Preliminary reliability and validity of Persian version of the Family Dermatology Life Quality Index (FDLQI)

Assessing the quality of life in the families of patients with epidermolysis bullosa: The mothers as main caregivers

Background

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is an uncommon group of inherited disorders characterized by skin blistering after friction or mechanical trauma. EB affects patients and their families physically, socially, and emotionally.

Objective

This study aimed to assess the family quality of life of these patients using the Family Dermatology Life Quality Index (FDLQI) questionnaire.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, we enrolled caregivers of patients with EB registered at the Molecular Dermatology Research Center, affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, up to 2020. Participants filled out a demographic data collection form and the FDLQI questionnaire. The data were analyzed using SPSS software, version 22.

Results

Overall, 80 participants, consisting of 65 mothers (81.2%) and 15 fathers (18.7%) as primary caregivers, were enrolled in this study. The average FDLQI score was 19.88 ± 4.71. The FDLQI scores of caregivers of patients with EB simplex was significantly lower than scores observed in those with other types of EB (p < .001). There was a significant positive association between the number of patients with EB in the family and FDLQI score (p = .049). FDLQI scores were lower in caregiving mothers who had a higher education (p < .001) and those who were employed (p < .001).

Conclusion

Family quality of life is affected in patients with EB. Families with lower socioeconomic status and unemployed caregivers require special attention. More studies are needed to determine the parameters involved in the quality of life of patients with EB and their families.

Validation of the Family Health Behavior Scale for the Brazilian population

OBJECTIVE

To validate the Family Health Behavior Scale (FHBS) for Brazilian families.

METHODS

The sample included 272 children aged 5 to 12 years old. Caregivers and their healthy answered the FHBS and questions about physical activity. In addition, anthropometric measurements of the children's weight and height were performed, as well as the bioimpedance exam. The scale was translated and the following validities were assessed: content (qualitative analysis and content validity index), construct (factor analysis) and concurrent validity (difference between domains and the total score with the categories of BMI, fat percentage and physical activity). Reliability (Cronbach's alpha, ceiling-floor effect, two-half test, intraclass correlation and Bland - Altman) was also assessed.

RESULTS

FHBS instrument performed well with regard to the psychometric properties in the Brazilian population. The content validity index was 0.987. Fit indices of the factor analysis were considered satisfactory, according to Bartlett's sphericity test (χ 2 = 1927, df = 351; p < 0.001) and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin index (KMO = 0.789). Concurrent validity, the differences between the mean of the domains and the total score between the categories of BMI (p = 0.011), percentage of fat (0.004) and physical activity (p < 0.001) were all significant. The reliability results were Cronbach's alpha internal consistency = 0.83, adequate ceiling-floor effect, 0.8105 (0.09 SD) two-half test, 0.626 intraclass correlation (95% CI: 0.406 to 0.777) and Bland - Altman -0.840 (-22.76 to 21.07).

CONCLUSION

The FHBS adapted for the Brazilian population showed evidence of adequate psychometric performance.

Family impact of pemphigus disease in an Iranian population using the Family Dermatology Life Quality Index

Background

Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is a rare but seriously disabling disorder of the skin and mucous membranes that can gravely impact the quality of life (QoL) of patients.

Objective

The aim of the present study was to identify how family members of patients with PV are affected by the disease.

Methods

A total of 118 patients with confirmed PV and one of their family members (caregivers) were enrolled in the study. To calculate disease severity, the Autoimmune Bullous Skin Disorder Intensity Score was used. The Persian version of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) questionnaire was used to evaluate the QoL of patients and the Family Dermatology Life Quality Index (FDLQI) to evaluate the QoL of caregivers.

Results

The mean age of patients was 43.14 ± 12.5 years. Ninety patients (76.3%) were female. Eighty-one patients (68.6%) had the mucocutaneous phenotype and 37 cases (31.4%) the mucosal phenotype. The DLQI score was 10.1 ± 7.1 for patients. The DLQI score was higher for patients with the mucocutaneous phenotype (11.8 ± 7.5) than those with the mucosal phenotype (6.4 ± 4.9; p < .001). QoL was significantly affected by disease severity. FDLQI score was 13 ± 7 for caregivers, and was significantly higher in older caregivers and married ones. There was a positive correlation between patients' admission frequencies and FDLQI score. FDLQI score was also significantly affected by the Autoimmune Bullous Skin Disorder Intensity Score of patients' disease severity. The QoL of patients and their caregivers showed a significant positive correlation.

Conclusion

The QoL of patients and their families are impaired significantly, and is considerably prominent in the mucocutaneous phenotype of PV and more severe forms.

Limitation

Pemphigus Disease Area Index (PDAI) and Autoimmune Bullous Disease QoL (ABQoL) were not used in this study.

Family dermatology life quality index in patients with pemphigus vulgaris: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Pemphigus vulgaris is a rare autoimmune intraepidermal vesiculobullous disease involving the skin and mucosa. It impacts the quality of life of both patients and their families.

METHODS

A total of 70 patients with pemphigus vulgaris (either outpatient or hospitalized) were enrolled using the simple sampling method between 2016 and 2017 from the dermatology clinic at Faghihi Hospital, Shiraz, Iran. A validated Persian version of the Family Dermatology Life Quality Index (FLDQI) questionnaire was filled by a family caregiver. The questionnaire contained 10 items assessing the quality of life of the family. Demographic variables were recorded in a separate form.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 51 ± 11.3 years and that of the family caregivers was 32 ± 8.8 years. The FLDQI score was higher (poorer quality of life) if the patient was male, older, had shorter disease duration or had fewer disease recurrences (P = 0.046, 0.01, 0.001 and >0.001, respectively). Higher scores were also obtained in the less-educated caregivers (P = 0.026) but there was no association with either gender or age (P = 0.399, 0.1).

CONCLUSION

Pemphigus vulgaris significantly affects the Family Dermatology Life Quality Index. Education and counseling of family caregivers by various support groups such as Pemphigus Family Associations could be effective in improving the quality of life of the caregivers.

LIMITATIONS

This study did not assess the effect of comprising domain analysis, severity of disease, patients' Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), mucosal involvement, response to treatment, outpatient or admitted status, socioeconomic status, or the quality of life among the various family members.

Japanese version of the Family Dermatology Life Quality Index: Translation and validation

Skin conditions affect the quality of life (QoL) of patients and their family. To assess family members' QoL, a questionnaire uniquely designed for family members is necessary. We translated the Family Dermatology Life Quality Index (FDLQI), originally created and validated by Basra et al., into Japanese, and evaluated its reliability and validity. For psychometric evaluations, 150 dermatology patients and their family members were included. The Japanese version of the FDLQI showed high test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.95) and internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.86). FDLQI scores significantly correlated with DLQI scores (r = 0.58, P < 0.01, Spearman's rho) and global question (GQ) which measured the patient's skin condition on a visual analog scale (r = 0.36, P < 0.01). Family members of patients with inflammatory skin diseases showed higher FDLQI scores than those with isolated lesions, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.062, Mann-Whitney U-test). Responsiveness to change was demonstrated in a group in which the patient's skin condition was assessed as improved (n = 37, r = 0.46, P < 0.01) but not in that in which it became worse. The difference of the change between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.01). Additionally, the change in FDLQI scores and GQ were significantly correlated (r = 0.40, P < 0.01). Exploratory factor analysis suggested essential unidimensionality of the instrument. We showed acceptable validity and responsiveness of this Japanese version of FDLQI. Further clinical epidemiological studies are required to confirm this.