A dual intervention in geriatric patients to prevent drug-related problems and improve discharge management

Designing and Implementation of a Digitalized Intersectoral Discharge Management System and Its Effect on Readmissions: Mixed Methods Approach

BACKGROUND

Digital transformation offers new opportunities to improve the exchange of information between different health care providers, including inpatient, outpatient and care facilities. As information is especially at risk of being lost when a patient is discharged from a hospital, digital transformation offers great opportunities to improve intersectoral discharge management. However, most strategies for improvement have focused on structures within the hospital.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the implementation of a digitalized discharge management system, the project "Optimizing instersectoral discharge management" (SEKMA, derived from the German Sektorübergreifende Optimierung des Entlassmanagements), and its impact on the readmission rate.

METHODS

A mixed methods design was used to evaluate the implementation of a digitalized discharge management system and its impact on the readmission rate. After the implementation, the congruence between the planned (logic model) and the actual intervention was evaluated using a fidelity analysis. Finally, bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation on the readmission rate. For this purpose, a difference-in-difference approach was adopted based on routine data of hospital admissions between April 2019 and August 2019 and between April 2022 and August 2022. The department of vascular surgery served as the intervention group, in which the optimized discharge management was implemented in April 2022. The departments of internal medicine and cardiology formed the control group.

RESULTS

Overall, 26 interviews were conducted, and we explored 21 determinants, which can be categorized into 3 groups: "optimization potential," "barriers," and "enablers." On the basis of these results, 19 strategies were developed to address the determinants, including a lack of networking among health care providers, digital information transmission, and user-unfriendliness. On the basis of these strategies, which were prioritized by 11 hospital physicians, a logic model was formulated. Of the 19 strategies, 7 (37%; eg, electronic discharge letter, providing mobile devices to the hospital's social service, and generating individual medication plans in the format of the national medication plan) have been implemented in SEKMA. A survey on the fidelity of the application of the implemented strategies showed that 3 of these strategies were not yet widely applied. No significant effect of SEKMA on readmissions was observed in the routine data of 14,854 hospital admissions (P=.20).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the potential of optimizing intersectoral collaboration for patient care. Although a significant effect of SEKMA on readmissions has not yet been observed, creating a digital ecosystem that connects different health care providers seems to be a promising approach to ensure secure and fast networking of the sectors. The described intersectoral optimization of discharge management provides a structured template for the implementation of a similar local digital care networking infrastructure in other care regions in Germany and other countries with a similarly fragmented health care system.

Pharmacists' Impact on Older Adults Transitioning To and From Patient Care Centers: A Scoping Review

Objective: Expand upon previous reviews conducted on transitions of care (TOC) services with a focus on pharmacist interventions for older adults specifically transitioning to and from long-term care, acute rehabilitation, residential care facilities, care homes, skilled nursing, or assisted living facilities, collectively termed patient care centers (PCC). Data Sources: A PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE search was conducted including citations between 1974 and July 14, 2022. Bibliographies were also reviewed for additional citations. Methods: Articles included described pharmacist interventions during TOC for patients transitioning to and from PCC, were written in English, and reported outcomes pertaining to TOC services. Of 873 citations reviewed, 22 articles met the inclusion criteria. Results: Most studies were prospective in design with small sample sizes, of limited duration, and with varying interventions and reported outcomes. Most explored the transition from hospital to PCC and included a pharmacist intervention involving the identification of medication errors and discrepancies during the TOC. Few studies reported cost savings or 30- and 60-day reductions in readmission rates or mortality. Conclusions: This scoping review revealed a lack of robust clinical trials to assess the effectiveness of specific interventions performed by pharmacists for patients transitioning to and from PCC. Of the available data, pharmacist involvement within an interprofessional team can be an effective intervention to resolve medication discrepancies, reduce readmissions, and medication-related adverse events. An opportunity exists for future studies to explore ways to improve outcomes during TOC within PCC.

Medication-Related Problems and Their Intervention in the Geriatric Population: A Review of the Literature

In order to implement the principles of providing clinically and economically effective care, the current state of healthcare must be evaluated, and challenges must be addressed. As part of a physician's role in such a context, one tool consists of identifying medication-related problems (MRPs) and accordingly implementing best practices and innovative strategies to improve patient healthcare outcomes. The geriatric population is expected to have passed through the natural ageing process and experienced several physiological and biological changes that impact their bodies and lives. In the presence of geriatric syndromes and the increased number of medications consumed, the risk of MRPs such as polypharmacy, potentially inappropriate medication (PIM), adverse events, drug-drug interactions, and risk of non-adherence increases. Different interventions that focus on practical and perceptual barriers have been studied, and different tools to define clinically important prescribing problems relating to PIM have been established. The Beers Criteria and STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions)/START (Screening Tool to Alert to Right Treatment) criteria are the most widely used sets of explicit PIM criteria; however, they are still limited in Saudi Arabia. These tools should be considered in clinical settings to improve healthcare outcomes in the geriatric population, and the clinical relevance of enhancing medication should also be explored from the point of view of both the patient and healthcare practitioners.

