The landscape of brain tumor mimics in neuro-oncology practice

Newly emerged T2 high-signal intensity area mimicking oligodendroglioma expansion on intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging: A case report

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an indispensable tool in neurosurgery, though it sometimes faces challenges such as "tumor mimicry." While intraoperative MRI (iMRI) is widely recognized for its usefulness in achieving maximal safe resection during glioma surgery, instances of tumor mimicry still occur on iMRI. Moreover, reports on tumor mimics observed through iMRI, particularly in low-grade gliomas, remain scarce. In this article, we present a case of oligodendroglioma, where a newly emerged T2 high-signal intensity region on iMRI necessitated differentiation from tumor expansion. A 23-year-old man presented with a newly diagnosed brain tumor and underwent surgical removal. An iMRI taken after tumor removal revealed a newly emerged T2 hyperintense area without diffusion restriction around the resection cavity, which was not observed in the preoperative MRI. Suspecting residual tumor, we performed additional resection. An MRI on the following day confirmed that the T2 hyperintense area identified on the iMRI had been completely resected but also revealed an enlarged T2 high-signal area over a wider region. Histopathology found no tumor cells in the additionally resected area, indicating that the iMRI finding was a tumor mimic. Six months later, the T2 high-signal area around the resection cavity had disappeared on MRI without any additional treatment. This case highlights the challenge of distinguishing between T2 hyperintense mimicry and tumor enlargement during glioma surgery seen on iMRI. Despite the significant value of iMRI, our report underscores the need for careful interpretation in neurosurgical practice, particularly with non-contrast-enhancing tumors.

Safety and efficacy of frameless stereotactic robot-assisted intraparenchymal brain lesion biopsies versus image-guided biopsies: a bicentric comparative study

PURPOSE

User-friendly robotic assistance and image-guided tools have been developed in the past decades for intraparenchymal brain lesion biopsy. These two methods are gradually becoming well accepted and are performed at the discretion of the neurosurgical teams. However, only a few data comparing their effectiveness and safety are available.

METHODS

Population-based parallel cohorts were followed from two French university hospitals with different surgical methods and defined geographical catchment regions (September 2019 to September 2022). In center A, frameless robot-assisted stereotactic intraparenchymal brain lesion biopsies were performed, while image-guided intraparenchymal brain lesion biopsies were performed in center B. Pre-and postoperative clinical, radiological, and histomolecular features were retrospectively collected and compared.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty patients were included: 131 frameless robot-assisted stereotactic intraparenchymal brain lesion biopsies in center A and 119 image-guided biopsies in center B. The clinical, radiological, and histomolecular features were comparable between the two groups. The diagnostic yield (96.2% and 95.8% respectively; p = 1.000) and the overall postoperative complications rates (13% and 14%, respectively; p = 0.880) did not differ between the two groups. The mean duration of the surgical procedure was longer in the robot-assisted group (61.9 ± 25.3 min, range 23-150) than in the image-guided group (47.4 ± 11.8 min, range 25-81, p < 0.001). In the subgroup of patients with anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet therapy administered preoperatively, the intracerebral hemorrhage > 10 mm on postoperative CT scan was higher in the image-guided group (36.8%) than in the robot-assisted group (5%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In our bicentric comparative study, robot-assisted stereotactic and image-guided biopsies have two main differences (shorter time but more frequent postoperative hematoma for image-guided biopsies); however, both techniques are demonstrated to be safe and efficient.

Acute cerebral hemorrhage mimicking glioblastoma on intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging: A case report

Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) is important in neurosurgical practice, especially for glioma surgery. However, the well-reported possibility to mistake lesions for brain tumors (tumor mimics) with MRI also exists for iMRI. Here, we first report a case of glioblastoma with acute cerebral hemorrhage that mimicked a newly emerged brain tumor on iMRI. A 53-year-old man underwent a second surgery for recurrent glioblastoma. Intraoperatively, iMRI revealed a new, enhanced lesion near the resected area that was absent on preoperative MRI and difficult to differentiate from newly emerged tumors. Here, a recent preoperative MRI was helpful and the new lesion was actually a hematoma. Neurosurgeons must understand that, as acute intracerebral hemorrhaging can mimic brain tumors on iMRI, preoperative MRI should be conducted just before surgery to place iMRI findings in proper context and avoid unnecessary resections.

Tumor or not a tumor: Pitfalls and differential diagnosis in neuro-oncology

The majority of intracranial expansive lesions are tumors. However, a wide range of lesions can mimic neoplastic pathology. Differentiating pseudotumoral lesions from brain tumors is crucial to patient management. This article describes the most common intracranial pseudotumors, with a focus on the imaging features that serve as clues to detect pseudotumors.