Clinical pharmacist's contribution to medication reconciliation on admission to hospital in Ireland

Recommendations for wider adoption of clinical pharmacy in Central and Eastern Europe in order to optimise pharmacotherapy and improve patient outcomes

Clinical pharmacy as an area of practice, education and research started developing around the 1960s when pharmacists across the globe gradually identified the need to focus more on ensuring the appropriate use of medicines to improve patient outcomes rather than being engaged in manufacturing and supply. Since that time numerous studies have shown the positive impact of clinical pharmacy services (CPS). The need for wider adoption of CPS worldwide becomes urgent, as the global population ages, and the prevalence of polypharmacy as well as shortage of healthcare professionals is rising. At the same time, there is great pressure to provide both high-quality and cost-effective health services. All these challenges urgently require the adoption of a new paradigm of healthcare system architecture. One of the most appropriate answers to these challenges is to increase the utilization of the potential of highly educated and skilled professionals widely available in these countries, i.e., pharmacists, who are well positioned to prevent and manage drug-related problems together with ensuring safe and effective use of medications with further care relating to medication adherence. Unfortunately, CPS are still underdeveloped and underutilized in some parts of Europe, namely, in most of the Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries. This paper reviews current situation of CPS development in CEE countries and the prospects for the future of CPS in that region.

Cost-effectiveness of medication reconciliation performed by a pharmacist in pediatrics of a hospital: A randomized clinical trial protocol linked to a pharmacoeconomic study

INTRODUCTION

Each patient admitted to the hospital is subject to one medication error per day, since the occurrence of this one with the potential to cause harm is three times more common in pediatric hospitalized patients than in adults. These harms can result from inaccurate or incomplete drug use histories when patients undergo a clinical evaluation, which jeopardizes patient safety and compromises hospitalization costs. Thus, medication reconciliation (MC) emerges as a possible solution to avoid the occurrence of these in pediatric patients and directly contributes to reducing costs in the hospital environment and increasing quality of life). Therefore, this study proposes to determine whether pharmacist-led medication reconciliation is a cost-effective strategy to improve health outcomes in pediatric patients.

METHODS

A randomized clinical trial will be carried out, over eight months, to carry out the cost analysis. Micro-costing pharmacoeconomic model through a questionnaire and clinical interview to collect the variables necessary for the study and comparison of the control and intervention groups. Participants in this study will be children aged 0 days to 12 years, admitted to the hospital. The perspective adopted will be that of the hospital. To assess the economic outcomes of MC, the cost-effect pairs will be categorized and visually represented in the cost-effectiveness plan to compare the intervention and control groups. Monte Carlo simulation and univariate sensitivity analysis will be performed to test the robustness of the findings.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The clinical trial was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Sergipe (CAAE: 19625319.6.0000.5546 and opinion number: 3,630,579). This protocol fully adhered to the recommendations of the 2010 CONSORT Declaration and was registered in the Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC): RBR-25dnqsk.

Should Pharmacists Lead Medication Reconciliation in Critical Care? A One-Stem Interventional Study in an Egyptian Intensive Care Unit

OBJECTIVES

The main objective was to compare physician-obtained medication histories to the practice of medication reconciliation undertaken by a pharmacist in the intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS

A one-stem interventional study involving 500 adults 18 years and older admitted to the ICU (50 beds) of an Egyptian Joint Commission International-accredited reference hospital was conducted. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of ICU patients with missing medications in the cohorts of physician versus pharmacist-led medication reconciliation. The secondary outcome measure was the percentage of patients who had at least one clinical condition or adverse event (AE) that was left untreated during hospitalization of the 2 arms of patients after reconciliation.

RESULTS

A total of 500 patients received reconciliation. Medication discrepancies in the cohort of physician-led reconciliation were greater than that of the pharmacist (26.1% versus 2.6%, P = 0.001). The most common discrepancy was indication with no medication, which was found to be greater in the physician-led cohort of patients than that of the pharmacist cohort (25.2% versus 2.6%, P = 0.001). Untreated AEs in the former cohort were present in 9.1% of cases versus 1.5% in the pharmacist-led reconciliation cohort ( P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study revealed that pharmacist-led medication reconciliation in ICU has dramatically decreased medication discrepancies and AEs in adults with acute ICU admissions.

Development of Screening Tools to Predict Medication-Related Problems Across the Continuum of Emergency Department Care: A Prospective, Multicenter Study

Background: Medication-related problems (MRPs) occur across the continuum of emergency department (ED) care: they may contribute to ED presentation, occur in the ED/short-stay unit (SSU), at hospital admission, or shortly after discharge to the community. This project aimed to determine predictors for MRPs across the continuum of ED care and incorporate these into screening tools (one for use at ED presentation and one at ED/SSU discharge), to identify patients at greatest risk, who could be targeted by ED pharmacists.

Methods: A prospective, observational, multicenter study was undertaken in nine EDs, between July 2016 and August 2017. Blocks of ten consecutive adult patients presenting at pre-specified times were identified. Within 1 week of ED discharge, a pharmacist interviewed patients and undertook a medical record review to determine a medication history, patient understanding of treatment, risk factors for MRPs and to manage the MRPs. Logistic regression was undertaken to determine predictor variables. Multivariable regression beta coefficients were used to develop a scoring system for the two screening tools.

