Measuring Lipolytic Activity to Support Process Improvements to Manage Lipase-Mediated Polysorbate Degradation

High-Throughput Fluorometric Assay For Quantifying Polysorbate In Biopharmaceutical Products Using Micelle Activated Fluorescence Probe N-Phenyl-1-Naphthylamine

PURPOSE

Polysorbates are among the most used surfactants in biopharmaceutical products containing proteins. Our work aims to develop a high-throughput fluorometric assay to further diversify the analytical toolbox for quantification of PSs.

METHOD

The assay leverages the micelle activated fluorescence signal from N-Phenyl-1-Naphthylamine (NPN). The development and optimization of assay parameters were guided by the pre-defined analytical target profile. Furthermore, NMR was used to probe the interaction between protein, PS80 and NPN in the measurement system and understand protein interference.

RESULTS

All assay parameters including excitation and emission wavelengths, standard curve, NPN concentration, and incubation time have been optimized and adapted to a microplate format, making it compatible with automated solutions that will be pursued in the near future to drive consistency and efficiency in our workflows. The specificity, accuracy, and precision of the assay have been demonstrated through a case study. Furthermore, NMR results provided additional insight into the change of the interaction dynamics between PS80 and NPN as the protein concentration increases. The results indicate minimal interaction between the protein and PS80 at lower concentration. However, when the concentration exceeds 75 mg/mL, there is a significant interaction between the protein and PS-80 micelle and monomer.

CONCLUSION

A high-throughput fluorometric assay has been developed for quantification of polysorbates in biopharmaceutical samples including in-process samples, drug substance and drug product. The assay reported herein could serve as a powerful analytical tool for polysorbate quantification and control, complementing the widely used liquid chromatography with charged aerosol detection method.

Multi-lipase gene knockdown in Chinese hamster ovary cells using artificial microRNAs to reduce host cell protein mediated polysorbate degradation

A large number of companies observe polysorbate (PS) degradation and associated (sub-)visible particle formation in biological drug formulations, which compromise the stability of the drug product, ultimately posing a risk toward delivering innovative medicines to patients. The main culprits of PS degradation are hydrolytic host cell proteins (HCPs) originating from the production cell lines, which are mostly Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell derived. Here, a small portion of particularly difficult-to-remove HCPs-mainly lipases-cause hydrolytic cleavage of PS resulting in the accumulation of free fatty acid aggregates/particles. One possible mitigation strategy is the removal of such critical HCPs in the production cell line. Multigene regulation can be achieved via microRNAs (miRNAs) thereby serving as a smart tool to reduce the expression of different target genes using a single miRNA. To enable a tailored gene regulation of multiple specific target lipases self-designed and non-naturally occurring artificial miRNAs (amiRNA) can be designed. Based on micro-conserved regions in the mRNA sequence of two sets of target HCPs, we provide a proof-of-concept for a simultaneous multi-lipase knockdown in CHO cells using single amiRNAs. By this, we were not only able to reduce PS degradation but laid the foundation to expand this tool to other areas of cell line phenotype engineering.

Application of Formulation Principles to Stability Issues Encountered During Processing, Manufacturing, and Storage of Drug Substance and Drug Product Protein Therapeutics

The field of formulation and stabilization of protein therapeutics has become rather extensive. However, most of the focus has been on stabilization of the final drug product. Yet, proteins experience stress and degradation through the manufacturing process, starting with fermentaition. This review describes how formulation principles can be applied to stabilize biopharmaceutical proteins during bioprocessing and manufacturing, considering each unit operation involved in prepration of the drug substance. In addition, the impact of the container on stabilty is discussed as well.

