Barriers and facilitators to optimal oral anticoagulant management: a scoping review

Coordination of oral anticoagulant care at hospital discharge (COACHeD): pilot randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether a focused, expert medication management intervention is feasible and potentially effective in preventing anticoagulation-related adverse events for patients transitioning from hospital to home.

DESIGN

Randomised, parallel design.

SETTING

Medical wards at six hospital sites in southern Ontario, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults 18 years of age or older being discharged to home on an oral anticoagulant (OAC) to be taken for at least 4 weeks.

INTERVENTIONS

Clinical pharmacologist-led intervention, including a detailed discharge medication management plan, a circle of care handover and early postdischarge virtual check-up visits to 1 month with 3-month follow-up. The control group received the usual care.

OUTCOMES MEASURES

Primary outcomes were study feasibility outcomes (recruitment, retention and cost per patient). Secondary outcomes included adverse anticoagulant safety events composite, quality of transitional care, quality of life, anticoagulant knowledge, satisfaction with care, problems with medications and health resource utilisation.

RESULTS

Extensive periods of restriction of recruitment plus difficulties accessing patients at the time of discharge negatively impacted feasibility, especially cost per patient recruited. Of 845 patients screened, 167 were eligible and 56 were randomised. The mean age (±SD) was 71.2±12.5 years, 42.9% females, with two lost to follow-up. Intervention patients were more likely to rate their ability to manage their OAC as improved (17/27 (63.0%) vs 7/22 (31.8%), OR 3.6 (95% CI 1.1 to 12.0)) and their continuity of care as improved (21/27 (77.8%) vs 2/22 (9.1%), OR 35.0 (95% CI 6.3 to 194.2)). Fewer intervention patients were taking one or more inappropriate medications (7 (22.5%) vs 15 (60%), OR 0.19 (95% CI 0.06 to 0.62)).

CONCLUSION

This pilot randomised controlled trial suggests that a transitional care intervention at hospital discharge for older adults taking OACs was well received and potentially effective for some surrogate outcomes, but overly costly to proceed to a definitive large trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02777047.

Anticoagulation under-utilization in atrial fibrillation patients is responsible for a large proportion of strokes requiring endovascular therapy

OBJECTIVES

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is responsible for 30-50% of large strokes requiring endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). Anticoagulation (AC) underutilization is a common source of AF-related stroke. We compared antithrombotic medications among stroke patients with AF that did or did not undergo EVT to determine if AC underutilization disproportionately results in strokes requiring EVT, while quantifying the proportion of likely preventable thrombectomies.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center cohort included consecutive patients admitted with acute ischemic stroke between 2016 and 2021. Patients were categorized based on the presence of AF, and pre-admission antithrombotic medications were compared between those who underwent EVT and those who didn't. The reason for not being on AC was abstracted from the medical record, and patients were categorized as either AC eligible or AC contraindicated.

RESULTS

Of 3092 acute ischemic stroke patients, 644 had a history of AF, 213 of whom underwent EVT. Patients who required EVT were more likely to not be taking any antithrombotics prior to admission (34% vs 24%, p=0.007) or have subtherapeutic INR on admission if taking warfarin (83% vs 63%; p = 0.046). Among the AF-EVT patients, 44% were taking AC, and only 31% were adequately anticoagulated. Only 8% of AF-EVT patients who were not on pre-admission AC had a clear contraindication, and 94% were ultimately discharged on AC.

CONCLUSIONS

Lack of antithrombotic therapy in AF patients disproportionately contributes to strokes requiring EVT. A small minority of AF patients have contraindications to AC, so adequate anticoagulation can prevent a remarkable number of strokes requiring EVT.

Barriers to self-monitoring implementation in the oral anticoagulated population: A qualitative study

AIM

This study aimed to explore and understand the barriers perceived by Italian nurses to adopting self-monitoring for managing oral anticoagulation in real-life settings.

BACKGROUND

Barriers to self-monitoring implementation for managing oral anticoagulation have been poorly described.

DESIGN

The study had a qualitative descriptive and exploratory design with a hybrid approach.

METHODS

A literature review was conducted to identify a priori barriers (deductive approach), while a small and semi-structured focus group discussion was performed to explore the contextual barriers experienced by Italian nurses (inductive approach). A classic content analysis technique was adopted. Data were collected in 2019.

FINDINGS

Two main categories were identified. Organizational barriers referred to the lack of inter-professional collaboration and health-care system strategies to provide clinical pathways for self-monitoring. Individual barriers encompassed professional characteristics (e.g. university background, professional knowledge, continuum education and accountability/responsibility) and patient characteristics (e.g. patient health literacy and knowledge, engagement/empowerment and educational programmes). Finally, unwarranted clinical variation in oral anticoagulation management arose as a barrier determined by organizational and individual elements.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study pointed out an urgent public health issue in addressing barriers influencing self-monitoring practice and in sustaining care models that might enhance the quality improvement of self-monitoring for managing oral anticoagulation.

Perceptions of patients and healthcare providers on patient education to improve oral anticoagulant management

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Education of patients is thought to be key to high-quality oral anticoagulant (OAC) medication management. Theoretically, improving patients' knowledge should improve their self-management skills and adherence. The study's objective was to explore the opinions of healthcare providers and patients on the desired content and format of patient education on OACs, in addition to perceived barriers to high-quality patient education.

METHODS

We applied qualitative descriptive methods in a focus group study on OAC management. Five focus group discussions were conducted in two health regions in Southwestern Ontario from 2017 to 2018 with 19 patients, 7 caregivers and 16 healthcare providers (physicians, nurses and pharmacists). During the focus groups, participants discussed their experiences with OAC education and made suggestions about the content and format for patient education on OACs. Transcripts were analysed using conventional content analysis.