Results: Of 1,238 patients meeting all inclusion criteria, 904 were recruited. Characteristics predicting MRPs related to ED presentation were: patient self-administers regular medications (OR = 7.95, 95%CI = 3.79–16.65), carer assists with medication administration (OR = 15.46, 95%CI = 6.52–36.67), or health-professional administers (OR = 5.01, 95%CI = 1.77–14.19); medication-related ED presentation (OR = 9.95, 95%CI = 4.92–20.10); age ≥80 years (OR = 3.63, 95%CI = 1.96–6.71), or age 65–79 years (OR = 2.01, 95%CI = 1.17–3.46); potential medication adherence issue (OR = 2.27, 95%CI = 1.38–3.73); medical specialist seen in past 6-months (OR = 2.02, 95%CI = 1.42–2.85); pharmaceutical benefit/pension/concession cardholder (OR = 1.89, 95%CI = 1.28–2.78); inpatient in previous 4-weeks (OR = 1.60, 95%CI = 1.02–2.52); being male (OR = 1.48, 95%CI = 1.05–2.10); and difficulties reading labels (OR = 0.63, 95%CI = 0.40–0.99). Characteristics predicting MRPs related to ED discharge were: potential medication adherence issue (OR = 6.80, 95%CI = 3.97–11.64); stay in ED > 8 h (OR = 3.23, 95%CI = 1.47–7.78); difficulties reading labels (OR = 2.33, 95%CI = 1.30–4.16); and medication regimen changed in ED (OR = 3.91, 95%CI = 2.43–6.30). For ED presentation, the model had a C-statistic of 0.84 (95% CI 0.81–0.86) (sensitivity = 80%, specificity = 70%). For ED discharge, the model had a C-statistic of 0.78 (95% CI 0.73–0.83) (sensitivity = 82%, specificity = 57%).

Conclusion: Predictors of MRPs are readily available at the bedside and may be used to screen for patients at greatest risk upon ED presentation and upon ED/SSU discharge to the community. These screening tools now require external validation and implementation studies to evaluate the impact of using such tools on patient care outcomes.

Evaluation of Pharmacy Intern-led Transition of Care Service at an Academic Hospital in Saudi Arabia: A Prospective Pilot Study

Objectives

The transition of patients from one setting to another increases the risk of medication errors (MEs). This study aims to assess the implementation of pharmacy intern-led transition of care (TOC) service and to demonstrate its impact on the quality of patient care.

Method

A prospective interventional pilot study was carried out from August 2020 to April 2021 at an academic hospital in Saudi Arabia. The TOC team consisted of three pharmacy interns and one pharmacist-in-charge. Daily activities included medication reconciliation, discharge counseling, and follow-up call after 3 days of discharge. The identified discrepancies were categorized according to the National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting Program.

Key findings

A total of 182 patients were included in the analysis. During medication reconciliation, 102 discrepancies were detected, with an average of 0.7 discrepancy per patient. The most common discrepancy at admission and discharge was omission (41.7% and 70%, respectively). Category B was the most frequent and accounted for 46% at admission and 93% at discharge. Around 39% of TOC beneficiaries received a follow-up call, and all reported a high level of satisfaction with the service.

Conclusion

Involving the pharmacy team in TOC activities was effective in identifying discrepancies and resolving MEs.

Written communication about the use of medications in medical records in a Brazilian hospital

BACKGROUND

Effective communication regarding the use of medications in hospital environments is a process that contributes to patient safety. Despite its importance, written communication about the medication use process in medical records remains insufficiently investigated.

AIM

To describe the documentation in medical records regarding the medication use process by pharmacists, physicians and nurses on admission, during the hospital stay, and at hospital discharge.

METHOD

A retrospective cross-sectional chart review study was carried out in medical records of patients admitted to a teaching hospital in Northeast Brazil. The study considered all patients admitted between December 2016 and February 2017, aged 18 or older and hospitalised for at least 48 hours. Clinical notes made by pharmacists, physicians and nurses were examined at three transition points of care. Data were collected using a questionnaire relating to the use of medications prior to hospital admission, changes in the prescribed medications during the hospital stay and discharge, as well as prescription non-conformities. Communication failures between the three healthcare professional groups were analysed and classified. The study was authorised by the Hospital's Board of Directors and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Sergipe.

RESULTS

This study included 202 medical records of patients with a mean age of 51.48 (SD 6.42, range: 19-97) years. There was no record of a patient or relative interview on allergies and adverse drug reactions in 54 (26.8%) physician notes, 44 (21.9%) nursing notes, and 9 (25.0%) pharmacist notes. Moreover, 1,588 changes in prescriptions were identified during data collection, and 1,198 (75.4%) of these were unjustified.

CONCLUSION

Medication-related information in medical records was incomplete and inconsistent in the clinical notes of the three studied professions, especially in pharmacists' documentation. Future studies should focus on investigating the consequences of interprofessional communication in patient care.

Advanced Medication Reconciliation: A Systematic Review of the Impact on Medication Errors and Adverse Drug Events Associated with Transitions of Care

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to conduct a systematic review on the impact of in-hospital electronic/enhanced medication reconciliation compared to basic medication reconciliation on medication errors, discrepancies, and adverse drug events (ADEs).

METHODS

The study team searched for peer-reviewed English-language articles in EMBASE, OVID, and Scopus databases up to October 2019. Included were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), pre-post, or interrupted time series designs with medication errors, discrepancies, or ADEs as an outcome, and medication reconciliation applied at hospital discharge. Basic medication reconciliation was defined as using a paper-based format, electronic medication reconciliation as using an electronic format, and enhanced medication reconciliation as incorporating additional interventions to reduce medication errors.

RESULTS

Ten studies (three RCTs, one retrospective cohort study, two interrupted time series studies, three pre-post studies, and one longitudinal study) were identified, with six and four studies comparing basic medication reconciliation to electronic and enhanced medication reconciliation, respectively. The overall risk of bias of the included studies was low (three), unclear (two), moderate (three), and serious/high (two). In general, studies demonstrated that electronic medication reconciliation reduced the odds of a medication discrepancy or ADE and may reduce the mean number of medication discrepancies. Enhanced medication reconciliation was more equivocal, with some studies showing improvement; however, risk of bias was generally significant.

CONCLUSION

Electronic medication reconciliation tends to reduce the risk of ADE; however, these conclusions were limited due to a lack of consistency in study settings, interventions, and outcome definitions. Future studies with more rigorous designs and standardized outcome definitions would provide clarity on this topic.

