Effects of Iontophoresis and Chemical Enhancers on the Transport of Lidocaine and Nicotine Across the Oral Mucosa

Intraoral medical devices for sustained drug delivery

OBJECTIVES

The oral cavity constitutes an attractive organ for the local and systemic application of drug substances. Oromucosal tablets, gels, or sprays are examples of the formulations applied. Due to the elution through the saliva, the residence time of the formulation at the application site is relatively short. Medical devices placed in the oral cavity, with a reservoir for an active substance, play an important role in solving this problem.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this review, we discuss the devices described in the literature that are designed to be used in the oral cavity, highlighting the advantages, disadvantages, and clinical applications of each of them.

RESULTS

Among the intraoral medical devices, special types are personalized 3D-printed devices, iontophoretic devices, and microneedle patches.

CONCLUSION

We anticipate that with the development of 3D printing and new polymers, the technology of flexible and comfortable devices for prolonged drug delivery in the oral cavity will develop intensively.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The presented review is therefore a useful summary of the current technological state, when in fact none of the existing devices has been widely accepted clinically.

Selected Medicines Used in Iontophoresis

Iontophoresis is a non-invasive method of systemic and local drug delivery using an electric field. Iontophoresis enables diffusion of the selected drug via skin, mucosa, enamel, dentin, and other tissues. The amount of delivered therapeutic molecules is about 10⁻2000 times greater than conventional forms of delivery. Among other fields, this method is used in dentistry, ophthalmology, otorhinolaryngology, and dermatology. According to related literature, the most important drugs studied or administered by iontophoresis are: Local anesthetics, opioids, steroids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antibacterial drugs, antifungal drugs, antiviral drugs, anticancer drugs, fluorides, and vitamins. The present review covers current available data regarding the selected medicines used in iontophoresis. Furthermore, indications and conditions of iontophoresis application are reviewed.

Iontophoretic Drug Delivery in the Oral Cavity

Iontophoresis is a noninvasive method to enhance systemic and local drug delivery by the application of an electric field. For systemic drug delivery in the oral cavity, iontophoresis was studied primarily for transbuccal delivery. Significant enhancement of drug delivery was observed in buccal iontophoresis compared to passive transport for different drugs. For local drug delivery in the oral cavity, iontophoresis could enhance drug penetration into the enamel, dentin, and other oral tissues for the treatment of oral diseases. Iontophoresis was evaluated in dentistry such as to produce local anesthesia and treat tooth decalcification and hypersensitivity, but this technology has not been fully utilized. The most common drugs in these evaluations were fluoride and lidocaine. In general, there is limited knowledge of the mechanisms of iontophoresis in the oral tissues. In vivo animal and human studies have suggested that iontophoresis is safe in the oral cavity under the conditions investigated. The present review covers the topics of iontophoretic drug delivery in the oral cavity for both systemic and local treatments. The anatomy and diseases in the oral cavity for iontophoretic drug delivery are also briefly reviewed, and the challenges for this drug delivery method are discussed.

Novel oleic acid derivatives enhance buccal permeation of didanosine

The aim of this study was to explore the potential of novel oleic acid (OA) derivatives as buccal permeation enhancers for the delivery of didanosine (ddI). The OA derivatives, i.e. ester derivative (OA1E), the dicarboxylic acid derivative (OA1A) and the bicephalous dianionic surfactant (OA1ANa) were synthesized and their effects were compared to the parent OA. OA, OA1E, OA1A and OA1ANa at 1% w/w all showed potential for enhancing the buccal permeability of ddI with enhancement ratio (ER) of 1.29, 1.33, 1.01 and 1.72, respectively. OA1ANa at 1% w/w demonstrated the highest flux (80.30 ± 10.37 µg cm(-2 )h), permeability coefficient (4.01 ± 0.57 × 10(-3) cm h(-1)) and ER (1.72). The highest flux for ddI (144.00 ± 53.54 µg cm(-2 )h) was reported with OA1ANa 2% w/w, which displayed an ER of 3.09 more than that with ddI alone. At equivalent concentrations, OA1ANa (ER = 3.09) had a significantly higher permeation-enhancing effect than its parent OA (ER = 1.54). Histomorphological studies confirmed that OA1ANa at all concentrations (0.5, 2.0 and 6.0% w/w) had no adverse effects on the mucosae. Morphological changes such as vacuoles formation and increased intercellular spaces were attributed to the buccal permeation-enhancing effect of OA1ANa. This study demonstrated the potential of novel OA derivatives as buccal permeation enhancers. OA1ANa at 2% w/w was also identified as the optimal novel OA derivative to widen the pool of fatty acid derivatives as chemical permeation enhancers for buccal drug delivery.

Targeted local simultaneous iontophoresis of chemotherapeutics for topical therapy of head and neck cancers

The objective was to investigate the feasibility of using buccal iontophoresis for the simultaneous delivery of chemotherapeutic agents with a view to developing a new approach to treat head and neck cancers. Short duration cathodal iontophoresis of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; 20mM) and leucovorin (LV; 10 mM) at 1 mA/cm(2) for 10 or 20 min from aqueous solution and a 2% hydroxyethyl cellulose gel at pH 7.6 was evaluated using bovine mucosa in vitro. Iontophoresis resulted in a statistically significant increase in the mucosal deposition of both drugs as compared to passive diffusion (Student's t-test, α=0.05); in each case, drug delivery was selective for deposition with no permeation being observed. After 20 min of iontophoresis, there was an ~ 8-fold enhancement for 5-FU (1.46 ± 0.86 and 11.93 ± 3.81 μg/cm(2), respectively) and a 3-fold increase for LV (8.31 ± 2.44 and 25.08 ± 6.89 μg/cm(2), respectively) when using aqueous solutions. The same trend was observed when the gel was applied for 10 min; passive delivery of 5-FU from the gel resulted in non-detectable levels in the mucosa, while 4.62 ± 1.76 μg/cm(2) were deposited in the mucosa following iontophoresis. Similarly, iontophoretic delivery of LV from the gel resulted in ~ 3-fold higher deposition as compared to passive diffusion (6.71 ± 1.36 and 21.12 ± 9.94 μg/cm(2), respectively). No drug permeation was observed in either case. In conclusion, iontophoresis can be used for targeted topical delivery of chemotherapeutics to the buccal mucosa and may enable less invasive local therapy of head and neck cancers.