Prospective randomised trial of isoniazid prophylaxis in renal transplant recipient

Isoniazid Prophylaxis Based on Tuberculosis Risk Factors in Living Kidney Transplantation Recipients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Tuberculosis (TB) is a major and severe opportunistic infection among solid organ transplant recipients. Chemoprophylaxis is advised for those with latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). However, the effectiveness of an isoniazid (INH) prophylactic approach based on TB risk factors remains uncertain.

METHODS

This study included all living-donor kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) between January 2016 and December 2022. The recipients were categorized into three groups: the risk group with isoniazid (R-INH), the risk group without isoniazid (R-NINH), and the non-risk group (NR), based on the presence of TB risk factors and INH usage. The R-INH group received a 6-month INH prophylactic regimen to prevent post-transplant TB infection. The incidence of active TB among the groups was assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 1348 patients were divided into R-INH (n=108), R-NINH (n=371), and NR (n=869). Forty-seven patients (3.49%) developed TB with an incidence rate of 16.0 per 1000 person-years. Compared to NR, the TB incidence in R-INH was not statistically different (HR, 0.55, 95% CI, 0.07-4.21, P = 0.564), whereas it was significantly higher in R-NINH (HR, 5.04, 95% CI, 2.64-9.62, P < 0.001). The median time from transplantation to TB was 19 months (IQR: 6-39), and 18 patients (38.3%) were diagnosed within one year of transplantation. Ninety-four patients (87.0%) completed INH prophylaxis, with adverse events including two cases of hepatotoxicity (1.85%) and one case of peripheral neuritis (0.93%).

CONCLUSIONS

A 6-month INH regimen based on TB risk factors is effective and well tolerated for preventing post-transplant TB in KTRs.

Chemoprophylaxis for the prevention of tuberculosis in kidney transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to investigate the efficacy and safety of isoniazid (INH) prophylaxis to prevent tuberculosis (TB) infection in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs).

Methods: Web of Science, SCOPUS, and PubMed were searched to identify relevant studies that compared the effects among patients who received INH prophylaxis after transplantation.

Results: A total of 13 studies (involving 6,547 KTRs) were included in our analysis. We found that the risk of active TB infection (RR: 0.35, 95%CI 0.27–0.45, p &lt; 0.01) for KTRs was lower in the INH treatment group than in those without prophylaxis. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in mortality (RR: 0.93, 95%CI 0.67–1.28, p = 0.64), acute rejection (RR: 0.82, 95%CI 0.44–1.51, p = 0.52), and hepatotoxicity (RR: 1.25, 95%CI 0.94–1.65, p = 0.12).

Conclusion: Isoniazid prophylaxis is a safe and effective for KTRs on reactivation of latent TB infection.

TB in paediatric kidney transplant recipients - A single-centre experience

BACKGROUND

TB remains a major challenge in transplantation, particularly in endemic countries. This study aimed to describe the incidence, clinical presentation and outcomes of TB in paediatric kidney transplant recipients and to assess the impact of INH prophylaxis.

METHODS

Single-centre retrospective descriptive analysis of children who received kidney transplants from 1995 to 2019 was carried out. The cohort was stratified according to receipt of INH prophylaxis which began in 2005.

RESULTS

A total of 212 children received a kidney transplant during the study period. Median age at transplantation was 11.2 years (IQR: 2.2-17.9), and 56% were males. TB was diagnosed in 20 (9%) children, with almost two-thirds (n = 12) occurring within the first year. Most infections were pulmonary. The main presenting symptoms included fever (n = 13/20), weight loss (n = 12/20) and cough (n = 10/20). TST was positive in four of 20 children. Coinfection with EBV, CMV or Staph was found in five children. Due to drug interactions, an up to threefold increase in calcineurin inhibitor dose was required to maintain therapeutic blood levels. INH prophylaxis was protective against development of TB (p = .04). Gender, age and type of allograft were not significant risk factors. Graft and patient survival was 100% upon completion of TB treatment.

CONCLUSION

Kidney transplant recipients in endemic countries have a high risk of developing TB. Diagnosis remains a challenge. Frequent and meticulous monitoring of immunosuppression drug levels during treatment of TB is required to avoid loss of patient or graft. INH prophylaxis protects against development of TB in this population.

Tuberculosis prevention in patients undergoing kidney transplantation: A nurse-led program for screening and treatment

BACKGROUND

Systematic screening for, and treatment of, latent tuberculosis (TB) infection is recommended prior to kidney transplant. However, little is known about patient compliance with, or the safety profile of, preventive therapies used in clinical practice.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study of patients who were eligible for kidney transplant and were evaluated for TB infection between January 2013 and June 2019 at the TB clinic of a tertiary care teaching hospital. All patient data were registered prospectively as part of our nurse-led program before kidney transplant. We assessed completion rates, tolerance with therapy, development of TB, and associated workload.

RESULTS

In total, 1568 patients were referred to our TB clinic for evaluation. Preventive therapy was given to 385 patients and completed by 340 (88.3%). Of these, 89 (23.1%) experienced some intolerance, with 27 requiring full discontinuation. After a median follow-up of 45 months (1426 patient-years), 206 (53.5%) of the treated patients received a kidney transplant; only one patient, who failed to complete treatment, developed post-transplant TB (7.01 cases per 10 000 patient-years; 95% confidence interval, 0.35-34.59). Extra nurse or medical visits were required by 268 (69.6%) patients.

