Increased 30-day readmission rate after craniotomy for tumor resection at safety net hospitals in small metropolitan areas

Utility of combining frailty and comorbid disease indices in predicting outcomes following craniotomy for adult primary brain tumors: A mixed-effects model analysis using the nationwide readmissions database

OBJECTIVE

The escalating healthcare expenditures in the United States, particularly in neurosurgery, necessitate effective tools for predicting patient outcomes and optimizing resource allocation. This study explores the utility of combining frailty and comorbidity indices, specifically the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups (JHACG) frailty index and the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI), in predicting hospital length of stay (LOS), non-routine discharge, and one-year readmission in patients undergoing craniotomy for benign and malignant primary brain tumors.

METHODS

Leveraging the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) for 2016-2019, we analyzed data from 645 patients with benign and 30,991 with malignant tumors. Frailty, ECI, and frailty + ECI were assessed as predictors using generalized linear mixed-effects models. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves evaluated predictive performance.

RESULTS

Patients in the benign tumor cohort had a mean LOS of 8.1 ± 15.1 days, and frailty + ECI outperformed frailty alone in predicting non-routine discharge (AUC 0.829 vs. 0.820, p = 0.035). The malignant tumor cohort patients had a mean LOS of 7.9 ± 9.1 days. In this cohort, frailty + ECI (AUC 0.821) outperformed both frailty (AUC 0.744, p < 0.0001) and ECI alone (AUC 0.809, p < 0.0001) in predicting hospital LOS. Frailty + ECI (AUC 0.831) also proved superior to frailty (AUC 0.809, p < 0.0001) and ECI alone (AUC 0.827, p < 0.0001) in predicting non-routine discharge location for patients with malignant tumors. All indices performed comparably to one another as a predictor of readmission in both cohorts.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the synergistic predictive capacity of frailty + ECI, especially in malignant tumor cases, and further suggests that comorbid diseases may greatly influence perioperative outcomes more than frailty. Enhanced risk assessment could aid clinical decision-making, patient counseling, and resource allocation, ultimately optimizing patient outcomes.

Causes and Predictors of Unplanned Readmission in Patients Undergoing Intracranial Tumor Resection: A Multicenter Analysis of 31,776 Patients

BACKGROUND

Although unplanned readmission is a postoperative outcome metric associated with significant morbidity and financial burden, precise assessment tools for its prediction have not yet been developed. The Risk Analysis Index (RAI) could potentially be used to help improve the prediction of unplanned readmissions for patients undergoing intracranial tumor resection (ITR). In the present study, we evaluate the predictive accuracy of frailty on 30-day unplanned readmission after ITR using the RAI.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. The baseline characteristics, preoperative clinical status, and outcomes were compared between patients with and without unplanned readmission. Frailty was calculated using the RAI. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent associations between unplanned readmissions and patient characteristics.

RESULTS

The unplanned readmission rate for this cohort (n = 31,776) was 10.8% (n = 3420). Of the 3420 readmitted patients, 958 required unplanned reoperation. Multiple characteristics were significantly different between the 2 groups, including age, body mass index, comorbidities, and RAI groups (P < 0.05). The common causes of unplanned readmission included infection (9.4%), seizures (6%), and pulmonary embolism (4%). The patient characteristics identified as reliable predictors of unplanned readmission included age, body mass index, functional status, diabetes, hypertension, hyponatremia, and the patient's RAI score (P < 0.05). Frail status, hyponatremia, leukocytosis, hypertension, and thrombocytosis were significant predictors of unplanned readmissions.

CONCLUSIONS

The RAI is a reliable preoperative frailty index for predicting unplanned readmissions after ITR. Using the RAI could decrease unplanned readmissions by identifying high-risk patients and enabling future implementation of appropriate management guidelines.

Systematic Review of Racial, Socioeconomic, and Insurance Status Disparities in Neurosurgical Care for Intracranial Tumors

BACKGROUND

The impact of race, socioeconomic status (SES), insurance status, and other social metrics on the outcomes of patients with intracranial tumors has been reported in several studies. However, these findings have not been comprehensively summarized.

METHODS

We conducted a PRISMA systematic review of all published articles between 1990 and 2020 that analyzed intracranial tumor disparities, including race, SES, insurance status, and safety-net hospital status. Outcomes measured include access, standards of care, receipt of surgery, extent of resection, mortality, complications, length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, readmission rate, and hospital charges.

RESULTS

Fifty-five studies were included. Disparities in mortality were reported in 27 studies (47%), showing minority status and lower SES associated with poorer survival outcomes in 14 studies (52%). Twenty-seven studies showed that African American patients had worse outcomes across all included metrics including mortality, rates of surgical intervention, extent of resection, LOS, discharge disposition, and complication rates. Thirty studies showed that privately insured patients and patients with higher SES had better outcomes, including lower mortality, complication, and readmission rates. Six studies showed that worse outcomes were associated with treatment at safety-net and/or low-volume hospitals. The influence of Medicare or Medicaid status, or inequities affecting other minorities, was less clearly delineated. Ten studies (18%) were negative for evidence of disparities.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant disparities exist among patients with intracranial tumors, particularly affecting patients of African American race and lower SES. Efforts at the hospital, state, and national level must be undertaken to identify root causes of these issues.

The impact of hospital safety-net status on inpatient outcomes for brain tumor craniotomy: a 10-year nationwide analysis

Background

Outcome disparities have been documented at safety-net hospitals (SNHs), which disproportionately serve vulnerable patient populations. Using a nationwide retrospective cohort, we assessed inpatient outcomes following brain tumor craniotomy at SNHs in the United States.

Methods

We identified all craniotomy procedures in the National Inpatient Sample from 2002–2011 for brain tumors: glioma, metastasis, meningioma, and vestibular schwannoma. Safety-net burden was calculated as the number of Medicaid plus uninsured admissions divided by total admissions. Hospitals in the top quartile of burden were defined as SNHs. The association between SNH status and in-hospital mortality, discharge disposition, complications, hospital-acquired conditions (HACs), length of stay (LOS), and costs were assessed. Multivariate regression adjusted for patient, hospital, and severity characteristics.

Results

304,719 admissions were analyzed. The most common subtype was glioma (43.8%). Of 1,206 unique hospitals, 242 were SNHs. SNH admissions were more likely to be non-white (P < .001), low income (P < .001), and have higher severity scores (P = .034). Mortality rates were higher at SNHs for metastasis admissions (odds ratio [OR] = 1.48, P = .025), and SNHs had higher complication rates for meningioma (OR = 1.34, P = .003) and all tumor types combined (OR = 1.17, P = .034). However, there were no differences at SNHs for discharge disposition or HACs. LOS and hospital costs were elevated at SNHs for all subtypes, culminating in a 10% and 9% increase in LOS and costs for the overall population, respectively (all P < .001).

Conclusions

SNHs demonstrated poorer inpatient outcomes for brain tumor craniotomy. Further analyses of the differences observed and potential interventions to ameliorate interhospital disparities are warranted.