1
|
Chege P, Njagi J, Komen J, Ngure G, Muriuki J, Karembu M. Best practices for acceptability of GM crops field trials conclusions: lessons for Africa. GM CROPS & FOOD 2024; 15:222-232. [PMID: 38980826 PMCID: PMC11236291 DOI: 10.1080/21645698.2024.2376415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2024] [Accepted: 07/01/2024] [Indexed: 07/11/2024]
Abstract
The ability to transfer information about the performance, safety, and environmental impacts of a genetically modified (GM) crop from confined field trials (CFTs) conducted in one location to another is increasingly gaining importance in biosafety regulatory assessment and decision-making. The CFT process can be expensive, time-consuming, and logistically challenging. Data transportability can help overcome these challenges by allowing the use of data obtained from CFTs conducted in one country to inform regulatory decision-making in another country. Applicability of transported CFT data would be particularly beneficial to the public sector product developers and small enterprises that develop innovative GM events but cannot afford to replicate redundant CFTs, as well as regulatory authorities seeking to improve the deployment of limited resources. This review investigates case studies where transported CFT data have successfully been applied in biosafety assessment and decision-making, with an outlook of how African countries could benefit from a similar approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Chege
- Program for Biosafety Systems (PBS), International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA AfriCenter), Nairobi, Kenya
- Program for Biosafety Systems (PBS), International Food Policy Institute (IFPRI), Washington, WA, USA
| | - Julia Njagi
- Inspection, National Biosafety Authority (NBA), Nairobi, Kenya
| | - John Komen
- Program for Biosafety Systems (PBS), International Food Policy Institute (IFPRI), Washington, WA, USA
| | - Godfrey Ngure
- Program for Biosafety Systems (PBS), International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA AfriCenter), Nairobi, Kenya
- Graduate School of Science and Technology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - John Muriuki
- Environmental Science, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Margaret Karembu
- Program for Biosafety Systems (PBS), International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA AfriCenter), Nairobi, Kenya
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen Y, Ren M, Pan L, Liu B, Guan X, Tao J. Impact of transgenic insect-resistant maize HGK60 with Cry1Ah gene on community components and biodiversity of arthropods in the fields. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0269459. [PMID: 35657976 PMCID: PMC9165892 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
In recent years, transgenic technology has developed rapidly, but the risk of the environmental release of transgenic organisms is still a key issue. Research on the impact on biodiversity is an effective way to objectively evaluate the risk. By taking transgenic maize HGK60 with insect-resistant gene Cry1Ah and common maize Zheng 58 as control, a 2-year experiment of arthropod community biodiversity in fields of them were studied using three methods.in 2019 and 2020. The results showed that a total of 124 species and 38537 individuals were observed from the experiment, belonging to 11 orders and 40 families. There was no significant difference in the individual number and species number of herbivorous, predatory and parasitic groups in the two kinds of maize in two years. Only the individual number of HGK60 was significantly higher than that of common maize Zheng 58 at heading stage in 2019. And the percentages of individual number and species number in different groups were basically the same in the two kinds of maize at each stage in two years. Analyses of Richness index, Shannon-Wiener diversity index, Dominance index and Evenness index showed no significant difference between the two kinds of maize in two years. The similarity coefficient of the arthropod community suggested that the arthropod community composition of HGK60 was similar to that of common maize Zheng 58. Furthermore, HGK60 had no significant effect on the relative stability of the arthropod community. These results indicated that despite the presence of a relatively minor difference in arthropod community between the two kinds of maize, the planting of HGK60 had little effect on arthropod community biodiversity. The results provided some data and support for the further studies of environmental risk of transgenic crops.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanjun Chen
- Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China
- College of Tropical Crops, Hainan University, Haikou, P.R. China
| | - Mengyun Ren
- Institute of Crops and Nuclear Technology Utilization, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Libo Pan
- Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Bo Liu
- Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Xiao Guan
- Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Jun Tao
