Paralytic ileus possibly associated with interaction between ritonavir/lopinavir and vincristine

Leveraging interdisciplinary management in people with HIV and lymphoid neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Drug-drug interactions between antiretroviral treatment (ART) and cytostatics may have a negative impact in the prognosis of people with HIV (PWH) and cancer.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of the implementation of interdisciplinary management and the type of ART in PWH diagnosed with lymphoid neoplasms.

METHODS

This is a multicentric, retrospective observational cohort study including PWH diagnosed with lymphoid neoplasm who started first-line chemotherapy between 2008 and 2020. Demographic, clinical and therapeutic variables were obtained from the electronic medical records and associated with 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

A total of 118 individuals were included. Boosted ART was being used in 55 (46.6%) cases at the time of neoplasm diagnosis. The Infectious Diseases or the Pharmacy Department was consulted before starting chemotherapy in 79/118 (66.9%) cases. Interdisciplinary management resulted in fewer subjects taking boosted ART (17.7% versus 71.8%, P < 0.001) and more subjects using unboosted integrase strand transfer inhibitor-based ART (74.7% versus 7.7%, P < 0.001). The use of boosted ART with chemotherapy was associated with worse 5-year PFS (P = 0.003) and 5-year OS (P = 0.016). There was a trend towards better 5-year PFS and OS when interdisciplinary management was implemented, with significant differences for individuals receiving boosted ART at neoplasm diagnosis (P = 0.0246 and P = 0.0329, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings underscore the significant impact of the type of ART on the prognosis of PWH undergoing chemotherapy. Encouraging collaborative management between oncologists, pharmacists and HIV teams for these patients enhances PFS and OS rates.

Antitumoral Agent-Induced Constipation: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Constipation is a common symptom in patients receiving antitumoral treatment. The mechanisms underlying antitumoral agent-induced constipation (ATAIC) are poorly defined. This systematic review aimed to analyze and synthesize the available information related to the prevalence, etiology, and treatment of ATAIC.

METHODS

A systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines was conducted. The review included human studies written in English, French, or Spanish involving patients with cancer and containing information about the prevalence, etiology, and treatment of ATAIC.

RESULTS

A total of 73 articles were included. The reported prevalence ranged from 0.8% to 86.6%. Six studies reported an ATAIC prevalence of over 50%. The prevalence rates of constipation of grades 3 and 4 ranged between 0 and 11%. The importance of enteric neuronal integrity in gastrointestinal function was reported. The articles with the highest levels of evidence in relation to ATAIC treatment obtained in this systematic review studied treatments with acupuncture, sweet potato, osteopath, probiotics, and moxibustion.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of constipation in patients undergoing antitumoral treatment is very diverse. Studies specifically designed to report the prevalence of antineoplastic treatment-induced constipation are needed. The importance of enteric neuronal integrity in gastrointestinal function was described. Thus, neuroprotection could be an area of research for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced gastrointestinal disorders.

Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in the HIV Setting

Despite the widespread use of combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) and the subsequent decrease in AIDS-defining cancers, HIV-related lymphomas remain a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in people with HIV (PWH). Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) subtype in PWH. This lymphoma is a heterogeneous disease including morphological variants and molecular subtypes according to the cell of origin or the mutation profile. In the pre-cART era, treatment with standard-dose chemotherapy induced high rates of toxicity and outcomes were very poor. The introduction of cART and the incorporation of infection prophylaxis allowed the use of conventional intensive chemotherapy regimens used in the general population, such as R-CHOP or R-EPOCH. The use of cART during chemotherapy treatment was initially controversial due to the potential risk of adverse drug-drug interactions. However, the availability of current cART regimens with less potential to cause drug interactions and evidence that cART improves survival rates in NHL strongly support the use of cART in PWH with DLBCL. Consequently, interdisciplinary collaboration between HIV specialists and hemato-oncologists for the management of potential interactions and overlapping toxicities between antiretroviral and antineoplastic drugs is crucial for the optimal treatment of PWH with NHL.

Hodgkin Lymphoma in People Living with HIV

Simple Summary

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a non-AIDS defining neoplasm, but people living with HIV (PLWH) have between a 5- and 26-fold higher risk of developing it than the general population. Epstein-Barr virus is present in almost all HIV-related HL cases, and plays an important role in its etiopathogenesis. Despite the aggressive characteristics, the prognosis of HL affecting PLWH is similar to that of the general population if patients are treated following the same recommendations. Administration of cART concomitantly with chemotherapy is highly recommended. However, this combination may be challenging due to drug–drug interactions and overlapping toxicity. Thus, interdisciplinary collaboration between hemato-oncologists and HIV specialists is crucial for the optimal treatment of both lymphoma and HIV infection.

