Transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-operative neurorehabilitation in neuro-oncology: a review of the literature and future directions

Function-guided differences of arcuate fascicle and inferior fronto-occipital fascicle tractography as diagnostic indicators for surgical risk stratification

BACKGROUND

Several patients with language-eloquent gliomas face language deterioration postoperatively. Persistent aphasia is frequently associated with damage to subcortical language pathways. Underlying mechanisms still need to be better understood, complicating preoperative risk assessment. This study compared qualitative and quantitative functionally relevant subcortical differences pre- and directly postoperatively in glioma patients with and without aphasia.

METHODS

Language-relevant cortical sites were defined using navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) language mapping in 74 patients between 07/2016 and 07/2019. Post-hoc nTMS-based diffusion tensor imaging tractography was used to compare a tract's pre- and postoperative visualization, volume and fractional anisotropy (FA), and the preoperative distance between tract and lesion and postoperative overlap with the resection cavity between the following groups: no aphasia (NoA), tumor- or previous resection induced aphasia persistent pre- and postoperatively (TIA_P), and surgery-induced transient or permanent aphasia (SIA_T or SIA_P).

RESULTS

Patients with NoA, TIA_P, SIA_T, and SIA_P showed distinct fasciculus arcuatus (AF) and inferior-fronto-occipital fasciculus (IFOF) properties. The AF was more frequently reconstructable, and the FA of IFOF was higher in NoA than TIA_P cases (all p ≤ 0.03). Simultaneously, SIA_T cases showed higher IFOF fractional anisotropy than TIA_P cases (p < 0.001) and the most considerable AF volume loss overall. While not statistically significant, the four SIA_P cases showed complete loss of ventral language streams postoperatively, the highest resection-cavity-AF-overlap, and the shortest AF to tumor distance.

CONCLUSION

Functionally relevant qualitative and quantitative differences in AF and IFOF provide a pre- and postoperative pathophysiological and clinically relevant diagnostic indicator that supports surgical risk stratification.

Connectomic insight into unique stroke patient recovery after rTMS treatment

An improved understanding of the neuroplastic potential of the brain has allowed advancements in neuromodulatory treatments for acute stroke patients. However, there remains a poor understanding of individual differences in treatment-induced recovery. Individualized information on connectivity disturbances may help predict differences in treatment response and recovery phenotypes. We studied the medical data of 22 ischemic stroke patients who received MRI scans and started repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment on the same day. The functional and motor outcomes were assessed at admission day, 1 day after treatment, 30 days after treatment, and 90 days after treatment using four validated standardized stroke outcome scales. Each patient underwent detailed baseline connectivity analyses to identify structural and functional connectivity disturbances. An unsupervised machine learning (ML) agglomerative hierarchical clustering method was utilized to group patients according to outcomes at four-time points to identify individual phenotypes in recovery trajectory. Differences in connectivity features were examined between individual clusters. Patients were a median age of 64, 50% female, and had a median hospital length of stay of 9.5 days. A significant improvement between all time points was demonstrated post treatment in three of four validated stroke scales utilized. ML-based analyses identified distinct clusters representing unique patient trajectories for each scale. Quantitative differences were found to exist in structural and functional connectivity analyses of the motor network and subcortical structures between individual clusters which could explain these unique trajectories on the Barthel Index (BI) scale but not on other stroke scales. This study demonstrates for the first time the feasibility of using individualized connectivity analyses in differentiating unique phenotypes in rTMS treatment responses and recovery. This personalized connectomic approach may be utilized in the future to better understand patient recovery trajectories with neuromodulatory treatment.

