Partial Splenic Embolization in Myelodysplastic Syndrome Associated with Immune Thrombocytopenia

The use of splenic embolization in immune thrombocytopenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The effectiveness of splenic embolization (SE) in treating refractory immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) remains uncertain. A systematic literature review was undertaken to assess the effectiveness and safety of SE in treating both paediatric and adult patients with ITP. We conducted an extensive search employing predefined criteria. We extracted platelet counts at baseline and at multiple intervals following SE, along with details of the proportion of embolized spleen parenchyma and the proportion of patients exhibiting complete or partial platelet count responses. We identified nine eligible reports for the analysis of effectiveness (228 patients) and 15 reports for the safety analysis (151 patients). Pooled estimates of complete response (platelet count >100 × 109/L) and overall response (platelet count >30 × 109/L) were 50.1% (95% CI: 38-62.3) and 74.4% (95% CI: 64.9-83.9) respectively. Most studies applied an embolization of at least 60% of the spleen parenchyma. Nearly all the patients suffered from mild adverse events (AEs), 1.3% suffered from serious AEs and one patient died (0.7%). In conclusion, SE resulted in an overall response rate in 74.4% of patients with ITP. However, this finding derives from uncontrolled studies of low to moderate quality.

Partial Splenic Artery Embolization in 35 Cancer Patients: Results of a Single Institution Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of partial splenic embolization (PSE) in cancer patients with different etiologies of splenomegaly/hypersplenism.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The medical records of 35 cancer patients who underwent 39 PSE procedures were analyzed. The splenomegaly/hypersplenism was due to chemotherapy (n = 17), portal hypertension (n = 10), or hematologic malignancy (n = 8). After the first 11 PSEs, celiac plexus neurolysis, corticosteroids, and non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were included in the post-procedural management.

RESULTS

PSE led to 59 ± 16% (mean ± standard deviation) splenic infarcts. The infarct volume per 1 mL 300-500 μm tris-acryl gelatin microspheres was not significantly different between the chemotherapy-induced group (264 ± 89 cm³) and the portal hypertension group (285 ± 139 cm³) but was significantly higher in the hematology group (582 ± 345 cm³). Platelet count increased from 65.7 ± 19.7 k/μl to a peak platelet count of 221 ± 83 k/μl at 2 weeks after PSE. Patients with a follow-up period of more than 1 year had the most recent platelet count of 174 ± 113 k/μl. Platelet count increase was significantly higher in the chemotherapy-induced group than the portal hypertension group. Adding celiac plexus neurolysis, corticosteroids, and NSAIDs to the post-procedural management resulted in a decreased rate of major complications from 73% to 46% and a decrease in the rate of moderate or severe pain from 92% to 20%.

CONCLUSIONS

PSE improved platelet counts in cancer patients despite different etiologies of splenomegaly. The addition of celiac plexus neurolysis, corticosteroids, and NSAIDS to the post-PSE treatment protocol reduced complications. Data from this study could help to predict the amount of 300-500 μm tris-acryl gelatin microspheres required to achieve a planned infarct size.