Uroflowmetric assessment of acute effects of sildenafil on the voiding of men with erectile dysfunction and symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia

Treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia and erectile dysfunction

This article summarizes years of challenging research on erectile dysfunction (ED), a condition that has an important social and cultural relevance. Preclinical and clinical research progress has led to new therapeutic approaches to ED in patients with different comorbidities and particularly in those with low urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)/benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). These goals were possible only by combined work of specialists and researchers of different and intertwined medical disciplines. Currently, tadalafil (5 mg/d) is the best choice; other phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5i) are not included among options, despite the growing evidence of therapeutic effects. Different regimens of tadalafil may be prescribed based on patient needs, severity of LUTS/BPH - ED profile, and clinical experience. An integrated approach is necessary to choose for a combined therapy with PDE5i and α-blockers following urological and cardiac counseling in terms of outcomes and adverse effects.

Phosphodiesterase inhibitors for lower urinary tract symptoms consistent with benign prostatic hyperplasia

BACKGROUND

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) refers to non-malignant enlargement of the prostate gland that may cause bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Alpha-blockers (ABs) and 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) are the mainstay of medical treatment. Recently, phosphodiesterase inhibitors (PDEIs) that so far have been used mainly to treat erectile dysfunction were introduced to treat male LUTS.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of PDEIs compared to placebo and other standard of care drugs (ABs and 5-ARIs) in men with LUTS consistent with BPH.

SEARCH METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and clinical trials registries of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (updated 2 August 2018). We performed citation tracking and handsearching of abstracts and conference proceedings. We also contacted study authors to ask for additional information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered for inclusion in this systematic review randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PDEIs versus placebo, ABs, or 5-ARIs for at least four weeks in men with BPH-LUTS.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three review authors independently screened the literature and extracted data. Primary outcomes were effects on urinary symptoms as assessed by the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS-total; score ranging from 0 to 35, with higher values reflecting more symptoms), urinary bother as assessed by the Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Impact Index (BPHII; score ranging from 0 to 13, with higher values reflecting more bother), and adverse events (AEs). We used GRADE to rate the quality of evidence. We considered short-term (up to 12 weeks) and long-term (12 weeks or longer) results separately.

MAIN RESULTS

We included a total of 16 randomised trials in this review. The results for primary outcomes are as follows.PDEI versus placebo: PDEIs may result in a small improvement in IPSS-total score (mean difference (MD) 1.89 lower, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.27 lower to 1.50 lower; n = 4293; low-quality evidence) compared to placebo, and may reduce the BPHII score slightly (MD 0.52 lower, 95% CI 0.71 lower to 0.33 lower; n = 3646; low-quality evidence). Rates of AEs may be increased (risk ratio (RR) 1.42, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.67; n = 4386; low-quality evidence). This corresponds to 95 more AEs per 1000 participants (95% CI 47 more to 151 more per 1000). Study results were limited to a treatment duration of six to 12 weeks.PDEI versus AB: PDEIs and ABs probably provide similar improvement in IPSS-total score (MD 0.22 higher, 95% CI 0.49 lower to 0.93 higher; n = 933; moderate-quality evidence) and may have a similar effect on BPHII score (MD 0.03 higher, 95% CI 1.10 lower to 1.16 higher; n = 550; low-quality evidence) and AEs (RR 1.35, 95% CI 0.80 to 2.30; n = 936; low-quality evidence). This corresponds to 71 more AEs per 1000 participants (95% CI 41 fewer to 264 more per 1000). Study results were limited to a treatment duration of six to 12 weeks.PDEI and AB versus AB alone: the combination of PDEI and AB may provide a small improvement in IPSS-total score (MD 2.56 lower, 95% CI 3.92 lower to 1.19 lower; n = 193; low-quality evidence) compared to AB alone. We found no evidence for BPHII scores. AEs may be increased (RR 2.81, 95% CI 1.53 to 5.17; n = 194; moderate-quality evidence). This corresponds to 235 more AEs per 1000 participants (95% CI 69 more to 542 more per 1000). Study results were limited to treatment duration of four to 12 weeks.PDEI and AB versus PDEI alone: the combination of PDEI and AB may provide a small improvement in IPSS-total (MD 2.4 lower, 95% CI 6.47 lower to 1.67 higher; n = 40; low-quality evidence) compared to PDEI alone. We found no data on BPHII or AEs. Study results were limited to a treatment duration of four weeks.PDEI and 5-ARI versus 5-ARI alone: in the short term (up to 12 weeks), the combination of PDEI and 5-ARI probably results in a small improvement in IPSS-total score (MD 1.40 lower, 95% CI 2.24 lower to 0.56 lower; n = 695; moderate-quality evidence) compared to 5-ARI alone. We found no evidence on BPHII scores or AEs. In the long term (13 to 26 weeks), the combination of PDEI and 5-ARI likely results in a small reduction in IPSS-total score (MD 1.00 less, 95% CI 1.83 lower to 0.17 lower; n = 695; moderate-quality evidence). We found no evidence about effects on BPHII scores. There may be no difference in rates of AEs (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.36; n = 695; low-quality evidence). This corresponds to 19 more AEs per 1000 participants (95% CI 43 fewer to 98 more per 1000).We found no trials comparing other combinations of treatments or comparing different PDEI agents.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Compared to placebo, PDEI likely leads to a small reduction in IPSS-total and BPHII sores, with a possible increase in AEs. There may be no differences between PDEI and AB with regards to improvement in IPSS-total, BPHII, and incidence of AEs. There appears to be no added benefit of PDEI combined with AB compared to PDEI or AB alone or PDEI combined with 5-ARI compared to ARI alone with regards to urinary symptoms. Most evidence was limited to short-term treatment up to 12 weeks and of moderate or low certainty.