[How complete is the Germany-wide standardised medication list ("Bundeseinheitlicher Medikationsplan")? An analysis at hospital admission.]

Einleitung  Bei stationärer Aufnahme scheint die Aktualität und Vollständigkeit des Bundeseinheitlichen Medikationsplans häufig nicht gegeben. Ebenso ist unklar, welche Charakteristiken der Pläne die Wahrscheinlichkeit für Diskrepanzen erhöhen.

Methoden  Retrospektiv wurden deshalb 100 Pläne, die zur Arzneimittelanamnese elektiver Patienten einer chirurgischen Klinik mitgebracht wurden, geprüft, ob und welche Abweichungen bestanden. Die Abweichungen wurden 7 Kategorien zugeordnet: Arzneimittel, das in der Anamnese erfasst wurde, fehlt auf dem Plan, Arzneimittel auf dem Plan wird nicht mehr eingenommen, Stärke oder Dosierung fehlt auf dem Plan bzw. ist falsch oder die Darreichungsform ist falsch dokumentiert. Hinweise zur Arzneimitteltherapiesicherheit, involvierte Arzneimittel und -formen wurden ebenfalls erfasst. Mithilfe multivariater Analysen wurde der Einfluss der Aktualität, der Anzahl der Arzneimittel und der ausstellenden Facharztdisziplin der Pläne auf die Art und Anzahl an Diskrepanzen untersucht.

Ergebnisse  Zur Arzneimittelanamnese wiesen 78 % (78/100) der Pläne Abweichungen auf. Insgesamt wurden 226 Abweichungen (2,3 ± 0,6 Abweichungen/Anamnese) dokumentiert. Am häufigsten fehlte ein Arzneimittel auf dem Plan (n = 103). Von allen Hinweisen und Empfehlungen betrafen 64 % (83/177) das perioperative Management von Antithrombotika (n = 55) und Antidiabetika (n = 28). In der multivariaten Analyse stieg nur das Risiko für fehlerhafte Angaben bei Stärke und Dosierung mit dem Alter der Pläne signifikant (p = 0,047) und war um mehr als das 2-fache erhöht, wenn der Plan älter als einen Monat war.

Diskussion  Die Aktualität, Vollständigkeit und Aspekte der Arzneimitteltherapiesicherheit des Bundeseinheitlichen Medikationsplans sollten umfassend und gezielt im Anamnesegespräch validiert werden. In der Praxis sollten Pläne, die älter als 1 Monat sind, besonders kritisch hinsichtlich Angaben zu Stärke und Dosierung geprüft und der Plan entsprechend regelmäßig aktualisiert werden.

Pharmacist-led pre-treatment assessment, management and outcomes in a Hepatitis C treatment patient cohort

Background Medication reconciliation and drug-drug interaction management represent important patient safety processes completed by pharmacists as part of Hepatitis C patient care. Objectives To describe the pharmacist-led interventions of medication reconciliation and drug-drug interaction assessment, grading and management in a real-world Hepatitis C treatment cohort and to assesses the impact on patient outcomes. Setting Two Hepatitis C hospital outpatient clinics at St. James's Hospital, Dublin. Method Patients treated with Hepatitis C direct acting anti-viral agents between December 2014 and February 2017 were included in this retrospective cohort study. The study employed a standardised medication reconciliation proforma and drug-drug interaction reference list. Main outcome measures Analyse medication variances identified during pharmacist-led medication reconciliation. Assess the prevalence, type and severity of drug-drug interactions between direct acting anti-virals and co-medications. Assess the rate of prescriber acceptance of the pharmacist-developed drug-drug interaction management strategies. Results Among the 300 patients in this study, medication reconciliation identified 1543 co-medications, with 71% of patients prescribed co-medications which were subject to a potential drug-drug interaction. Drug-drug interaction assessments assigned a rating of severe to 68 interaction episodes. At least one co-medication was stopped during treatment in 25% of patients to facilitate drug-drug interaction management. Pharmacist proposed management recommendations were accepted by prescribers in 96.9% of cases. The sustained virological response rate among the cohort was 92.7%. Conclusions In this Hepatitis C pre-treatment pharmacist assessment analysis, a significant number of medication reconciliation variances and clinically significant drug-drug interactions were identified which present unique and important patient safety risks. Pharmacist-led management strategies aided the achievement of optimum treatment response while promoting patient safety and antiviral stewardship.

Roles of the emergency medicine pharmacist: A systematic review

PURPOSE

Results of a systematic literature review to identify roles for emergency medicine (EM) pharmacists beyond traditionally reported activities and to quantify the benefits of these roles in terms of patient outcomes are reported.

SUMMARY

Emergency department (ED)-based clinical pharmacy is a rapidly growing practice area that has gained support in a number of countries globally, particularly over the last 5-10 years. A systematic literature search covering the period 1995-2016 was conducted to characterize emerging EM pharmacist roles and the impact on patient outcomes. Six databases were searched for research publications on pharmacist participation in patient care in a general ED or trauma center that documented interventions by ED-based pharmacists; 15 results satisfied the inclusion criteria. Six reported studies evaluated EM pharmacist involvement in the care of critically ill patients, 5 studies evaluated antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) activities via pharmacist review of positive cultures, 2 studies assessed pharmacist involvement in generating orders for nurse-administered home medications and 2 reviewed publications focused on EM pharmacist involvement in management of healthcare-associated pneumonia and dosing of phenytoin. A diverse range of positive patient outcomes was identified. The included studies were assessed to be of low quality.

CONCLUSION

A systematic review of the literature revealed 3 key emerging areas of practice for the EM pharmacist that are associated with positive patient outcomes. These included involvement in management of critically ill patients, AMS roles, and ordering of home medications in the ED.

