Effect of a Pluronic(®) P123 formulation on the nitric oxide-generating drug JS-K

Historical Perspectives of the Role of NO/NO Donors in Anti-Tumor Activities: Acknowledging Dr. Keefer's Pioneering Research

The role of nitric oxide (NO) in cancer has been a continuous challenge and particularly the contradictory findings in the literature reporting NO with either anti-cancer properties or pro-cancer properties. This dilemma was largely resolved by the level of NO/inducible nitric oxide synthase in the tumor environment as well as other cancer-associated gene activations in different cancers. The initial findings on the role of NO as an anti-cancer agent was initiated in the late 1990's in Dr. Larry Keefer's laboratory, who had been studying and synthesizing many compounds with releasing NO under different conditions. Using an experimental model with selected NO compounds they demonstrated for the first time that NO can inhibit tumor cell proliferation and sensitizes drug-resistant cancer cells to chemotherapy-induced cytotoxicity. This initial finding was the backbone and the foundation of subsequent reports by the Keefer's laboratory and followed by many others to date on NO-mediated anti-cancer activities and the clinical translation of NO donors in cancer therapy. Our laboratory initiated studies on NO-mediated anti-cancer therapy and chemo-immuno-sensitization following Keefer's findings and used one of his synthesized NO donors, namely, (Z)-1-[N-(2-aminoethyl)-N-(2-ammonioethyl)amino]diazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (DETANONOate), throughout most of our studies. Many of Keefer's collaborators and other investigators have reported on the selected compound, O2-(2,4-dinitrophenyl) 1-[(4-ethoxycarbonyl)piperazin-1-yl] diazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (JS-K), and its therapeutic role in many tumor model systems. Several lines of evidence that investigated the treatment with NO donors in various cancer models revealed that a large number of gene products are modulated by NO, thus emphasizing the pleiotropic effects of NO on cancers and the identification of many targets of therapeutic significance. The present review reports historically of several examples reported in the literature that emanated on NO-mediated anti-cancer activities by the Keefer's laboratory and his collaborators and other investigators including my laboratory at the University of California at Los Angeles.

JS-K induces reactive oxygen species-dependent anti-cancer effects by targeting mitochondria respiratory chain complexes in gastric cancer

As a nitric oxide (NO) donor prodrug, JS‐K inhibits cancer cell proliferation, induces the differentiation of human leukaemia cells, and triggers apoptotic cell death in various cancer models. However, the anti‐cancer effect of JS‐K in gastric cancer has not been reported. In this study, we found that JS‐K inhibited the proliferation of gastric cancer cells in vitro and in vivo and triggered mitochondrial apoptosis. Moreover, JS‐K induced a significant accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and the clearance of ROS by antioxidant reagents reversed JS‐K‐induced toxicity in gastric cancer cells and subcutaneous xenografts. Although JS‐K triggered significant NO release, NO scavenging had no effect on JS‐K‐induced toxicity in vivo and in vitro. Therefore, ROS, but not NO, mediated the anti‐cancer effects of JS‐K in gastric cancer. We also explored the potential mechanism of JS‐K‐induced ROS accumulation and found that JS‐K significantly down‐regulated the core proteins of mitochondria respiratory chain (MRC) complex I and IV, resulting in the reduction of MRC complex I and IV activity and the subsequent ROS production. Moreover, JS‐K inhibited the expression of antioxidant enzymes, including copper‐zinc‐containing superoxide dismutase (SOD1) and catalase, which contributed to the decrease of antioxidant enzymes activity and the subsequent inhibition of ROS clearance. Therefore, JS‐K may target MRC complex I and IV and antioxidant enzymes to exert ROS‐dependent anti‐cancer function, leading to the potential usage of JS‐K in the prevention and treatment of gastric cancer.

Glutathione S-transferase π: a potential role in antitumor therapy

Glutathione S-transferase π (GSTπ) is a Phase II metabolic enzyme that is an important facilitator of cellular detoxification. Traditional dogma asserts that GSTπ functions to catalyze glutathione (GSH)-substrate conjunction to preserve the macromolecule upon exposure to oxidative stress, thus defending cells against various toxic compounds. Over the past 20 years, abnormal GSTπ expression has been linked to the occurrence of tumor resistance to chemotherapy drugs, demonstrating that this enzyme possesses functions beyond metabolism. This revelation reveals exciting possibilities in the realm of drug discovery, as GSTπ inhibitors and its prodrugs offer a feasible strategy in designing anticancer drugs with the primary purpose of reversing tumor resistance. In connection with the authors' current research, we provide a review on the biological function of GSTπ and current developments in GSTπ-targeting drugs, as well as the prospects of future strategies.