index (mFI), while patients comorbidity burden was assessed according to the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). Body mass index (BMI) was used as categorized variable.

Results

A total of 110 geriatric patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma were identified. Geriatric patients categorized as least-frail achieved a median overall survival (mOS) of 17 months, whereas most frail patients achieved a mOS of 8 months (p = 0.003). Patients with a CCI > 2 had a lower mOS of 6 months compared to patients with a lower comorbidity burden (12 months; p = 0.03). Multivariate analysis identified “subtotal resection” (p = 0.02), “unmethylated MGMT promoter status” (p = 0.03), “BMI < 30” (p = 0.04), and “frail patient (mFI ≥ 0.27)” (p = 0.03) as significant and independent predictors of 1-year mortality in geriatric patients with surgical treatment of glioblastoma (Nagelkerke's R² 0.31).

Conclusions

The present study concludes that both increased frailty and comorbidity burden are significantly associated with poor OS in geriatric patients with glioblastoma. Further, the present series suggests an obesity paradox in geriatric glioblastoma patients.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s11060-020-03625-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Safety metric profiling in surgery for temporal glioblastoma: lobectomy as a supra-total resection regime preserves perioperative standard quality rates

Introduction

Supra-total resection in terms of anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) has gained growing attention with regard to superior long-term disease control for temporal-located glioblastoma. However, aggressive onco-surgical approaches—geared beyond conventional gross total resections (GTR)—may be associated with peri- and postoperative unfavorable events which significantly worsen initial favorable postoperative outcome. In the current study we analyzed our institutional database with regard to patient safety indicators (PSIs), hospital-acquired conditions (HACs) and specific cranial surgery-related complications (CSC) as high standard quality metric profiles in patients that had undergone surgery for temporal glioblastoma.

Methods

Between 2012 and 2018, 61 patients with temporal glioblastoma underwent GTR or temporal lobectomy at the authors’ institution. Both groups of differing resection modalities were analyzed with regard to the incidence of PSIs, HACs and CSCs.

Results

Overall, we found 6 PSI and 2 HAC events. Postoperative hemorrhage (3 out of 61 patients; 5%) and catheter-associated urinary tract infection (2 out 61 patients; 3%) were identified as the most frequent PSIs and HACs. PSIs were present in 1 out of 41 patients (5%) for the temporal GTR and 2 out of 20 patients for the lobectomy group (p = 1.0). Respective rates for PSIs were 5 of 41 (12%) and 1 of 20 (5%) (p = 0.7). Further, CSCs did not yield significant differences between these two resection modalities (p = 1.0).

Conclusion

With regard to ATL and GTR as differing onco-surgical approaches these data suggest ATL in terms of an aggressive supra-total resection strategy to preserve perioperative standard safety metric profiles.

Survival benefit of lobectomy for glioblastoma: moving towards radical supramaximal resection

PURPOSE

Extent of resection remains a paramount prognostic factor for long-term outcomes for glioblastoma. As such, supramaximal resection or anatomic lobectomy have been offered for non-eloquent glioblastoma in an attempt to improve overall survival. Here, we conduct a propensity-matched analysis of patients with non-eloquent glioblastoma who underwent either lobectomy or gross total resection of lesion to investigate the efficacy of supramaximal resection of glioblastoma.

METHODS

Patients who underwent initial surgery for gross total resection or lobectomy for non-eloquent glioblastoma at our tertiary care referral center from 2010 to 2019 were included for this propensity-matched survival analysis. Propensity scores were generated with the following covariates: age, location, preoperative KPS, product of perpendicular maximal tumor diameters, and product of perpendicular FLAIR signal diameters. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with generated propensity scores was used to compare progression-free survival and overall survival.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients were identified who underwent initial resection of glioblastoma for non-eloquent glioblastoma from 2010 to 2019 (GTR = 37, lobectomy = 32). Using IPTW, overall survival (30.7 vs. 14.1 months) and progression-free survival (17.2 vs. 8.1 months were significantly higher in the lobectomy cohort compared to the GTR group (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in pre-op or post-op KPS or complication rates between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Our propensity-matched study suggests that lobectomy for non-eloquent glioblastoma confers an added survival benefit compared to GTR alone. For patients with non-eloquent glioblastoma, a supramaximal resection by means of an anatomic lobectomy should be considered as a primary surgical treatment in select patients if feasible.