Recent applications of quantitative mass spectrometry in biopharmaceutical process development and manufacturing

Biopharmaceutical products have seen rapid growth over the past few decades and continue to dominate the global pharmaceutical market. Aligning with the quality by design (QbD) framework and realization, recent advances in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) instrumentation and related techniques have enhanced biopharmaceutical characterization capabilities and have supported an increased development of biopharmaceutical products. Beyond its routine qualitative characterization, the quantitative feature of LC-MS has unique applications in biopharmaceutical process development and manufacturing. This review describes the recent applications and implications of the advancement of quantitative MS methods in biopharmaceutical process development, and characterization of biopharmaceutical product, product-related variants, and process-related impurities. We also provide insights on the emerging applications of quantitative MS in the lifecycle of biopharmaceutical product development including quality control in the Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) environment and process analytical technology (PAT) practices during process development and manufacturing. Through collaboration with instrument and software vendors and regulatory agencies, we envision broader adoption of phase-appropriate quantitative MS-based methods for the analysis of biopharmaceutical products, which in turn has the potential to enable manufacture of higher quality products for patients.

A fast and sensitive high-throughput assay to assess polysorbate-degrading hydrolytic activity in biopharmaceuticals

Hydrolysis of polysorbate in biopharmaceutical products has been ascribed to the enzymatic activity from trace levels of residual host cell proteins. In recent years, significant efforts to identify the causative enzymes typically used elaborate, material-intensive and time-consuming approaches. Therefore, the lack of fast and sensitive assays to monitor their activity remains a major bottleneck for supporting process optimization and troubleshooting activities where time and sample throughput are crucial constraints. To address this bottleneck, we developed a novel Electrochemiluminescence-based Polysorbase Activity (EPA) assay to measure hydrolytic activities in biotherapeutics throughout the drug substance manufacturing process. By combining the favorable features of an in-house designed surrogate substrate with a well-established detection platform, the method yields fast (∼36 h turnaround time) and highly sensitive readouts compatible with high-throughput testing. The assay capability for detecting substrate conversion in a precise and reliable manner was demonstrated by extensive qualification studies and by employing a number of recombinant hydrolases associated with polysorbate hydrolysis. In addition, high assay sensitivity and wide applicability were confirmed for in-process pool samples of three different antibody products by performing a head-to-head comparison between this method and an established liquid chromatography - mass spectrometry based assay for the quantification of free fatty acids. Overall, our results suggest that this new approach is well-suited to resolve differences in hydrolytic activity through all stages of purification.

Existence of a superior polysorbate fraction in respect to protein stabilization and particle formation?

Biologicals including monoclonal antibodies are the current flagships in pharmaceutical industry. However, they are exposed to a multitude of destabilization conditions like for instance hydrophobic interfaces, leading to reduced biological activity. Polysorbates are commonly applied to effectively stabilize these active pharmaceutical ingredients against colloidal stress. Nevertheless, chemical instability of polysorbate via hydrolysis or oxidation results in degradation products that might form particles via phase separation. Polysorbates are mixtures of hundreds of individual components, and recently purer quality grades with reduced variations in the fatty acid composition are available. As the protective function of polysorbate itself is not completely understood, even less is known about its individual components, raising the question of the existence of a superior polysorbate species in respect to protein stabilization or degradation susceptibility. Here, we evaluated the protective function of four main fractions of polysorbate 20 (PS20) in agitation studies with monoclonal antibodies, followed by particle analysis as well as protein and polysorbate content determination. The commercially-available inherent mixtures PS20 high purity and PS20 all-laurate, as well as the fraction isosorbide-POE-monolaurate showed superior protection against mechanical-induced stress (visual inspection and turbidity) at the air-water interface in comparison to sole sorbitan-POE-monolaurate, -dilaurate, and -trilaurate. Fractions composed mainly of higher-order esters like sorbitan-POE-dilaurate and sorbitan-POE-trilaurate indicated high turbidities as indication for subvisible and small particles accompanied by a reduced protein monomer content after agitation. For the isosorbide-POE-monolaurates as well as for the inherent polysorbate mixtures no obvious differences in protein content and protein aggregation (SEC) were observed, reflecting the observations from visual appearance. However, absolute polysorbate concentrations vary drastically between different species in the actual formulations. As there are still open questions in respect to protein specificity or regarding mixtures versus individual components of PS20, further studies must be performed, to gain a better understanding of a "generalized" stabilizing effect of polysorbates on monoclonal antibodies. The knowledge of the characteristics of individual polysorbate species can have the potential to pave the way to superior detergents in respect to protein stabilization and/or degradation susceptibility.