RESULTS

We identified the five themes of patient education on OAC management: content of OAC education (rationale, risk and appropriate drug administration methods), the best times for providing OAC education (time of OACs initiation along with continuing education), preferred education delivery strategies (case management targeted patient information summaries from authoritative sources such as Thrombosis Canada and video education), patient and community pharmacist engagement in OAC education, and perceived barriers to optimal patient education (patients depending too much on their healthcare providers for advice, the limited time patients spend with healthcare providers, gaps in clear communication between providers and the lack of a nationally or provincially coordinated OAC management programme).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that patients, caregivers and healthcare providers support the need for education on OACs, including for patients taking DOACs. Specific important content and proper education format are needed. The optimal combination of content, format, duration, timing and sources for OAC education requires further research.

Coordination of Oral Anticoagulant Care at Hospital Discharge (COACHeD): protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial

Background

Oral anticoagulants (OACs) are commonly prescribed, have well-documented benefits for important clinical outcomes but have serious harms as well. Rates of OAC-related adverse events including thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events are especially high shortly after hospital discharge. Expert OAC management involving virtual care is a research priority given its potential to reach remote communities in a more feasible, timely, and less costly way than in-person care. Our objective is to test whether a focused, expert medication management intervention using a mix of in-person consultation and virtual care follow-up, is feasible and effective in preventing anticoagulation-related adverse events, for patients transitioning from hospital to home.

Methods and analysis

A randomized, parallel, multicenter design enrolling consenting adult patients or the caregivers of cognitively impaired patients about to be discharged from medical wards with a discharge prescription for an OAC. The interdisciplinary multimodal intervention is led by a clinical pharmacologist and includes a detailed discharge medication reconciliation and management plan focused on oral anticoagulants at hospital discharge; a circle of care handover and coordination with patient, hospital team and community providers; and early post-discharge follow-up virtual medication check-up visits at 24 h, 1 week, and 1 month. The control group will receive usual care plus encouragement to use the Thrombosis Canada website.

The primary feasibility outcomes include recruitment rate, participant retention rates, trial resources management, and the secondary clinical outcomes include adverse anticoagulant safety events composite (AASE), coordination and continuity of care, medication-related problems, quality of life, and healthcare resource utilization. Follow-up is 3 months.

Discussion

This pilot RCT tests whether there is sufficient feasibility and merit in coordinating oral anticoagulant care early post-hospital discharge to warrant a full sized RCT.

Trial registration

NCT02777047.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40814-022-01130-z.

Barriers and facilitators for optimizing oral anticoagulant management: Perspectives of patients, caregivers, and providers

BACKGROUND

Oral anticoagulants (OACs) are very commonly prescribed for prevention of serious vascular events, but are also associated with serious medication-related bleeding. Mitigation of harm is believed to require high-quality OAC management. This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators for optimal OAC management from the perspective of patients, caregivers and healthcare providers.

METHODS

Using a qualitative descriptive study design, we conducted five focus groups, three with patients and caregivers and two with health care providers, in two health regions in Southwestern Ontario. An expert facilitator led the discussions using a semi-structured interview guide. Each session was digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim and anonymized. Transcripts were analyzed in duplicate using conventional content analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-two (19 patients, 7 caregivers, and 16 providers including physicians, nurses and pharmacists) participated. More than half of the patients received OAC for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (57.9%) and the majority (94.7%) were on chronic therapy (defined as >3 years). Data analysis organized codes describing barriers and facilitators into 4 main themes-medication-related, patient-related, provider-related, and system-related. Barriers highlighted were problems with medication access due to cost, patient difficulties with adherence, knowledge and adjusting their lifestyles to OAC therapy, provider expertise, time for adequate communication amongst providers and their patients, and health care system inadequacies in supporting communications and monitoring. Facilitators identified generally addressed these barriers.

CONCLUSIONS

Many barriers to optimal OAC management exist even in the era of DOACs, many of which are amenable to facilitators of improved care coordination, patient education, and adherence monitoring.

Predictors, time course, and outcomes of persistence patterns in oral anticoagulation for non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a Dutch Nationwide Cohort Study

Aims 

Persistence with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has become a concern in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients, but whether this affects prognosis is rarely studied. We investigated the persistence with oral anticoagulants (OACs) and its association with prognosis among a nationwide cohort of NVAF patients.

Methods and results 

DOAC-naive NVAF patients who started to use DOACs for ischaemic stroke prevention between 2013 and 2018 were included using Dutch national statistics. Persistence with OACs was determined based on the presence of a 100-day gap between the last prescription and the end of study period. In 93 048 patients, 75.7% had a baseline CHA₂DS₂-VASc score of ≥2. The cumulative incidence of persistence with OACs was 88.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 87.9–88.3%], 82.6% (95% CI 82.3–82.9%), 77.7% (95% CI 77.3–78.1%), and 72.0% (95% CI 71.5–72.5%) at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years after receiving DOACs, respectively. Baseline characteristics associated with better persistence with OACs included female sex, age range 65–74 years, permanent atrial fibrillation, previous exposure to vitamin K antagonists, stroke history (including transient ischaemic attack), and a CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥2. Non-persistence with OACs was associated with an increased risk of the composite outcome of ischaemic stroke and ischaemic stroke-related death [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.79, 95% CI 1.49–2.15] and ischaemic stroke (aHR 1.58, 95% CI 1.29–1.93) compared with being persistent with OACs.

Conclusion 

At least a quarter of NVAF patients were non-persistent with OACs within 4 years, which was associated with poor efficacy of ischaemic stroke prevention. The identified baseline characteristics may help identify patients at risk of non-persistence.