HOMA-IR in acromegaly: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Glucose intolerance in acromegaly is driven by low insulin secretion; results from an intravenous glucose tolerance test

PURPOSE

Insulin sensitivity (Si) and its role in glucose intolerance of acromegaly has been extensively evaluated. However, data on insulin secretion is limited. We aimed to assess stimulated insulin secretion using an intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) in active acromegaly.

METHODS

We performed an IVGTT in 25 patients with active acromegaly (13 normal glucose tolerance [NGT], 6 impaired glucose tolerance [IGT] and 6 diabetes mellitus [DM]) and 23 controls (8 lean NGT, 8 obese NGT and 7 obese IGT). Serum glucose and insulin were measured at 20 time points along the test to calculate Si and acute insulin response (AIRg). Medical treatment for acromegaly or diabetes was not allowed.

RESULTS

In acromegaly, patients with NGT had significantly (p for trend < 0.001) higher AIRg (3383 ± 1082 pmol*min/L) than IGT (1215 ± 1069) and DM (506 ± 600). AIRg was higher in NGT (4764 ± 1180 pmol*min/L) and IGT (3183 ± 3261) controls with obesity than NGT (p = 0.01) or IGT (p = 0.17) acromegaly. Si was not significantly lower in IGT (0.68 [0.37, 0.88] 106*L/pmol*min) and DM (0.60 [0.42, 0.84]) than in NGT (0.81 [0.58, 1.55]) patients with acromegaly. NGT (0.33 [0.30, 0.47] 106*L/pmol*min) and IGT (0.37 [0.21, 0.66]) controls with obesity had lower Si than NGT (p = 0.001) and IGT (p = 0.43) acromegaly.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated that low insulin secretion is the main driver behind glucose intolerance in acromegaly. Compared to NGT and IGT controls with obesity, patients with NGT or IGT acromegaly had higher Si. Together, these findings suggest that impaired insulin secretion might be a specific mechanism for glucose intolerance in acromegaly.

Practical therapeutic approach in the management of diabetes mellitus secondary to Cushing's syndrome, acromegaly and neuroendocrine tumours

Cushing's syndrome, acromegaly and neuroendocrine disorders are characterized by an excess of counterregulatory hormones, able to induce insulin resistance and glucose metabolism disorders at variable degrees and requiring immediate treatment, until patients are ready to undergo surgery. This review focuses on the management of diabetes mellitus in endocrine disorders related to an excess of counterregulatory hormones. Currently, the landscape of approved agents for treatment of diabetes is dynamic and is mainly patient-centred and not glycaemia-centred. In addition, personalized medicine is more and more required to provide a precise approach to the patient's disease. For this reason, we aimed to define a practical therapeutic algorithm for management of diabetes mellitus in patients with glucagonoma, pheochromocytoma, Cushing's syndrome and acromegaly, based on our practical experience and on the physiopathology of the specific endocrine disease taken into account. This document is addressed to all specialists who approach patients with diabetes mellitus secondary to endocrine disorders characterized by an excess of counterregulatory hormones, in order to take better care of these patients. Care and control of diabetes mellitus should be one of the primary goals in patients with an excess of counterregulatory hormones requiring immediate and aggressive treatment.

