Discrepancies in patients' medication lists from pharmacies in Sweden: an interview study before the implementation of the Swedish National Medication List

Trends in Drug Duplications in Swedish Older Adults: A Nationwide Register Study from 2006 to 2021

BACKGROUND

Drug duplication (DD), the use of two identical drugs simultaneously, is a medication error increasing the risk of adverse drug events. We describe the trends and implicated drugs in potential DD in older adults in Sweden from 2006 to 2021.

METHODS

We conducted a register-based, repeated cross-sectional study of all older adults (aged ≥65 years) dispensed drugs at a community pharmacy in 2006-2021. DD was defined as a ≥30-day overlap of two dispensations of drugs with the same 5th level (chemical substance) Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification, but with different brand names, within a 3-month period each year.

RESULTS

Among Swedish older adults with ordinary prescriptions (i.e. multidose excluded; n ≈ 1,200,000-1,600,000 per year), the prevalence of potential DD increased from 5.2% to 10.6% in 65- to 79-year-olds and from 7.0% to 11.7% in those aged ≥80 years. The drug groups (ATC level 3; pharmacological subgroup) most frequently implicated in DD in 2006 were β-blocking agents, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and calcium channel blockers, and in 2021 Vitamin B12 and folic acid, β-blocking agents and angiotensin II receptor blockers.

CONCLUSIONS

DD represents a common but unnecessary and potentially hazardous medication error. Our results indicate that during the last two decades, the prevalence has almost doubled in older adults with ordinary prescriptions, reaching 11% in 2021. More national efforts are needed to revert this trend, including a nationally available complete drug list for all patients, and prescriber support to detect DD.

Health professionals' experience and perceived obstacles with managing patients' medication information in Norway: cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND

Access to correct and up to date medication information is crucial for effective patient treatment. However, persistent discrepancies exist. This study examines the experiences and challenges health professionals encounter while utilizing current digital solutions in the Norwegian healthcare system to manage patients' medication information.

METHODS

A cross-sectional descriptive analysis using quantitative survey data was conducted to investigate how health professionals managed patients' medication information. Content analysis was used to analyze free-text responses concerning challenges they encountered when transferring medication information and to identify factors deemed necessary for implementing the Shared Medication List in Norway.

RESULTS

A total of 262 doctors and 244 nurses responded to the survey. A higher percentage of doctors (72.2%) expressed concerns regarding obtaining accurate and updated medication lists than nurses (42.9%), particularly for patients with polypharmacy (35.3%) or transitioning between primary and specialist care services (27.6%). The patient's verbal information was the main source for hospital doctors (17%) to obtain an overview of the patient's medication usage, while general practitioners (19%) and nurses (working in both primary and specialist care services, 28% and 27% respectively) predominantly relied on electronic prescriptions. Doctors, in particular general practitioners, reported carrying excessive responsibilities in coordinating with other health actors (84.8%) and managing patients' medication information. The vast majority of both doctors (84.4%) and nurses (82.0%) were in favor of a Shared Medication List. However, about a third of doctors (36.3%) and nurses (29.8%) expressed the need for a more balanced responsibility in updating and managing patients' medication information, while ensuring compatibility with existing digital systems.

CONCLUSIONS

Fragmented resources for medication information and unclear responsibilities were prevalent concerns among both professional groups. Doctors voiced more concern than nurses about the accuracy of patients' medication list. While both groups are positive about a shared medication list, successful implementation requires proactive training initiatives and clearer role clarification.

Potential Drug-Related Problems in Pediatric Patients-Describing the Use of a Clinical Decision Support System at Pharmacies in Sweden

The clinical support system Electronic Expert Support (EES) is available at all pharmacies in Sweden to examine electronic prescriptions when dispensing to prevent drug-related problems (DRPs). DRPs are common, and result in patient suffering and substantial costs for society. The aim of this research was to study the use of EES for the pediatric population (ages 0-12 years), by describing what types of alerts are generated for potential DRPs, how they are handled, and how the use of EES has changed over time. Data on the number and categories of EES analyses, alerts, and resolved alerts were provided by the Swedish eHealth Agency. The study shows that the use of EES has increased. The most common type of alert for a potential DRP among pediatric patients was regarding high doses in children (30.3% of all alerts generated). The most common type of alert for a potential DRP that was resolved among pediatrics was therapy duplication (4.6% of the alerts were resolved). The most common reason for closing an alert was dialogue with patient for verification of the treatment (66.3% of all closed alerts). Knowledge of which type of alerts are the most common may contribute to increased prescriber awareness of important potential DRPs.

Healthcare professionals' perceptions of a web-based application for using the new National Medication List in Sweden

Objective

During the first stage of implementing the National Medication List in Sweden, a web-based application called Förskrivningskollen (FK) was launched. FK includes information about a patient's prescribed and dispensed medications, and it works as a backup system until the healthcare electronic health record (EHR) systems are fully integrated. The aim of this study was to examine the healthcare professionals' experiences and perceptions of FK.

Methods

The study applied a mixed methods approach, with statistics about the use of FK and a survey with open and closed questions. The respondents (n  =  288) were healthcare professionals who were users or potential users of FK.

Results

Overall there was little knowledge about FK and uncertainty regarding working routines and the regulations connected to the application. Lack of interoperability with the EHRs made FK time-consuming to use. Respondents said that the information in FK was not updated, and they were concerned that using FK could lead to a false sense of security about the accuracy of the list. Most clinical pharmacists thought FK added benefit to their clinical work, while as a group, physicians were more ambivalent about FK's benefit.

Conclusions

The concerns of healthcare professionals give important insights for future implementation of shared medication lists. Working routines and regulations linked to FK need to be clarified. In Sweden, the potential value of a national shared medication list will probably not be realized until it is fully integrated into the EHR in a way that supports healthcare professionals' desired ways of working.