- College of Tropical Crops, Hainan University, Haikou, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vesprini F, Maggi AI, López Olaciregui M, Módena NA. Transportability of Conclusions From Confined Field Trials: A Case Study Using the Virus Resistant Transgenic Bean Developed in Brazil. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2020; 8:815. [PMID: 32850707 PMCID: PMC7396523 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The conceptual framework for Data Transportability, builds on the premise that well-designed studies conducted for the environmental and food/feed risk assessment of transgenic crops may be transportable across geographies. Beyond individual data, provided that certain criteria are met, the general conclusions of comparative assessments of a transgenic crop with its conventional counterpart would also be transportable. In spite of this, many regulatory agencies still require in-country field trials to complete risk assessments of transgenic crops. A sub-team from ILSI Argentina’s (International Life Sciences Institute, Argentina. www.ilsi.org.ar) Biotechnology Working Group tested the applicability of the transportability concept to the case of the golden mosaic virus-resistant transgenic bean, developed by EMBRAPA (EMBRAPA: Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation). To this end, regulatory confined field trials (CFTs) carried out in Brazil to gather agro-phenotypic and compositional data were analyzed. The transportability of the conclusions of these studies to the bean cropping areas in Argentina was assessed as a conceptual exercise (with no intention to conclude on the biosafety of the common bean event). Comparative studies included the transgenic bean and its conventional parental line and were run in different agroecological environments so that any relevant differences could be observed. The main criteria to enable transportability were set by the sub-team and found to be met by the CFTs carried out in Brazil to inform a potential risk evaluation for Argentina.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Facundo Vesprini
- Biotechnology Directorate, Argentinian Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries, Buenos Aires, Argentina.,ILSI Argentina, Working Group on Biotechnology, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Andrés Ignacio Maggi
- ILSI Argentina, Working Group on Biotechnology, Buenos Aires, Argentina.,National Service for Agrifood Health and Quality (SENASA), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Magdalena López Olaciregui
- ILSI Argentina, Working Group on Biotechnology, Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Corteva Agriscience, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Natalia Andrea Módena
- ILSI Argentina, Working Group on Biotechnology, Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Bayer Crop Science, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Raybould A. Problem formulation and phenotypic characterisation for the development of novel crops. Transgenic Res 2020; 28:135-145. [PMID: 31321696 DOI: 10.1007/s11248-019-00147-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Phenotypic characterisation provides important information about novel crops that helps their developers to make technical and commercial decisions. Phenotypic characterisation comprises two activities. Product characterisation checks that the novel crop has the qualities of a viable product-the intended traits have been introduced and work as expected, and no unintended changes have been made that will adversely affect the performance of the final product. Risk assessment evaluates whether the intended and unintended changes are likely to harm human health or the environment. Product characterisation follows the principles of problem formulation, namely that the characteristics required in the final product are defined and criteria to decide whether the novel crop will have these properties are set. The hypothesis that the novel crop meets the criteria are tested during product development. If the hypothesis is corroborated, development continues, and if the hypothesis is falsified, the product is redesigned or its development is halted. Risk assessment should follow the same principles. Criteria that indicate the crop poses unacceptable risk should be set, and the hypothesis that the crop does not possess those properties should be tested. However, risk assessment, particularly when considering unintended changes introduced by new plant breeding methods such as gene editing, often ignores these principles. Instead, phenotypic characterisation seeks to catalogue all unintended changes by profiling methods and then proceeds to work out whether any of the changes are important. This paper argues that profiling is an inefficient and ineffective method of phenotypic characterisation for risk assessment. It discusses reasons why profiling is favoured and corrects some misconceptions about problem formulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan Raybould
- Syngenta Crop Protection AG, Rosentalstrasse 67, 4002, Basel, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Raybould A. Hypothesis-Led Ecological Risk Assessment of GM Crops to Support Decision-Making About Product Use. GMOS 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-53183-6_14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
|
6
|
Assessment of potential impacts associated with gene flow from transgenic hybrids to Mexican maize landraces. Transgenic Res 2019; 28:509-523. [PMID: 31250247 PMCID: PMC6848245 DOI: 10.1007/s11248-019-00160-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2019] [Accepted: 06/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