Clinical pharmacist intervention to improve medication safety for hip fracture patients through secondary and primary care settings: a nonrandomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Hip fracture patients face a patient safety threat due to medication discrepancies and adverse drug reactions when they have a combination of high age, polypharmacy and several care transitions. Consequently, optimised pharmacotherapy through medication reviews and seamless communication of medication information between care settings is necessary. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the impact on medication management and pharmacotherapy. The secondary aim was to evaluate implementation of the novel Patient Pathway Pharmacist intervention for hip fracture patients.

METHODS

Hip fracture patients were included in this nonrandomised controlled trial, comparing a prospective intervention group (n = 58) with pre-intervention controls who received standard care (n = 50). The Patient Pathway Pharmacist intervention consisted of the steps: (A) medication reconciliation at admission to hospital, (B) medication review during hospitalisation, (C) recommendation for the medication information in the hospital discharge summary, (D) medication reconciliation at admission to rehabilitation, and (E) medication reconciliation and (F) review after hospital discharge. The primary outcome measure was quality score of the medication information in the discharge summary (range 0-14). Secondary outcomes were potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) at discharge, proportion receiving pharmacotherapy according to guidelines (e.g. prophylactic laxatives and osteoporosis pharmacotherapy), and all-cause readmission and mortality.

RESULTS

The quality score of the discharge summaries was significantly higher for the intervention patients (12.3 vs. 7.2, p < 0.001). The intervention group had significantly less PIMs at discharge (- 0.44 (95% confidence interval - 0.72, - 0.15), p = 0.003), and a higher proportion received prophylactic laxative (72 vs. 35%, p < 0.001) and osteoporosis pharmacotherapy (96 vs. 16%, p < 0.001). There were no differences in readmission or mortality 30 and 90 days post-discharge. The intervention steps were delivered to all patients (step A, B, E, F = 100% of patients), except step (C) medication information at discharge (86% of patients) and step (D) medication reconciliation at admission to rehabilitation (98% of patients).

CONCLUSION

The intervention steps were successfully implemented for hip fracture patients and contributed to patient safety through a higher quality medication information in the discharge summary, fewer PIMs and optimised pharmacotherapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03695081.

Determine the impact of a structured pharmacist-led medication review - a controlled intervention study to optimise medication safety for residents in long-term care facilities

Background

Medication reviews contribute to protecting long-term care (LTC) residents from drug related problems (DRPs). However, few controlled studies have examined the impact on patient-relevant outcomes so far.

Objective

We examined the impact of a one-time, pharmacist-led medication review on medication changes (primary endpoint) including discontinued medication, the number of chronic medications, hospital admissions, falls, and deaths (secondary endpoints).

Methods

A prospective, controlled intervention study was performed in three LTC facilities. In the intervention group (IG), after performing a medication review, a pharmacist gave recommendations for resolving DRPs to physicians, nurses and community pharmacists. The control group (CG) received usual care without a medication review. (i) We assessed the number of medication changes and the secondary endpoints in both groups before (t0) and after (t1, t2) the intervention. (ii) Additionally, the medication review was evaluated in the IG with regard to identified DRPs, the healthcare professional’s feedback on the forwarded pharmacist recommendations and whether DRPs were finally resolved.

Results

107 (IG) and 104 (CG) residents were enrolled. (i) More medication changes were identified in the IG than in the CG at t1 (p = 0.001). However, no significant difference was identified at t2 (p = 0.680). Mainly, medication was discontinued in those medication changes. Chronic medications increased in the CG (p = 0.005) at t2 while hospital admissions, falls, and deaths showed no differences. (ii) Overall, 1252 DRPs (median: 10; minimum-maximum: 2–39) were identified. Recommendations for 82% of relevant DRPs were forwarded to healthcare professionals, of which 61% were accepted or clarified. 22% were not accepted, 12% required further review and 6% remained without feedback. 51% of forwarded DRPs were finally resolved.

Conclusions

We found more medication changes in the IG compared to controls. Mostly, medication was discontinued. This suggests that our intervention was successful in discontinuing unnecessary medication. Other clinical outcomes such as falls, hospitalisations, and deaths were not improved due to the one-time intervention. The medication review further identified a high prevalence of DRPs in the IG, half of which were finally resolved.

Trial registration

German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00026120 (www.drks.de, retrospectively registered 07/09/2021).

Detection and resolution of drug-related problems at hospital discharge focusing on information availability - a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Hospital stays are often associated with medication changes, which may lead to drug-related problems (DRPs). Medication reconciliation and medication reviews are strategies to detect and resolve DRPs.

METHODS

A descriptive cohort study was conducted using DRPs collected during routine pharmacist-led medication reconciliation and medication reviews in the hospital's community pharmacy at discharge (Zug Cantonal Hospital, Switzerland). In a simulation experiment, we retrospectively analysed the detection and resolution possibilities of these DRPs and their dependency on different information sources.