Abstract

Despite widespread use of combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) and increased life expectancy in people living with HIV (PLWH), HIV-related lymphomas (HRL) remain a leading cause of cancer morbidity and mortality for PLWH, even in patients optimally treated with cART. While the incidence of aggressive forms of non-Hodgkin lymphoma decreased after the advent of cART, incidence of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) has increased among PLWH in recent decades. The coinfection of Epstein–Barr virus plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of HL in the HIV setting. Currently, PLWH with HRL, including HL, are treated similarly to HIV-negative patients and, importantly, the prognosis of HL in PLWH is approaching that of the general population. In this regard, effective cART during chemotherapy is strongly recommended since it has been shown to improve survival rates in all lymphoma subtypes, including HL. As a consequence, interdisciplinary collaboration between HIV specialists and hemato-oncologists for the management of potential drug–drug interactions and overlapping toxicities between antiretroviral and antineoplastic drugs is crucial for the optimal treatment of PLWH with HL. In this article the authors review and update the epidemiological, clinical and biological aspects of HL presenting in PLWH with special emphasis on advances in prognosis and the factors that have contributed to it.

Lung Cancer (LC) in HIV Positive Patients: Pathogenic Features and Implications for Treatment

: The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection continues to be a social and public health problem. Thanks to more and more effective antiretroviral therapy (ART), nowadays HIV-positive patients live longer, thus increasing their probability to acquire other diseases, malignancies primarily. Senescence along with immune-system impairment, HIV-related habits and other oncogenic virus co-infections increase the cancer risk of people living with HIV (PLWH); in the next future non-AIDS-defining cancers will prevail, lung cancer (LC) in particular. Tumor in PLWH might own peculiar predictive and/or prognostic features, and antineoplastic agents' activity might be subverted by drug-drug interactions (DDIs) due to concurrent ART. Moreover, PLWH immune properties and comorbidities might influence both the response and tolerability of oncologic treatments. The therapeutic algorithm of LC, rapidly and continuously changed in the last years, should be fitted in the context of a special patient population like PLWH. This is quite challenging, also because HIV-positive patients have been often excluded from participation to clinical trials, so that levels of evidence about systemic treatments are lower than evidence in HIV-uninfected individuals. With this review, we depicted the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical-pathological characteristics and implications for LC care in PLWH, offering a valid focus about this topic to clinicians.

Use of a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model to simulate drug-drug interactions between antineoplastic and antiretroviral drugs

Background

Co-administration of antineoplastics with ART is challenging due to potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs). However, trials specifically assessing such DDIs are lacking. Our objective was to simulate DDIs between the antineoplastics erlotinib and gefitinib with key antiretroviral drugs and to predict dose adjustments using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model.

Methods

In vitro data describing chemical properties and pharmacokinetic processes of each drug and their effect on cytochrome P450 isoforms were obtained from the literature. Plasma drug-concentration profiles were simulated in a virtual population of 50 individuals receiving erlotinib or gefitinib alone or with darunavir/ritonavir, efavirenz or etravirine. Simulated pharmacokinetic parameters and the magnitude of DDIs with probe drugs (midazolam, maraviroc) were compared with literature values. Erlotinib and gefitinib pharmacokinetics with and without antiretrovirals were compared and dose-adjustment strategies were evaluated.

Results

Simulated parameters of each drug and the magnitude of DDIs with probe drugs were in agreement with reference values. Darunavir/ritonavir increased erlotinib and gefitinib exposure, while efavirenz and etravirine decreased erlotinib and gefitinib concentrations. Based on our predictions, dose-adjustment strategies may consist of once-daily dosing erlotinib at 25 mg and gefitinib at 125 mg with darunavir/ritonavir; or erlotinib at 200 mg and gefitinib at 375 mg with etravirine. The interaction with efavirenz was not overcome even after doubling erlotinib or gefitinib doses.

Conclusions

PBPK models predicted the in vivo pharmacokinetics of erlotinib, gefitinib and the antiretrovirals darunavir/ritonavir, efavirenz and etravirine, and the DDIs between them. The simulated dose-adjustments may represent valuable strategies to optimize antineoplastic therapy in HIV-infected patients.

Involvement of Cannabinoid Signaling in Vincristine-Induced Gastrointestinal Dysmotility in the Rat

Background: In different models of paralytic ileus, cannabinoid receptors are overexpressed and endogenous cannabinoids are massively released, contributing to gastrointestinal dysmotility. The antitumoral drug vincristine depresses gastrointestinal motility and a similar mechanism could participate in this effect. Therefore, our aim was to determine, using CB₁ and CB₂ antagonists, whether an increased endocannabinoid tone is involved in vincristine-induced gastrointestinal ileus.

