Off-label prescribing in a French hospital

Off-label drug prescriptions in French general practice: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

Off-label drug prescribing is a public health and economic issue. The aim of this study was to describe off-label prescription in general practice in France, in terms of frequency and nature, and to identify its main determining factors.

DESIGN

Multicentre cross-sectional study SETTING: Twenty-three training general practice offices PARTICIPANTS: All the voluntary patients coming for a medical consultation or visited at home over a cumulative period of 5 days per office between November 2015 and January 2016.

METHODS

Eleven interns, acting as observers, collected data. Two reviewers analysed the drugs prescribed by the trainers, in order to identify those prescribed off-label in terms of their indication or the age of the patient. We used a univariate, then a multivariate model, based on hierarchical mixed-effects logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among the 4932 drug prescriptions registered, 911 (18.5%[95% CI17.4% to 19.6%]) were off-label, of which 865 (17.6%) due to the indication of the drug and 58 (1.2%) due to the age of the patient. The prescription never mentioned the off-label use, neither was the patient informed of it, as required by the French law. With the multivariate analysis, variables contributing to off-label prescription were the number of drugs (OR=1.05 for each additional drug), the initiation of new drug therapy (OR=1.26) and the non-specific goal of the prescription (OR=1.43); the age of the patient ≤14 years (OR=1.42); the rural location of the physician's practice (OR=1.38) and the low frequency of the visits of national health insurance representatives (OR=0.93).

CONCLUSION

Almost one out of five drugs prescribed in French general practice was off-label. It seems necessary to better train physicians in clinical pharmacology, to provide them with more effective drug prescription software, to reinforce postmarketing surveillance and to clearly define off-label use by consensus.

Prospective data collection of off-label use of rituximab in Australian public hospitals

BACKGROUND

Rituximab is a chimeric, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody registered for the treatment of B-cell malignancies and refractory rheumatoid arthritis in Australia. In addition to these approved indications, there has been growing interest in the use of off-label rituximab in the management of a variety of diseases.

AIMS

To determine the current usage of off-label rituximab in Australia, we collected nationwide data.

METHODS

Information regarding patients receiving rituximab for off-label indications was prospectively collected for a 6-month period from Australian public hospitals. Data recorded included clinical indication, dosing schedule, previous therapy and efficacy assessment. The level of evidence for the use of rituximab was determined for each off-label indication.

RESULTS

During the 6-month period, a total of 364 instances of off-label rituximab use was recorded in the national database. A total of 63 underlying diagnoses was identified. These were subclassified into haematological disorders (19%), autoimmune connective tissue diseases (12%), vasculitis (12%), neurological disorders (12%), transplant-related uses (12%), haematological malignancies (11%), muscle disorders (8%), renal diseases (6%), dermatological conditions (5%), other conditions (2%) and ocular diseases (1%). Forty percent of these requests were supported only by level 4 evidence of benefit. Data highlighted the non-standardised approaches to drug approval mechanisms, dosing schedules and monitoring for efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Off-label rituximab is prescribed for a diverse range of clinical conditions. Determining a safe and effective means of regulating this use within an evidence-based framework remains an ongoing challenge.

Paediatric drug use with focus on off-label prescriptions at Swedish hospitals - a nationwide study

AIM

To perform a nationwide investigation of paediatric drug use at Swedish hospitals, including an analysis of off-label drug use.

METHODS

All paediatric hospitals in Sweden were invited to register all prescriptions to children, aged between 0 and 18, during two separate 2-day-periods in 2008. Data were reported and analysed with respect to licence status and proportion of and reasons for off-label drug use.

RESULTS

Data on 11,294 prescriptions to 2947 paediatric patients were received. Drugs associated with pain relief, infection, prematurity, nutrition and surgery or anaesthesia were most commonly used. Paracetamol was the most frequently used drug on-label and also among the most commonly used off-label drugs. Nearly half (49%) of all administered prescriptions concerned unlicensed drugs, off-label drugs or extemporaneously prepared drugs. The corresponding rate among neonates was 69%. Lack of paediatric information in the Summary of Product Characteristics was the main reason for off-label classification.

CONCLUSIONS

Paediatric off-label drug use is common at Swedish hospitals, and nearly half of all prescriptions were not documented for use in children. The findings emphasize a need for paediatric clinical studies as well as compilation of existing clinical experience and scattered evidence, particularly for drug treatment in infants and neonates.

Off-label use of contrast agents

When contrast agents are approved, the label describes the approved indications and particular circumstances of use such as age, organ function or pregnancy. The use of contrast agents outside their labelled indications is increasing, namely with contrast agents used for MRI. The aim of this paper is to improve the knowledge about this topic. The basis for off-label use is the physician's prerogative, which finds its basis in the "Declaration of Helsinki". Off-label use is allowed under special conditions and might be even the medical state of the art. The necessity for off-label use will continue to increase for MR-contrast agents, as the regulatory requirements for approval of new indications continuously increase, and clinical trials for registration purposes are quite costly and time consuming. As a consequence, manufacturers will concentrate on clinical studies for the essential indications.