RESULTS

Overall, 6,087 prescriptions were filled in the hospital's community pharmacy (between June 2016 and May 2019). Among 1,352 prescriptions (with ≥ 1 documented DRP) a total of 1,876 DRPs were detected. The retrospective assessment showed that 1,115 DRPs could have been detected by performing simple medication reviews (based on the discharge prescription and the medication history), whereas in the remaining cases, additional clinical and/or patient-specific information would have been needed. In 944 (84.7 %) DRPs, which are detectable by simple medication reviews, the pharmacist would need to consult the prescriber for resolution.

CONCLUSION

The detection of DRPs is strongly influenced by the information available. These results support models with pre-discharge medication reconciliation and pharmacist-led medication review procedures enabling both comprehensive detection and facilitated resolution of DRPs.

Drug-Related Problems of Patients in Primary Health Care Institutions: A Systematic Review

Introduction: Drug-related problems (DRPs) are not only detrimental to patients' physical health and quality of life but also lead to a serious waste of health care resources. The condition of DRPs might be more severe for patients in primary health care institutions.

Objective: This systematic review aims to comprehensively review the characteristics of DRPs for patients in primary health care institutions, which might help find effective strategies to identify, prevent, and intervene with DRPs in the future.

Methods: We searched three English databases (Embase, The Cochrane Library, and PubMed) and four Chinese databases (CNKI, CBM, VIP, and Wanfang). Two of the researchers independently conducted literature screening, quality evaluation, and data extraction. Qualitative and quantitative methods were combined to analyze the data.

Results: From the 3,368 articles screened, 27 met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. The median (inter-quartile range, IQR) of the incidences of DRPs was 70.04% (59%), and the median (IQR) of the average number of DRPs per patient was 3.4 (2.8). The most common type of DRPs was “treatment safety.” The causes of DRPs were mainly in the prescribing section, including “drug selection” and “dose selection”, while patients' poor adherence in the use section was also an important cause of DRPs. Risk factors such as the number of medicines, age, and disease condition were positively associated with the occurrence of DRPs. In addition, the medians (IQR) of the rate of accepted interventions, implemented interventions, and solved DRPs were 78.8% (22.3%), 64.15% (16.85%), and 76.99% (26.09%), respectively.

Conclusion: This systematic review showed that the condition of DRPs in primary health care institutions was serious. In pharmaceutical practice, the patients with risk factors of DRPs should be monitored more closely. Pharmacists could play important roles in the identification and intervention of DRPs, and more effective intervention strategies need to be established in the future.

Prevalence of drug-related problems using STOPP/START and medication reviews in elderly patients with dementia

BACKGROUND

Drug-related problems (DRPs) are common among elderly patients with dementia. STOPP/START is an explicit tool that has been used to detect DRPs among elderly patients.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to compare prevalence and type of DRPs identified by STOPP/START with DRPs identified by clinical pharmacists among the same population. Secondary objectives were to investigate factors associated with the use of DRPs using the two methods.

METHOD

Extracts from medical records were used to identify DRPs in 212 patients by using STOPP/START. The patients were ≥65 years of age with dementia or cognitive impairment. An earlier study was performed in the same study population in 2012-2014, where DRPs were identified by clinical pharmacists in order to decrease the number of rehospitalizations.

RESULTS

STOPP/START identified DRPs in 72.2% of the patients compared with 66.0% identified by the clinical pharmacists. The numbers of DRPs identified by the different methods were 326 and 310, respectively. Different types of DRPs were identified with the different tools. STOPP/START mainly identified DRPs in the categories "ineffective/inappropriate drug" and "needs additional drug therapy", whereas the clinical pharmacists identified DRPs in several categories.

CONCLUSION

Even though STOPP/START was able to identify a similar number of DRPs compared with DRPs identified by clinical pharmacists, STOPP/START failed to identify DRPs in several important categories. To cover all DRPs, STOPP/START might be used as a complement to implicit criteria.

Accuracy of pharmacist electronic discharge medicines review information transmitted to primary care at discharge

Background The poor quality of discharge summaries following admission to hospital, especially in relation to information on medication changes, is well documented. Hospital pharmacists can record changes to medications in the electronic discharge note to improve the quality of this information for primary care. Objective To audit the pharmacist-completed notes describing changes to admission medication, and to identify improvement opportunities. Setting 750-bed teaching district general hospital in England. Methods An evaluation of pharmacist written notes was conducted at a 750-bed teaching district general hospital in England. A sample of notes was analysed in three consecutive years, 2016-2018. Analyses were performed using descriptive statistics. Main outcome measure The number of discrepancies in the note compared to the discharge summary medication list. Results Notes were analysed for 125, 120 and 120 patients in 2016-2018 respectively. We saw an overall improvement in the accuracy of our notes from 12% of patients having an inaccurate note in 2016 to 4.2% in 2017 and 5.8% in 2018. The percentage of discharge medicines affected by these discrepancies reduced from 1.7% (2016) to 0.6% (2017) and 0.9% (2018). Conclusion Discrepancies were due to changes in the patient's medicines journey not being fully captured and documented. The overall reduction of discrepancies over the three consecutive audits was felt to be largely due to formalisation of the discharge medicines reconciliation process and reminding staff on how to complete a note. We are planning to utilise informatics surveillance tools along with system developments to sustain this elimination of out of date notes being transmitted to primary care.