Methods: First, we confirmed the effects of vincristine on the gut mucosa, by conventional histological techniques, and characterized its effects on motility, by radiographic means. Conscious male Wistar rats received an intraperitoneal injection of vincristine (0.1–0.5 mg/kg), and barium sulfate (2.5 ml; 2 g/ml) was intragastrically administered 0, 24, or 48 h later. Serial X-rays were obtained at different time-points (0–8 h) after contrast. X-rays were used to build motility curves for each gastrointestinal region and determine the size of stomach and caecum. Tissue samples were taken for histology 48 h after saline or vincristine (0.5 mg/kg). Second, AM251 (a CB₁ receptor antagonist) and AM630 (a CB₂ receptor antagonist) were used to determine if CB₁ and/or CB₂ receptors are involved in vincristine-induced gastrointestinal dysmotility.

Key results: Vincristine induced damage to the mucosa of ileum and colon and reduced gastrointestinal motor function at 0.5 mg/kg. The effect on motor function was particularly evident when the study started 24 h after administration. AM251, but not AM630, significantly prevented vincristine effect, particularly in the small intestine, when administered thrice. AM251 alone did not significantly alter gastrointestinal motility.

Conclusions: The fact that AM251, but not AM630, is capable of reducing the effect of vincristine suggests that, like in other experimental models of paralytic ileus, an increased cannabinoid tone develops and is at least partially responsible for the alterations induced by the antitumoral drug on gastrointestinal motor function. Thus, CB₁ antagonists might be useful to prevent/treat ileus induced by vincristine.

Lung cancer in HIV-infected patients in the combination antiretroviral treatment era

The advent of combination antiretroviral treatment (cART) has been followed by a decrease in HIV-associated morbidity and mortality, but also by an apparent increase in the incidence of non-AIDS-defining cancers (NADCs). The risk of lung cancer is substantially higher in HIV-infected patients than in the general population, in part due to aging and tobacco use, and it is the most frequent NADC. The management of lung cancer in HIV-infected patients has some peculiarities that need to be taken into account. This review focuses on the epidemiology, risk factors, and clinical management of lung cancer in HIV-infected patients. In addition, screening tools and future perspectives are also discussed.

A case of severe toxicity during coadministration of vincristine and piperacillin: are drug transporters involved in vincristine hypersensitivity and drug-drug interactions?

Neurotoxicity is frequent with vincristine treatment, but severe autonomic neuropathy is rare. A decreased activity of drug transporters in the presence of an interacting drug may favor such events by increasing systemic or tissue exposure to the drug. We encountered severe autonomic neuropathy and cholestasis in a child receiving vincristine, after the introduction of piperacillin-tazobactam. A causality assessment of the adverse reaction identified the antibiotic as the most probable cause of the observation. The patient was heterozygous for several common polymorphisms of ABCC2 (multidrug-related protein-2), CYP3A5, and ABCB1 (multidrug-related protein-1, P-glycoprotein), but their role in the toxicity cannot be ascertained.

Raltegravir-based HAART regimen in a patient with large B-cell lymphoma

OBJECTIVE

To describe the antiretroviral management of a patient diagnosed simultaneously with HIV/AIDS and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, focusing on the drug-drug interactions between highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and concomitant cancer chemotherapy.

CASE SUMMARY

A 55-year-old white man was recently diagnosed with HIV/AIDS and presented 1 month later with complaints of nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, double vision, right eye discomfort/swelling, and a 3.6-kg weight loss. An excisional biopsy of a right inguinal lymph node confirmed a new diagnosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. HAART and a chemotherapeutic regimen, including cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (CHOP) with intrathecal methotrexate, was to be initiated. As the potential for multiple drug-drug interactions existed, raltegravir, abacavir, and lamivudine were chosen for the initial HAART regimen. The patient achieved and maintained an undetectable viral load throughout 6 CHOP cycles.

DISCUSSION

HAART improves the chemotherapeutic response in patients with HIV and lymphoma. Multiple drug-drug interactions are possible in patients who are to receive CHOP and HAART. Cyclophosphamide and vincristine are metabolized via the CYP3A4 isoenzyme. Protease inhibitors (PIs) and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors both inhibit and induce CYP3A4, with the potential for altered chemotherapeutic and cytotoxic effects. When PIs are combined with CHOP, mortality is reduced, but increased adverse effects are demonstrated. Raltegravir, an integrase inhibitor, is eliminated via glucuronidation and results in minimal drug-drug interactions. Raltegravir improves virologic and immunologic responses in HAART-naïve patients and thus would be a suitable alternative for preventing chemotherapeutic-HAART interactions.

CONCLUSIONS

There is limited information published regarding the potential for interactions between HAART and cancer chemotherapy. While further research is necessary, it is important for clinicians to consider the potential for drug-drug interactions when designing a HAART regimen concurrently with chemotherapy.