Impact of pharmacist's directed medication reconciliation on reducing medication discrepancies during transition of care in hospital setting

Objectives

To evaluate the effect of pharmacist's directed services (reconciliation plus counselling) on reducing medication discrepancies and improving patient's outcomes at discharge from hospital.

Methods

During the 3-month study period, 200 patients were randomly selected from internal medicine department from Jordan University Hospital (JUH) and allocated into two groups (intervention and control groups). The number and types of medication discrepancies were identified at admission. Then, pharmacist implemented medication reconciliation and medication counselling services to the intervention group patients. At discharge, the number of unintentional discrepancies was evaluated for both groups. Patients were assessed at 1 month following their discharge for any subsequent hospital readmissions, emergency department visits or side effects of medication therapy.

Key findings

The total number of identified unintentional discrepancies was 84 for the intervention group compared with 60 discrepancies for the control group. Omission and addition represented the most common types of discrepancies for both groups. Of the 84 recommendations submitted by pharmacists, clinicians accepted 78 cases (92.8%), and implemented only 46 recommendations (54.7%). At discharge, a significant reduction in the number of unintentional discrepancies was achieved for the intervention group, P-value (0.014), while no significant change was found for the control group, P-value = 0.508. One month postdischarge, a significantly higher number of patients in the control group reported experiencing side effects compared with the intervention group, P-value = 0.020.

Conclusion

The presence of clinical pharmacists in hospital wards had a promising effect on decreasing the number of medication errors and improving health outcomes.

Implementing the medicines reconciliation tool in practice: challenges and opportunities for pharmacists in Kuwait

BACKGROUND

Using the medicines reconciliation tool which involves preparing an updated list of patient's medications at each transition of care can significantly enhance patient safety. The pharmacist has been leading this process in western healthcare systems. Little is known about pharmacists' role in medicines reconciliation in Middle Eastern Countries.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the implementation of medicines reconciliation in Kuwait hospitals, pharmacists' role in this process and perceptions of the challenges in implementing it in practice.

METHODS

This was an exploratory descriptive study of medicines reconciliation practices at eleven secondary/tertiary hospitals in Kuwait. A mixed-methods research design was used whereby 110 hospital pharmacists participated in 11 focus groups and 88 of them completed self-administered surveys.

RESULTS

Participants reported that medicines reconciliation is poorly applied in hospitals and that they had limited role in the process. The current medicines reconciliation policy does not assign any responsibilities for pharmacists in this process. The most significant barriers to applying medicines reconciliation by pharmacists were inadequate staff numbers, lack of time, difficult access to patient information, lack of policy to support pharmacist role and patients' poor knowledge about their medications.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital pharmacists in Kuwait advocate implementing medicines reconciliation but report significant strategic/operational barriers to its application. Efforts are needed in policy reform and team training to enable pharmacists provide effective patient care services including medicines reconciliation.

Clinical pharmacist-led program on medication reconciliation implementation at hospital admission: experience of a single university hospital in Croatia

Aim

To evaluate the clinical pharmacist-led medication reconciliation process in clinical practice by quantifying and analyzing unintentional medication discrepancies at hospital admission.

Methods

An observational prospective study was conducted at the Clinical Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Dubrava, during a 1-year period (October 2014 – September 2015) as a part of the implementation of Safe Clinical Practice, Medication Reconciliation of the European Network for Patient Safety and Quality of Care Joint Action (PASQ JA) project. Patients older than 18 years taking at least one regular prescription medication were eligible for inclusion. Discrepancies between pharmacists' Best Possible Medication History (BPMH) and physicians' admission orders were detected and communicated directly to the physicians to clarify whether the observed changes in therapy were intentional or unintentional. All discrepancies were discussed by an expert panel and classified according to their potential to cause harm.

Results

In 411 patients included in the study, 1200 medication discrepancies were identified, with 202 (16.8%) being unintentional. One or more unintentional medication discrepancy was found in 148 (35%) patients. The most frequent type of unintentional medication discrepancy was drug omission (63.9%) followed by an incorrect dose (24.2%). More than half (59.9%) of the identified unintentional medication discrepancies had the potential to cause moderate to severe discomfort or clinical deterioration in the patient.

Conclusion

Around 60% of medication errors were assessed as having the potential to threaten the patient safety. Clinical pharmacist-led medication reconciliation was shown to be an important tool in detecting medication discrepancies and preventing adverse patient outcomes. This standardized medication reconciliation process may be widely applicable to other health care organizations and clinical settings.

Hospital pharmacy medication reconciliation practice in Jordan: perceptions and barriers

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The primary aim of this study is to gain an insight into hospital pharmacists' current practice and perceptions towards medicine reconciliation and to identify common challenges preventing pharmacists from providing this service.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted over 2 months (September-October 2015) at four Jordanian hospitals accredited by the Joint International Commission. A total of 76 pharmacists were recruited. Each pharmacist completed a validated structured questionnaire evaluating (1) pharmacist's current practice of medication reconciliation, (2) pharmacist's perceptions towards practicing medication reconciliation and (3) pharmacist's perceived barriers towards implementing medication reconciliation.

RESULTS

There was relatively low awareness of the presence of current medication reconciliation policy in the hospitals. The majority of recruited pharmacists believed that pharmacists must have an integral role in providing such services to patients. They were also willing and able to provide help and support to all healthcare providers regarding the appropriateness of prescribed medications. It was evident that the greater the practice of medication reconciliation services and the higher the educational level, the better the overall perception score (r = 0.416 and r = 0.366, respectively; P-value = 0.000 for both). 'Time constraint' was the primary barrier discouraging pharmacists from practicing such service.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates a relatively low awareness of the concept and policy of medication reconciliation process among Jordanian pharmacists. This suggests that educational programs are urgently needed to increase pharmacists' role and responsibilities in implementing and practicing reconciliation services with expected positive impact on patient care.