Characterization of Recombinantly-Expressed Hydrolytic Enzymes from Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells: Identification of Host Cell Proteins that Degrade Polysorbate

Enzymatic hydrolysis of polysorbate in drug products is a major challenge for the biopharmaceutical industry. Polysorbate hydrolysis caused by host cell proteins (HCPs) co-purified during bioprocessing can reduce the protective effects of the surfactant for the active pharmaceutical ingredient and cause the accumulation of low-solubility degradation products over the long-term storage. The identities of such HCPs are elusive due to their extremely low concentrations after the efficient purification processes of most biopharmaceuticals. In this work, 20 enzymes-selected for their known or putative hydrolytic activity and potential to degrade polysorbate-were recombinantly expressed, purified, and characterized via orthogonal methods. First, these recombinant HCPs were assessed for hydrolytic activity against a fluorogenic esterase substrate in a recently-developed, high-throughput assay. Second, these HCPs were screened for hydrolytic activity against polysorbate in a representative mAb formulation. Third, HCPs that displayed hydrolytic activities in the first two assays were subjected to more detailed characterization of their enzyme kinetics against polysorbates. Finally, these HCPs were evaluated for substrate specificity towards different sub-species of polysorbates. This work provides critical new insights for targeted LC-MS/MS approaches for identification of relevant polysorbate-degrading enzymes and supports improvements to remove such HCPs, including knockouts or targeted removal during purification.

Industry Perspective on the Use and Characterization of Polysorbates for Biopharmaceutical Products Part 2: Survey Report on Control Strategy Preparing for the Future

Polysorbate (PS) 20 and 80 are the main surfactants used to stabilize biopharmaceutical products. Industry practices on various aspects of PS based on a confidential survey and following discussions by 16 globally acting major biotechnology companies is presented in two publications. Part 1 summarizes the current practice and use of PS during manufacture in addition to aspects like current understanding of the (in)stability of PS, the routine QC testing and control of PS, and selected regulatory aspects of PS.¹ The current part 2 of the survey focusses on understanding, monitoring, prediction, and mitigation of PS degradation pathways in order to propose an effective control strategy. The results of the survey and extensive cross-company discussions are put into relation with currently available scientific literature.

Industry perspective on the use and characterization of polysorbates for biopharmaceutical products Part 1: Survey report on current state and common practices for handling and control of polysorbates

Polysorbates (PS) are widely used as a stabilizer in biopharmaceutical products. Industry practices on various aspects of PS are presented in this part 1 survey report based on a confidential survey and following discussions by 16 globally acting major biotechnology companies. The current practice and use of PS during manufacture across their global manufacturing sites are covered in addition to aspects like current understanding of the (in)stability of PS, the routine QC testing and control of PS, and selected regulatory aspects of PS. The results of the survey and extensive cross-company discussions are put into relation with currently available scientific literature. Part 2 of the survey report (upcoming) will focus on understanding, monitoring, prediction, and mitigation of PS degradation pathways to develop an effective control strategy.

The measurement and control of high-risk host cell proteins for polysorbate degradation in biologics formulation

Nonionic surfactant polysorbates, including PS-80 and PS-20, are commonly used in the formulation of biotherapeutic products for both preventing surface adsorption and acting as stabilizer against protein aggregation. Trace levels of residual host cell proteins (HCPs) with lipase or esterase enzymatic activity have been shown to degrade polysorbates in biologics formulation. The measurement and control of these low abundance, high-risk HCPs for polysorbate degradation are an industry-wide challenge to achieve desired shelf life of biopharmaceuticals in liquid formulation, especially for high-concentration formulation product development. Here, we reviewed the challenges, recent advances, and future opportunities of analytical method development, risk assessment, and control strategies for polysorbate degradation during formulation development with a focus on enzymatic degradation. Continued efforts to advance our understanding of polysorbate degradation in biologics formulation will help develop high-quality medicines for patients.