Phosphodiesterase inhibitors for treatment of voiding dysfunction: An overview of experimental and clinical evidence

Recently, the focus of the origin of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) has change from the prostate to the bladder. Regardless of the underlying mechanism associated with the origin of LUTS, alpha-blockers continue to be the most common medicine prescribed to treat LUTS due to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). The newest class of drug introduced to treat LUTS/BPO is phosphodiesterase inhibitors (PDEi) and the aim of this study was to review the role of PDEi in the treatment of LUTS/BPO. In this review, the first evidence was evaluated based on epidemiological studies followed by randomized clinical trials which provide evidence on the administration of PDEi in patients with LUTS/BPO. Experimental studies were also assessed to tentatively elucidate the association between LUTS and erectile dysfunction, and to elucidate the underlying mechanism. There is still controversy regarding the administration of PDEi due to the fear of detrusor impairment, response to acute administration, and the effects of PDEi combined with alpha-blockers. Following this review, we conclude that treatment of BPO/LUTS with PDEi is beneficial, based on experimental studies, strong evidence and the large number of randomized clinical trials confirming their efficiency.

Evaluating the significance of cyclic adenosine monophosphate-mediated signaling in human prostate: a functional and biochemical study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate further the potential significance of the cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) pathway in the control of prostate smooth muscle. The cAMP pathway has been assumed to be an alternative pharmacologic target to treat dysfunctions of the human lower urinary tract. To date, only a few studies have addressed the physiologic relevance of cAMP signal transduction in the control of human prostate function.

METHODS

Phosphodiesterase activity was isolated from microsomal fractions prepared from prostatic tissue and subjected to biochemical analysis. Using the organ bath technique, the effects of the phosphodiesterase type (PDE)4 inhibitors Ro 20-1724, rolipram, and RP 73401 on the tension induced by norepinephrine of isolated prostatic tissue were investigated and compared with the PDE5 inhibitor sildenafil and BAY 13-1197, a nitric oxide-independent activator of the soluble guanylyl cyclase. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Gosset t test.

RESULTS

Biochemical analysis of the microsomal fraction revealed only a single peak of PDE activity that was sensitive to papaverine and the PDE4 inhibitors rolipram and Ro 20-1724. The tension induced by norepinephrine was reversed by the drugs with the following order of efficacy: Ro 20-1724, RP 73401, rolipram, sildenafil, and BAY 13-1197. Pre-exposure of the tissue to a threshold concentration (0.05 μM) of forskolin (adenlyl cyclase activator) increased the reversion of tension induced by rolipram and RP 73401 and the PDE5 inhibitor sildenafil.

CONCLUSION

These results have provided evidence for the significance of cAMP signaling in the control of prostate smooth muscle.

Phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitors in the treatment of lower urinary tract dysfunction

Several disorders of the human upper and lower urinary tract, such as urinary stone disease, lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and detrusor overactivity, can be therapeutically addressed by influencing the function of the smooth musculature of the ureter, prostate or urinary bladder, respectively. In order to ensure a drug effect without significant adverse events, a certain degree of tissue selectivity is mandatory. The treatment of said conditions aims to focus on orally available drugs acting via intracellular signalling pathways. Specifically, the cyclic nucleotide monophosphate cyclic GMP represents an important mediator in the control of the outflow region (bladder, urethra). The use of phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitors, such as sildenafil, tadalafil, vardenafil, avanafil or udenafil, known to restrain the degradation of the second messenger cyclic GMP, offers great opportunities in the treatment of lower urinary tract dysfunction. PDE inhibitors are regarded as efficacious, have a rapid onset of action and favourable effect-to-side-effect ratio. The role of PDE5 inhibitors in the treatment of BPH/LUTS and the overactive bladder has already been addressed in randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, as well as preliminary open-label studies enrolling either several hundreds or only 20 patients. The purpose of this review is to focus on the potential use and clinical significance of PDE inhibitors in the treatment of storage and voiding dysfunctions of the lower urinary tract. The strategy of modulating the activity of PDE isoenzymes might represent a novel approach in patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD).