Genetically modified (GM) maize has been grown and safely consumed on a global scale since its commercialization in 1996. However, questions have been raised about the potential impact that GM maize could have on native maize landraces in Mexico, which is the center of origin and diversity of maize. This research was conducted to evaluate potential changes to maize landraces in an unlikely event of transgene introgression. For this study, two GM traits that confer insect protection and herbicide tolerance in maize (MON 89034 and MON 88017), designated as VT3Pro, were introgressed into two Mexican landraces, Tuxpeño and Tabloncillo. Field trials were conducted across four environments to assess phenotypic characteristics, plant response to stressors, and kernel composition of landraces with and without VT3Pro traits. Furthermore, materials from four backcrossing generations were analyzed for segregation of these GM traits. Generally, no significant differences were observed between landraces with and without VT3Pro traits for the evaluated characteristics and the segregation analysis showed that GM traits, when introgressed into landraces, followed Mendelian principles. These results support the conclusion that, if inadvertently introgressed into landraces, VT3Pro traits are not expected to alter phenotypic or kernel characteristics, plant response to stressors (except for targeted insect protection and herbicide tolerance traits) and would segregate like any endogenous gene. These results should be taken into consideration when discussing benefits and risks associated with commercial production of GM maize hybrids in the centers of origin and diversity of maize.
Collapse
|
7
|
Raybould A, Holt K, Kimber I. Using problem formulation to clarify the meaning of weight of evidence and biological relevance in environmental risk assessments for genetically modified crops. GM CROPS & FOOD 2019; 10:63-76. [PMID: 31184249 PMCID: PMC6615591 DOI: 10.1080/21645698.2019.1621615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2019] [Revised: 05/15/2019] [Accepted: 05/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Weight of evidence and biological relevance are important concepts for risk assessment and decision-making over the use of GM crops; however, their meanings are not well defined. We use problem formulation to clarify the definition of these concepts and thereby identify data that are relevant for risk assessment. Problem formulation defines criteria for the acceptability of risk and devises rigorous tests of the hypothesis that the criteria are met. Corroboration or falsification of such hypotheses characterize risk and enable predictable and transparent decisions about whether certain risks from using a particular GM crop are acceptable. Decisions based on a weight of evidence approach use a synthesis of several lines of evidence, whereas a "definitive" approach to risk assessment enables some decisions to be based on the results of a single test. Data are biologically relevant for risk assessment only if they test a hypothesis that is useful for decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Karen Holt
- Syngenta Ltd., Jealott’s Hill International Research Centre, Bracknell, UK
| | - Ian Kimber
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Moyers BT, Morrell PL, McKay JK. Genetic Costs of Domestication and Improvement. J Hered 2017; 109:103-116. [DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esx069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2017] [Accepted: 08/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Brook T Moyers
- Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO
| | - Peter L Morrell
- Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN (Morrell)
| | - John K McKay
- Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Plant characterization of genetically modified maize hybrids MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-88Ø17-3, MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6, and MON-ØØ6Ø3-6: alternatives for maize production in Mexico. Transgenic Res 2016; 26:135-151. [PMID: 27771867 PMCID: PMC5243880 DOI: 10.1007/s11248-016-9991-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2016] [Accepted: 10/09/2016] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Environmental risk assessment (ERA) of genetically modified (GM) crops is a process to evaluate whether the biotechnology trait(s) in a GM crop may result in increased pest potential or harm to the environment. In this analysis, two GM insect-resistant (IR) herbicide-tolerant maize hybrids (MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-88Ø17-3 and MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6) and one herbicide-tolerant GM hybrid (MON-ØØ6Ø3-6) were compared with conventional maize hybrids of similar genetic backgrounds. Two sets of studies, Experimental Phase and Pilot Phase, were conducted across five ecological regions (ecoregions) in Mexico during 2009–2013, and data were subject to meta-analysis. Results from the Experimental Phase studies, which were used for ERA, indicated that the three GM hybrids were not different from conventional maize for early stand count, days-to-silking, days-to-anthesis, root lodging, stalk lodging, or final stand count. Statistically significant differences were observed for seedling vigor, ear height, plant height, grain moisture, and grain yield, particularly in the IR hybrids; however, none of these phenotypic differences are expected to contribute to a biological or ecological change that would result in an increased pest potential or ecological risk when cultivating these GM hybrids. Overall, results from the Experimental Phase studies are consistent with those from other world regions, confirming that there are no additional risks compared to conventional maize. Results from Pilot Phase studies indicated that, compared to conventional maize hybrids, no differences were detected for the agronomic and phenotypic characteristics measured on the three GM maize hybrids, with the exception of grain moisture and grain yield in the IR hybrids. Since MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-88Ø17-3 and MON-89Ø34-3 × MON-ØØ6Ø3-6 confer resistance to target insect pests, they are an alternative for farmers in Mexico to protect the crop from insect damage. Additionally, the herbicide tolerance conferred by all three GM hybrids enables more cost-effective weed management.
