Pattern of technology diffusion in the adoption of stereotactic laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) in neuro-oncology

Laser interstitial thermal therapy followed by consolidation stereotactic radiosurgery (LITT-cSRS) in patients with newly diagnosed brain metastasis

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy and safety of laser interstitial thermal therapy followed by consolidation radiosurgery (LITT-cSRS) was previously studied in brain metastasis that recurs locally after initial radiosurgery (BMRS). Here, we characterize the clinical outcome of LITT-cSRS in patients with newly diagnosed brain metastasis.

METHODS

Between 2017 and 2023, ten consecutive cancer patients with newly diagnosed brain mass of unclear etiology who underwent stereotactic needle biopsy (SNB) and LITT in the same setting followed by consolidation SRS (cSRS) with > 6 months follow-up were identified retrospectively. Clinical and imaging outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

The histology of the BM were: breast cancer (n = 3), melanoma (n = 3), non-cell cell lung cancer (n = 3), colon (n = 1). There were no wound or procedural complications. All patients were discharged home, with a median one-day hospital stay (range: 1-2 days). All patients were off corticosteroid therapy by the one-month follow-up. cSRS were carried out 12-27 days (median of 19 days) after SNB + LITT. There were no subsequent emergency room presentation, 30-day or 90-day re-admission. The Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) remains stable or improved at the 3 months-follow-up. With a median follow-up of 416 days (13.8 mo; range: 199-1,096 days), there was one local recurrence at 384 days (12.8 mo) post-LITT-cSRS. With exception of this patient with local recurrence, all patients showed decreased FLAIR volume surrounding the LITT-cSRS treated BMRS by the six-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

To our awareness, this case series represent the first to describe LITT-cSRS in the setting of newly diagnosed BM. The results presented here provide pilot data to support the safety and efficacy of LITT-cSRS and lay the foundation for future studies.

A cost analysis of MR-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy for adult refractory epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

MR-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is used increasingly for refractory epilepsy. The goal of this investigation is to directly compare cost and short-term adverse outcomes for adult refractory epilepsy treated with temporal lobectomy and LITT, as well as to identify risk factors for increased costs and adverse outcomes.

METHODS

The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was queried for patients who received LITT between 2012 and 2019. Patients with adult refractory epilepsy were identified. Multivariable mixed-effects models were used to analyze predictors of cost, length of stay (LOS), and complications.

RESULTS

LITT was associated with reduced LOS and overall cost relative to temporal lobectomy, with a statistical trend toward lower incidence of postoperative complications. High-volume surgical epilepsy centers had lower LOS overall. Longer LOS was a significant driver of increased cost for LITT, and higher comorbidity was associated with non-routine discharge.

SIGNIFICANCE

LITT is an affordable alternative to temporal lobectomy for adult refractory epilepsy with an insignificant reduction in inpatient complications. Patients may benefit from expanded access to this treatment modality for both its reduced LOS and lower cost.

Risk of Tract Seeding Following Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy for Brain Tumors

BACKGROUND

The management of intracranial oncological disease remains a significant challenge despite advances in systemic cancer therapy. Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) represents a novel treatment for local control of brain tumors through photocoagulation with a stereotactically implanted laser fiber. Because the use of laser interstitial thermal therapy continues to increase within neurosurgery, characterization of LITT is necessary to improve outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the risk of tumor seeding along the laser fiber tract in patients receiving LITT for primary or metastatic brain tumors at a high-volume treatment center.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients receiving LITT from 2015 to 2021 at our medical center. Patients with biopsy-confirmed tumors were included in this study. Tract seeding was identified as discontinuous, newly enhancing tumor along the LITT tract.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients received LITT for biopsy-confirmed tumors from 2015 to 2021, with tract seeding identified in 3 (5.4%). Twenty-nine (51.8%) patients had gliomas, while the remainder had metastases, of which lung was the most common histology (20 patients, 74%). Tract seeding was associated with ablation proceeding inward from superficial tumor margin closest to the cranial entry point ( P = .03). Patients with tract seeding had a shorter median time to progression of 1.1 (0.1-1.3) months vs 4.2 (2.2-8.6) months ( P = .03).

CONCLUSION

Although the risk of tract seeding after LITT is reassuringly low, it is associated with decreased progression-free survival. This risk may be related to surgical technique or experience. Follow-up radiosurgery to the LITT tract has the potential to prevent this complication.

Learning Curve Analysis and Adverse Events After Implementation of Neurosurgical Laser Ablation Treatment: A Population-Based Single-Institution Consecutive Series

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of the first 30 patients treated with stereotactic laser ablation (SLA) at our institution since the introduction of the technique in September 2019. We aimed to analyze our initial results and potential learning curve by investigating precision and lesion coverage and assessing the frequency and nature of adverse events according to the Landriel-Ibanez classification for neurosurgical complications.

RESULTS

Indications were de novo gliomas (23%), recurrent gliomas (57%), and epileptogenic foci (20%). There was a trend toward improvement of lesion coverage and target deviation, and a statistically significant improvement in entry point deviation, over time. Four patients (13.3%) experienced a new neurological deficit, where three patients had transient and one patient had permanent deficits, respectively. Our results show a learning curve on precision measures over the first 30 cases. Based on our results the technique can safely be implemented at centers with experience in stereotaxy.

