1
|
Namiot ED, Smirnovová D, Sokolov AV, Chubarev VN, Tarasov VV, Schiöth HB. Depression clinical trials worldwide: a systematic analysis of the ICTRP and comparison with ClinicalTrials.gov. Transl Psychiatry 2024; 14:315. [PMID: 39085220 PMCID: PMC11291508 DOI: 10.1038/s41398-024-03031-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Revised: 07/16/2024] [Accepted: 07/18/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Major depressive disorder (MDD), commonly known as depression, affects over 300 million people worldwide as of 2018 and presents a wide range of clinical symptoms. The international clinical trials registry platform (ICTRP) introduced by WHO includes aggregated data from ClinicalTrials.gov and 17 other national registers, making it the largest clinical trial platform. Here we analysed data in ICTRP with the aim of providing comprehensive insights into clinical trials on depression. Applying a novel hidden duplicate identification method, 10,606 depression trials were identified in ICTRP, with ANZCTR being the largest non- ClinicalTrials.gov database at 1031 trials, followed by IRCT with 576 trials, ISRCTN with 501 trials, CHiCTR with 489 trials, and EUCTR with 351 trials. The top four most studied drugs, ketamine, sertraline, duloxetine, and fluoxetine, were consistent in both groups, but ClinicalTrials.gov had more trials for each drug compared to the non-ClinicalTrials.gov group. Out of 9229 interventional trials, 663 unique agents were identified, including approved drugs (74.5%), investigational drugs (23.2%), withdrawn drugs (1.8%), nutraceuticals (0.3%), and illicit substances (0.2%). Both ClinicalTrials.gov and non-ClinicalTrials.gov databases revealed that the largest categories were antidepressive agents (1172 in ClinicalTrials.gov and 659 in non-ClinicalTrials.gov) and nutrients, amino acids, and chemical elements (250 in ClinicalTrials.gov and 659 in non-ClinicalTrials.gov), indicating a focus on alternative treatments involving dietary supplements and nutrients. Additionally, 26 investigational antidepressive agents targeting 16 different drug targets were identified, with buprenorphine (opioid agonist), saredutant (NK2 antagonist), and seltorexant (OX2 antagonist) being the most frequently studied. This analysis addresses 40 approved drugs for depression treatment including new drug classes like GABA modulators and NMDA antagonists that are offering new prospects for treating MDD, including drug-resistant depression and postpartum depression subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugenia D Namiot
- Department of Surgical Science, Functional Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Diana Smirnovová
- Department of Surgical Science, Functional Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Aleksandr V Sokolov
- Department of Surgical Science, Functional Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Vladimir N Chubarev
- Advanced Molecular Technologies, Limited Liability Company (LLC), Moscow, Russia
| | - Vadim V Tarasov
- Advanced Molecular Technologies, Limited Liability Company (LLC), Moscow, Russia
| | - Helgi B Schiöth
- Department of Surgical Science, Functional Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Roydhouse JK, Cohen ML, Eshoj HR, Corsini N, Yucel E, Rutherford C, Wac K, Berrocal A, Lanzi A, Nowinski C, Roberts N, Kassianos AP, Sebille V, King MT, Mercieca-Bebber R. The use of proxies and proxy-reported measures: a report of the international society for quality of life research (ISOQOL) proxy task force. Qual Life Res 2021; 31:317-327. [PMID: 34254262 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-021-02937-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Proxy reports are often used when patients are unable to self-report. It is unclear how proxy measures are currently in use in adult health care and research settings. We aimed to describe how proxy reports are used in these settings, including the use of measures developed specifically for proxy reporting in adult health populations. METHODS We systematically searched Medline, PsycINFO, PsycTESTS, CINAHL and EMBASE from database inception to February 2018. Search terms included a combination of terms for quality of life and health outcomes, proxy-reporters, and health condition terms. The data extracted included clinical context, the name of the proxy measure(s) used and other descriptive data. We determined whether the measures were developed specifically for proxy use or were existing measures adapted for proxy use. RESULTS The database search identified 17,677 possible articles, from which 14,098 abstracts were reviewed. Of these, 11,763 were excluded and 2335 articles were reviewed in full, with 880 included for data extraction. The most common clinical settings were dementia (30%), geriatrics (15%) and cancer (13%). A majority of articles (51%) were paired studies with proxy and patient responses for the same person on the same measure. Most paired studies (77%) were concordance studies comparing patient and proxy responses on these measures. DISCUSSION Most published research using proxies has focused on proxy-patient concordance. Relatively few measures used in research with proxies were specifically developed for proxy use. Future work is needed to examine the performance of measures specifically developed for proxies. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO No. CRD42018103179.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica K Roydhouse
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, 17 Liverpool Street, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia.