Collapse
|
10
|
Campbell BW, Stupar RM. Soybean (Glycine max) Mutant and Germplasm Resources: Current Status and Future Prospects. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016; 1:307-327. [PMID: 30775866 DOI: 10.1002/cppb.20015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Genetic bottlenecks during domestication and modern breeding limited the genetic diversity of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). Therefore, expanding and diversifying soybean genetic resources is a major priority for the research community. These resources, consisting of natural and induced genetic variants, are valuable tools for improving soybean and furthering soybean biological knowledge. During the twentieth century, researchers gathered a wealth of genetic variation in the forms of landraces, Glycine soja accessions, Glycine tertiary germplasm, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Type and Isoline Collections. During the twenty-first century, soybean researchers have added several new genetic and genomic resources. These include the reference genome sequence, genotype data for the USDA soybean germplasm collection, next-generation mapping populations, new irradiation and transposon-based mutagenesis populations, and designer nuclease platforms for genome engineering. This paper briefly surveys the publicly accessible soybean genetic resources currently available or in development and provides recommendations for developing such genetic resources in the future. © 2016 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin W Campbell
- Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota
| | - Robert M Stupar
- Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Goto H, Shimada H, Horak MJ, Ahmad A, Baltazar BM, Perez T, McPherson MA, Stojšin D, Shimono A, Ohsawa R. Characterization of Natural and Simulated Herbivory on Wild Soybean (Glycine soja Seib. et Zucc.) for Use in Ecological Risk Assessment of Insect Protected Soybean. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0151237. [PMID: 26963815 PMCID: PMC4786143 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2015] [Accepted: 02/25/2016] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Insect-protected soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) was developed to protect against foliage feeding by certain Lepidopteran insects. The assessment of potential consequences of transgene introgression from soybean to wild soybean (Glycine soja Seib. et Zucc.) is required as one aspect of the environmental risk assessment (ERA) in Japan. A potential hazard of insect-protected soybean may be hypothesized as transfer of a trait by gene flow to wild soybean and subsequent reduction in foliage feeding by Lepidopteran insects that result in increased weediness of wild soybean in Japan. To assess this potential hazard two studies were conducted. A three-year survey of wild soybean populations in Japan was conducted to establish basic information on foliage damage caused by different herbivores. When assessed across all populations and years within each prefecture, the total foliage from different herbivores was ≤ 30%, with the lowest levels of defoliation (< 2%) caused by Lepidopteran insects. A separate experiment using five levels of simulated defoliation (0%, 10%, 25%, 50% and 100%) was conducted to assess the impact on pod and seed production and time to maturity of wild soybean. The results indicated that there was no decrease in wild soybean plants pod or seed number or time to maturity at defoliation rates up to 50%. The results from these experiments indicate that wild soybean is not limited by lepidopteran feeding and has an ability to compensate for defoliation levels observed in nature. Therefore, the potential hazard to wild soybean from the importation of insect-protected soybean for food and feed into Japan is negligible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hidetoshi Goto
- Monsanto Japan Limited, 2-5-18, Kyobashi, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104–0031, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Shimada
- Monsanto Japan Limited, Kawachi Research Farm, 4475–2, Manaita Aza Dotemukai, Kawachi-machi, Inashiki-gun, Ibaraki, 300–1331, Japan
| | - Michael J. Horak