CONCLUSION

Despite the complexity and workload generated by patients with ESRD awaiting kidney transplant, preventive therapy for TB is effective in most cases. Our experience provides important evidence on the feasibility of preventive therapy for TB before kidney transplant when delivered as part of a comprehensive nurse-led program.

Guidelines for the Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis Infection: Recommendations from the National Tuberculosis Controllers Association and CDC, 2020

Comprehensive guidelines for treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) among persons living in the United States were last published in 2000 (American Thoracic Society. CDC targeted tuberculin testing and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161:S221–47). Since then, several new regimens have been evaluated in clinical trials. To update previous guidelines, the National Tuberculosis Controllers Association (NTCA) and CDC convened a committee to conduct a systematic literature review and make new recommendations for the most effective and least toxic regimens for treatment of LTBI among persons who live in the United States.

The systematic literature review included clinical trials of regimens to treat LTBI. Quality of evidence (high, moderate, low, or very low) from clinical trial comparisons was appraised using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. In addition, a network meta-analysis evaluated regimens that had not been compared directly in clinical trials. The effectiveness outcome was tuberculosis disease; the toxicity outcome was hepatotoxicity. Strong GRADE recommendations required at least moderate evidence of effectiveness and that the desirable consequences outweighed the undesirable consequences in the majority of patients. Conditional GRADE recommendations were made when determination of whether desirable consequences outweighed undesirable consequences was uncertain (e.g., with low-quality evidence).

These updated 2020 LTBI treatment guidelines include the NTCA- and CDC-recommended treatment regimens that comprise three preferred rifamycin-based regimens and two alternative monotherapy regimens with daily isoniazid. All recommended treatment regimens are intended for persons infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis that is presumed to be susceptible to isoniazid or rifampin. These updated guidelines do not apply when evidence is available that the infecting M. tuberculosis strain is resistant to both isoniazid and rifampin; recommendations for treating contacts exposed to multidrug-resistant tuberculosis were published in 2019 (Nahid P, Mase SR Migliori GB, et al. Treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis. An official ATS/CDC/ERS/IDSA clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019;200:e93–e142). The three rifamycin-based preferred regimens are 3 months of once-weekly isoniazid plus rifapentine, 4 months of daily rifampin, or 3 months of daily isoniazid plus rifampin. Prescribing providers or pharmacists who are unfamiliar with rifampin and rifapentine might confuse the two drugs. They are not interchangeable, and caution should be taken to ensure that patients receive the correct medication for the intended regimen. Preference for these rifamycin-based regimens was made on the basis of effectiveness, safety, and high treatment completion rates. The two alternative treatment regimens are daily isoniazid for 6 or 9 months; isoniazid monotherapy is efficacious but has higher toxicity risk and lower treatment completion rates than shorter rifamycin-based regimens.

In summary, short-course (3- to 4-month) rifamycin-based treatment regimens are preferred over longer-course (6–9 month) isoniazid monotherapy for treatment of LTBI. These updated guidelines can be used by clinicians, public health officials, policymakers, health care organizations, and other state and local stakeholders who might need to adapt them to fit individual clinical circumstances.

Prevention and treatment of tuberculosis in solid organ transplant recipients

Introduction: Tuberculosis (TB) in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Its management in transplant recipients is difficult and highly complex, given the underlying immunosuppression and the risks of drug-drug interactions imposed by immunosuppressive drugs that are needed to maintain the transplant allograft.Areas covered: We provide a brief review of TB in SOT and discuss the clinical indications, mechanisms of action and drug resistance, drug-drug interactions, and adverse effects of anti-TB drugs. We provide a summary of recent clinical trials, which serve as the foundation for current recommendations. We further include relevant updates on new agents being evaluated for clinical use in TB management.Expert commentary: TB causes significant morbidity in SOT recipients. The drugs used in the treatment for latent TB and active disease in SOT are similar to the regimens used in the general population. However, TB disease in transplant recipients is more difficult to manage because of the potential for hepatotoxicity and the complex drug-drug interactions with immunosuppressive drugs. We believe that alternative regimens suited for the vulnerable transplant population, and more therapeutic drug options are needed given the adverse toxicities associated with currently approved anti-TB drugs.

Treatment of latent TB Infection and the risk of tuberculosis after solid organ transplantation: Comprehensive review

BACKGROUND

Mycobacterium tuberculosis disease may occur after treatment of latent TB infection (LTBI). Prompted by a case of reactivation TB disease in a solid organ transplant (SOT) recipient who received LTBI treatment, we reviewed the literature to examine outcomes, adverse effects, resistance, and treatment choices of tuberculosis after LTBI therapy.

METHODS

MEDLINE and Web of Science from inception to 5/2019 were reviewed using key words "latent tuberculosis infection" and "SOT" or "transplantation." The search yielded nine cases, 41 cohort studies and six randomized controlled trials (RCT).