Cyclic nucleotide metabolism including nitric oxide and phosphodiesterase-related targets in the lower urinary tract

The clinical data on the use of the orally active phosphodiesterase (PDE) type 5 inhibitors sildenafil (VIAGRA™), vardenafil (LEVITRA™), and tadalafil (CIALIS™) for the treatment of male erectile dysfunction have boosted research activities on the physiology and pharmacology of the organs of the lower urinary tract (LUT). This includes both intracellular signal transduction in the prostate, urinary bladder (detrusor), and urethra, as well as central brain and spinal cord pathways controlling the function of the LUT. Such efforts provided the basis for the development of new therapeutic modalities into the management of dysfunctions/ syndromes of the LUT, some of which are already offered to the patients. The pharmacological treatment of the overactive bladder and the so-called benign prostatic syndrome, including LUT symptomatology and bladder outlet obstruction secondary to benign prostatic enlargement, has primarily focused on selective, orally available drugs acting by influencing intracellular regulatory mechanisms. These agents are regarded efficacious, have a fast onset of drug action in the target tissue and an improved effect-to-side-effect ratio. Better understanding of the functional significance of proteins related to cyclic nucleotide-dependent pathways, such as nitric oxide synthase, cytosolic and membrane-bound guanylyl cyclases, PDE isoenzymes and cyclic AMP- and cyclic GMP-binding protein kinases, the relative distribution in tissues of the LUT, and the consequences for urogenital function, seems to be of particular interest in order to identify new or more selective pharmacological approaches to manage disorders of the LUT. The present review focuses on cyclic nucleotide-related targets involved in the control of the function of the bladder, prostate, and urethra and the significance of those proteins in the process of evolving new pharmacological options for the treatment of LUT symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia as well as dysfunctions of the storage and voiding capability of the urinary bladder.

Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

• To review the evidence in support of the effectiveness of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors in lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

METHODS

• Relevant studies were identified by performing a literature search using MEDLINE® and The Cochrane Library®. The criteria used during the search included randomized, placebo-controlled trials of treatment for LUTS secondary to BPH using the International Prostate Symptom Score as an outcome measure.

RESULTS

• Four trials that included a total of 1928 patients met the inclusion criteria. All four studies showed a statistically significant difference in the International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life and erectile function in favour of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors. • No study showed a statistically significant improvement of the maximum urinary flow. • Meta-analysis of the results was not possible because of heterogeneity across the studies.

CONCLUSIONS

• Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors used in the clinical setting can significantly improve LUTS secondary to BPH, erectile function and quality of life. Maximum urinary flow improvement is not statistically significant. • Future research should focus on pathophysiological principles and cost analysis.

Expression of cAMP-dependent protein kinase isoforms in the human prostate: functional significance and relation to PDE4

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the expression of isoforms of the cyclic AMP (cAMP)-dependent protein kinase (cAK) in the transition zone of the human prostate and the functional significance of the enzyme in the control of prostate smooth muscle.

METHODS

Using Western blot analysis and immunohistochemistry, the expression and distribution in the prostate of cAKIalpha, cAKIbeta, cAKIIalpha, and cAKIIbeta in relation to alpha-actin and the phosphodiesterase PDE4 (types A and B) were investigated. The effects of the cAK inhibitor Rp-8-CPT-cAMPS on the reversion of the adrenergic tension of isolated prostate tissue induced by forskolin, rolipram, sodium nitroprusside (SNP), and tadalafil were examined by means of the organ bath technique.

RESULTS

Immunosignals specific for cAKIalpha, cAKIIalpha, and cAKIIbeta were observed in the smooth musculature and glandular structures of the prostate. Double stainings revealed the colocalization of alpha-actin and PDE4 with the cAK isoforms. The expression of the cAK isoforms was confirmed by Western blot analysis. The relaxation of the tension induced by norepinephrine brought about by forskolin, rolipram, SNP, and tadalafil was significantly attenuated by Rp-8-CPT-cAMPS.

CONCLUSIONS

The colocalization of smooth muscle alpha-actin and PDE4 with cAK, as well as the results from the organ bath experiments, provide further evidence for a pivotal role of the cAMP-dependent signaling in the regulation of prostate smooth muscle contractility. Compounds interacting with the cAMP/cAK pathway might represent a new therapeutic avenue to treat symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia and lower urinary tract symptomatology.