- Monsanto Company, 800 N Lindbergh Blvd., St. Louis, MO, 63167, United States of America
| | - Aqeel Ahmad
- Monsanto Company, 800 N Lindbergh Blvd., St. Louis, MO, 63167, United States of America
| | - Baltazar M. Baltazar
- Monsanto Company, 800 N Lindbergh Blvd., St. Louis, MO, 63167, United States of America
| | - Tim Perez
- Monsanto Company, 800 N Lindbergh Blvd., St. Louis, MO, 63167, United States of America
| | - Marc A. McPherson
- Monsanto Company, 800 N Lindbergh Blvd., St. Louis, MO, 63167, United States of America
| | - Duška Stojšin
- Monsanto Company, 800 N Lindbergh Blvd., St. Louis, MO, 63167, United States of America
| | - Ayako Shimono
- Faculty of Science, Toho University, 2-2-1 Miyata, Funabashi, Chiba, 274–8510, Japan
| | - Ryo Ohsawa
- Laboratory of Plant Breeding, Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennoudai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305–8572, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ahmad A, Negri I, Oliveira W, Brown C, Asiimwe P, Sammons B, Horak M, Jiang C, Carson D. Transportable data from non-target arthropod field studies for the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified maize expressing an insecticidal double-stranded RNA. Transgenic Res 2016; 25:1-17. [PMID: 26433587 PMCID: PMC4735227 DOI: 10.1007/s11248-015-9907-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2015] [Accepted: 09/23/2015] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
As part of an environmental risk assessment, the potential impact of genetically modified (GM) maize MON 87411 on non-target arthropods (NTAs) was evaluated in the field. MON 87411 confers resistance to corn rootworm (CRW; Diabrotica spp.) by expressing an insecticidal double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) transcript and the Cry3Bb1 protein and tolerance to the herbicide glyphosate by producing the CP4 EPSPS protein. Field trials were conducted at 14 sites providing high geographic and environmental diversity within maize production areas from three geographic regions including the U.S., Argentina, and Brazil. MON 87411, the conventional control, and four commercial conventional reference hybrids were evaluated for NTA abundance and damage. Twenty arthropod taxa met minimum abundance criteria for valid statistical analysis. Nine of these taxa occurred in at least two of the three regions and in at least four sites across regions. These nine taxa included: aphid, predatory earwig, lacewing, ladybird beetle, leafhopper, minute pirate bug, parasitic wasp, sap beetle, and spider. In addition to wide regional distribution, these taxa encompass the ecological functions of herbivores, predators and parasitoids in maize agro-ecosystems. Thus, the nine arthropods may serve as representative taxa of maize agro-ecosystems, and thereby support that analysis of relevant data generated in one region can be transportable for the risk assessment of the same or similar GM crop products in another region. Across the 20 taxa analyzed, no statistically significant differences in abundance were detected between MON 87411 and the conventional control for 123 of the 128 individual-site comparisons (96.1%). For the nine widely distributed taxa, no statistically significant differences in abundance were detected between MON 87411 and the conventional control. Furthermore, no statistically significant differences were detected between MON 87411 and the conventional control for 53 out of 56 individual-site comparisons (94.6 %) of NTA pest damage to the crop. In each case where a significant difference was observed in arthropod abundance or damage, the mean value for MON 87411 was within the reference range and/or the difference was not consistently observed across collection methods and/or sites. Thus, the differences were not representative of an adverse effect unfamiliar to maize and/or were not indicative of a consistent plant response associated with the GM traits. Results from this study support a conclusion of no adverse environmental impact of MON 87411 on NTAs compared to conventional maize and demonstrate the utility of relevant transportable data across regions for the ERA of GM crops.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aqeel Ahmad
- Monsanto Company, 800 N. Lindbergh Boulevard, St. Louis, MO, 63141, USA.