RESULTS

Cohort and RCT demonstrated significant reduction in TB disease among transplanted patients who received LTBI therapy; only 56/2651 (2.1%) SOT patients developed TB after LTBI therapy. Adverse drug reactions occurred in 149/1148 (12.9%) and 73/641 (11.4%) of cohort and RCT patients, respectively. Among liver recipients, 56/266 (21%) developed side effects, of which half (29/56, 51.8%) was INH-related. There was no reported INH resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

Latent TB infection treatment is efficacious in SOT recipients at risk of TB disease. However, tuberculosis may still occur despite LTBI treatment. Hepatotoxicity associated with LTBI therapy is infrequent, although more commonly observed among liver recipients.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Active disease and latent infection in a renal transplant cohort

AIM

Our aim was threefold: first, to determine the incidence of active TB in our cohort, second to investigate the risk factors for active TB and third, to understand current screening practices. The ultimate goal was to use our findings to inform development of local and national guidelines.

METHODS

The records of all adult patients who underwent renal transplantation at our centre from 2005 to 2014 were retrospectively reviewed to assess current screening practices, the risks for and burden of active TB.

RESULTS

A total of 660 individuals underwent renal transplantation during this period, totalling 3647 person years of follow up. Two patients were diagnosed with active TB after renal transplant, resulting in an incidence of 55 per 100 000 person-years. Of 656 transplant recipients, 102 (15.5%) were born in high TB incidence countries and 89 (13.5%) had an interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) at any point. Individuals born in high TB risk countries had a much higher incidence of active TB (353 per 100 000 person-years). Ten individuals had positive IGRA tests, of whom two were treated for active TB, two received chemoprophylaxis and six were not treated.

CONCLUSIONS

In the absence of formal guidelines, IGRA-based screening for LTBI was infrequently performed. Our data suggest that screening and treatment of renal transplant recipients born in high incidence countries is an important preventive measure.

Mycobacterial Infections in Solid Organ and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Mycobacterial infections are uncommon in solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients but carry significant morbidity and mortality. Donor screening strategies for tuberculosis should be emphasized in high-risk populations. Both tuberculosis and nontuberculous mycobacterial infections can have pulmonary and extrapulmonary manifestations of infections. Recommended treatment regimens typically involve multiple drugs with significant adverse effects and drug interactions.

Tuberculosis and Transplantation

Mycobacterium tuberculosis is a major opportunistic pathogen in transplant recipients. Compared to that in the general population, the frequency of tuberculosis (TB) is 10 to 40 times higher in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients and 20 to 74 times higher in solid-organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Transplant recipients with TB are also more likely to develop disseminated disease, have longer time to definitive diagnosis, require more invasive diagnostic procedures, and experience greater anti-TB treatment-related toxicity than the general population. Specific risk factors for TB in SOT recipients include previous exposure to M. tuberculosis (positive tuberculin skin tests and/or residual TB lesions in pretransplant chest X ray) and the intensity of immunosuppression (use of antilymphocyte antibodies, type of basal immunosuppression, and intensification of immunosuppressive therapy for allograft rejection). Risk factors in HSCT recipients are allogeneic transplantation from an unrelated donor; chronic graft-versus-host disease treated with corticosteroids; unrelated or mismatched allograft; pretransplant conditioning using total body irradiation, busulfan, or cyclophosphamide; and type and stage of primary hematological disorder. Transplant recipients with evidence of prior exposure to M. tuberculosis should receive treatment appropriate for latent TB infection. Optimal management of active TB disease is particularly challenging due to significant drug interactions between the anti-TB agents and the immunosuppressive therapy. In this chapter, we address the epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic considerations, and management strategies for TB in SOT and HSCT recipients.

Isoniazid Prophylaxis for Latent Tuberculosis Infections in Liver Transplant Recipients in a Tuberculosis-Endemic Area

Background

Isoniazid (INH) prophylaxis (Px) has good efficacy for preventing tuberculosis (TB) in the general population. However, its use for the treatment of latent TB infections (LTBI) in liver transplant (LT) recipients is challenging because little is known about INH-induced hepatotoxicity in graft recipients. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of INH Px in LT recipients.

Material/Methods

From March 2008 to December 2012, we retrospectively reviewed data on 277 patients who received LT at a single center. We examined the results of tuberculin skin tests and interferon-γ release assays, use of INH, INH-induced hepatotoxicity, and post-LT TB occurrence.

Results

Among 277 recipients, 7 cases of post-transplant TB were detected (2.52%). Seventeen patients received post-transplant INH Px. Among INH Px recipients, post-LT TB infection did not occur. Hepatotoxicity after INH Px was significantly lower in the patients who received INH Px at an aspartate aminotransferase (AST) level that was less than 50 U/L than in those who received INH Px at an AST level that was more than 50 U/L (P=0.046, 0.002).

Conclusions

INH is likely to be effective for preventing post-LT TB recurrence in LTBI. However, because of INH-induced hepatotoxicity, it is better to avoid using it in the early post-LT period and to wait to initiate INH Px until liver function is stable in LT recipients.

Globalization of pediatric transplantation: The risk of tuberculosis or not tuberculosis

The risk of TB among pediatric SOT recipients increases as the globalization of medical care continues to broaden. Unlike adults, children and especially infants are more susceptible to TB as a complication after transplantation. Little data exist regarding the true incidence of TB and the optimal risk-based management of this very vulnerable population. Here, we highlight the theoretical and practical issues that complicate the management of these patients and pose some questions that should be addressed when managing these patients. More data are needed to provide optimal guidance of the best diagnostic and management practices to this unique population.