The effect of medication therapy management service combined with a national PharmaCloud system for polypharmacy patients

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated a medication therapy management service using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Administration's PharmaCloud system in a medical center in Taiwan. The new PharmaCloud System, launched in 2013, links a complete list of prescribed and dispensed medication from different hospitals, clinics, and pharmacies for all insured patients.

METHOD

The study included patients with polypharmacy (≥5 drugs) at a medication therapy management service from March 2013 to March 2014. A structured questionnaire was designed to collect patients' baseline data and record patients' knowledge, attitudes, and practice scores before and after the service intervention. Phone follow-ups for practice and adherence scores on medication use were performed after 3 months.

RESULTS

There were 152 patients recruited in the study. Scores for medication use attitudes and practice significantly increased after the service (attitudes: 40.06 ± 0.26 to 43.07 ± 0.19, p <0.001; practice: 33.42 ± 0.30 to 40.37 ± 0.30, p <0.001). The scores for medication adherence also increased from 3.02 ± 0.07 to 3.92 ± 0.02 (p <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The PharmaCloud system facilitates accurate and efficient medication reconciliation for pharmacists in the medication therapy management service. The model improved patients' attitudes and practice of the rational use of medications and adherence with medications. Further studies are warranted to evaluate human resources, executing costs, and the cost-benefit ratio of this medication therapy management service with the PharmaCloud system.

Impact of pharmacist interventions in older patients: a prospective study in a tertiary hospital in Germany

Background

Inappropriate pharmacotherapy among older adults remains a critical issue in our health care systems. Besides polypharmacy and multiple comorbidities, the age-related pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes may increase the risk of adverse drug reactions and medication errors.

Objective

The main target of this study was to describe the characteristics of pharmaceutical interventions in two geriatric wards (orthogeriatric ward and geriatric day unit) of a general teaching hospital and to evaluate the clinical significance of the detected medication errors.

Materials and methods

The study was conducted between August 2014 and October 2015 and was based on a triple approach that included validation of medical orders, medication reconciliation at patients’ admission, and a predischarge planning appointment with the patient. The validation of medical orders was based on analyzing the suitability of the drugs prescribed, the drug dose depending on the patient’s characteristics, the presence of contraindications and interactions between drugs, and the proposal of alternative drugs included in the hospital formulary.

Results

A total of 2,307 interventions associated to a medication error in 15,282 medical orders for 1,859 older patients were recorded. The greater part of the interventions carried out on the orthogeriatric ward at admission and at discharge were due to omission of a drug in the medical order (20.0%) and clinically significant interactions requiring monitoring (30.4%), respectively. The main factor triggering pharmacist’s recommendations on the geriatric day unit was clinically significant interactions (21.1%). With regard to the clinical severity of the detected errors, 68.1% were considered significant, 24.8% were of minor significance, and 7.2% were clinically serious.

Conclusion

Our findings show the importance of clinical pharmacist involvement in the optimization of pharmacotherapy in older adults, ensuring that they receive effective, safe, and efficient drug therapy.

Impact of electronic medication reconciliation interventions on medication discrepancies at hospital transitions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Medication reconciliation has been identified as an important intervention to minimize the incidence of unintentional medication discrepancies at transitions in care. However, there is a lack of evidence for the impact of information technology on the rate and incidence of medication discrepancies identified during care transitions. This systematic review was thus, aimed to evaluate the impact of electronic medication reconciliation interventions on the occurrence of medication discrepancies at hospital transitions.

Methods

Systematic literature searches were performed in MEDLINE, PubMed, CINHAL, and EMBASE from inception to November, 2015. We included published studies in English that evaluated the effect of information technology on the incidence and rate of medication discrepancies compared with usual care. Cochrane’s tools were used for assessment of the quality of included studies. We performed meta-analyses using random-effects models.

Results

Ten studies met our inclusion criteria; of which only one was a randomized controlled trial. Interventions were carried out at various hospital transitions (admission, 5; discharge, 2 and multiple transitions, 3 studies). Meta-analysis showed a significant reduction of 45 % in the proportion of medications with unintentional discrepancies after the use of electronic medication reconciliation (RR 0.55; 95 % CI 0.51 to 0.58). However, there was no significant reduction in either the proportion of patients with medication discrepancies or the mean number of discrepancies per patient. Drug omissions were the most common types of unintended discrepancies, and with an electronic tool a significant but heterogeneously distributed reduction of omission errors over the total number of medications reconciled have been observed (RR 0.20; 95 % CI 0.06 to 0.66). The clinical impact of unintended discrepancies was evaluated in five studies, and there was no potentially fatal error identified and most errors were minor in severity.

Conclusion

Medication reconciliation supported by an electronic tool was able to minimize the incidence of medications with unintended discrepancy, mainly drug omissions. But, this did not consistently reduce other process outcomes, although there was a lack of rigorous design to conform these results.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12911-016-0353-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Impact of clinical pharmacist intervention on length of stay in an acute admission unit: a cluster randomised study

Objectives

Physicians in acute admission units (AAUs) are obliged to obtain medication history and perform medication reconciliation, which is time consuming and often incomplete. Studies show that clinical pharmacists (CPs) can obtain accurate medication histories, but so far no studies have investigated the effect of this on time measures. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of a CP intervention on length of stay (LOS) in an AAU.

Methods

The study was designed as a prospective, cluster randomised study. Weekdays were randomised to control or intervention. CP intervention consisted of obtaining medication history and performing medication reconciliation and review. The primary outcome was LOS in the AAU. Secondary outcomes were other time-related measures-for example, physicians' self-reported time spent on medication topics. Finally, the number of documented medications per patient was established.

Results

232 and 216 patients, respectively, were included on control (n=63) and intervention (n=63) days. The mean LOS was 342 (95% CI 323 to 362) min in the intervention group and 339 (95% CI 322 to 357) min in the control group, which was not statistically significantly different. Physicians spent on average 4.3 (95% CI 3.7 to 5.0) min in the intervention group and 7.5 (95% CI 6.6 to 8.5) min in the control group, corresponding to an overall reduction of 43.0% (95% CI 30.9% to 53.0%, p<0.001). The number of documented medications per patient was 10.0 (intervention group) and 8.8 (control group).