- Department of Health Services, Policy & Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
| | - Matthew L Cohen
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA
| | - Henrik R Eshoj
- Department of Hematology, Quality of Life Research Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Nadia Corsini
- Rosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Emre Yucel
- Amgen, Global Health Economics, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
- Bristol Myers Squibb, New York, NY, USA
| | - Claudia Rutherford
- Cancer Nursing Research Unit (CNRU), Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Katarzyna Wac
- Quality of Life Technologies Lab, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Quality of Life Technologies Lab, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Allan Berrocal
- Quality of Life Technologies Lab, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Alyssa Lanzi
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA
| | - Cindy Nowinski
- Departments of Medical Social Sciences and Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Natasha Roberts
- Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Angelos P Kassianos
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Veronique Sebille
- SPHERE, University of Nantes, University of Tours, INSERM, Nantes, France
- Department of Methodology and Biostatistics, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
| | - Madeleine T King
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber
- Faculty of Medicine, Sydney Medical School, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sato I, Sakka M, Soejima T, Kita S, Kamibeppu K. Randomized comparative study of child and caregiver responses to three software functions added to the Japanese version of the electronic Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (ePedsQL) questionnaire. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2020; 4:49. [PMID: 32577921 PMCID: PMC7311606 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-020-00213-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) refer to any report of the status of a patient's health condition, health behavior, or experience with healthcare directly from the patient, without interpretation of the patient's response by a clinician or any other external party. While many PROs, such as the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL), were originally administered in paper-and-pencil format, these are now available as electronic versions (ePROs). Although ePROs might well have used the same structure as their paper versions, we developed an alternate ePedsQL incorporating three software functions: 1) a non-forcing non-response alert, 2) a conditional question branch of the School Functioning Scale that only displays for (pre) school children, and 3) a vertical item-by-item display for small-screen devices. This report evaluated the effect of these functions on item non-response rate, survey completion time, and user experience. METHODS All surveys were conducted via the online/computer mode. We compared the dynamic format containing the three functions with the basic format in a randomized comparative study in 2803 children and 6289 caregivers in Japan. RESULTS We found that the non-response alert lowered the item non-response rate (0.338% to 0.046%, t = - 4.411, p < 0.001 by generalized linear mixed model analysis). The conditional question branch had mixed effects on survey completion time depending on the respondents' age. Surprisingly, respondents rated the vertical question display for handheld devices less legible than the matrix format. Further, multigroup structural equation modelling revealed that the same configuration for both formats showed an acceptable fit (CFI 0.933, RMSEA 0.060, SRMR 0.038) but the errors of observed variables were larger for the dynamic format than the basic format. CONCLUSIONS We confirmed the robustness of the ePedsQL in different formats. The non-response rate of ePedsQL was very low even in the absence of an alert. The branch and item-by-item display were effective but unnecessary for all populations. Our findings further understanding of how humans respond to special software functions and different digital survey formats and provide new insight on how the three tested functions might be most successfully implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iori Sato
- Department of Family Nursing, Division of Health Sciences and Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Mariko Sakka
- Department of Health Quality and Outcome Research, Division of Nursing System, Global Nursing Research Center, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan
- Department of Gerontological Home Care and Long-term Care Nursing, Division of Health Sciences and Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan
| | - Takafumi Soejima
- Department of Family Nursing, Division of Health Sciences and Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sachiko Kita
- Department of Family Nursing, Division of Health Sciences and Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kiyoko Kamibeppu
- Department of Family Nursing, Division of Health Sciences and Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Health Quality and Outcome Research, Division of Nursing System, Global Nursing Research Center, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan
| |
Collapse
|