Poor predictability of QuantiFERON-TB assay in recipients and donors for tuberculosis development after kidney transplantation in an intermediate-TB-burden country

BACKGROUND

Tuberculosis (TB) is a common opportunistic infection after kidney transplantation (KT). The QuantiFERON-TB-Gold In-Tube test (QFT) is widely used for assessing latent TB; however, it is currently unclear whether the pre-KT QFT of the recipient and donor can predict post-KT TB.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients who received KT between January 2009 and December 2015 at Seoul National University Hospital. The QFT was performed in 458 KT recipients and 239 paired living donors, and 138 KT recipients underwent both the QFT and tuberculin skin test (TST). After excluding 12 patients diagnosed as having clinically latent TB, we evaluated whether the QFT of the recipient and donor was predictive for new-onset active TB after KT.

RESULTS

The QFT was positive in 101 (22.1%) recipients and associated with clinically latent TB before KT (P < 0.05). However, agreement between the TST and QFT was poor (κ = 0.327). Post-KT TB occurred in 1 of 95 recipients with a positive QFT, and 2 cases of TB occurred among 351 patients with a negative or indeterminate QFT. The incidence of TB was 242 cases/100,000 person-years among 446 KT recipients with a median follow-up of 30.2 months. The QFT of recipients could not predict post-KT TB in Poisson regression analysis (relative risk [RR], 1.847; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.168-20.373; P = 0.616). Of 234 living donor-recipient pairs, the QFT of the recipient (RR, 5.012; 95% CI, 0.301-83.430; P = 0.261) and QFT of the donor (RR, 1.758; 95% CI, 0.106-29.274; P = 0.694) could not predict post-KT TB.

CONCLUSION

The QFT of recipients or living donors pre-KT cannot predict the short-term development of post-KT TB in an intermediate TB-burden country.

Comparison of interferon gamma release assay & tuberculin skin tests for diagnosis of latent tuberculosis in patients on maintenance haemodialysis

Background & objectives:

Tuberculosis (TB) is a common infection in patients on haemodialysis. There is a definite role of treatment of latent TB (LTB) in these patients. However, diagnosis of LTB in these patients by tuberculin skin test (TST) is unreliable. There is suggestion that interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) will be more reliable test for diagnosis of LTB in this setting. Thus, we evaluated value of IGRA and TST for the diagnosis of LTB in patients on dialysis in an Indian setting.

Methods:

Patients with end stage kidney disease on dialysis were included. Patients with active TB were excluded. Each patient was subjected to TST (induration of ≥10 mm was taken as positive) and QuantiFERON TB Gold In-Tube test (QFT-GIT) for diagnosis of LTB.

Results:

A total of 185 patients were included; 129 (69.7%) were males and mean age was 36.7 ± 12.3 yr. Past history of TB was present in 18 (9.7%) patients. One hundred and thirty four (72.4%) patients had scar of BCG vaccination. QFT-GIT test was positive in 66 (36%), TST in 32 (17%) and both in 13 (7%) patients. Of the 66 patients positive with QFT-GIT, only 13 (19.6%) were positive for TST. Of the 32 patients positive with TST, only 13 (40.6%) were positive with QFT-GIT; 100 (54%) patients were negative for both the tests. Overall, 85 (45.9%) patients were positive for either of the two tests. Poor agreement was shown between the two methods. On logistic regression analysis, odds of QFT-GIT to be positive in patients with BCG vaccination was 1.23 and with history of TB 0.99, both being insignificant. odds of tuberculin skin test to be positive in patients with BCG vaccination was 1.04 and with history of TB 0.99, both again being insignificant.

Interpretation & conclusions:

Our findings showed that more number of patients (36%) on haemodialysis were positive for QuantiFERON Gold In-Tube test as compared to TST (17%). There was poor agreement between the two tests. No significant effect of BCG vaccination and history of TB in past was observed on both tests.

Mycobacterial infections in solid organ transplant recipients

Mycobacterial infections represent a growing challenge for solid organ transplant recipients (SOT). The adverse effects of tuberculosis (TB) therapy present a major difficulty, due to the interactions with immunosuppressive drugs and direct drug toxicity. While TB may be donor-transmitted or community-acquired, it usually develops at a latent infection site in the recipient. Pre-transplant prevention efforts will improve transplant outcomes and avoid the complications associated with post-transplant diagnosis and treatment. The present review and consensus manuscript is based on the updated published information and expert recommendations. The current data about epidemiology, diagnosis, new regimens for the treatment of latent TB infection (LTBI), the experience with rifamycins for the treatment of active TB in the post-transplant period and the experience with isoniazid for LTBI in the liver transplant population, are also reviewed. We attempt to provide useful recommendations for each transplant period and problem concerning mycobacterial infections in SOT recipients.