Identification of the specific causes of polysorbate 20 degradation in monoclonal antibody formulations containing multiple lipases

PURPOSE

Polysorbates (PS) are excipients used in the biotech industry to stabilize monoclonal antibody (mAb) protein products. However, PS in drug product formulations can be degraded during storage and lead to particle formation because of the limited solubility of the free fatty acids released through the enzymatic hydrolysis of PS-a process driven by residual host cell proteins, especially lipases, that are co-purified with the drugs. When multiple lipases are present, it is very difficult to know the cause for PS degradation. In this study, we aim to determine the cause of PS degradation from two lipases, lysosomal acid lipase (LAL) and lipoprotein lipase (LPL).

METHODS

PS degradation pattern of the drug product was compared with those induced by recombinant lipases. Correlations between the concentration of LPL or LAL and PS20 loss were compared. Specific inhibitors, LAL inhibitor lalistat2 and LPL inhibitor GSK264220A, were used to differentiate their degradation of PS in the drug products.

RESULTS

The complete inhibition of PS20 degradation by lalistat2 suggested that LAL, rather than LPL, was responsible for the PS20 degradation. In addition, LAL was more strongly correlated than LPL with the percentage of PS20 degradation. No PS20 degradation was observed for several mAbs containing similar levels of LPL (0.5-1.5 ppm) in the absence of LAL, suggesting that LPL concentrations below 1.5 ppm does not degrade PS20 in drug products.

CONCLUSIONS

LAL was determined to be the cause of the PS20 degradation. This study provides a practical strategy to determine the root cause of PS degradation.

Assessing the polysorbate degradation fingerprints and kinetics of lipases - how the activity of polysorbate degrading hydrolases is influenced by the assay and assay conditions

Two of the most widely used surfactants to stabilize biologicals against e.g. interfacial stresses are polysorbate 20 (PS20) and polysorbate 80 (PS80). In recent years, numerous cases of hydrolytic polysorbate (PS) degradation in liquid formulations of biopharmaceuticals have been observed. Concomitant with the degradation of PSs, formulated proteins become inherently instable and more susceptible to aggregation. Furthermore, poorly soluble fatty acids (FA) are released from the PSs, which might lead to FA precipitation and the formation of visible and subvisible particles. Therefore, possible particle inducing factors have to be monitored closely. The major root cause of hydrolytic PS degradation in biologicals is the presence of enzymatic active host cell proteins (HCP), like lipases and esterases, which are co-purified with the active pharmaceutical ingredient. Such contaminants can be detected via their hydrolytic activity, either using ester-based substrates or PS itself. However, each approach has its up- and downsides, which makes the comparison of the results from other publications difficult. It was therefore the aim of the present study to investigate the impact of lipase specificities on the assay readouts. This study evaluates three different surrogate (model) lipases with distinctively different degradation kinetics and substrate specificities using specific analytical methods. The analytical panel contains on one hand two lipase activity assays with ester-based substrates, either detecting the release of para-nitrophenol or 4-methylumbelliferone, and on the other hand two PS-based monitoring analyses (fluorescence micelle assay and reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography - charged aerosol detection), which detect hydrolytic "activity" directly in the target substrate. Thereby, strengths and weaknesses of each assay are discussed, and recommendations are made for the respective use cases. Our results show that the determined lipase activities vary not only from assay to assay, but also significantly for the lipase tested, thus showing a different degradation fingerprint in the RP-HPLC-CAD chromatogram. This demonstrates that a comprehensive monitoring approach is essential to assess potential HCP contaminations.