Secondary diabetes mellitus in acromegaly

Secondary diabetes mellitus (DM) is a common complication of acromegaly, encountered in up to 55% of cases. Vice versa, the prevalence of acromegaly is markedly higher in cohorts of patients with type 2 DM (T2DM). The presence of secondary DM depends primarily on acromegaly status and is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity, malignancy rate and overall mortality. The principal pathophysiologic mechanism is increased insulin resistance due to excessive lipolysis and altered fat distribution, reflected at the presence of intermuscular fat and attenuated, dysfunctional adipose tissue. Insulin resistance is ascribed to the direct, diabetogenic effects of growth hormone (GH), which prevail over the insulin-sensitizing effects of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), probably due to higher glucometabolic potency of GH, IGF-1 resistance, or both. Inversely, GH and IGF-1 act synergistically in increasing insulin secretion. Hyperinsulinemia in portal vein leads to enhanced responsiveness of liver GH receptors and IGF-1 production, pointing towards a mutually amplifying loop between GH-IGF-1 axis and insulin. Secondary DM occurs upon beta cell exhaustion, principally due to gluco-lipo-toxicity. Somatostatin analogues inhibit insulin secretion; especially pasireotide (PASI) impairs glycaemic profile in up to 75% of cases, establishing a separate pathophysiologic entity, PASI-induced DM. In contrast, pegvisomant and dopamine agonizts improve insulin sensitivity. In turn, metformin, pioglitazone and sodium-glucose transporters 2 inhibitors might be disease-modifying by counteracting hyperinsulinemia or acting pleiotropically. Large, prospective cohort studies are needed to validate the above notions and define optimal DM management in acromegaly.

Frequency of hyperostosis frontalis interna in patients with active acromegaly: is there a possible role of GH excess or hyperprolactinemia in its etiopathogenesis?

PURPOSE

Acromegaly is characterized by bone changes due to excessive growth hormone (GH) secretion. Hyperostosis frontalis interna (HFI) is described as an overgrowth in the inner plate of the frontal bone. An increased incidence of HFI has been reported in patients with acromegaly. Since the etiology of HFI is poorly understood, we have analyzed whether there is a relationship between the hormonal and metabolic status of patients with acromegaly (with or without hyperprolactinemia) and the pathogenesis of HFI.

METHODS

Forty-five patients with acromegaly and two control groups consisting of 25 patients with prolactinoma (group 1) and 47 healthy subjects (group 2) were included in this retrospective study. Baseline hormonal data and cranial imaging were obtained from medical records and analyzed.

RESULTS

Mean frontal bone thickness was 6.75 mm in acromegaly, 4.85 mm in group 1, and 5.1 mm in group 2 of controls (p < 0.001). The frequency of HFI was higher in acromegalic patients than in the controls (22%, 0%, and 2.2%, respectively). There was no difference between the HFI positive and negative acromegalic patients in basal GH, IGF-1, and PRL levels, IGF-1 index, diagnosis lag time, and insulin resistance. There was no difference between groups regarding parietal and occipital bone thickness.

CONCLUSION

Although the frequency of HFI is 22% in patients with acromegaly, neither excess GH nor hyperprolactinemia plays a role in its etiopathogenesis. Various genetic or epigenetic factors may contribute to its etiology.

Clinical Biology of the Pituitary Adenoma

All endocrine glands are susceptible to neoplastic growth, yet the health consequences of these neoplasms differ between endocrine tissues. Pituitary neoplasms are highly prevalent and overwhelmingly benign, exhibiting a spectrum of diverse behaviors and impact on health. To understand the clinical biology of these common yet often innocuous neoplasms, we review pituitary physiology and adenoma epidemiology, pathophysiology, behavior, and clinical consequences. The anterior pituitary develops in response to a range of complex brain signals integrating with intrinsic ectodermal cell transcriptional events that together determine gland growth, cell type differentiation, and hormonal production, in turn maintaining optimal endocrine health. Pituitary adenomas occur in 10% of the population; however, the overwhelming majority remain harmless during life. Triggered by somatic or germline mutations, disease-causing adenomas manifest pathogenic mechanisms that disrupt intrapituitary signaling to promote benign cell proliferation associated with chromosomal instability. Cellular senescence acts as a mechanistic buffer protecting against malignant transformation, an extremely rare event. It is estimated that fewer than one-thousandth of all pituitary adenomas cause clinically significant disease. Adenomas variably and adversely affect morbidity and mortality depending on cell type, hormone secretory activity, and growth behavior. For most clinically apparent adenomas, multimodal therapy controlling hormone secretion and adenoma growth lead to improved quality of life and normalized mortality. The clinical biology of pituitary adenomas, and particularly their benign nature, stands in marked contrast to other tumors of the endocrine system, such as thyroid and neuroendocrine tumors.