Transplantation in the tropics: lessons on prevention and management of tropical infectious diseases

Tropical infectious diseases (IDs) remain a rare complication in transplant recipients even in tropical settings, but this topic has become increasingly important during the last decade due to multiple factors. Interestingly, non-tropical countries report most of the experiences with tropical diseases. The reported experience from non-endemic regions, however, does not always reflect the experience of endemic areas. Most of the guidelines and recommendations in the literature may not be applicable in tropical settings due to logistical difficulties, cost, and lack of proven benefit. In addition, certain post-transplant prevention measures, as prophylaxis and reducing exposure risk, are not feasible. Nonetheless, risk assessment and post-transplant management of tropical IDs in tropical areas should not be neglected, and clinicians need to have a higher clinical awareness for tropical ID occurring in this population. Herein, we review the more significant tropical ID in transplant patients, focusing on relevant experience reported by tropical settings.

Outcome of latent tuberculosis infection in solid organ transplant recipients over a 10-year period

BACKGROUND

Screening and therapy of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is recommended in solid organ transplant (SOT). However, there are limited data on the tolerability of LTBI therapy pretransplant and posttransplant. We studied the tolerability of LTBI therapy and effectiveness of a centralized LTBI treatment program in a low-risk population.

METHODS

Provincial TB and transplant databases were retrospectively reviewed for LTBI therapy referrals in SOT candidates and recipients over a 10-year period. Using univariate logistic regression, we examined factors associated with failure to complete therapy and followed patients for active TB.

RESULTS

From 2001 to 2010, 200/461 SOT candidates referred to the TB program (43.4%) were eligible for therapy for LTBI. Eleven patients refused therapy. The remaining patients (n=189) were initially prescribed isoniazid (73%), rifampin (12.7%), or another regimen (14.3%). Adequate LTBI therapy occurred in 122 (64.5%). Patients who were liver transplant candidates or recipients were less likely to complete therapy than nonliver transplant patients (OR, 0.20; P<0.001) as were patients treated in the posttransplant phase (OR, 0.47; P=0.034). Liver enzyme elevation led to discontinuation of therapy more often in liver transplant candidates and recipients (OR, 10.48; P<0.001) and posttransplant treatment (OR, 3.50; P=0.019). In 599.4 patient-years of follow-up posttransplant (mean, 4.9 year/patient), there were no cases of active TB.

CONCLUSION

A centralized referral program for LTBI therapy in transplant candidates is effective to prevent TB reactivation posttransplant. A significant proportion of liver transplant candidates and recipients do not tolerate standard LTBI therapy. Alternative therapies for these patients should be evaluated.

A rare case of Cytomegalovirus, Scedosporium apiospermum and Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a renal transplant recipient

BACKGROUND

Renal transplant recipients are at high risk of developing multiple infections, often concomitantly because of their immunocompromised status. Post renal transplant infections are often elusive and require extensive evaluation for proper diagnosis and treatment. A high index of suspicion is required and an attempt should be made to confirm the microbiological diagnosis from each site involved to rule out multiple infections.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a 50-year-old female, a renal allograft recipient who presented with left hemiplegia, esophageal ulcers and fever 3 months after her transplant. Esophageal biopsy revealed Cytomegalovirus (CMV) inclusions and the whole blood quantitative CMV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was positive. Neuroimaging showed a brain abscess, stereotactic biopsy from which revealed Scedosporium apiospermum on fungal culture. Her tacrolimus and mycophenolate were stopped and she was managed with intravenous ganciclovir and voriconazole. With these measures, she showed marked improvement in her general and neurological condition. Two months later, she developed recurrence of fever with dry cough. Radiological investigation revealed a cavitating lung lesion, a needle aspiration from which demonstrated acid-fast bacilli. She was started on antituberculous treatment. With these measures, she recovered completely and maintained good graft function despite being on only prednisolone 10 mg once a day.

CONCLUSION

Although CMV disease is not uncommon in the first three months post transplant, Scedosporium is a rare cause of brain abscess. On the other hand, tuberculosis is common in transplant recipients, especially in developing countries, like India. However, this is the first case report of occurrence of these three infections in the same patient, demonstrating the importance of a good microbiological work-up from each site involved in immunosuppressed subjects.

Antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing post solid organ transplant tuberculosis

BACKGROUND

Organ transplant recipients are at increased risk of infection as a result of immunosuppression caused inadvertently by medical treatment. Tuberculosis (TB) is a challenging infection to manage among organ transplant recipients that can be transmitted from infected people or triggered from latent infection. Organ transplant recipients have been reported to be up to 300 times more likely to develop TB than the general population. Consensus about the use of antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent post solid organ transplant TB has not been achieved.

OBJECTIVES

This review assessed the benefits and harms of antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent post solid organ transplant TB.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register up to 30 April 2013 through contact with the Trials' Search Co-ordinator using search terms relevant to this review. Studies contained in the Specialised Register are identified through search strategies specifically designed for CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE and handsearching conference proceedings.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that compared antibiotic prophylaxis with a placebo or no intervention for recipients of solid organ transplants were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed studies for inclusion and extracted data. We derived risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous data and mean differences (MD) for continuous data with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Methodological risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified three studies (10 reports) that involved 558 kidney transplant recipients which met our inclusion criteria. All studies were conducted in countries that have high prevalence of TB (India and Pakistan), and investigated isoniazid, an oral antibacterial drug. Control in all studies was no antibiotic prophylaxis. Prophylactic administration of isoniazid reduced the risk of developing TB post-transplant (3 studies, RR 0.35 95% CI 0.14 to 0.89), and there was no significant effect on all-cause mortality (2 studies, RR 1.39, 95% CI 0.70 to 2.78). There was however substantial risk of liver damage (3 studies, RR 2.74, 95% CI 1.22 to 6.17).Reporting of methodological quality parameters was incomplete in all three studies. Overall, risk of bias was assessed as suboptimal.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Isoniazid prophylaxis for kidney transplant recipients reduced the risk of developing TB post-transplant. Kidney transplant recipients in settings that have high prevalence of TB should receive isoniazid during the first year following transplant. There is however, significant risk of liver damage, particularly among those who are hepatitis B or C positive. Further studies are needed among recipients of other solid organ transplants and in settings with low prevalence of TB to determine the benefits and harms of anti-TB prophylaxis in those populations.

