The conformational spaces of dinaphthyl ketones, dinaphthyl thioketones, and dinaphthyl diazomethanes: 1-substituted naphthalenes versus 2-substituted naphthalenes

Crystal structures of functional building blocks derived from bis(benzo[b]thiophen-2-yl)methane

The syntheses of three bis(benzo[b]thiophen-2-yl)methane derivatives, namely bis(benzo[b]thiophen-2-yl)methanone, C17H10OS2, (I), 1,1-bis(benzo[b]thiophen-2-yl)-3-(trimethylsilyl)prop-2-yn-1-ol, C22H20OS2Si, (II), and 1,1-bis(benzo[b]thiophen-2-yl)prop-2-yn-1-ol, C19H12OS2, (III), are described and their crystal structures discussed comparatively. The conformation of ketone (I) and the respective analogues are rather similar for most of the compounds compared. This is true for the interplanar angles, the Caryl—Cbridge—Carylangles and the dihedral angles. The best resemblance is found for a bioisotere of (I),viz.2,2′-dinaphthyl ketone, (VII). By way of interest, the crystal packings also reveal similarities between (I) and (VII). In (I), the edge-to-face interactions seen between two napthyl residues in (VII) are substituted by S...π contacts between the benzo[b]thiophen-2-yl units in (I). In the structures of the bis(benzo[b]thiophen-2-yl)methanols,i.e.(II) and (III), the interplanar angles are also quite similar compared with analogues and related active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) containing the dithiophen-2-ylmethane scaffold, though the dihedral angles show a larger variability and produce unsymmetrical molecules.