QSAR Development for Plasma Protein Binding: Influence of the Ionization State

Systematic evaluation of high-throughput PBK modelling strategies for the prediction of intravenous and oral pharmacokinetics in humans

Physiologically based kinetic (PBK) modelling offers a mechanistic basis for predicting the pharmaco-/toxicokinetics of compounds and thereby provides critical information for integrating toxicity and exposure data to replace animal testing with in vitro or in silico methods. However, traditional PBK modelling depends on animal and human data, which limits its usefulness for non-animal methods. To address this limitation, high-throughput PBK modelling aims to rely exclusively on in vitro and in silico data for model generation. Here, we evaluate a variety of in silico tools and different strategies to parameterise PBK models with input values from various sources in a high-throughput manner. We gather 2000 + publicly available human in vivo concentration-time profiles of 200 + compounds (IV and oral administration), as well as in silico, in vitro and in vivo determined compound-specific parameters required for the PBK modelling of these compounds. Then, we systematically evaluate all possible PBK model parametrisation strategies in PK-Sim and quantify their prediction accuracy against the collected in vivo concentration-time profiles. Our results show that even simple, generic high-throughput PBK modelling can provide accurate predictions of the pharmacokinetics of most compounds (87% of Cmax and 84% of AUC within tenfold). Nevertheless, we also observe major differences in prediction accuracies between the different parameterisation strategies, as well as between different compounds. Finally, we outline a strategy for high-throughput PBK modelling that relies exclusively on freely available tools. Our findings contribute to a more robust understanding of the reliability of high-throughput PBK modelling, which is essential to establish the confidence necessary for its utilisation in Next-Generation Risk Assessment.

Recent Studies of Artificial Intelligence on In Silico Drug Distribution Prediction

Drug distribution is an important process in pharmacokinetics because it has the potential to influence both the amount of medicine reaching the active sites and the effectiveness as well as safety of the drug. The main causes of 90% of drug failures in clinical development are lack of efficacy and uncontrolled toxicity. In recent years, several advances and promising developments in drug distribution property prediction have been achieved, especially in silico, which helped to drastically reduce the time and expense of screening undesired drug candidates. In this study, we provide comprehensive knowledge of drug distribution background, influencing factors, and artificial intelligence-based distribution property prediction models from 2019 to the present. Additionally, we gathered and analyzed public databases and datasets commonly utilized by the scientific community for distribution prediction. The distribution property prediction performance of five large ADMET prediction tools is mentioned as a benchmark for future research. On this basis, we also offer future challenges in drug distribution prediction and research directions. We hope that this review will provide researchers with helpful insight into distribution prediction, thus facilitating the development of innovative approaches for drug discovery.

Application of machine learning techniques to the analysis and prediction of drug pharmacokinetics

In this review, we describe the current status and challenges in applying machine-learning techniques to the analysis and prediction of pharmacokinetic data. The theory of pharmacokinetics has been developed over decades on the basis of physiology and reaction kinetics. Mathematical models allow the reduction of pharmacokinetic data to parameter values, giving insight and understanding into ADME processes and predicting the outcome of different dosing scenarios. However, much information hidden in the data is lost through conceptual simplification with models. It is difficult to use mechanistic models alone to predict diverse pharmacokinetic time profiles, including inter-drug and inter-individual differences, in a cross-sectional manner. Machine learning is a prediction platform that can handle complex phenomena through data-driven analysis. As a resule, machine learning has been successfully adopted in various fields, including image recognition and language processing, and has been used for over two decades in pharmacokinetic research, primarily in the area of quantitative structure-activity relationships for pharmacokinetic parameters. Machine-learning models are generally known to provide better predictive performance than conventional linear models. Owing to the recent success in deep learning, models with new structures are being consistently proposed. These models include transfer learning and generative adversarial networks, which contribute to the effective use of a limited amount of data by diverting existing similar models or generating pseudo-data. How to make such newly emerging machine learning technologies applicable to meet challenges in the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics field is now the key issue.

Using VEGAHUB Within a Weight-of-Evidence Strategy

Industrial needs and regulatory requirements have played a significant role in accelerating the use of nontesting methods including in silico tools as alternatives to animal testing. The main interest is not solely on the use of in silico tools, or in read-across, but on better toxicological safety assessment of substances, and for this purpose more advanced, integrated strategies have to be implemented. VEGAHUB wants to promote this broader view, not necessarily focused on a specific approach. Applying multiple tools and complementary approaches instead of one technique may provide more elements for a more robust evaluation, but at the same time it is important to have a conceptual scheme to integrate multiple, heterogeneous lines of evidence. We will show how the user can benefit from the diversity of tools available within the platform VEGAHUB for assessing the biological properties of chemical substances on an example of (non)mutagenicity.