Results of implementation of preventive recommendations for tuberculosis after renal transplantation in an endemic area

This retrospective cohort study assessed the results of the implementation of preventive recommendations for tuberculosis (TB) among renal transplant recipients in an endemic area (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil). Subjects were defined as at high risk for TB if they had latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), reported recent close contact with individuals with TB or received a graft from a donor with LTBI. A 6-month course of isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT) was targeted to high-risk subjects. The study end point was TB confirmed by culture. Altogether, 535 patients were included. Median follow-up was 59 months. The overall cumulative incidence of TB was 2.1% while among the 274 patients in whom the preventive protocol was fully implemented, the incidence was only 0.7%. The incidence of TB among 75 high-risk recipients not treated with isoniazid (7%) was significantly higher than that observed in 209 untreated low-risk patients (1%, p = 0.006) and in 65 high-risk subjects that received IPT (no case, p = 0.03). In conclusion, the implementation of preventive recommendations for TB in an endemic area allowed the appropriate discrimination between high- and low-risk renal transplant recipients and was associated with long-term reduction in the incidence of this complication among high-risk subjects.

Diagnosis and management of tuberculosis in transplant donors: a donor-derived infections consensus conference report

Mycobacterium tuberculosis is a ubiquitous organism that infects one-third of the world's population. In previous decades, access to organ transplantation was restricted to academic medical centers in more developed, low tuberculosis (TB) incidence countries. Globalization, changing immigration patterns, and the expansion of sophisticated medical procedures to medium and high TB incidence countries have made tuberculosis an increasingly important posttransplant infectious disease. Tuberculosis is now one of the most common bacterial causes of solid-organ transplant donor-derived infection reported in transplant recipients in the United States. Recognition of latent or undiagnosed active TB in the potential organ donor is critical to prevent emergence of disease in the recipient posttransplant. Donor-derived tuberculosis after transplantation is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, which can best be prevented through careful screening and targeted treatment. To address this growing challenge and provide recommendations, an expert international working group was assembled including specialists in transplant infectious diseases, transplant surgery, organ procurement and TB epidemiology, diagnostics and management. This working group reviewed the currently available data to formulate consensus recommendations for screening and management of TB in organ donors.

Tuberculin skin test for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis during renal replacement therapy in an endemic area: A single center study

Patients on renal replacement therapy (RRT) are at-risk for developing tuberculosis (TB). There is limited information on tuberculin skin test (TST) and its predictability for development of TB. In this prospective cohort study, patients taken for RRT were included. Patients with active TB were excluded. TST was done with 5-tuberculin unit. In addition to TST, age, sex, diabetes as basic disease, number of dialysis and blood transfusion (BT), pre-transplant TB, hepatitis B and C infections and type of immunosuppression were correlated with the development of TB. Of the 200 patients included, TST was positive in 21 and negative in 179. In TST negative group, 20 (11.1%) and in TST positive group 5 (23.8%) patients developed TB. TB free survival in two groups was similar (P = 0.08). On multivariate Cox regression analysis, hazard of development of TB by TST was 2.7 [P = 0.11, confidence interval (CI) 0.78-9.7]. There was no difference between TST non-responsive and TST negative patients (P = 0.18). Sensitivity and specificity of TST for predicting TB was only 20 and 9%, respectively. Our study shows that TST in patients on dialysis is an insensitive and nonspecific test to predict development of active TB.

Latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection in Liver Transplant Recipients-Controversies in Current Diagnosis and Management

Liver transplantation for end-stage liver disease is increasingly being undertaken in India.(1) Routine tuberculin skin testing (TST) for latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and isoniazid prophylaxis in TST-positive liver-transplant recipients (LTRs) is recommended(2,3) but seldom implemented worldwide.(4-7) The role of TST-testing and isoniazid prophylaxis in LTRs remains further undefined in high prevalence areas, including India. We describe the burden of LTBI in LTRs; the epidemiological aspects of M. tuberculosis infection in high prevalence areas; identifiable risk factors for M. tuberculosis infection; the limitations of current diagnostic techniques for LTBI in LTRs and the efficacy and toxicity of isoniazid prophylaxis in TST-positive LTRs and suggest directions for future investigations in this area.

Tuberculosis in renal transplant recipients: the evidence for prophylaxis

BACKGROUND

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a leading cause of death in endemic countries and is 20 to 70 times more common in renal transplant recipients, where it contributes to both increased morbidity and mortality. This review will focus on the epidemiology of TB in renal transplant recipients and critically appraise the published literature on isoniazid prophylaxis in renal transplantation.