| | - Ignacio Negri
- Monsanto Company, Fontezuela Research Station Route 8, km214, CP2700, Pergamino, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Wladecir Oliveira
- Monsanto Company, Dionisio Bortolotti Avenue, km 0.5, Caixa Postal 9, Santa Cruz das Palmeiras, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Christopher Brown
- Monsanto Company, 800 N. Lindbergh Boulevard, St. Louis, MO, 63141, USA
| | - Peter Asiimwe
- Monsanto Company, 800 N. Lindbergh Boulevard, St. Louis, MO, 63141, USA
| | - Bernard Sammons
- Monsanto Company, 800 N. Lindbergh Boulevard, St. Louis, MO, 63141, USA
| | - Michael Horak
- Monsanto Company, 800 N. Lindbergh Boulevard, St. Louis, MO, 63141, USA
| | - Changjian Jiang
- Monsanto Company, 800 N. Lindbergh Boulevard, St. Louis, MO, 63141, USA
| | - David Carson
- Monsanto Company, 800 N. Lindbergh Boulevard, St. Louis, MO, 63141, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Transportability of confined field trial data from cultivation to import countries for environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops. Transgenic Res 2015; 24:929-44. [PMID: 26138875 PMCID: PMC4639567 DOI: 10.1007/s11248-015-9892-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2015] [Accepted: 06/22/2015] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Requirement of in-country confined field trials for genetically modified (GM) crops prior to unrestricted release is well-established among countries with domestic regulations for the cultivation approval of GM crops. However, the requirement of in-country confined field trials is not common in countries where the scope of the application does not include cultivation. Nonetheless, Japan and China request in-country confined field trials for GM crops which are intended only for use as food, feed and processing. This paper considers the transportability of confined field trial data from cultivation countries (e.g. United States, Canada, and South American countries) to import countries like Japan for the environmental risk assessment of GM crops by reviewing: (1) the purpose of confined field trial assessment, (2) weediness potential, defined as “an ability to establish and persist in an unmanaged area that is frequently disturbed by human activity”, of host crops, and (3) reliability of the confined field trial data obtained from cultivation countries. To review the reliability of the confined field data obtained in the US, this paper describes actual examples of three confined field trials of approved GM corn events conducted both in the US and Japan. Based on the above considerations, this paper concludes that confined field data of GM corn and cotton is transportable from cultivation countries to importing countries (e.g. from the US to Japan), regardless of the characteristics of the inserted gene(s). In addition, this paper advocates harmonization of protocols for confined field trials to facilitate more efficient data transportability across different geographies.
Collapse
|
14
|
Horak MJ, Rosenbaum EW, Phillips SL, Kendrick DL, Carson D, Clark PL, Nickson TE. Characterization of the ecological interactions of Roundup Ready 2 Yield® soybean, MON 89788, for use in ecological risk assessment. GM CROPS & FOOD 2015; 6:167-82. [PMID: 26177011 PMCID: PMC5033220 DOI: 10.1080/21645698.2015.1067365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2015] [Revised: 06/22/2015] [Accepted: 06/24/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
As part of an ecological risk assessment, Roundup Ready 2 Yield® soybean (MON 89788) was compared to a conventional control soybean variety, A3244, for disease and arthropod damage, plant response to abiotic stress and cold, effects on succeeding plant growth (allelopathic effects), plant response to a bacterial symbiont, and effects on the ability of seed to survive and volunteer in a subsequent growing season. Statistically significant differences between MON 89788 and A3244 were considered in the context of the genetic variation known to occur in soybean and were assessed for their potential impact on plant pest (weed) potential and adverse environmental impact. The results of these studies revealed no effects of the genetic modification that would result in increased pest potential or adverse environmental impact of MON 89788 compared with A3244. This paper illustrates how such characterization studies conducted in a range of environments where the crop is grown are used in an ecological risk assessment of the genetically modified (GM) crop. Furthermore, risk assessors and decision makers use this information when deciding whether to approve a GM crop for cultivation in-or grain import into-their country.
Collapse
|