Accuracy and safety of 101 consecutives neurosurgical procedures for newly diagnosed central nervous system lymphomas: a single-institution experience

Indications for a brain biopsy in neurological diseases of unknown etiology: The role of magnetic resonance imaging findings and liquid biopsy in yielding definitive pathological diagnoses

Brain biopsies are often considered for patients who cannot be diagnosed with various laboratory test results. However, physicians tend to be hesitant regarding their application in possibly non-neoplastic brain diseases, due to the invasiveness and risks. The aim was to determine the indications for brain biopsies in cases of neurological diseases of unknown etiology. We retrospectively evaluated diagnostic accuracy, laboratory findings (including a liquid biopsy for malignant lymphoma), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics and the post-treatment outcomes of patients undergoing brain biopsies for neurological diseases of unknown etiology. The data of patients who had undergone a brain biopsy during their admission to Niigata University Hospital, between 2011 and 2024, were reviewed. Moreover, the laboratory data and MRI findings between patients with definitive and nonspecific biopsy diagnoses were compared. Twenty-six patients underwent a brain biopsy, and a definitive diagnosis was obtained in 14 patients (53.8%). Even in cases where a nonspecific diagnosis was made, biopsy findings helped rule out malignancy and guide clinical diagnosis and treatment decisions. The liquid biopsy for malignant lymphoma was performed in eight patients, with one yielding a positive result, consistent with primary central nervous system lymphoma. The sensitivity and specificity of liquid biopsy were 0.5 and 1, respectively. Diffusely contrasted cortical lesions and the presence of mass effects on MRI, were significantly associated with a definitive diagnosis, compared to a nonspecific diagnosis. In conclusion, brain MRI and liquid biopsies can assist in determining the appropriate indications for brain biopsies in neurological diseases of unknown etiology.

Preoperative Corticosteroids Reduce Diagnostic Accuracy of Stereotactic Biopsies in Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Despite general acceptance that corticosteroid therapy (CST) should be withheld before biopsy for suspected primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), there remains conflicting evidence surrounding the precise impact of preoperative CST on the histopathological diagnosis. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to describe and quantify the effects of preoperative CST on the diagnostic accuracy of biopsies for PCNSL.

METHODS

Primary articles were screened from Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. Meta-analysis was performed for immunocompetent patients with histologically confirmed PCNSL. Subgroup and regression analyses were performed to assess the effects of biopsy type, CST duration, dose, and preoperative taper on the diagnostic accuracy. In addition, the sensitivity of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analyses for PCNSL was assessed.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies, comprising 1226 patients (45% female; mean age: 60.3 years), were included. Preoperative CST increased the risk of nondiagnostic biopsy with a relative risk (RR) of 2.1 (95% CI: 1.1-4.1). In the stereotactic biopsy subgroup, the RR for nondiagnostic biopsy was 3.0 (95% CI: 1.2-7.5). CST taper, duration, and dose did not significantly influence diagnostic biopsy rates. The sensitivity of CSF cytology, including flow cytometry, for PCNSL was 8.0% (95% CI: 6.0%-10.7%).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that preoperative CST reduces the diagnostic yield of stereotactic biopsies for PCNSL. We found no evidence that tapering CST before biopsy improves diagnostic rates. CSF analysis currently has a poor sensitivity for the diagnosis of PCNSL.

Safety and efficacy of frameless stereotactic robot-assisted intraparenchymal brain lesion biopsies versus image-guided biopsies: a bicentric comparative study

PURPOSE

User-friendly robotic assistance and image-guided tools have been developed in the past decades for intraparenchymal brain lesion biopsy. These two methods are gradually becoming well accepted and are performed at the discretion of the neurosurgical teams. However, only a few data comparing their effectiveness and safety are available.

METHODS

Population-based parallel cohorts were followed from two French university hospitals with different surgical methods and defined geographical catchment regions (September 2019 to September 2022). In center A, frameless robot-assisted stereotactic intraparenchymal brain lesion biopsies were performed, while image-guided intraparenchymal brain lesion biopsies were performed in center B. Pre-and postoperative clinical, radiological, and histomolecular features were retrospectively collected and compared.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty patients were included: 131 frameless robot-assisted stereotactic intraparenchymal brain lesion biopsies in center A and 119 image-guided biopsies in center B. The clinical, radiological, and histomolecular features were comparable between the two groups. The diagnostic yield (96.2% and 95.8% respectively; p = 1.000) and the overall postoperative complications rates (13% and 14%, respectively; p = 0.880) did not differ between the two groups. The mean duration of the surgical procedure was longer in the robot-assisted group (61.9 ± 25.3 min, range 23-150) than in the image-guided group (47.4 ± 11.8 min, range 25-81, p < 0.001). In the subgroup of patients with anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet therapy administered preoperatively, the intracerebral hemorrhage > 10 mm on postoperative CT scan was higher in the image-guided group (36.8%) than in the robot-assisted group (5%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In our bicentric comparative study, robot-assisted stereotactic and image-guided biopsies have two main differences (shorter time but more frequent postoperative hematoma for image-guided biopsies); however, both techniques are demonstrated to be safe and efficient.