METHODS

A literature search for randomized and nonrandomized studies investigating the use of isoniazid prophylaxis in renal transplant recipients was conducted using Ovid MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, the Transplant Library, and EMBASE. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported. Meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed with a fixed-effects model.

RESULTS

Eleven relevant studies were identified; six nonrandomized and five RCTs. The nonrandomized studies indicate a reduced risk of TB with isoniazid prophylaxis. The RCTs demonstrated conflicting results, with two studies finding a reduction in TB with prophylaxis and two studies finding no difference. Meta-analysis of the 709 patients from the four RCTs demonstrated a reduced risk of TB with isoniazid prophylaxis (RR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.19-0.51). No significant difference was found in the incidence of hepatitis (RR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.91-1.65).

CONCLUSION

Both randomized and nonrandomized studies support the value of isoniazid as TB prophylaxis in renal transplant recipients at risk of active infection. Clinicians should consider prophylaxis in renal transplant recipients in endemic areas or in recipients in nonendemic countries who are at risk. However, the evidence for the benefit of isoniazid prophylaxis in renal transplantation is not robust and there is still a need for a large multicenter trial of isoniazid prophylaxis in kidney transplantation in an endemic area.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in transplant recipients: early diagnosis and treatment of resistant tuberculosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide a better understanding and summarize recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) infection in solid organ transplant (SOT) candidates and recipients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite advances in SOT medicine, MTB causes substantial morbidity and mortality in SOT recipients, with reported prevalence rates of 0.4-6%. The primary source of posttransplant MTB is reactivation of pretransplant latent MTB infection. The short-term mortality rate in SOT recipients with drug-susceptible active MTB is 30%. In immunocompromised persons with extensively drug-resistant MTB, the mortality rate approaches 100%. Clinical presentation is often atypical with more than half of SOT recipients presenting with extrapulmonary or disseminated disease. Pretransplant latent MTB infection screening and treatment is the cornerstone for preventing reactivation and dissemination of active MTB posttransplant. Treatment of active MTB in SOT recipients is problematic, given significant drug toxicity and interaction with immunosuppressive agents.

SUMMARY

A high degree of suspicion for latent and active MTB infection in SOT candidates and recipients is warranted to establish a timely diagnosis and initiate life-saving appropriate therapy.

KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients

The 2009 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) clinical practice guideline on the monitoring, management, and treatment of kidney transplant recipients is intended to assist the practitioner caring for adults and children after kidney transplantation. The guideline development process followed an evidence-based approach, and management recommendations are based on systematic reviews of relevant treatment trials. Critical appraisal of the quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations followed the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The guideline makes recommendations for immunosuppression, graft monitoring, as well as prevention and treatment of infection, cardiovascular disease, malignancy, and other complications that are common in kidney transplant recipients, including hematological and bone disorders. Limitations of the evidence, especially on the lack of definitive clinical outcome trials, are discussed and suggestions are provided for future research.

[Consensus document for the management of tuberculosis in solid organ transplant recipients]

The relevance of tuberculosis in solid organ transplant recipients stems from the difficulties in the diagnosis, which delay the start of treatment, and the associated toxicity of pharmacological therapy. These facts are responsible for the large number of clinical complications and the high mortality in this population. This Consensus Document from GESITRA (Spanish Transplantation Infection Study Group) defines the indications for prophylaxis of latent tuberculosis infection in patients undergoing solid organ transplantation, in particular those with a high risk of pharmacological toxicity, as is the case of liver transplant recipients. This Consensus Document also establishes recommendations for the choice of drugs to use and duration of treatment for tuberculosis in solid organ transplant recipients, with special mention of vigilance for the development of pharmacological interactions between rifampin and immunosuppressive drugs (cyclosporine, tacrolimus, rapamycin, and steroids).

Tuberculosis in liver transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data

Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) causes substantial morbidity and mortality in liver transplant recipients. We examined the efficacy of isoniazid latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection (LTBI) treatment in liver transplant recipients and reviewed systematically all cases of active MTB infection in this population. We found 7 studies that evaluated LTBI treatment and 139 cases of active MTB infection in liver transplant recipients. Isoniazid LTBI treatment was associated with reduced MTB reactivation in transplant patients with latent MTB risk factors (0.0% versus 8.2%, P = 0.02), and isoniazid-related hepatotoxicity occurred in 6% of treated patients, with no reported deaths. The prevalence of active MTB infection in transplant recipients was 1.3%. Nearly half of all recipients with active MTB infection had an identifiable pretransplant MTB risk factor. Among recipients who developed active MTB infection, extrapulmonary involvement was common (67%), including multiorgan disease (27%). The short-term mortality rate was 31%. Surviving patients were more likely to have received 3 or more drugs for MTB induction therapy (P = 0.003) and to have been diagnosed within 1 month of symptom onset (P = 0.01) and were less likely to have multiorgan disease (P = 0.01) or to have experienced episodes of acute transplant rejection (P = 0.02). Compared with the general population, liver transplant recipients have an 18-fold increase in the prevalence of active MTB infection and a 4-fold increase in the case-fatality rate. For high-risk transplant candidates, isoniazid appears safe and is probably effective at reducing MTB reactivation. All liver transplant candidates should receive a tuberculin skin test, and isoniazid LTBI treatment should be given to patients with a positive skin test result or MTB pretransplant risk factors, barring a specific contraindication. Liver Transpl 15:894-906, 2009. (c) 2009 AASLD.