Conclusions

This study indicates that LOS in the AAU was not affected by CP intervention; however, physicians reported a significant reduction in time spent on medication topics.

Trial registration number

Clinical Trial Gov: 1-16-02-379-13.

Effectiveness of pharmacist-led medication reconciliation programmes on clinical outcomes at hospital transitions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Pharmacists play a role in providing medication reconciliation. However, data on effectiveness on patients' clinical outcomes appear inconclusive. Thus, the aim of this study was to systematically investigate the effect of pharmacist-led medication reconciliation programmes on clinical outcomes at hospital transitions.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, IPA, CINHAL and PsycINFO from inception to December 2014. Included studies were all published studies in English that compared the effectiveness of pharmacist-led medication reconciliation interventions to usual care, aimed at improving medication reconciliation programmes. Meta-analysis was carried out using a random effects model, and subgroup analysis was conducted to determine the sources of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

17 studies involving 21,342 adult patients were included. Eight studies were randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Most studies targeted multiple transitions and compared comprehensive medication reconciliation programmes including telephone follow-up/home visit, patient counselling or both, during the first 30 days of follow-up. The pooled relative risks showed a more substantial reduction of 67%, 28% and 19% in adverse drug event-related hospital revisits (RR 0.33; 95% CI 0.20 to 0.53), emergency department (ED) visits (RR 0.72; 95% CI 0.57 to 0.92) and hospital readmissions (RR 0.81; 95% CI 0.70 to 0.95) in the intervention group than in the usual care group, respectively. The pooled data on mortality (RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.95 to 1.16) and composite readmission and/or ED visit (RR 0.95; 95% CI 0.90 to 1.00) did not differ among the groups. There was significant heterogeneity in the results related to readmissions and ED visits, however. Subgroup analyses based on study design and outcome timing did not show statistically significant results.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacist-led medication reconciliation programmes are effective at improving post-hospital healthcare utilisation. This review supports the implementation of pharmacist-led medication reconciliation programmes that include some component aimed at improving medication safety.

Application of the structured history taking of medication use tool to optimise prescribing for older patients and reduce adverse events

BACKGROUND

Older patients, due to polypharmacy, co-morbidities and often multiple prescribing doctors are particularly susceptible to medication history errors, leading to adverse drug events, patient harm and increased costs. Medication reconciliation at the point of admission to hospital can reduce medication discrepancies and adverse events. The Structured HIstory taking of Medication use (SHiM) tool was developed to provide a structure to the medication reconciliation process. There has been very little research with regards to SHiM, it's application to older patients and it's potential to reduce adverse events.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether application of SHiM could optimise older patients' prescriptions on admission to hospital, and in-turn reduce adverse events, compared to standard care.

SETTING

A sub-study of a large clinical trial involving hospital inpatients over the age of 65 in five hospitals across Europe.

METHOD

A modified version of SHiM was used to obtain accurate drug histories for patients after the attending physician had obtained a medication list via standard methods. Discrepancies between the two lists were recorded and classified, and the clinical relevance of the discrepancies was determined. Whether discrepancies in patients' medication histories, as revealed by SHiM, resulted in actual clinical consequences was then investigated. As this study was carried out during the observation phase of the clinical trial, results were not communicated to the medical teams.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Discrepancies between medication lists and whether these resulted in clinical consequences.

RESULTS

SHiM was applied to 123 patients. The mean age of the participants was 78 (±6). 200 discrepancies were identified. 90 patients (73 %) had at least one discrepancy with a median of 1.0 discrepancies per patient (IQR 0.00-2.25). 53 (26.5 %) were classified as 'unlikely to cause patient discomfort or clinical deterioration', 145 (72.5 %) as 'having potential to cause moderate discomfort or clinical deterioration', and 2 (1 %) as 'having potential to cause severe discomfort or clinical deterioration'. Of the 200 discrepancies identified, 2(1 %) resulted in adverse events.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest SHiM is an effective medications reconciliation tool and does identify discrepancies with potential for patient harm. However, it's the capacity to prevent actual adverse events is less convincing.

Effect of teaching and checklist implementation on accuracy of medication history recording at hospital admission

BACKGROUND

Medication discrepancies at hospital admission is an extensive problem and knowledge is limited regarding improvement strategies.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of teaching and checklist implementation on accuracy of medication history recording during hospitalization.

METHOD

Patients admitted to an internal medicine ward were prospectively included in two consecutive periods. Between the periods, non-mandatory teaching lessons were provided and a checklist assisting medication history recording implemented. Discrepancies between the recorded medications at admission and the patient's actual drug use, as revealed by pharmacist-conducted medication reconciliation, were compared between the periods. The primary endpoint was difference between the periods in proportion of patients with minimum one discrepancy. Difference in median number of discrepancies was included as a secondary endpoint.

RESULTS

56 and 119 patients were included in period 1 (P1) and period 2 (P2), respectively. There was no significant difference in proportion of patients with minimum one discrepancy in P2 (68.9 %) versus P1 (76.8 %, p = 0.36), but a tendency of lower median number of discrepancies was observed in P2 than P1, i.e. 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.087).

CONCLUSION

More powerful strategies than non-mandatory teaching activities and checklist implementation are required to achieve sufficient improvements in medication history recording during hospitalization.

Impact of the Collaborative Pharmaceutical Care at Tallaght Hospital (PACT) model on medication appropriateness of older patients

Objectives

A high prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) has been identified in older patients in Ireland. The impact of the Collaborative Pharmaceutical Care at Tallaght Hospital (PACT) model on the medication appropriateness of acute hospitalised older patients during admission and at discharge is reported.

