Efficacy and safety of metformin compared to insulin in gestational diabetes: a systemic review and meta-analysis of Chinese randomized controlled trials

Management of Endocrinopathies During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review

Uncertainty surrounds the efficacy and security of several medications in treating endocrinopathies, such as gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in individuals whose normal glucose levels cannot be maintained by diet and exercise alone. To improve pregnancy results for GDM individuals, the present review is conducted to measure the effectiveness of several antidiabetic medications for glucose management. Up until 2024, we looked through PubMed and Google Scholar. Patients with GDM were enrolled in randomized controlled studies that examined several medications. Using the Cochrane risk of bias method, we obtained the pertinent data and evaluated the bias probability. To determine the odds ratio and the surface of the cumulative ranking function of the maternal and neonatal consequences of various therapies in GDM individuals, we first performed pair-wise meta-assessments and subsequently used a systematic review. Macrosomia, higher gestational ages, infant hypoglycemia, and birth weight are the neonatal outcomes. Glycohemoglobin (HbA1c), and pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) are the maternal outcomes. This thorough analysis of 25 trial designs found that metformin had fewer cases of macrosomia, higher gestational ages, infant hypoglycemia, and decreased birth weight when compared to glyburide. Metformin was found to be the fastest way to control blood sugar levels in individuals with GDM, whereas glyburide was found to be the most successful medicine for the same purpose.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of metformin versus insulin in the treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVE

Although there have been many studies on gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) treatment, there is still a knowledge gap regarding the comparative cost-effectiveness of metformin and insulin in the treatment phase. Existing studies have focused on treatment efficacy and drug safety, but relatively little has been explored regarding cost-effectiveness analysis. In particular, no comprehensive study has evaluated the cost-effectiveness of metformin and insulin for GDM treatment. Therefore, this study aimed to fill this knowledge gap by conducting a cost-effectiveness analysis of these two treatments for GDM.

METHODS

A decision-analytic model was used to compare the cost-effectiveness of metformin and insulin in China. Probabilities, costs, and utilities were derived from the literature. The cost and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated using the roll-back method. The strategy was considered cost-effective if the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was below the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of ¥242,938 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses were also conducted to assess the robustness of the results.

RESULTS

The roll-back analysis indicated that insulin was not cost-effective compared to metformin, resulting in increased costs and decreased QALYs, with a negative ICER. These findings suggested that metformin is a cost-effective option than insulin. Furthermore, the sensitivity analysis showed that the model was robust.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with insulin, metformin is a cost-effective treatment option for GDM.

Case Report: Abruptio placentae and epileptic seizure after occurrence of perinatal hyperglycaemia in woman with gestational diabetes mellitus and hypertriglyceridemia-induced acute pancreatitis

Hypertriglyceridemia-induced acute pancreatitis seldom occurs in the second trimester of pregnancy with gestational diabetes mellitus. For these patients, the existing knowledge on concomitant hyperglycemia is not sufficient. We report a case of abruptio placentae and epileptic seizure following perinatal hyperglycaemia in woman with gestational diabetes mellitus and hypertriglyceridemia-induced acute pancreatitis. The occurrence of abruptio placentae and epileptic seizure may be associated with concomitant hyperglycemia, and the epileptic seizure was terminated after she underwent treatment with insulin. We should pay more attention to the adverse effects of perinatal hyperglycemia and continue to give appropriate insulin treatment even if patients have passed the acute phase of hypertriglyceridemia-induced acute pancreatitis.

Association of Polyphenols Consumption with Risk for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Preeclampsia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) and preeclampsia (PE) affects 6-25% of pregnancies and are characterized by an imbalance in natural prooxidant/antioxidant mechanisms. Due to their antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, polyphenols consumption during the pregnancy might exert positive effects by preventing GDM and PE development. However, this association remains inconclusive. This systematic review and metanalysis is aimed to analyze the association between polyphenol-rich food consumption during pregnancy and the risk of GDM and PE. A systematic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics, London, United Kingdom) for articles dated between 1 January 1980 and July 2022 was undertaken to identify randomized controlled trials and observational studies evaluating polyphenol-rich food consumption and the risk of GDM and PE. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the quality of these included studies. Twelve studies were included, of which eight articles evaluated GDM and four studied PE. A total of 3785 women presented with GDM (2.33%). No association between polyphenol consumption and GDM was found (ES = 0.85, 95% CI 0.71-1.01). When total polyphenol intake was considered, a lower likelihood to develop GDM was noted (ES = 0.78, 95% CI 0.69-0.89). Furthermore, polyphenol consumption was not associated with PE development (ES = 0.90, 95% CI 0.57-1.41). In conclusion, for both outcomes, pooled analyses showed no association with polyphenol-rich food consumption during pregnancy. Therefore, association of polyphenol intake with a decreased risk of GDM and PE remains inconclusive.