When to consider targeted therapies in thrombotic microangiopathies in the modern era: walking the tightrope between cost, safety, and efficacy

New Therapeutic Targets and Treatment Options for Thrombotic Microangiopathy: Caplacizumab and Ravulizumab

OBJECTIVE

To review the efficacy and safety of caplacizumab and ravulizumab for thrombotic microangiopathy.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search from January 2011 to May 2020 was performed using the key terms caplacizumab (or ALX-0681), ravulizumab (or ALXN1210), atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS), acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP), and thrombotic microangiopathy.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Relevant clinical trials and articles in the English language were identified and reviewed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

aTTP and aHUS are syndromes of thrombotic microangiopathy manifested by excessive platelet aggregation and endothelial cell destruction, with subsequent thrombocytopenia, hemolysis, and multiorgan failure. Current standard therapy for aTTP is therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) to remove von Willebrand factor (vWF) multimers and anti-ADAMTS13 autoantibodies. As an adjunctive therapy to TPE, caplacizumab inhibits binding of vWF to platelets and prevents new microthrombi formation. It reduces thromboembolic event rate and days of TPE and delays relapse. Headache and epistaxis were the most common adverse events. aHUS develops because of dysregulation of the alternative complement pathway, followed by constitutive activation of complement components that causes thrombosis and end-organ damage. Short-term initial evaluation with ravulizumab, a long-acting complement inhibitor, demonstrates rapid hematological and renal improvement, with sustained complement inhibition and tolerable adverse effects.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

This review describes the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, cost consideration, and clinical studies for caplacizumab and ravulizumab for thrombotic microangiopathy. Place of therapy is also discussed.

CONCLUSION

Targeted therapies with caplacizumab and ravulizumab are expected to reduce the burden of exacerbation, refractory disease, recurrence, and possibly death for thrombotic microangiopathy.

Indications for therapeutic apheresis in hematological disorders

The early apheresis devices were developed in 1930s, but therapeutic apheresis only became widely used decades later, when automated cell separators were introduced. Progress in technical development of these devices continues to this day. Initial use of therapeutic apheresis has not been evidence based. Documents such as the Guidelines by the American Society for Apheresis provided hematologist with better tools to assess the role of therapeutic apheresis in daily practice. This review focuses on the use of therapeutic apheresis in patients with hematological disorders. Four separate apheresis modalities most encountered by hematologists are discussed: therapeutic plasma exchange, therapeutic leukocytapheresis, red blood cell exchange, and extracorporeal photopheresis. Examples of indications are provided and discussed. The future of therapeutic apheresis and its role in different diseases is undergoing continuous re-evaluation as disease pathogenesis is better understood and new treatment options become available.