Comparative Study for Prediction of Low and High Plasma Protein Binding Drugs by Various Machine Learning-Based Classification Algorithms

<p>In the drug discovery path, most drug candidates failed at the early stages due to their pharmacokinetic behavior in the system. Early prediction of pharmacokinetic properties and screening methods can reduce the time and investment for lead discoveries. Plasma protein binding is one of these properties which has a vital role in drug discovery and development. The focus of the current study is to develop a computational model for the classification of Low Plasma Protein Binding (LPPB) and High Plasma Protein Binding (HPPB) drugs using machine learning methods for early screening of molecules through WEKA. Plasma protein binding drugs data was collated from the Drug Bank database where 617 drug candidates were found to interact with plasma proteins, out of which an equal proportion of high and low plasma protein binding drugs were extracted to build a training set of ~300 drugs. The machine learning algorithms were trained with a training set and evaluated by a test set. We also compared various machine learning-based classification algorithms i.e., the Naïve Bayes algorithm, Instance-Based Learner (IBK), multilayer perceptron, and random forest to determine the best model based on accuracy. It was observed that the random forest algorithm-based model outperforms with an accuracy of 99.67% and 0.9933 kappa value on training set and on test set as compared to other classification methods and can predict drug plasma binding capacity in the given data set using the WEKA tool.</p>

Designing QSARs for Parameters of High-Throughput Toxicokinetic Models Using Open-Source Descriptors

The intrinsic metabolic clearance rate (Cl_int) and the fraction of the chemical unbound in plasma (f_up) serve as important parameters for high-throughput toxicokinetic (TK) models, but experimental data are limited for many chemicals. Open-source quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models for both parameters were developed to offer reliable in silico predictions for a diverse set of chemicals regulated under the U.S. law, including pharmaceuticals, pesticides, and industrial chemicals. As a case study to demonstrate their utility, model predictions served as inputs to the TK component of a risk-based prioritization approach based on bioactivity/exposure ratios (BERs), in which a BER < 1 indicates that exposures are predicted to exceed a biological activity threshold. When applied to a subset of the Tox21 screening library (6484 chemicals), we found that the proportion of chemicals with BER <1 was similar using either in silico (1133/6484; 17.5%) or in vitro (148/848; 17.5%) parameters. Further, when considering only the chemicals in the Tox21 set with in vitro data, there was a high concordance of chemicals classified with either BER <1 or >1 using either in silico or in vitro parameters (767/848, 90.4%). Thus, the presented QSARs may be suitable for prioritizing the risk posed by many chemicals for which measured in vitro TK data are lacking.

In silico Plasma Protein Binding Studies of Selected Group of Drugs Using TLC and HPLC Retention Data

Plasma protein binding is an important determinant of the pharmacokinetic properties of chemical compounds in living organisms. The aim of the present study was to determine the index of protein binding affinity based on chromatographic experiments. The question is which chromatographic environment will best mimic the drug–protein binding conditions. Retention data from normal phase thin-layer liquid chromatography (NP TLC), reversed phase (RP) TLC and HPLC chromatography experiments with 129 active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) were collected. The stationary phase of the TLC plates was modified with protein and the HPLC column was filled with immobilized human serum albumin. In both chromatographic methods, the mobile phase was based on a buffer with a pH of 7.4 to mimic physiological conditions. Chemometric analyses were performed to compare multiple linear regression models (MLRs) with retention data, using protein binding values as the dependent variable. In the course of the analysis, APIs were divided into acidic, basic and neutral groups, and separate models were created for each group. The MLR models had a coefficient of determination between 0.73 and 0.91, with the highest values from NP TLC data.

Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery: A Comprehensive Review of Data-driven and Machine Learning Approaches

As expenditure on drug development increases exponentially, the overall drug discovery process requires a sustainable revolution. Since artificial intelligence (AI) is leading the fourth industrial revolution, AI can be considered as a viable solution for unstable drug research and development. Generally, AI is applied to fields with sufficient data such as computer vision and natural language processing, but there are many efforts to revolutionize the existing drug discovery process by applying AI. This review provides a comprehensive, organized summary of the recent research trends in AI-guided drug discovery process including target identification, hit identification, ADMET prediction, lead optimization, and drug repositioning. The main data sources in each field are also summarized in this review. In addition, an in-depth analysis of the remaining challenges and limitations will be provided, and proposals for promising future directions in each of the aforementioned areas.

Setting the stage for next-generation risk assessment with non-animal approaches: the EU-ToxRisk project experience

In 2016, the European Commission launched the EU-ToxRisk research project to develop and promote animal-free approaches in toxicology. The 36 partners of this consortium used in vitro and in silico methods in the context of case studies (CSs). These CSs included both compounds with a highly defined target (e.g. mitochondrial respiratory chain inhibitors) as well as compounds with poorly defined molecular initiation events (e.g. short-chain branched carboxylic acids). The initial project focus was on developing a science-based strategy for read-across (RAx) as an animal-free approach in chemical risk assessment. Moreover, seamless incorporation of new approach method (NAM) data into this process (= NAM-enhanced RAx) was explored. Here, the EU-ToxRisk consortium has collated its scientific and regulatory learnings from this particular project objective. For all CSs, a mechanistic hypothesis (in the form of an adverse outcome pathway) guided the safety evaluation. ADME data were generated from NAMs and used for comprehensive physiological-based kinetic modelling. Quality assurance and data management were optimized in parallel. Scientific and Regulatory Advisory Boards played a vital role in assessing the practical applicability of the new approaches. In a next step, external stakeholders evaluated the usefulness of NAMs in the context of RAx CSs for regulatory acceptance. For instance, the CSs were included in the OECD CS portfolio for the Integrated Approach to Testing and Assessment project. Feedback from regulators and other stakeholders was collected at several stages. Future chemical safety science projects can draw from this experience to implement systems toxicology-guided, animal-free next-generation risk assessment.