Deconvoluting human Brodmann area 8 based on its unique structural and functional connectivity

Brodmann area 8 (BA8) is traditionally defined as the prefrontal region of the human cerebrum just anterior to the premotor cortices and enveloping most of the superior frontal gyrus. Early studies have suggested the frontal eye fields are situated at its most caudal aspect, causing many to consider BA8 as primarily an ocular center which controls contralateral gaze and attention. However, years of refinement in cytoarchitectural studies have challenged this traditional anatomical definition, providing a refined definition of its boundaries with neighboring cortical areas and the presence of meaningful subdivisions. Furthermore, functional imaging studies have suggested its involvement in a diverse number of higher-order functions, such as motor, cognition, and language. Thus, our traditional working definition of BA8 has likely been insufficient to truly understand the complex structural and functional significance of this area. Recently, large-scale multi-modal neuroimaging approaches have allowed for improved mapping of the neural connectivity of the human brain. Insight into the structural and functional connectivity of the brain connectome, comprised of large-scale brain networks, has allowed for greater understanding of complex neurological functioning and pathophysiological diseases states. Simultaneously, the structural and functional connectivity of BA8 has recently been highlighted in various neuroimaging studies and detailed anatomic dissections. However, while Brodmann's nomenclature is still widely used today, such as for clinical discussions and the communication of research findings, the importance of the underlying connectivity of BA8 requires further review.

Neurocognition in adults with intracranial tumors: does location really matter?

OBJECTIVE

As preservation of cognitive functioning increasingly becomes important in the light of ameliorated survival after intracranial tumor treatments, identification of eloquent brain areas would enable optimization of these treatments.

METHODS

This cohort study enrolled adult intracranial tumor patients who received neuropsychological assessments pre-irradiation, estimating processing speed, verbal fluency and memory. Anatomical magnetic resonance imaging scans were used for multivariate voxel-wise lesion-symptom predictions of the test scores (corrected for age, gender, educational level, histological subtype, surgery, and tumor volume). Potential effects of histological and molecular subtype and corresponding WHO grades on the risk of cognitive impairment were investigated using Chi square tests. P-values were adjusted for multiple comparisons (p < .001 and p < .05 for voxel- and cluster-level, resp.).

RESULTS

A cohort of 179 intracranial tumor patients was included [aged 19-85 years, median age (SD) = 58.46 (14.62), 50% females]. In this cohort, test-specific impairment was detected in 20-30% of patients. Higher WHO grade was associated with lower processing speed, cognitive flexibility and delayed memory in gliomas, while no acute surgery-effects were found. No grading, nor surgery effects were found in meningiomas. The voxel-wise analyses showed that tumor locations in left temporal areas and right temporo-parietal areas were related to verbal memory and processing speed, respectively.

INTERPRETATION

Patients with intracranial tumors affecting the left temporal areas and right temporo-parietal areas might specifically be vulnerable for lower verbal memory and processing speed. These specific patients at-risk might benefit from early-stage interventions. Furthermore, based on future validation studies, imaging-informed surgical and radiotherapy planning could further be improved.

Repeated Awake Surgical Resection(s) for Recurrent Diffuse Low-Grade Gliomas: Why, When, and How to Reoperate?

Early maximal surgical resection is the first treatment in diffuse low-grade glioma (DLGG), because the reduction of tumor volume delays malignant transformation and extends survival. Awake surgery with intraoperative mapping and behavioral monitoring enables to preserve quality of life (QoL). However, because of the infiltrative nature of DLGG, relapse is unavoidable, even after (supra)total resection. Therefore, besides chemotherapy and radiotherapy, the question of reoperation(s) is increasingly raised, especially because patients with DLGG usually enjoy a normal life with long-lasting projects. Here, the purpose is to review the literature in the emerging field of iterative surgeries in DLGG. First, long-term follow-up results showed that patients with DLGG who underwent multiple surgeries had an increased survival (above 17 years) with preservation of QoL. Second, the criteria guiding the decision to reoperate and defining the optimal timing are discussed, mainly based on the dynamic intercommunication between the glioma relapse (including its kinetics and pattern of regrowth) and the reactional cerebral reorganization—i.e., mechanisms underpinning reconfiguration within and across neural networks to enable functional compensation. Third, how to adapt medico-surgical strategy to this individual spatiotemporal brain tumor interplay is detailed, by considering the perpetual changes in connectome. These data support early reoperation in recurrent DLGG, before the onset of symptoms and before malignant transformation. Repeat awake resection(s) should be integrated in a global management including (neo)adjuvant medical treatments, to enhance long-lasting functional and oncological outcomes. The prediction of potential and limitation of neuroplasticity at each step of the disease must be improved to anticipate personalized multistage therapeutic attitudes.