Methods

Uncontrolled before-after study. The study population for this study was medical patients aged ≥65 years, using ≥3 regular medicines at admission, taken from a previous before-after study. Standard care involved clinical pharmacists being ward-based, contributing to medication history taking and prescription review, but not involved at discharge. The innovative PACT model involved clinical pharmacists being physician team-based, leading admission and discharge medication reconciliation and undertaking prescription review, with authority to change the prescription during admission or at discharge. The primary outcome was the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI) score applied pre-admission, during admission and at discharge.

Results

Some 108 patients were included (48 PACT, 60 standard). PACT significantly improved the MAI score from pre-admission to admission (mean difference 2.4, 95% CI 1.0 to 3.9, p<0.005), and from pre-admission to discharge (mean difference 4.0, 95 CI 1.7 to 6.4, p<0.005). PACT resulted in significantly fewer drugs with one or more inappropriate rating at discharge (PACT 15.0%, standard 30.5%, p<0.001). The MAI criteria responsible for most inappropriate ratings were 'correct directions' (4.8% PACT, 17.3% standard), expense (5.3% PACT, 5.7% standard) and dosage (0.6% PACT, 4.0% standard). PACT suggestions to optimise medication use were accepted more frequently, and earlier in the hospital episode, than standard care (96.7% PACT, 69.3% standard, p<0.05).

Conclusions

Collaborative pharmaceutical care between physicians and pharmacists from admission to discharge, with authority for pharmacists to amend the prescription, improves medication appropriateness in older hospitalised Irish patients.

Medication reconciliation in patients hospitalized in a cardiology unit

OBJECTIVES

To compare drugs prescribed on hospital admission with the list of drugs taken prior to admission for adult patients admitted to a cardiology unit and to identify the role of a pharmacist in identifying and resolving medication discrepancies.

METHOD

This study was conducted in a 300 bed university hospital in Brazil. Clinical pharmacists taking medication histories and reconciling medications prescribed on admission with a list of drugs used prior to admission. Discrepancies were classified as justified (e.g., based on the pharmacotherapeutic guidelines of the hospital studied) or unintentional. Treatments were reviewed within 48 hours following hospitalization. Unintentional discrepancies were further classified according to the categorization of medication error severity. Pharmacists verbally contacted the prescriber to recommend actions to resolve the discrepancies.

RESULTS

A total of 181 discrepancies were found in 50 patients (86%). Of these discrepancies, 149 (82.3%) were justified changes to the patient's home medication regimen; however, 32 (17.7%) discrepancies found in 24 patients were unintentional. Pharmacists made 31 interventions and 23 (74.2%) were accepted. Among unintentional discrepancies, the most common was a different medication dose on admission (42%). Of the unintentional discrepancies 13 (40.6%) were classified as error without harm, 11 (34.4%) were classified as error without harm but which could affect the patient and require monitoring, 3 (9.4%) as errors could have resulted in harm and 5 (15.6%) were classified as circumstances or events that have the capacity to cause harm.

CONCLUSION

The results revealed a high number of unintentional discrepancies and the pharmacist can play an important role by intervening and correcting medication errors at a hospital cardiology unit.

Reducing medication errors at admission: 3 cycles to implement, improve and sustain medication reconciliation

BACKGROUND

In France, medication errors are the third leading cause of serious adverse events. Many studies have shown the positive impact of medication reconciliation (MR) on reducing medication errors at admission but this practice is still rarely implemented in French hospitals.

OBJECTIVE

Implement and sustain a MR process at admission in two surgery units. The quality improvement approach used to meet this objective is described.

SETTING

The gastrointestinal surgery and orthopedic surgery departments of a 407 inpatient bed French teaching hospital.

METHODS

A step by step collaborative approach based on plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles. Three cycles were successively performed with regular feedback during multidisciplinary meetings.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

mean unintended medication discrepancies (UMDs) per patients at admission.

RESULTS

The three PDSA cycles and the monitoring phase allowed to implement, optimize and sustain a MR process in the two surgery units. Cycle 1, by showing a rate of 0.65 UMDs at admission (95 % CI 0.39-0.91), underlined the need for a MR process; cycle 2 showed how the close-collaboration between pharmacy and surgery units could help to reduce mean UMDs per patients at admission (0.18; 95 % CI 0.09-0.27) (p < 0.001); finally, cycle 3 allowed the optimization of the MR process by reducing the delays of the best possible medication history availability.

CONCLUSIONS

This work highlights how a collaborative quality-improvement approach based on PDSA cycles can meet the challenge of implementing MR to improve medication management at admission.

Impact of admission medication reconciliation performed by clinical pharmacists on medication safety

BACKGROUND

Many activities contribute to reduce drug-related problems. Among them, the medication reconciliation (MR) is used to compare the best possible medication history (BPMH) and the current admission medication order (AMO) to identify and solve unintended medication discrepancies (UMD). This study aims to assess the impact of the implementation of admission MR by clinical pharmacists on UMD.

METHOD

This prospective study was carried out in two units of general medicine and infectious and tropical diseases in a 1844-bed French hospital. A retroactive MR performed in an observational period was compared to a proactive MR realized in an interventional period. We used a logistic regression to identify risk factors of UMD.

RESULTS

During both periods, 394 patients were enrolled and 2,725 medications were analyzed in the BPMH. Proactive MR reduced the percentage of patients with at least one UMD compared with retroactive process (respectively 2.1% vs. 45.8%, p<0.001). Patients with at least one UMD during both periods were older compared to patients without UMD (79 vs. 72, p<0.005) and had more medications at admission (7 vs. 6, p<0.0001). UMD occur 38 times more often when there is no clinical pharmacist intervention. Among the 226 UMD detected in both periods, 42% would have required monitoring or intervention to preclude harm, and 10% had potential harm to the patient and 2% were life threatening.

