Creatinine monitoring patterns in the setting of direct oral anticoagulant therapy for non-valvular atrial fibrillation

Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Apixaban Versus Warfarin in Morbidly Obese Patients

This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apixaban versus warfarin in morbidly obese patients. A total of 250 morbidly obese patients with a body mass index (BMI) higher than 40 kg/m² or a body weight higher than 120 kg who were on anticoagulation therapy with either apixaban or warfarin for over one month were included in the study. This retrospective cohort, multicenter study was executed using the medical records of 125 morbidly obese patients treated with apixaban, while patients on warfarin were selected using a systemic random sampling to match the sample size of the apixaban group. There was no significant difference between apixaban and warfarin in the development of thromboembolic events and major bleeding. However, incidences of minor bleeding significantly decreased in the apixaban group compared to patients treated with warfarin. This difference was overcome by controlling serum creatinine and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). In conclusion, apixaban efficacy and safety are nearly the same as that of warfarin in morbidly obese patients with a lower incidence of minor bleeding with apixaban. Controlling serum creatinine and NSAIDs use may improve warfarin safety and decrease its complications.

Guideline-discordant dosing of direct-acting oral anticoagulants in the veterans health administration

Background

Clear guidelines exist to guide the dosing of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs). It is not known how consistently these guidelines are followed in practice.

Methods

We studied patients from the Veterans Health Administration (VA) with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who received DOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban) between 2010 and 2016. We used patient characteristics (age, creatinine, body mass) to identify which patients met guideline recommendations for low-dose therapy and which for full-dose therapy. We examined how often patient dosing was concordant with these recommendations. We examined variation in guideline-concordant dosing by site of care and over time. We examined patient-level predictors of guideline-concordant dosing using multivariable logistic models.

Results

A total of 73,672 patients who were prescribed DOACS were included. Of 5837 patients who were recommended to receive low-dose therapy, 1331 (23%) received full-dose therapy instead. Of 67,935 patients recommended to receive full-dose therapy, 4079 (6%) received low-dose therapy instead. Sites varied widely on guideline discordant dosing; on inappropriate low-dose therapy, sites varied from 0 to 15%, while on inappropriate high-dose therapy, from 0 to 41%. Guideline discordant therapy decreased by about 20% in a relative sense over time, but its absolute numbers grew as DOAC therapy became more common. The most important patient-level predictors of receiving guideline-discordant therapy were older age and creatinine function being near the cutoff value.

Conclusions

A substantial portion of DOAC prescriptions in the VA system are dosed contrary to clinical guidelines. This phenomenon varies widely across sites of care and has persisted over time.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-07397-x.

Consensus on basic conduct during the hospital admission of patients with acute heart failure

Acute heart failure (AHF) is a highly prevalent clinical entity in individuals older than 45years in Spain. AHF is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and is the leading cause of hospitalisation for individuals older than 65years in Spain, a quarter of whom die within 1year of the hospitalisation. In recent years, there has been an upwards trend in hospitalisations for AHF, which increased 76.7% from 2003 to 2013. Readmissions at 30days for AHF have also increased (from 17.6% to 22.1%), at a relative mean rate of 1.36% per year, with the consequent increase in the use of resources and the economic burden for the healthcare system. The aim of this document (developed by the Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation Group of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine) is to guide specialists on the most important aspects of treatment and follow-up for patients with AHF during hospitalisation and the subsequent follow-up. The main recommendations listed in this document are as follows: (1)At admission, perform a comprehensive assessment, considering the patient's standard treatment and comorbidities, given that these determine the disease prognosis to a considerable measure. (2)During the first few hours of hospital care, decongestive treatment is a priority, and a staged diuretic therapeutic approach based on the patient's response is recommended. (3)To manage patients in the stable phase, consider starting and/or adjusting evidence-based drug treatment (e.g., sacubitril/valsartan or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensinII receptor blockers, beta blockers and aldosterone antagonists). (4)At hospital discharge, use a checklist to optimise the patient's management and identify the most efficient options for maintaining continuity of care after discharge.

Consensus on basic conduct during the hospital admission of patients with acute heart failure

Acute heart failure (AHF) is a highly prevalent clinical entity in individuals older than 45 years in Spain. AHF is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and is the leading cause of hospitalisation for individuals older than 65 years in Spain, a quarter of whom die within 1 year of the hospitalisation. In recent years, there has been an upwards trend in hospitalisations for AHF, which increased 76.7% from 2003 to 2013. Readmissions at 30 days for AHF have also increased (from 17.6% to 22.1%), at a relative mean rate of 1.36% per year, with the consequent increase in the use of resources and the economic burden for the healthcare system. The aim of this document (developed by the Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation Group of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine) is to guide specialists on the most important aspects of treatment and follow-up for patients with AHF during hospitalisation and the subsequent follow-up. The main recommendations listed in this document are as follows: 1) At admission, perform a comprehensive assessment, considering the patient's standard treatment and comorbidities, given that these determine the disease prognosis to a considerable measure. 2) During the first few hours of hospital care, decongestive treatment is a priority, and a staged diuretic therapeutic approach based on the patient's response is recommended. 3) To manage patients in the stable phase, consider starting and/or adjusting evidence-based drug treatment (e.g., sacubitril/valsartan or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers, beta blockers and aldosterone antagonists). 4) At hospital discharge, use a checklist to optimise the patient's management and identify the most efficient options for maintaining continuity of care after discharge.

Novel assay based on diluted prothrombin time reflects anticoagulant effects of direct oral factor Xa inhibitors: Results of multicenter study in Japan

BACKGROUND

Direct oral anticoagulants targeting factor Xa (DXaIs) are administered as prophylaxis for various venothrombotic diseases without routine monitoring required. However, assessment of their anticoagulant effects is necessary to prevent severe events, including major bleeding and/or refractory thrombosis.

OBJECTIVES

We examined the correlation of ratio of inhibited thrombin generation (RITG), determined using a novel assay based on dilute prothrombin time (dPT), with coagulant markers and laboratory test results to show drug effects. In addition, RITG usefulness as a confirmation test for DXaI therapy was investigated.

METHODS

Citrated plasma samples were obtained from patients treated with rivaroxaban (n = 882), apixaban (n = 1214), or edoxaban (n = 820) at 4 different institutions in Japan. Laboratory tests, including prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), D-dimer, and plasma concentrations of DXaIs, were conducted, with drug concentrations divided into peak and trough groups, within and after 5 h of administration.

RESULTS

In each DXaI group, RITG was positively correlated with PT, APTT, and drug concentration, and negatively with D-dimer. RITG fluctuation during the peak and trough periods reflected the anticoagulant activity characteristic of each DXaI, which was different from blood concentration fluctuations. RITG showed a significant decrease in cases with thrombosis, while that was increased in those with hemorrhage.

CONCLUSION

We developed RITG, a novel measurement method based on dPT. RITG represents residual coagulation ability in plasma samples, and is useful for assessment of bleeding and thrombotic tendencies in DXaI patients. RITG can be utilized to confirm the effectiveness of oral anticoagulation therapy with DXaI agents.