Determinants of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction as clinical presentation of acute coronary syndrome

Increased Vulnerability and Distinct Layered Phenotype at Culprit and Nonculprit Lesions in STEMI Versus NSTEMI

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the pancoronary plaque vulnerability (including culprit and nonculprit lesions) and layered phenotype in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) vs non-STEMI (NSTEMI).

BACKGROUND

Pancoronary vulnerability should account for distinct clinical manifestations of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Layered plaque is indicative of previous coronary destabilization and thrombosis.

METHODS

A total of 464 patients with AMI who underwent 3-vessel optical coherence tomography imaging were consecutively studied and divided into a STEMI group (318 patients; 318 culprit and 1,187 nonculprit plaques) and a NSTEMI group (146 patients; 146 culprit and 560 nonculprit plaques). Patients were followed up for a median period of 2 years.

RESULTS

Compared with NSTEMI, culprit lesions in STEMI had more plaque rupture, thrombus, thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA), calcification, macrophage accumulation, and microvessels. The prevalence of plaque rupture (8.2% vs 4.8%; P = 0.018), microvessels (57.5% vs 45.2%; P < 0.001), and calcification (40.7% vs 30.2%; P = 0.003) at nonculprit lesions was higher in STEMI than NSTEMI. The layer area and thickness at the culprit and nonculprit lesions were significantly larger in STEMI than in NSTEMI. Multivariate analyses showed that culprit layer area (odds ratio: 1.443; 95% CI: 1.138-1.830; P = 0.002) was predictive of STEMI (vs NSTEMI), in addition to culprit TCFA, culprit thrombus, and non-left circumflex artery location of the culprit lesion. Although the type of AMI was not related to clinical outcomes, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, culprit calcified nodule, and nonculprit TCFA predicted the 2-year major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with AMI.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with STEMI had increased plaque vulnerability (ie, more plaque rupture and microvessels) and distinct layered phenotype at the culprit and nonculprit lesions compared with NSTEMI patients. Culprit lesion features of large layer area, TCFA, thrombus, and non-left circumflex artery location predicted the clinical presentation of STEMI.

Vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque features: findings from coronary imaging

Pathological studies have suggested that features of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques likely to progress and lead to acute cardiovascular events have specific characteristics. Given the progress of intravascular coronary imaging technology, some large prospective studies have detected features of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques using these imaging modalities. However, the rate of cardiovascular events, such as acute coronary syndrome, has been found to be considerably reduced in the limited follow-up period available in the statin era. Additionally, not all disrupted plaques lead to thrombus formation with clinical presentation. If sub-occlusive or occlusive thrombus formation does not occur, a thrombus on a disrupted plaque will organize without any symptoms, forming a “healed plaque”. Although vulnerable plaque detection using intracoronary imaging is focused on “thin-cap fibroatheroma” leading to plaque rupture, superficial plaque erosion is increasingly recognized; however, the underlying mechanism of thrombus formation on eroded plaques is not well understood. One of intravascular imaging, optical coherence tomography (OCT) has the highest image resolution and has enabled detailed characterization of the plaque in vivo. Here, we reviewed the status and limitations of intravascular imaging in terms of detecting vulnerable plaque through mainly OCT studies. We suggested that vulnerable plaque should be reconsidered in terms of eroded plaque and healed plaque and that both plaque and circulating blood should be assessed in greater detail accordingly.

Optical coherence tomography and coronary angioscopy assessment of healed coronary plaque components

PURPOSE

Histopathological or intracoronary image assessment of healed plaques (HPs) has been reported. However, the lesion characteristics of HPs remains undetermined yet. We assessed the healed plaque components in patients with coronary artery lesions using multiple imaging modalities.

METHODS

We enrolled 33 stable angina pectoris (SAP) patients with 36 native coronary culprit lesions with angiography severe stenosis and without severe calcification undergoing pre-intervention optical coherence tomography (OCT) and coronary angioscopy (CAS). HPs were defined as layered phenotype on OCT. Lesion morphologies and plaque characteristics of HPs were assessed using OCT and CAS.

RESULTS

HPs were observed in 19 lesions (52.8%). HP lesions had higher frequent B2/C lesions (89.4% vs. 52.9%, p = 0.02), worse pre-PCI coronary flow (corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction count 21.6 ± 13.5 vs. 13.8 ± 6.2, p = 0.047) and greater lumen-area stenosis (79.6 ± 10.6% vs. 68.0 ± 21.6%, p = 0.047) than non-HP lesions. HP lesions had higher prevalence of OCT-thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) (31.6% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.02), OCT-macrophage (89.5% vs. 41.2%, p = 0.004), and CAS-red thrombus (89.5% vs. 41.2%, p = 0.004) than non-HP lesions. The combination of 3 features including OCT-TCFA, macrophages, and CAS-red thrombus showed higher predictive valuer for HPs on OCT than each single variable. Post-PCI irregular tissue protrusion was more frequently observed in lesions with HPs than in those without (52.6% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

SAP lesions with HPs might have more frequent vulnerable plaques with intraplaque inflammation and thrombus than those without, suggesting that layered phenotype on OCT might reflect not only healing process but also potential risks for future coronary events.