A Highly Sensitive LC-MS/MS Method for Targeted Quantitation of Lipase Host Cell Proteins in Biotherapeutics

Identification and accurate quantitation of host cell proteins (HCPs) in biotherapeutic drugs has become increasingly important due to the negative impact of certain HCPs on the safety, stability, and other product quality of biotherapeutics. Recently, several lipase HCPs have been identified to potentially cause the enzymatic degradation of polysorbate, a widely used excipient in the formulation of biotherapeutics, which can severely impact the stability and product quality of drug products. In this study, we identified three lipase HCPs that were frequently detected in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell cultures using shotgun proteomics, including phospholipase B-like 2 (PLBL2), lipoprotein lipase (LPL), and lysosomal acid lipase (LIPA). A targeted quantitation method for these three lipase HCPs was developed utilizing liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) with high-resolution multiple-reaction-monitoring (MRMhr) quantitation. The method demonstrated good sensitivity with low limit of quantitation (LLOQ) around 1 ng/mL, and linear dynamic range of three orders of magnitude for the three lipase HCPs. It has been applied for the characterization of process intermediates from various in-house monoclonal antibody (mAb) production. In addition, the method has also been used to evaluate the robustness of clearance for one of the lipase HCPs, PLBL2, under different column purification process conditions.

High-Throughput, Fluorescence-Based Esterase Activity Assay for Assessing Polysorbate Degradation Risk during Biopharmaceutical Development

PURPOSE

Hydrolytic degradation of polysorbate during 2-8°C storage of monoclonal antibody drug products has been attributed to residual enzymes (e.g., esterases) from bioprocessing steps. Robust detection of esterase activity using sensitive, non-polysorbate surrogate substrates can provide an alternate method to assess polysorbate degradation risk, if the correlation between the esterase activity and polysorbate degradation is established.

METHODS

A general esterase activity assay was developed as a monitoring and characterization tool during bioprocess development of monoclonal antibodies.

RESULTS

We report a fluorescence plate-based assay for quantifying esterase activity, utilizing 4-methylumbelliferyl caprylate (MU-C8) as the esterase substrate. The assay was first assessed for substrate, inhibitor and pH specificity using both model enzymes and purified protein samples. The assay was then extensively tested to understand sample matrix effects on activity rates.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of this high-throughput method will allow for rapid characterization of protein samples in under three hours. The esterase activity correlated directly with polysorbate degradation and can provide valuable information on polysorbate degradation risk throughout drug development.

Screening natural product extracts for potential enzyme inhibitors: protocols, and the standardisation of the usage of blanks in α-amylase, α-glucosidase and lipase assays

BACKGROUND

Enzyme assays have widespread applications in drug discovery from plants to natural products. The appropriate use of blanks in enzyme assays is important for assay baseline-correction, and the correction of false signals associated with background matrix interferences. However, the blank-correction procedures reported in published literature are highly inconsistent. We investigated the influence of using different types of blanks on the final calculated activity/inhibition results for three enzymes of significance in diabetes and obesity; α-glucosidase, α-amylase, and lipase. This is the first study to examine how different blank-correcting methods affect enzyme assay results. Although assays targeting the above enzymes are common in the literature, there is a scarcity of detailed published protocols. Therefore, we have provided comprehensive, step-by-step protocols for α-glucosidase-, α-amylase- and lipase-inhibition assays that can be performed in 96-well format in a simple, fast, and resource-efficient manner with clear instructions for blank-correction and calculation of results.

RESULTS

In the three assays analysed here, using only a buffer blank underestimated the enzyme inhibitory potential of the test sample. In the absorbance-based α-glucosidase assay, enzyme inhibition was underestimated when a sample blank was omitted for the coloured plant extracts. Similarly, in the fluorescence-based α-amylase and lipase assays, enzyme inhibition was underestimated when a substrate blank was omitted. For all three assays, method six [Raw Data - (Substrate + Sample Blank)] enabled the correction of interferences due to the buffer, sample, and substrate without double-blanking, and eliminated the need to add substrate to each sample blank.

CONCLUSION

The choice of blanks and blank-correction methods contribute to the variability of assay results and the likelihood of underestimating the enzyme inhibitory potential of a test sample. This highlights the importance of standardising the use of blanks and the reporting of blank-correction procedures in published studies in order to ensure the accuracy and reproducibility of results, and avoid overlooked opportunities in drug discovery research due to inadvertent underestimation of enzyme inhibitory potential of test samples resulting from unsuitable blank-correction. Based on our assessments, we recommend method six [RD - (Su + SaB)] as a suitable method for blank-correction of raw data in enzyme assays.