CONCLUSION

Proactive MR performed by clinical pharmacists is an acute process of detection and correction of UMD, but it requires a lot of human resources.

Initiatives promoting seamless care in medication management: an international review of the grey literature

BACKGROUND

Patients' transition between hospital and community is a high-risk period for the occurrence of medication-related problems.

AIM OF THE REVIEW

The objective was to review initiatives, implemented at national and regional levels in seven selected countries, aiming at improving continuity in medication management upon admission and hospital discharge.

METHOD

We performed a structured search of grey literature, mainly through relevant websites (scientific, professional and governmental organizations). Regional or national initiatives were selected. For each initiative data on the characteristics, impact, success factors and barriers were extracted. National experts were asked to validate the initiatives identified and the data extracted.

RESULTS

Most initiatives have been implemented since the early 2000 and are still ongoing. The principal actions include: development and implementation of guidelines for healthcare professionals, national information campaigns, education of healthcare professionals and development of information technologies to share data across settings of care. Positive results have been partially reported in terms of intake into practice or process measures. Critical success factors identified included: leadership and commitment to convey national and local forces, tailoring to local settings, development of a regulatory framework and information technology support. Barriers identified included: lack of human and financial resources, questions relative to responsibility and accountability, lack of training and lack of agreement on privacy issues.

CONCLUSION

Although not all initiatives are applicable as such to a particular healthcare setting, most of them convey very interesting data that should be used when drawing recommendations and implementing approaches to optimize continuity of care.

Medication reconciliation and prescribing reviews by pharmacy technicians in a geriatric ward

OBJECTIVE

Incomplete medication histories obtained on hospital admission are responsible for more than 25% of prescribing errors. This study aimed to evaluate whether pharmacy technicians can assist hospital physicians' in obtaining medication histories by performing medication reconciliation and prescribing reviews. A secondary aim was to evaluate whether the interventions made by pharmacy technicians could reduce the time spent by the nurses on administration of medications to the patients.

METHODS

This observational study was conducted over a 7 week period in the geriatric ward at Odense University Hospital, Denmark. Two pharmacy technicians conducted medication reconciliation and prescribing reviews at the time of patients' admission to the ward. The reviews were conducted according to standard operating procedures developed by a clinical pharmacist and approved by the Head of the Geriatric Department.

FINDINGS

In total, 629 discrepancies were detected during the conducted medication reconciliations, in average 3 for each patient. About 45% of the prescribing discrepancies were accepted and corrected by the physicians. "Medication omission" was the most frequently detected discrepancy (46% of total). During the prescribing reviews, a total of 860 prescription errors were detected, approximately one per medication review. Almost all of the detected prescription errors were later accepted and/or corrected by the physicians. "Dosage and time interval errors" were the most frequently detected error (48% of total). The time used by nurses for administration of medicines was reduced in the study period.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that pharmacy technicians can contribute to a substantial reduction in medication discrepancies in acutely admitted patients by performing medication reconciliation and focused medication reviews. Further randomized, controlled studies including a larger number of patients are required to elucidate whether these observations are of significance and of importance for securing patient safety.

Cost-outcome description of clinical pharmacist interventions in a university teaching hospital

BACKGROUND

Pharmacist interventions are one of the pivotal parts of a clinical pharmacy service within a hospital. This study estimates the cost avoidance generated by pharmacist interventions due to the prevention of adverse drug events (ADE). The types of interventions identified are also analysed.

METHODS

Interventions recorded by a team of hospital pharmacists over a one year time period were included in the study. Interventions were assigned a rating score, determined by the probability that an ADE would have occurred in the absence of an intervention. These scores were then used to calculate cost avoidance. Net cost benefit and cost benefit ratio were the primary outcomes. Categories of interventions were also analysed.

RESULTS

A total cost avoidance of €708,221 was generated. Input costs were calculated at €81,942. This resulted in a net cost benefit of €626,279 and a cost benefit ratio of 8.64: 1. The most common type of intervention was the identification of medication omissions, followed by dosage adjustments and requests to review therapies.

CONCLUSION

This study provides further evidence that pharmacist interventions provide substantial cost avoidance to the healthcare payer. There is a serious issue of patient's regular medication being omitted on transfer to an inpatient setting in Irish hospitals.

Collaborative pharmaceutical care in an Irish hospital: uncontrolled before-after study

BACKGROUND

We investigated the benefits of the Collaborative Pharmaceutical Care in Tallaght Hospital (PACT) service versus standard ward-based clinical pharmacy in adult inpatients receiving acute medical care, particularly on prevalence of medication error and quality of prescribing.

METHODS

Uncontrolled before-after study, undertaken in consecutive adult medical inpatients admitted and discharged alive, using at least three medications. Standard care involved clinical pharmacists being ward-based, contributing to medication history taking and prescription review, but not involved at discharge. The innovative PACT intervention involved clinical pharmacists being team-based, leading admission and discharge medication reconciliation and undertaking prescription review. Primary outcome measures were prevalence per patient of medication error and potentially severe error. Secondary measures included quality of prescribing using the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI) in patients aged ≥65 years.

FINDINGS

Some 233 patients (112 PACT, 121 standard) were included. PACT decreased the prevalence of any medication error at discharge (adjusted OR 0.07 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.15)); number needed to treat (NNT) 3 (95% CI 2 to 3) and no PACT patient experienced a potentially severe error (NNT 20, 95% CI 10 to 142). In patients aged ≥65 years (n=108), PACT improved the MAI score from preadmission to discharge (Mann-Whitney U p<0.05; PACT median -1, IQR -3.75 to 0; standard care median +1, IQR -1 to +6).

CONCLUSIONS

PACT, a collaborative model of pharmaceutical care involving medication reconciliation and review, delivered by clinical pharmacists and physicians, at admission, during inpatient care and at discharge was protective against potentially severe medication errors in acute medical patients and improved the quality of prescribing in older patients.