Challenge of tuberculosis in renal transplantation

There is very high incidence of tuberculosis (TB) in dialysis and renal transplant (RT) recipients in developing countries. Clinical manifestation of TB may be atypical or obscure in initial stages. Common clinical abnormalities include pyrexia, pulmonary infiltrates, exudative pleural effusion, and exudative ascites. Aggressive investigations must be done in patients with pyrexia, pulmonary abnormalities, scanty sputum, and weight loss. BAL and computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest should be done in such cases. Tuberculin skin test is not helpful in the majority of patients. New blood tests to quantitate PPD reactivity in vivo and tests to distinguish between latent M tuberculosis infection from BCG-induced reactivity have been devised recently. Side effects of anti-TB drugs, especially hepatitis, need close observation because of the frequent occurrence of viral hepatitis in such cases. Tests to confirm latent TB are desirable before starting chemoprophylaxis in RT recipients. INH prophylaxis cannot be recommended universally in all RT recipients.

Conversion to Combined Therapy with Sirolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil Improved Renal Function in Stable Renal Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Information is needed on renal function improvement after late elimination of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) and conversion to combined therapy of sirolimus (SRL) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in Asian renal transplant recipients.

METHODS

A single-arm prospective study was undertaken to assess the outcome of stable Taiwanese renal transplant recipients who had CNI withdrawn and received combined SRL and MMF therapy. The primary endpoints were acute rejection and renal function. The secondary endpoints were graft and patient survival, side effects and infectious complications. Therapeutic drug monitoring of SRL and MMF was conducted during the study period.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were recruited at 9-72 (31.7+/-18.6) months post-transplantation. The graft and patient survival rates were both 100% at 12 months, though one of the 30 patients (3.33%, 1/30) had biopsy-proven acute rejection. On paired t test, the estimated glomerular filtration rates (GFR) from 4 to 12 months were significantly higher than the baseline GFR. The average trough level of SRL was 7.38+/-3.74 ng/mL at 12 months and the average abbreviated area under the concentration curve of mycophenolic acid was 64.86+/-36.62 mg/L*hour at an average MMF dose of 1.56+/-0.45 g/day. However, two patients (6.67%, 2/30) had tuberculosis (TB) reactivation at 3 and 4 months, respectively, after the combined SRL and MMF therapy.

CONCLUSION

Conversion to combined SRL and MMF therapy improved renal function in stable renal transplant recipients, though the risk of TB reactivation should be kept in mind when the combined therapy is employed in the Asian countries with a high prevalence of TB.

Prospective randomized control trial of isoniazid chemoprophylaxis during renal replacement therapy

BACKGROUND

Infectious diseases remain among the major morbid events in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on renal replacement therapy (RRT). In developing countries, tuberculosis (TB) has been found to occur more frequently in these patients than in the general population. Efficacy of isoniazid (INH) chemoprophylaxis has been seen in other situations, such as human immunodeficiency virus infection. However, studies on INH prophylaxis in ESRD patients on RRT are limited.

METHODS

In this prospective randomized controlled trial, from April 2000 to June 2001, a total of 109 ESRD patients registered for renal transplant and accepted for maintenance hemodialysis in our hospital were included and followed up until June 2004 to assess the role of INH prophylaxis in preventing development of TB. At the time of acceptance for hemodialysis, 54 patients were assigned to receive daily INH for 1 year and 55 patients were assigned to the control group. Primary outcome was development of TB. Secondary outcome was INH hepatotoxicity. To evaluate the effect of INH prophylaxis on the development of TB, a Kaplan-Meier survival estimate was used to plot TB-free survival curve and log-rank test was used for comparison.

RESULTS

Overall, TB was diagnosed in 27 patients during RRT, with an incidence of 24.8%. TB developed in 9 (16.7%) patients in the INH group and in 18 (32.7%) patients in the control group. There was a significantly lower incidence of TB in the INH group as compared with the control group. The risk ratio of INH vs. control group for development of TB was 0.40 (95% confidence index [CI], 0.17-0.92; P=0.032). In the INH group 27 (50%) patients and in the control group 17 (30.9%) patients developed some hepatic dysfunction. However, significant hepatitis that required discontinuation of INH developed in only 9 (16.7%) patients in the INH group. Furthermore, significant hepatitis also developed in 6 (10.9%) patients in the control group. The majority of patients with significant hepatitis in both groups (INH as well as control) were subsequently found to be positive for hepatitis B and/or hepatitis C viral infection. Mild hepatitis (which did not require discontinuation of INH) was seen in 18 (33.3%) patients in the INH group and 11 (20%) patients in the control group. Viral hepatitis infection was not found in any of the milder cases of hepatitis in either group.

CONCLUSION

This study shows significant efficacy of INH chemoprophylaxis during RRT in preventing development of TB, when the INH was started during dialysis itself. INH chemoprophylaxis was safe and well tolerated in the majority of patients. However, mild hepatic dysfunction was common, both in the treatment as well as in the control group. As the incidence of viral hepatitis overall was high in our patients on RRT, it is difficult to identify INH-induced hepatitis in this clinical setting.