Semi-correlations as a tool to build up categorical (active/inactive) model of GABAA receptor modulator activity

Application of ensemble learning for predicting GABAA receptor agonists

BACKGROUND

Over the past few decades, agonists binding to the benzodiazepine site of the GABAA receptor have been successfully developed as clinical drugs. Different modulators (agonist, antagonist, and reverse agonist) bound to benzodiazepine sites exhibit different or even opposite pharmacological effects, however, their structures are so similar that it is difficult to distinguish them based solely on molecular skeleton. This study aims to develop classification models for predicting the agonists.

METHODS

306 agonists or non-agonists were collected from literature. Six machine learning algorithms including RF, XGBoost, AdaBoost, GBoost, SVM, and ANN algorithms were employed for model development. Using six descriptors including 1D/2D Descriptors, ECFP4, 2D-Pharmacophore, MACCS, PubChem, and Estate fingerprint to characterize chemical structures. The model interpretability was explored by SHAP method.

RESULTS

The best model demonstrated an AUC value of 0.905 and an MCC value of 0.808 for the test set. The PubMac-based model (PubMac-GB) achieved best AUC values of 0.935 for test set. The SHAP analysis results emphasized that MaccsFP62, ECFP_624, ECFP_724, and PubchemFP213 were the crucial molecular features. Applicability domain analysis was also performed to determine reliable prediction boundaries for the model. The PubMac-GB model was applied to virtual screening for potential GABAA agonists and the top 100 compounds were given.

CONCLUSION

Overall, our ensemble learning-based model (PubMac-GB) achieved comparable performance and would be helpful in effectively identifying agonists of GABAA receptors.

CORAL Models for Drug-Induced Nephrotoxicity

Drug-induced nephrotoxicity is a major cause of kidney dysfunction with potentially fatal consequences. The poor prediction of clinical responses based on preclinical research hampers the development of new pharmaceuticals. This emphasises the need for new methods for earlier and more accurate diagnosis to avoid drug-induced kidney injuries. Computational predictions of drug-induced nephrotoxicity are an attractive approach to facilitate such an assessment and such models could serve as robust and reliable replacements for animal testing. To provide the chemical information for computational prediction, we used the convenient and common SMILES format. We examined several versions of so-called optimal SMILES-based descriptors. We obtained the highest statistical values, considering the specificity, sensitivity and accuracy of the prediction, by applying recently suggested atoms pairs proportions vectors and the index of ideality of correlation, which is a special statistical measure of the predictive potential. Implementation of this tool in the drug development process might lead to safer drugs in the future.

Using VEGAHUB Within a Weight-of-Evidence Strategy

Industrial needs and regulatory requirements have played a significant role in accelerating the use of nontesting methods including in silico tools as alternatives to animal testing. The main interest is not solely on the use of in silico tools, or in read-across, but on better toxicological safety assessment of substances, and for this purpose more advanced, integrated strategies have to be implemented. VEGAHUB wants to promote this broader view, not necessarily focused on a specific approach. Applying multiple tools and complementary approaches instead of one technique may provide more elements for a more robust evaluation, but at the same time it is important to have a conceptual scheme to integrate multiple, heterogeneous lines of evidence. We will show how the user can benefit from the diversity of tools available within the platform VEGAHUB for assessing the biological properties of chemical substances on an example of (non)mutagenicity.

Semi-correlations as a tool to model for skin sensitization

Semi-correlation specifically assesses the correlation between a binary variable and a continuous variable. Semi-correlations were applied to develop binary models for various endpoints. We applied the semi-correlation to develop models of two kinds of skin sensitization one related to animals (local lymph node assay LLNA) and one to human beings (direct peptide reactivity assay DPRA and/or human cell line activation test h-CLAT). The models refer to binary classification for a two-level strategy: the first level (analysis of all compounds) is used in the format "sensitizer or non-sensitizer", and the second level (only sensitizers) is a further classification in the format "strong or weak sensitizer". The ranges of statistical characteristics of the models depend on the endpoint, LLNA or DPRA/h-CLAT: for the first level, sensitivity: 0.69-0.88, specificity: 0.75-0.89, accuracy: 0.77-0.87, Matthew's correlation coefficient (MCC): 0.54-0.57 and for the second level, sensitivity: 0.70-1.0, specificity: 0.78-0.83, accuracy: 0.77-0.87, MCC: 0.54-0.76. Thus, the described approach can be applied to building up models of the skin sensitization potency.

The system of self-consistent semi-correlations as one of the tools of cheminformatics for designing antiviral drugs

The development of antiviral agents against SARS-CoV-2 is necessary.

The Monte Carlo Method as a Tool to Build up Predictive QSPR/QSAR

Background:

The Monte Carlo method has a wide application in various scientific researches. For the development of predictive models in a form of the quantitative structure-property / activity relationships (QSPRs/QSARs), the Monte Carlo approach also can be useful. The CORAL software provides the Monte Carlo calculations aimed to build up QSPR/QSAR models for different endpoints.

Methods:

Molecular descriptors are a mathematical function of so-called correlation weights of various molecular features. The numerical values of the correlation weights give the maximal value of a target function. The target function leads to a correlation between endpoint and optimal descriptor for the visible training set. The predictive potential of the model is estimated with the validation set, i.e. compounds that are not involved in the process of building up the model.

Results:

The approach gave quite good models for a large number of various physicochemical, biochemical, ecological, and medicinal endpoints. Bibliography and basic statistical characteristics of several CORAL models are collected in the present review. In addition, the extended version of the approach for more complex systems (nanomaterials and peptides), where behaviour of systems is defined by a group of conditions besides the molecular structure is demonstrated.

Conclusion:

The Monte Carlo technique available via the CORAL software can be a useful and convenient tool for the QSPR/QSAR analysis.

Predicting acute contact toxicity of organic binary mixtures in honey bees (A. mellifera) through innovative QSAR models

Pollinators such as honey bees are of considerable importance, because of the crucial pollination services they provide for food crops and wild plants. Since bees are exposed to a wide range of multiple chemicals "mixtures" both of anthropogenic (e.g. plant protection products) and natural origin (e.g. plant toxins), understanding their combined toxicity is critical. Although honey bees are employed worldwide as surrogate species for Apis and non-Apis bees in toxicity tests, it is practically unfeasible to perform in vivo tests for all mixtures of chemicals. Therefore, Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR) models can be developed using available data and can provide useful tools to predict such combined toxicity. Here, three different QSAR models within the CORAL software have been calibrated and validated for honey bees (A. mellifera) to predict the acute contact mixtures potency (LD_50-mix), in two regression based-models, and the nature of combined toxicity (synergism / non-synergism) in a classification-based model. Experimental data on binary mixtures (n = 123) (LD_50-mix) including dose response data (n = 97) and corresponding Toxic Unit values were retrieved from EFSA databases. The models were built using the principle of extraction of attributes from SMILES (or quasi-SMILES) while calculating so-called correlation weights for these attributes using Monte Carlo techniques. The two regression models were validated for their reliability and robustness (R² = 0.89, CCC = 0.92, Q² = 0.81; R² = 0.87, CCC = 0.89, Q² = 0.75). The classification model was validated using sensitivity (=0.86), specificity (=1), accuracy (=0.96), and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC = 0.90) as qualitative statistical validation parameters. Results indicate that these QSAR models successfully predict acute contact toxicity of binary mixtures in honey bees and can support prioritisation of multiple chemicals of concerns. Data gaps and further development of QSAR models for honey bees are highlighted particularly for chronic and sub-lethal effects.