Comparable safety profile between neuro-oncology procedures involving stereotactic needle biopsy (SNB) followed by laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) and LITT alone procedures

INTRODUCTION

Tissue diagnosis through stereotactic needle biopsy (SNB) is often needed prior to laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT). Whether these procedures should be performed in the same surgery or in separate settings remain unclear. As a first step to address this question, we assess safety profile of procedures involving LITT alone versus SNB + LITT.

METHODS

Using International Classification of Disease (ICD) codes, we queried the National Readmissions Database (NRD, 2010-2018) for malignant brain tumor patients who underwent either (1) LITT alone or (2) elective LITT in combination with SNB (SNB + LITT). Survey regression methods were utilized. Additionally, the procedural outcome of LITT or SNB + LITT performed by the senior surgeon (2014-2022) were reviewed.

RESULTS

During the study period, an estimated 678 malignant brain tumor patients underwent LITT alone versus 373 patients that underwent SNB + LITT. Patients undergoing LITT and SNB + LITT exhibited statistically comparable median lengths of hospital stay (IQR; LITT = 2 day [1, 3]; SNB + LITT = 1 day [1, 3]; p = 0.405) and likelihood of routine discharge (LITT = 73.5%; SNB + LITT = 81.1%; p = 0.068). The odds of 30-day medical or neurological readmissions were comparable between LITT and SNB + LITT treated patients (all p ≥ 0.793). In the single surgeon experience of 218 procedures performed over an eight year period (2014-2022), the complications (LITT = 3.9%; SNB + LITT = 2.6%, p = 0.709), discharge within 48 h (LITT = 84.5%; SNB + LITT = 87.8%; p = 0.556), routine discharge (LITT = 91.3%; SNB + LITT = 93.9%; p = 0.604), and unplanned 30-day readmission (LITT = 3.9%; SNB + LITT = 1.7%; p = 0.423) were similarly comparable between LITT and SNB + LITT.

CONCLUSION

The length of hospital stay, the likelihood of routine discharge, and 30-day readmission for malignant brain tumor patients who underwent LITT and SNB + LITT were comparable.

Laser ablation of a sphenoid wing meningioma: A case report and review of the literature

Background

Meningiomas are the most common primary central nervous system neoplasm in the United States. While the majority of meningiomas are benign, the World Health Organization (WHO) Grade I tumors, a not-insignificant proportion of tumors are in anatomically complex locations or demonstrate more aggressive phenotypes, presenting a challenge for local disease control with surgery and radiation. Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) consists of stereotactic delivery of laser light for tumor ablation and is minimally invasive, requiring implantation of a laser fiber through a cranial burr hole. Herein, we demonstrate the first use of this technology in a progressive atypical sphenoid wing meningioma for a previously resected and irradiated tumor.

Case Description

A 47-year-old female was diagnosed with a left-sided atypical meningioma, the WHO 2, of the sphenoid wing following acute worsening of bitemporal headache and dizziness. Given neurovascular involvement, a subtotal resection was performed, followed by stereotactic radiosurgery. Following progression 9 months from resection, the patient elected to proceed with LITT. The patient's postoperative course was uncomplicated and she remains progression free at 24 months following LITT.

Conclusion

We present the first use of LITT for a sphenoid wing meningioma documented in the literature, which demonstrated enhanced disease control for a lesion that was refractory to both surgery and radiation. LITT could represent an additional option for local control of progressive meningiomas, even in locations that are challenging to access surgically. More evidence is needed regarding the technical nuances of LITT for lesions of the skull base.

Persistent Racial Disparities in Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease

We sought to determine whether racial and socioeconomic disparities in the utilization of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson's disease (PD) have improved over time. We examined DBS utilization and analyzed factors associated with placement of DBS. The odds of DBS placement increased across the study period, whereas White patients with PD were 5 times more likely than Black patients to undergo DBS. Individuals, regardless of racial background, with 2 or more comorbidities were 14 times less likely to undergo DBS. Privately insured patients were 1.6 times more likely to undergo DBS. Despite increasing DBS utilization, significant disparities persist in access to DBS. ANN NEUROL 2022;92:246–254

Laser interstitial thermal therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma

Gliomas are the most frequent primary brain tumor in adults. Patients with glioblastoma (GBM) tumors deemed inoperable with open surgical techniques and treated only with chemo/radiation have a median overall survival of less than 9 months. Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) has emerged as a cytoreductive alternative to surgery for these patients. The present study describes the outcomes of twenty patients with newly diagnosed, IDH wild-type glioblastoma treated with LITT. We retrospectively reviewed patients with newly diagnosed, unresectable GBM who underwent LITT at our institution. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint measured in our study, defined as time from LITT to disease progression. Results Twenty patients were identified with newly diagnosed, inoperable GBM lesions who underwent LITT. The overall median PFS was 4 months (95% CI = 2 - N/A, upper limit not reached). The median progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with less than 1 cm 3 residual tumor (gross total ablation, GTA) was 7 months (95% CI = 6 - N/A, upper limit not reached), compared to 2 months (95% CI = 1 - upper limit not reached) for patients with a lower GTA (p = .0019). The median overall survival was 11 months (95% CI = 6 - upper limit not reached). Preoperative Karnofsky performance score (KPS) less than or equal to 80 and deep-seated tumor location were significantly associated with decreased PFS (HR, .18, p = .03; HR, .08, p = .03, respectively). At the end of 1 month, only 4 patients (20%) experienced persistent motor deficits. LITT is a safe and effective treatment for patients with unresectable, untreated GBM with rates of survival and local recurrence comparable to patients with surgically accessible lesions treated with conventional resection. Careful patient selection is needed to determine if GTA is attainable.